Skip to main content
Top
Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 8/2021

01-08-2021 | Lung Cancer | Original Article

Trajectory and profile of quality of life in patients undergoing lung resection for lung cancer during hospitalization according to the EQ-5D

Authors: Hideo Ichimura, Keisuke Kobayashi, Masahiko Gosho, Kojiro Nakaoka, Takahiro Yanagihara, Sho Ueda, Yusuke Saeki, Kentaro Araki, Tomoyuki Kawamura, Yukio Sato

Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To clarify the trajectory and profile of quality of life (QOL) in lung cancer patients undergoing surgery during hospitalization.

Methods

Among prospectively enrolled 279 patients between 2015 and 2018, we used the EQ-5D-5 levels (EQ-5D-5L), which consist of a descriptive system of five dimensions and a visual analog scale (VAS) (from 0 to 100). The five dimensions are mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, which are rated according to a 5-grade evaluation. QOL assessments were performed preoperatively (Pre) and on postoperative day 1/3/5/7 (D1/D3/D5/D7). To observe the trajectory of QOL, the EQ-5D VAS was used. To define the profile of QOL, we applied univariate linear regression analysis to predict EQ-5D VAS based on the five dimensions of EQ-5D as explanatory variables and to determine the rank of absolute values of the standardized coefficient of each dimension that represented strength of the effect on the EQ-5D VAS.

Results

The means of VAS scores were as follows: Pre/D1/D3/D5/D7 = 79/45/58/64/71. Younger age, fewer comorbidities, and surgical indications decreased the VAS at D1. More comorbidities, advanced cancer stage, postoperative adverse events, and chest tube placements hampered restoration of the VAS. Regarding QOL profiles, anxiety/depression was the highest rank preoperatively while usual activity, but not pain/discomfort, was the highest postoperatively.

