Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2/2013

Open Access 01-06-2013 | Case Report

Loose body following cross-pin fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors: R. A. Boden, A. Razak, S. M. A. Hussain, S. J. Mcloughlin

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

We report a case of loosening of a bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Forty-two months following a bone tendon bone reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, the patient presented with a subcutaneous collection in the medial side of the knee. At subsequent surgery, a RIGIDFIX cross-pin fixator (Mitek, Westwood, MA, USA) was retrieved, intact, from the sterile fluctuant mass around the superomedial aspect of the knee. The graft was stable both radiologically and clinically, and the patient remains symptom free. This case raises concern about the use of this smooth cross-pin fixator and the consequences of backing out and the resultant intraarticular loose body. We suggest consideration of a loose body if the patient becomes symptomatic postoperatively, and early intervention to prevent chondral damage is recommended.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stahelin AC, Helling HJ, Sudkamp NP (2000) Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 16(3):305–321PubMedCrossRef Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stahelin AC, Helling HJ, Sudkamp NP (2000) Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 16(3):305–321PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ahn JH, Park JS, Lee YS, Cho YJ (2007) Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(10):1093–1099PubMedCrossRef Ahn JH, Park JS, Lee YS, Cho YJ (2007) Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(10):1093–1099PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Harilainen A, Sandelin J (2009) A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices—Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix—randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:699–706 Harilainen A, Sandelin J (2009) A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices—Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix—randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:699–706
4.
go back to reference Cossey AJ, Kalairajah Y, Morcom R, Spriggins AJ (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of biodegradable transfemoral fixation used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22(2):199–204PubMedCrossRef Cossey AJ, Kalairajah Y, Morcom R, Spriggins AJ (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of biodegradable transfemoral fixation used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22(2):199–204PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cossey AJ, Paterson RS (2005) Loose intra-articular body following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(3):348–350PubMedCrossRef Cossey AJ, Paterson RS (2005) Loose intra-articular body following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(3):348–350PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Agrawal CM, Athanasiou KA (1997) Technique to control pH in vicinity of biodegrading PLA-PGA implants. J Biomed Mater Res 38(2):105–114PubMedCrossRef Agrawal CM, Athanasiou KA (1997) Technique to control pH in vicinity of biodegrading PLA-PGA implants. J Biomed Mater Res 38(2):105–114PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Loose body following cross-pin fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Authors
R. A. Boden
A. Razak
S. M. A. Hussain
S. J. Mcloughlin
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1590-9921
Electronic ISSN: 1590-9999
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-012-0194-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2/2013 Go to the issue