Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2007

01-02-2007 | Technique

Low section of the rectum during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision using the ContourTM device

Technical report

Authors: E. M. Targarona, C. Balagué, R. Berindoague, A. Pey, C. Martinez, P. Hernandez, J. Garriga, M. Trias

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Excerpt

The advantages of the laparoscopic approach for colon cancer have been clearly demonstrated, and there is now growing evidence for the possible role of this type of surgery for rectal cancer [2, 3]. Initial reports show the technical feasibility of total mesorectal excision, with adequate oncologic clearance and optimal immediate and long-term outcome. The conversion rate ranges between 0% and 20%, and anastomotic leakage is below 20% [14]. The laparoscopic approach facilitates the procedure, as magnification permits dissection of the lower rectum as far as the supra levator level. Local anatomy (male versus female pelvis, prostate volume, and size of the tumor) may impair adequate dissection, but the most challenging step could be the transection of the lower rectum. Available devices (30, 45, or 60 mm endostaplers, straight or flexible) reach the transection line in an oblique direction when introduced through the right iliac fossa or through a suprapubic trocar. More than one staple loader is usually required to complete the transection, obtaining a zigzag staple line. The distal rectal stump acquires an asymmetric trapezoidal shape whose corners may be poorly irrigated. The usual neoadjuvant therapy with chemoradiotherapy may increase the risk of staple line failure. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, Schicke B (2005) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 19: 757–766CrossRef Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, Schicke B (2005) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 19: 757–766CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Breukink SO, Pierie JP, Hoff C, Wiggers T, Meijerink WJ (2005) Technique for laparoscopic autonomic nerve preserving total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 30: 1–6 Breukink SO, Pierie JP, Hoff C, Wiggers T, Meijerink WJ (2005) Technique for laparoscopic autonomic nerve preserving total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 30: 1–6
3.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Nelson H (2005) Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 12: 960–970CrossRef Stocchi L, Nelson H (2005) Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 12: 960–970CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19: 1460–1467CrossRef Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19: 1460–1467CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Low section of the rectum during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision using the ContourTM device
Technical report
Authors
E. M. Targarona
C. Balagué
R. Berindoague
A. Pey
C. Martinez
P. Hernandez
J. Garriga
M. Trias
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0800-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2007 Go to the issue