Conclusions

This is the first study to visualize the trajectory of QOL in surgical patients with lung cancer during hospitalization. This information may help improve perioperative patient care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wildaard K, Ravn J, Kehlet H. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:170–80.CrossRef Wildaard K, Ravn J, Kehlet H. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:170–80.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gotoda Y, Kambara N, Sakai T, Kishi Y, Kodama K, Koyama T. The morbidity, time course and predictive factors for persistent post-thoracotomy pain. Eur J Pain. 2001;5:89–96.CrossRef Gotoda Y, Kambara N, Sakai T, Kishi Y, Kodama K, Koyama T. The morbidity, time course and predictive factors for persistent post-thoracotomy pain. Eur J Pain. 2001;5:89–96.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Metin SK, Meydan B, Evman S, Dogruyol T, Baysungur V. The effect of pregabalin and methylcobalamin combination on the chronic postthoracotomy pain syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1109–13.CrossRef Metin SK, Meydan B, Evman S, Dogruyol T, Baysungur V. The effect of pregabalin and methylcobalamin combination on the chronic postthoracotomy pain syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1109–13.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Andreetti C, Menna C, Ibrahim M, Ciccone AM, D’Andrilli A, Venuta F, et al. Postoperative pain control: videothoracoscopic versus conservative mini-thoracotomic approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:907–12.CrossRef Andreetti C, Menna C, Ibrahim M, Ciccone AM, D’Andrilli A, Venuta F, et al. Postoperative pain control: videothoracoscopic versus conservative mini-thoracotomic approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:907–12.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Krebs ED, Mehaffey JH, Sarosiek BM, Blank RS, Lau CL, Martin LW. Is less really more? Reexamining video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy in the setting of an enhanced recovery protocol. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(284–294):e1. Krebs ED, Mehaffey JH, Sarosiek BM, Blank RS, Lau CL, Martin LW. Is less really more? Reexamining video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy in the setting of an enhanced recovery protocol. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(284–294):e1.
6.
go back to reference Bendixen M, Jorgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:836–44.CrossRef Bendixen M, Jorgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:836–44.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aoki T, Tsuchida M, Hashimoto T, Saito M, Koike T, Hayashi J. Quality of life after lung cancer surgery: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Heart Lung Circ. 2007;16:285–9.CrossRef Aoki T, Tsuchida M, Hashimoto T, Saito M, Koike T, Hayashi J. Quality of life after lung cancer surgery: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Heart Lung Circ. 2007;16:285–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stamatis G, Leschber G, Schwarz B, Brintrup DL, Ose C, Weinreich G, et al. Perioperative course and quality of life in a prospective randomized multicenter phase III trial, comparing standard lobectomy versus anatomical segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer up to 2cm, stage IA (7th edition of TNM staging system). Lung Cancer. 2019; 138: 19–26. Stamatis G, Leschber G, Schwarz B, Brintrup DL, Ose C, Weinreich G, et al. Perioperative course and quality of life in a prospective randomized multicenter phase III trial, comparing standard lobectomy versus anatomical segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer up to 2cm, stage IA (7th edition of TNM staging system). Lung Cancer. 2019; 138: 19–26.
9.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Ghanie A, Hsu M, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Sarkaria IS, et al. A prospective trial comparing pain and quality of life measures after anatomic lung resection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1160–6.CrossRef Rizk NP, Ghanie A, Hsu M, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Sarkaria IS, et al. A prospective trial comparing pain and quality of life measures after anatomic lung resection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1160–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Poghosyan H, Sheldon LK, Leveille SG, Cooley ME. Health-related quality of life after surgical treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2013;81:11–26.CrossRef Poghosyan H, Sheldon LK, Leveille SG, Cooley ME. Health-related quality of life after surgical treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2013;81:11–26.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.CrossRef Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRef Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T, Kusumoto M, Asamura H, Nagai K, et al. A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:751–6.CrossRef Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T, Kusumoto M, Asamura H, Nagai K, et al. A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:751–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference El Tumi H, Johnson MI, Dantas PBF, Maynard MJ, Tashani OA. Age-related changes in pain sensitivity in healthy humans: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2017;21:955–64.CrossRef El Tumi H, Johnson MI, Dantas PBF, Maynard MJ, Tashani OA. Age-related changes in pain sensitivity in healthy humans: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2017;21:955–64.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ghione S. Hypertension-associated hypalgesia. Evidence in experimental animals and humans, pathophysiological mechanisms, and potential clinical consequences. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 494–504. Ghione S. Hypertension-associated hypalgesia. Evidence in experimental animals and humans, pathophysiological mechanisms, and potential clinical consequences. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 494–504.
17.
go back to reference Bouazza YB, Chiairi I, El Kharbouchi O, De Backer L, Vanhoutte G, Janssens A, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2017;113:140–51.CrossRef Bouazza YB, Chiairi I, El Kharbouchi O, De Backer L, Vanhoutte G, Janssens A, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2017;113:140–51.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:570–9.CrossRef Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:570–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bejjani J, Fiore JF Jr, Lee L, Kaneva P, Mata J, Ncuti A, et al. Validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions as a measure of recovery after pulmonary resection. J Surg Res. 2015;194:281–8.CrossRef Bejjani J, Fiore JF Jr, Lee L, Kaneva P, Mata J, Ncuti A, et al. Validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions as a measure of recovery after pulmonary resection. J Surg Res. 2015;194:281–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vijayvergia N, Shah PC, Denlinger CS. Survivorship in non-small cell lung cancer: challenges faced and steps forward. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:1151–61.CrossRef Vijayvergia N, Shah PC, Denlinger CS. Survivorship in non-small cell lung cancer: challenges faced and steps forward. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:1151–61.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. 4th ed. Blackwell: Wiley; 2016. p. 259–82. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. 4th ed. Blackwell: Wiley; 2016. p. 259–82.
Metadata
Title
Trajectory and profile of quality of life in patients undergoing lung resection for lung cancer during hospitalization according to the EQ-5D
Authors
Hideo Ichimura
Keisuke Kobayashi
Masahiko Gosho
Kojiro Nakaoka
Takahiro Yanagihara
Sho Ueda
Yusuke Saeki
Kentaro Araki
Tomoyuki Kawamura
Yukio Sato
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6713
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01607-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 8/2021 Go to the issue