Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Breast Oncology

Low Prognostic Implication of Fibroblast Growth Factor Family Activation in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Subsets

Authors: Hee Jin Lee, MD, PhD, An Na Seo, MD, PhD, So Yeon Park, MD, PhD, Joo Young Kim, MD, Ji Young Park, MD, PhD, Jong Han Yu, MD, PhD, Jin-Hee Ahn, MD, PhD, Gyungyub Gong, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite a greater understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of breast cancer, current therapeutic strategies still cannot overcome the relatively poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Deregulation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling has been found in breast cancer, and blocking this pathway has been suggested as a potential therapeutic target. We therefore evaluated the expression and copy number changes of FGF family members in TNBC.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 148 primary TNBC in 2009 for FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGF2 expression by immunohistochemistry. FGFR1 and FGFR2 gene copy numbers were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data was used to study correlations between gene expression and amplification or methylation of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGF2 in basal-like TNBC.

Results

FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGF2 expression were found in 16.2 % (24 of 148), 12.8 % (19 of 148), and 12.8 % (19 of 148) of TNBCs, respectively. FGFR1 gene amplification was observed in 4.1 % (6 of 145), and FGFR1 high polysomy was detected in 6.9 % (10 of 145) of the cases examined. FGFR2 gene amplification and high polysomy were identified in 4.7 % (6 of 129 cases) and 0.8 % (1 of 129 cases), respectively. FGF2 expression was found to be associated with basal-like TNBC. The expression of FGF family members and FGFR1 or FGFR2 gene amplification did not affect patient survival. TCGA data revealed that promoter methylation of the 3 genes was significantly associated with mRNA expression.

