Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2024

Open Access 08-01-2024 | Lymphadenectomy

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove tecnologie) network prospective study on the approach to right colon lymphadenectomy in Italy: is there a standard?—CoDIG 2 (ColonDx Italian Group)

Authors: G. Anania, M. Chiozza, A. Campagnaro, F. Bagolini, G. Resta, D. Azzolina, G. Silecchia, R. Cirocchi, A. Agrusa, D. Cuccurullo, M. Guerrieri, SICE CoDIG (ColonDx Italian Group)

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colon cancer is a disease with a worldwide spread. Surgery is the best option for the treatment of advanced colon cancer, but some aspects are still debated, such as the extent of lymphadenectomy. In Japanese guidelines, the gold standard was D3 dissection to remove the central lymph nodes (203, 213, and 223), but in 2009, Hoenberger et al. introduced the concept of complete mesocolic excision, in which surgical dissection follows the embryological planes to remove the mesentery entirely to prevent leakage of cancer cells and collect more lymph nodes. Our study describes how lymphadenectomy is currently performed in major Italian centers with an unclear indication on the type of lymphadenectomy that should be performed during right hemicolectomy (RH).

Methods

CoDIG 2 is an observational multicenter national study that involves 76 Italian general surgery wards highly specialized in colorectal surgery. Each center was asked not to modify their usual surgical and clinical practices. The aim of the study was to assess the preference of Italian surgeons on the type of lymphadenectomy to perform during RH and the rise of any new trends or modifications in habits compared to the findings of the CoDIG 1 study conducted 4 years ago.

Results

A total of 788 patients were enrolled. The most commonly used surgical technique was laparoscopic (82.1%) with intracorporeal (73.4%), side-to-side (98.7%), or isoperistaltic (96.0%) anastomosis. The lymph nodes at the origin of the vessels were harvested in an inferior number of cases (203, 213, and 223: 42.4%, 31.1%, and 20.3%, respectively). A comparison between CoDIG 1 and CoDIG 2 showed a stable trend in surgical techniques and complications, with an increase in the robotic approach (7.7% vs. 12.3%).

