Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Discover Oncology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Lung Cancer | Brief Communication

Results of a pilot risk-based lung cancer screening study: outcomes and comparisons to a Medicare eligible cohort

Authors: Erin A. Hirsch, Melissa L. New, Stephanie L. Brown, Stephen P. Malkoski

Published in: Discover Oncology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Risk-based lung cancer screening holds potential to detect more cancers and avert more cancer deaths than screening based on age and smoking history alone, but has not been widely assessed or implemented in the United States. The purpose of this study was to prospectively identify patients for lung cancer screening based on lung cancer risk using the PLCOm2012 model and to compare characteristics, risk profiles, and screening outcomes to a traditionally eligible screening cohort.

Methods

Participants who had a 6 year lung cancer risk score ≥ 1.5% calculated by the PLCOm2012 model and were ineligible for screening under 2015 Medicare guidelines were recruited from a lung cancer screening clinic. After informed consent, participants completed shared decision-making counseling and underwent a low-dose CT (LDCT). Characteristics and screening outcomes of the study population were compared to the traditionally eligible Medicare cohort with Fisher’s Exact, t-tests, or Brown Mood tests, as appropriate.

Results

From August 2016 to July 2019, the study completed 48 baseline LDCTs. 10% of LDCTs recommended further pulmonary nodule evaluation (Lung-RADs 3 or 4) with two early-stage lung cancers diagnosed in individuals that had quit smoking > 15 years prior. The study population was approximately 5 years older (p = 0.001) and had lower pack years (p = 0.002) than the Medicare cohort.

Conclusion

Prospective application of risk-based screening identifies screening candidates who are similar to a traditionally eligible Medicare cohort and future research should focus on the impact of risk calculators on lung cancer outcomes and optimal usability in clinical environments.
This study was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03683940) on 09/25/2018.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1980–91.CrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1980–91.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):503–13.CrossRefPubMed de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):503–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kovalchik SA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD, et al. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(3):245–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kovalchik SA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD, et al. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(3):245–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Tammemägi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, Church TR, Caporaso N, Kvale PA, et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:728–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tammemägi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, Church TR, Caporaso N, Kvale PA, et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:728–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Katki HA, Kovalchik SA, Petito LC, Cheung LC, Jacobs E, Jemal A, et al. Implications of nine risk prediction models for selecting ever-smokers for computed tomography lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:10–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Katki HA, Kovalchik SA, Petito LC, Cheung LC, Jacobs E, Jemal A, et al. Implications of nine risk prediction models for selecting ever-smokers for computed tomography lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:10–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemägi MC, et al. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: a retrospective validation study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(4):e1002277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemägi MC, et al. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: a retrospective validation study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(4):e1002277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Pasquinelli MM, Tammemägi MC, Kovitz KL, et al. Risk prediction model versus United States preventive services task force lung cancer screening eligibility criteria: reducing race disparities. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(11):1738–47.CrossRefPubMed Pasquinelli MM, Tammemägi MC, Kovitz KL, et al. Risk prediction model versus United States preventive services task force lung cancer screening eligibility criteria: reducing race disparities. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(11):1738–47.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tammemägi MC, Ruparel M, Tremblay A, et al. USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (international lung screening trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(1):138–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tammemägi MC, Ruparel M, Tremblay A, et al. USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (international lung screening trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(1):138–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Field JK, Duffy SW, Baldwin DR, et al. The UK lung cancer screening trial: a pilot randomised controlled trial of low-dose computed tomography screening for the early detection of lung cancer. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(40):1–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Field JK, Duffy SW, Baldwin DR, et al. The UK lung cancer screening trial: a pilot randomised controlled trial of low-dose computed tomography screening for the early detection of lung cancer. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(40):1–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hirsch EA, Brown SL, New ML, Malkoski SP. A prospective pilot study of lung cancer screening in patients at high risk for lung cancer who do not meet current screening guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(4):801.CrossRef Hirsch EA, Brown SL, New ML, Malkoski SP. A prospective pilot study of lung cancer screening in patients at high risk for lung cancer who do not meet current screening guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(4):801.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hirsch EA, New ML, Brown SL, Barón AE, Sachs PB, Malkoski SP. Impact of a hybrid lung cancer screening model on patient outcomes and provider behavior. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21(6):e640–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hirsch EA, New ML, Brown SL, Barón AE, Sachs PB, Malkoski SP. Impact of a hybrid lung cancer screening model on patient outcomes and provider behavior. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21(6):e640–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Pasquinelli MM, Tammemägi MC, Kovitz KL, et al. Brief report: risk prediction model versus United States preventive services task force 2020 draft lung cancer screening eligibility criteria-reducing race disparities. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020;2(3):100137.PubMedPubMedCentral Pasquinelli MM, Tammemägi MC, Kovitz KL, et al. Brief report: risk prediction model versus United States preventive services task force 2020 draft lung cancer screening eligibility criteria-reducing race disparities. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020;2(3):100137.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Krist AH, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for lung cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(10):962–70.CrossRefPubMed Krist AH, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for lung cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(10):962–70.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Results of a pilot risk-based lung cancer screening study: outcomes and comparisons to a Medicare eligible cohort
Authors
Erin A. Hirsch
Melissa L. New
Stephanie L. Brown
Stephen P. Malkoski
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Discover Oncology / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1868-8497
Electronic ISSN: 2730-6011
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-023-00773-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Discover Oncology 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine