Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels of noise-exposed construction workers

Authors: Monique C. J. Leensen, Wouter A. Dreschler

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Longitudinal analysis of audiometric data of a large population of noise-exposed workers provides insight into the development of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) as a function of noise exposure and age, particularly during the first decade of noise exposure.

Methods

Data of pure-tone audiometry of 17,930 construction workers who underwent periodic occupational hearing screening at least twice during a 4-year period were available for analysis. These concerned all follow-up measurements of the baseline cohort described by Leensen et al. (Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84:577–590, 2011). Linear mixed models explored the relationship between the annual rate of change in hearing and noise exposure level, exposure duration, and age. Data of 3,111 workers who were tested on three occasions were used to investigate the pattern of hearing loss development.

Results

The mean annual deterioration in hearing in this study population was 0.54 dB/yr, and this became larger with increasing noise exposure level and increasing age. Remarkably, during the first decade of noise exposure, an improvement in hearing threshold levels (HTLs) was observed. The change in hearing over three measurements showed a concave development of hearing loss as a function of time, which corresponds to NIHL development.

Conclusions

Overall, hearing deteriorated over the measurement period. Because HTLs at follow-up were better than those obtained at baseline, no statement can be made about the NIHL development during the first decade of noise exposure. This improvement in HTLs rather resembles the result of measurement variation in occupational screening audiometry than an actual improvement in hearing ability.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
These values concern NIPTS only, therefore deviate from the values displayed in Fig. 2 that reflect total predicted hearing loss based on both NIPTS and ARHL.
 