Conclusions

This analysis shows how lymphadenectomy is performed in Italy to achieve oncological outcomes in RH, although the technique to achieve a higher lymph node count has not yet been standardized.
Trial registration (ClinicalTrials.gov) ID: NCT05943951.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424CrossRefPubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Xu L, Su X, He Z, Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang G, Sun Y, Du X, Chi P, Wang Z, Zhong M, Wu A, Zhu A, Li F, Xu J, Kang L, Suo J, Deng H, Ye Y, Ding K, Xu T, Zhang Z, Zheng M, Xiao Y, RELARC Study Group (2021) Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol 22(3):391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30685-9CrossRefPubMed Xu L, Su X, He Z, Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang G, Sun Y, Du X, Chi P, Wang Z, Zhong M, Wu A, Zhu A, Li F, Xu J, Kang L, Suo J, Deng H, Ye Y, Ding K, Xu T, Zhang Z, Zheng M, Xiao Y, RELARC Study Group (2021) Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol 22(3):391–401. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(20)30685-9CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Shortterm endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short­term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic­assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dennosuke J (1983) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part I. Clinical classification. Jpn J Surg 13:557–573CrossRef Dennosuke J (1983) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part I. Clinical classification. Jpn J Surg 13:557–573CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364 (discussion 364–365)CrossRefPubMed Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364 (discussion 364–365)CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Degiuli M, Solej M, Resendiz Aguilar HA, Marchiori G, Reddavid R (2022) Complete mesocolic excision in comparison with conventional surgery for right colon cancer: a nationwide multicenter study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology colorectal cancer network (CoME-in trial). Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 52(10):1232–1241. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyac116CrossRefPubMed Degiuli M, Solej M, Resendiz Aguilar HA, Marchiori G, Reddavid R (2022) Complete mesocolic excision in comparison with conventional surgery for right colon cancer: a nationwide multicenter study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology colorectal cancer network (CoME-in trial). Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 52(10):1232–1241. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​jjco/​hyac116CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference West NP, Morris EJA, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857–865CrossRefPubMed West NP, Morris EJA, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857–865CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kim NK, Kim YW, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS et al (2016) Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer: principle, anatomy, surgical technique, and outcomes. Surg Oncol 25(3):252–262CrossRefPubMed Kim NK, Kim YW, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS et al (2016) Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer: principle, anatomy, surgical technique, and outcomes. Surg Oncol 25(3):252–262CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Anania G, Agresta F, Artioli E, Rubino S, Resta G, Vettoretto N, Petz WL, Bergamini C, Arezzo A, Valpiani G, Morotti C, Silecchia G, SICE CoDIG (Colon Dx Italian Group) (2020) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) network prospective trial on 1225 cases comparing intra corporeal versus extra corporeal ileo-colic side-to-side anastomosis. Surg Endosc 34(11):4788–4800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07255-2; Erratum in: Surg Endosc 2019CrossRefPubMed Anania G, Agresta F, Artioli E, Rubino S, Resta G, Vettoretto N, Petz WL, Bergamini C, Arezzo A, Valpiani G, Morotti C, Silecchia G, SICE CoDIG (Colon Dx Italian Group) (2020) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) network prospective trial on 1225 cases comparing intra corporeal versus extra corporeal ileo-colic side-to-side anastomosis. Surg Endosc 34(11):4788–4800. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-019-07255-2; Erratum in: Surg Endosc 2019CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ueno H, Hase K, Shiomi A, Shiozawa M, Ito M, Sato T, Hashiguchi Y, Kusumi T, Kinugasa Y, Ike H, Matsuda K, Yamada K, Komori K, Takahashi K, Kanemitsu Y, Ozawa H, Ohue M, Masaki T, Takii Y, Ishibe A, Watanabe J, Toiyama Y, Sonoda H, Koda K, Akagi Y, Itabashi M, Nakamura T, Sugihara K (2023) Optimal bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: prospective multicentre cohort study with lymph node and feeding artery mapping. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 33:100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ueno H, Hase K, Shiomi A, Shiozawa M, Ito M, Sato T, Hashiguchi Y, Kusumi T, Kinugasa Y, Ike H, Matsuda K, Yamada K, Komori K, Takahashi K, Kanemitsu Y, Ozawa H, Ohue M, Masaki T, Takii Y, Ishibe A, Watanabe J, Toiyama Y, Sonoda H, Koda K, Akagi Y, Itabashi M, Nakamura T, Sugihara K (2023) Optimal bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: prospective multicentre cohort study with lymph node and feeding artery mapping. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 33:100680. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​lanwpc.​2022.​100680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, Hashiguchi Y, Kato T, Kodaira S et al (2012) Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, Hashiguchi Y, Kato T, Kodaira S et al (2012) Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Xu L, Su X, He Z, Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang G et al (2021) Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol 22(3):391–401CrossRefPubMed Xu L, Su X, He Z, Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang G et al (2021) Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol 22(3):391–401CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Crane J, Hamed M, Borucki JP, El-Hadi A, Shaikh I, Stearns AT (2021) Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 23(7):1670–1686CrossRef Crane J, Hamed M, Borucki JP, El-Hadi A, Shaikh I, Stearns AT (2021) Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 23(7):1670–1686CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Okuno K (1997) The extent of lymph node dissection for colon carcinoma: the potential impact on laparoscopic surgery. Cancer 80(2):188–192CrossRefPubMed Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Okuno K (1997) The extent of lymph node dissection for colon carcinoma: the potential impact on laparoscopic surgery. Cancer 80(2):188–192CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove tecnologie) network prospective study on the approach to right colon lymphadenectomy in Italy: is there a standard?—CoDIG 2 (ColonDx Italian Group)
Authors
G. Anania
M. Chiozza
A. Campagnaro
F. Bagolini
G. Resta
D. Azzolina
G. Silecchia
R. Cirocchi
A. Agrusa
D. Cuccurullo
M. Guerrieri
SICE CoDIG (ColonDx Italian Group)
Publication date
08-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10607-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2024 Go to the issue