Conclusions

Even though the implications for patient outcomes are not significant, subsets of TNBCs harbor FGFR1 or FGFR2 gene amplification and FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGF2 protein overexpression.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2750–67.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2750–67.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ossovskaya V, Wang Y, Budoff A, Xu Q, Lituev A, Potapova O, et al. Exploring molecular pathways of triple-negative breast cancer. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:870–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ossovskaya V, Wang Y, Budoff A, Xu Q, Lituev A, Potapova O, et al. Exploring molecular pathways of triple-negative breast cancer. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:870–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Turner N, Lambros MB, Horlings HM, Pearson A, Sharpe R, Natrajan R, et al. Integrative molecular profiling of triple negative breast cancers identifies amplicon drivers and potential therapeutic targets. Oncogene. 2010;29:2013–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Turner N, Lambros MB, Horlings HM, Pearson A, Sharpe R, Natrajan R, et al. Integrative molecular profiling of triple negative breast cancers identifies amplicon drivers and potential therapeutic targets. Oncogene. 2010;29:2013–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brooks AN, Kilgour E, Smith PD. Molecular pathways: fibroblast growth factor signaling: a new therapeutic opportunity in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1855–62.PubMedCrossRef Brooks AN, Kilgour E, Smith PD. Molecular pathways: fibroblast growth factor signaling: a new therapeutic opportunity in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1855–62.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ahmad I, Iwata T, Leung HY. Mechanisms of FGFR-mediated carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823:850–60.PubMedCrossRef Ahmad I, Iwata T, Leung HY. Mechanisms of FGFR-mediated carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823:850–60.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Elbauomy Elsheikh S, Green AR, Lambros MB, Turner NC, Grainge MJ, Powe D, et al. FGFR1 amplification in breast carcinomas: a chromogenic in situ hybridisation analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Elbauomy Elsheikh S, Green AR, Lambros MB, Turner NC, Grainge MJ, Powe D, et al. FGFR1 amplification in breast carcinomas: a chromogenic in situ hybridisation analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2784–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2784–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koh YW, Lee HJ, Lee JW, Kang J, Gong G. Dual-color silver-enhanced in situ hybridization for assessing HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:794–800.PubMedCrossRef Koh YW, Lee HJ, Lee JW, Kang J, Gong G. Dual-color silver-enhanced in situ hybridization for assessing HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:794–800.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jang MH, Kim EJ, Choi Y, Lee HE, Kim YJ, Kim JH, et al. FGFR1 is amplified during the progression of in situ to invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R115.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jang MH, Kim EJ, Choi Y, Lee HE, Kim YJ, Kim JH, et al. FGFR1 is amplified during the progression of in situ to invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R115.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cappuzzo F, Hirsch FR, Rossi E, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:643-55.PubMedCrossRef Cappuzzo F, Hirsch FR, Rossi E, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:643-55.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stephens PJ, Tarpey PS, Davies H, Van Loo P, Greenman C, Wedge DC, et al. The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer. Nature. 2012;486:400–4.PubMedCentralPubMed Stephens PJ, Tarpey PS, Davies H, Van Loo P, Greenman C, Wedge DC, et al. The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer. Nature. 2012;486:400–4.PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, Cheang M, Karaca G, Hu Z, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5367–74.PubMedCrossRef Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, Cheang M, Karaca G, Hu Z, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5367–74.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, Leung S, McKinney S, Chia SK, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1368–76.PubMedCrossRef Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, Leung S, McKinney S, Chia SK, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1368–76.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Beroukhim R, Getz G, Nghiemphu L, Barretina J, Hsueh T, Linhart D, et al. Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20007–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Beroukhim R, Getz G, Nghiemphu L, Barretina J, Hsueh T, Linhart D, et al. Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20007–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Massabeau C, Sigal-Zafrani B, Belin L, Savignoni A, Richardson M, Kirova YM, et al. The fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), a marker of response to chemoradiotherapy in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:259–66.PubMedCrossRef Massabeau C, Sigal-Zafrani B, Belin L, Savignoni A, Richardson M, Kirova YM, et al. The fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), a marker of response to chemoradiotherapy in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:259–66.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sun S, Jiang Y, Zhang G, Song H, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. Increased expression of fibroblastic growth factor receptor 2 is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:773–9.PubMedCrossRef Sun S, Jiang Y, Zhang G, Song H, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. Increased expression of fibroblastic growth factor receptor 2 is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:773–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gelsi-Boyer V, Orsetti B, Cervera N, Finetti P, Sircoulomb F, Rougé C, et al. Comprehensive profiling of 8p11-12 amplification in breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2005;3:655–67.PubMedCrossRef Gelsi-Boyer V, Orsetti B, Cervera N, Finetti P, Sircoulomb F, Rougé C, et al. Comprehensive profiling of 8p11-12 amplification in breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2005;3:655–67.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Turner N, Pearson A, Sharpe R, Lambros M, Geyer F, Lopez-Garcia MA, et al. FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2085–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Turner N, Pearson A, Sharpe R, Lambros M, Geyer F, Lopez-Garcia MA, et al. FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2085–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sharpe R, Pearson A, Herrera-Abreu MT, Johnson D, Mackay A, Welti JC, et al. FGFR signaling promotes the growth of triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:5275–86.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sharpe R, Pearson A, Herrera-Abreu MT, Johnson D, Mackay A, Welti JC, et al. FGFR signaling promotes the growth of triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:5275–86.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jain VK, Turner NC. Challenges and opportunities in the targeting of fibroblast growth factor receptors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:208.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jain VK, Turner NC. Challenges and opportunities in the targeting of fibroblast growth factor receptors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:208.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Low Prognostic Implication of Fibroblast Growth Factor Family Activation in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Subsets
Authors
Hee Jin Lee, MD, PhD
An Na Seo, MD, PhD
So Yeon Park, MD, PhD
Joo Young Kim, MD
Ji Young Park, MD, PhD
Jong Han Yu, MD, PhD
Jin-Hee Ahn, MD, PhD
Gyungyub Gong, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3456-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2014 Go to the issue