Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2005

01-05-2005 | Original Article

Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility

Authors: Sudha Anupindi, James Perumpillichira, Esther J. Israel, Michael E. Zalis, Diego Jaramillo

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: CT colonography (CTC) is utilized as a diagnostic tool in the detection of colon polyps and early colorectal cancer in adults. Large studies in the literature, although focused on adult populations, have shown CTC to be a safe, accurate, non-invasive technique. Objective: We evaluated the technical feasibility of CTC in children using a low-dose technique. Materials and methods: From November 2001 to April 2004 we evaluated eight patients (3–17 years) with non-contrast CTC. Seven of the patients had CTC, followed by standard colonoscopy (SC) the same day; in one patient, CTC followed a failed SC. CTC results were compared to results of SC. The estimated effective dose from each CTC was calculated and compared to that of standard barium enema. Results: CTC results were consistent with those of SC. Sensitivity for polyps 5–10 mm was 100%, and sensitivity for polyps 10 mm and larger was 66.7%. The estimated mean effective dose was 2.17 mSv for CTC, compared to the 5–6 mSv for a standard air-contrast barium enema in a small child. Conclusion: Our initial experience shows CTC in children is well-tolerated, safe, and useful. The procedure can be performed successfully with a low radiation dose, and preliminary results compare well with SC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stringer DA (2000) Pediatric gastrointestinal imaging. Decker, Hamilton, Ontario, pp 523–524 Stringer DA (2000) Pediatric gastrointestinal imaging. Decker, Hamilton, Ontario, pp 523–524
2.
go back to reference Macari M (2001) Virtual colonoscopy: clinical results. Semin Ultras CT MR 22:432–442 Macari M (2001) Virtual colonoscopy: clinical results. Semin Ultras CT MR 22:432–442
3.
go back to reference Mendelson RM, Forbes GM (2000) Virtually viewing the large bowel: the future of colorectal cancer screening? Med J Aust 172:416–417 Mendelson RM, Forbes GM (2000) Virtually viewing the large bowel: the future of colorectal cancer screening? Med J Aust 172:416–417
4.
go back to reference Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224:383–392PubMed Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224:383–392PubMed
5.
go back to reference Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–392PubMed Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–392PubMed
6.
go back to reference Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al (2003) Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 229:775–781PubMed Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al (2003) Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 229:775–781PubMed
7.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222:337–345PubMed Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222:337–345PubMed
9.
go back to reference Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636 Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636
10.
go back to reference Capunay CMJ, Carrascosa PM, Bou-Khair A, et al (2001) Low radiation dose multislice CT colonography in children. RSNA, Chicago Capunay CMJ, Carrascosa PM, Bou-Khair A, et al (2001) Low radiation dose multislice CT colonography in children. RSNA, Chicago
11.
go back to reference Huda W (1997) Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. AJR 169:1487–1488 Huda W (1997) Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. AJR 169:1487–1488
12.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Schueler BA (2000) Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27:828–837 McCollough CH, Schueler BA (2000) Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27:828–837
14.
go back to reference Van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33PubMed Van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33PubMed
15.
go back to reference Jansen JT, Geleijns J, Zweers D, et al (1996) Calculation of computed tomography dose index to effective dose conversion factors based on measurement of the dose profile along the fan-shaped beam. Br J Radiol 69:33–41 Jansen JT, Geleijns J, Zweers D, et al (1996) Calculation of computed tomography dose index to effective dose conversion factors based on measurement of the dose profile along the fan-shaped beam. Br J Radiol 69:33–41
16.
go back to reference Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, et al (1994) The essential physics of medical imaging. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, et al (1994) The essential physics of medical imaging. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
17.
go back to reference Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al (2002) Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223:615–619PubMed Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al (2002) Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223:615–619PubMed
18.
go back to reference Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, et al (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR 173:561–564PubMed Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, et al (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR 173:561–564PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kelly J, Perumpillichira J, Zalis ME (2003) CT colonography in clinical practice. Appl Radiol 32:13–16 Kelly J, Perumpillichira J, Zalis ME (2003) CT colonography in clinical practice. Appl Radiol 32:13–16
20.
go back to reference Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al (2001) CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461–465PubMed Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al (2001) CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461–465PubMed
21.
go back to reference Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al (1997) Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR 168:1181–1184 Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al (1997) Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR 168:1181–1184
22.
go back to reference Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357PubMed Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357PubMed
23.
go back to reference Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Mendelson RM, et al (2001) Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3009–3012PubMed Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Mendelson RM, et al (2001) Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3009–3012PubMed
24.
go back to reference Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, et al (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218:274–277PubMed Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, et al (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218:274–277PubMed
25.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, et al (2003) CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations. Radiology 226:911–917PubMed Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, et al (2003) CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations. Radiology 226:911–917PubMed
Metadata
Title
Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility
Authors
Sudha Anupindi
James Perumpillichira
Esther J. Israel
Michael E. Zalis
Diego Jaramillo
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1394-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

Pediatric Radiology 5/2005 Go to the issue

Pediatric Radiology CME Activity

CME questions - May 2005