Literature
go back to reference Albera R, Lacilla M, Piumetto E, Canale A (2010) Noise-induced hearing loss evolution: influence of age and exposure to noise. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:665–671CrossRef Albera R, Lacilla M, Piumetto E, Canale A (2010) Noise-induced hearing loss evolution: influence of age and exposure to noise. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:665–671CrossRef
go back to reference Arbouw (1998) Lawaai in de bouw. Arbouw-advies voor de bouwnijverheid. Stichting Arbouw, Harderwijk Arbouw (1998) Lawaai in de bouw. Arbouw-advies voor de bouwnijverheid. Stichting Arbouw, Harderwijk
go back to reference ASA (1951) American standard specification for audiometers for general diagnostic purposes (Z24.5-1951). American Standards Association, New York ASA (1951) American standard specification for audiometers for general diagnostic purposes (Z24.5-1951). American Standards Association, New York
go back to reference Clark WW, Bohl CD (2005) Hearing levels of firefighters: risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss assessed by cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Ear Hear 26:327–340CrossRef Clark WW, Bohl CD (2005) Hearing levels of firefighters: risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss assessed by cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Ear Hear 26:327–340CrossRef
go back to reference de Moraes Marchiori LL, de Almeida Rego Filho E, Matsuo T (2006) Hypertension as a factor associated with hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 72:533–540 de Moraes Marchiori LL, de Almeida Rego Filho E, Matsuo T (2006) Hypertension as a factor associated with hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 72:533–540
go back to reference Dobie RA (1983) Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: implications for hearing conservation program design. Laryngoscope 93:906–927CrossRef Dobie RA (1983) Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: implications for hearing conservation program design. Laryngoscope 93:906–927CrossRef
go back to reference Franks JR (2001) Hearing measurement. In: Goelzer B, Hansen CH, Sehrndt GA (eds) Occupational exposure to noise: evaluation, prevention and control. World Health Organization, Dortmund, pp 183–232 Franks JR (2001) Hearing measurement. In: Goelzer B, Hansen CH, Sehrndt GA (eds) Occupational exposure to noise: evaluation, prevention and control. World Health Organization, Dortmund, pp 183–232
go back to reference Glorig A, Quiggle R, Wheeler DE, Grings W (1956) Determination of the normal hearing reference zero. J Acous Soc Am 28:1110–1113CrossRef Glorig A, Quiggle R, Wheeler DE, Grings W (1956) Determination of the normal hearing reference zero. J Acous Soc Am 28:1110–1113CrossRef
go back to reference Hall AJ, Lutman ME (1999) Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 38:277–280CrossRef Hall AJ, Lutman ME (1999) Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 38:277–280CrossRef
go back to reference Helleman HW, Dreschler WA (2012) Overall versus individual changes for otoacoustic emissions and audiometry in a noise-exposed cohort. Int J Audiol 51:362–372CrossRef Helleman HW, Dreschler WA (2012) Overall versus individual changes for otoacoustic emissions and audiometry in a noise-exposed cohort. Int J Audiol 51:362–372CrossRef
go back to reference Helleman HW, Jansen EJM, Dreschler WA (2010) Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds. Int J Audiol 49:410–419CrossRef Helleman HW, Jansen EJM, Dreschler WA (2010) Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds. Int J Audiol 49:410–419CrossRef
go back to reference Henderson D, Saunders SS (1998) Acquisition of noise-induced hearing loss by railway workers. Ear Hear 19:120–130CrossRef Henderson D, Saunders SS (1998) Acquisition of noise-induced hearing loss by railway workers. Ear Hear 19:120–130CrossRef
go back to reference Hétu R (1979) Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss. J Occup Med 21:251–254 Hétu R (1979) Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss. J Occup Med 21:251–254
go back to reference ISO 8253.1 (2010) Acoustics—audiometric test methods—part 1: pure-tone air and bone conduction audiometry. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva ISO 8253.1 (2010) Acoustics—audiometric test methods—part 1: pure-tone air and bone conduction audiometry. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference ISO-1999 (1990) Acoustics—determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva ISO-1999 (1990) Acoustics—determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference ISO-389.1 (1998) Acoustics—reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment—part 1: reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva ISO-389.1 (1998) Acoustics—reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment—part 1: reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference ISO-6189 (1983) Acoustics—pure tone air conduction threshold audiometry for hearing conservation purposes. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva ISO-6189 (1983) Acoustics—pure tone air conduction threshold audiometry for hearing conservation purposes. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference Jansen EJM, Helleman HW, Dreschler WA, de Laat JAPM (2009) Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:153–164CrossRef Jansen EJM, Helleman HW, Dreschler WA, de Laat JAPM (2009) Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:153–164CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson DL (1991) Field studies: industrial exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 90:170–174CrossRef Johnson DL (1991) Field studies: industrial exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 90:170–174CrossRef
go back to reference Leensen MCJ, van Duivenbooden JC, Dreschler WA (2011) A retrospective study of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84:577–590CrossRef Leensen MCJ, van Duivenbooden JC, Dreschler WA (2011) A retrospective study of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84:577–590CrossRef
go back to reference Neitzel RL, Stover B, Seixas NS (2011) Longitudinal assessment of noise exposure in a cohort of construction workers. Ann Occup Hyg 55:906–916CrossRef Neitzel RL, Stover B, Seixas NS (2011) Longitudinal assessment of noise exposure in a cohort of construction workers. Ann Occup Hyg 55:906–916CrossRef
go back to reference NVAB (2006) Multidisciplinaire richtlijn Preventie beroepsslechthorendheid door een effectief gehoorbeschermingsprogramma. NVAB, Utrecht NVAB (2006) Multidisciplinaire richtlijn Preventie beroepsslechthorendheid door een effectief gehoorbeschermingsprogramma. NVAB, Utrecht
go back to reference Prince MM (2002) Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 112:557–567CrossRef Prince MM (2002) Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 112:557–567CrossRef
go back to reference Rabinowitz PM, Slade MD, Galusha D, Dixon-Ernst C, Cullen MR (2006) Trends in the prevalence of hearing loss among young adults entering an industrial workforce 1985 to 2004. Ear Hear 27:369–375CrossRef Rabinowitz PM, Slade MD, Galusha D, Dixon-Ernst C, Cullen MR (2006) Trends in the prevalence of hearing loss among young adults entering an industrial workforce 1985 to 2004. Ear Hear 27:369–375CrossRef
go back to reference Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Dixon-Ernst C, Slade MD, Cullen MR (2007) Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort? Occup Environ Med 64:53–59CrossRef Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Dixon-Ernst C, Slade MD, Cullen MR (2007) Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort? Occup Environ Med 64:53–59CrossRef
go back to reference Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Kirsche SR, Cullen MR, Slade MD, Dixon-Ernst C (2011) Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers. Occup Environ Med 68:414–418CrossRef Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Kirsche SR, Cullen MR, Slade MD, Dixon-Ernst C (2011) Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers. Occup Environ Med 68:414–418CrossRef
go back to reference Rösler G (1994) Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol 23:13–37CrossRef Rösler G (1994) Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol 23:13–37CrossRef
go back to reference Royster JD, Royster LH (1986) Using audiometric database analysis. J Occup Med 28:1055–1068CrossRef Royster JD, Royster LH (1986) Using audiometric database analysis. J Occup Med 28:1055–1068CrossRef
go back to reference Royster LH, Lilley DT, Thomas WG (1980) Recommended criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 41:40–48CrossRef Royster LH, Lilley DT, Thomas WG (1980) Recommended criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 41:40–48CrossRef
go back to reference Schlauch RS, Carney E (2012) The challenge of detecting minimal hearing loss in audiometric surveys. Am J Audiol 21:106–119CrossRef Schlauch RS, Carney E (2012) The challenge of detecting minimal hearing loss in audiometric surveys. Am J Audiol 21:106–119CrossRef
go back to reference Seixas NS, Kujawa SG, Norton S, Sheppard L, Neitzel R, Slee A (2004) Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults. Occup Environ Med 61:899–907CrossRef Seixas NS, Kujawa SG, Norton S, Sheppard L, Neitzel R, Slee A (2004) Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults. Occup Environ Med 61:899–907CrossRef
go back to reference Seixas NS, Goldman B, Sheppard L, Neitzel R, Norton S, Kujawa SG (2005) Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices. Occup Environ Med 62:309–317CrossRef Seixas NS, Goldman B, Sheppard L, Neitzel R, Norton S, Kujawa SG (2005) Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices. Occup Environ Med 62:309–317CrossRef
go back to reference Seixas NS, Neitzel R, Stover B, Sheppard L, Feeney P, Mills D, Kujawa SG (2012) 10-Year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workers. Occup Environ Med 69:643–650CrossRef Seixas NS, Neitzel R, Stover B, Sheppard L, Feeney P, Mills D, Kujawa SG (2012) 10-Year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workers. Occup Environ Med 69:643–650CrossRef
go back to reference Suter AH (2002) Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) 63:768–789 Suter AH (2002) Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) 63:768–789
go back to reference Taylor W, Pearson J, Mair A, Burns W (1965) Study of noise and hearing in jute weaving. J Acoust Soc Am 38:113–120CrossRef Taylor W, Pearson J, Mair A, Burns W (1965) Study of noise and hearing in jute weaving. J Acoust Soc Am 38:113–120CrossRef
go back to reference van der Molen H, Lenderink A (eds) (2012) Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2012. Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten, Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, AMC, UvA, Amsterdam van der Molen H, Lenderink A (eds) (2012) Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2012. Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten, Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, AMC, UvA, Amsterdam
Metadata
Title
Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels of noise-exposed construction workers
Authors
Monique C. J. Leensen
Wouter A. Dreschler
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0932-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 1/2015 Go to the issue