Top

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Longitudinal association between interparental conflict and risk-taking behavior among Chinese adolescents: testing a moderated mediation model

Authors: Wan-Yu Ye, Kai Dou, Lin-Xin Wang, Xiao-Qi Lin, Ming-Chen Zhang

Published in: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health | Issue 1/2023

Abstract

Background

The interparental conflict has been associated with an increased adolescents’ engagement in risk-taking behaviors. However, few studies have examined the potential mediation of deviant peer affiliation and the potential moderation of school climate. Grounded in the ecological system theory, this study aimed to explore the mediating role of deviant peer affiliation and the moderating role of school climate between the association of interparental conflict and risk-taking behavior.

Methods

This study conducted a longitudinal design (3 time points, 3 months apart) with the sample comprising 550 middle school students in southeastern China (52.91% males; mean age at Time 1 = 15.37). The performed measurements encompassed interparental conflict (T1), deviant peer affiliation (T2), school climate (T3), risk-taking behavior (T1/T2/T3), and demographic information.

Results

The moderated mediation model revealed that after controlling for T1/T2 risk-taking behavior, T1 interparental conflict was longitudinally and positively correlated with T3 risk-taking behavior through T2 deviant peer affiliation. Furthermore, moderated mediation analysis demonstrated that a positive school climate ameliorated the adverse impact of deviant peer affiliation on risk-taking behavior, thereby mitigating the indirect effect of interparental conflict on risk-taking behavior among adolescents.

Conclusions

Our findings propose a nuanced explanation of the processing mechanisms between interparental conflict and risk-taking behaviors among Chinese adolescents. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Available only for authorised users

Acock AC. Working with missing values. J Marriage Fam. 2005;67:1012–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00191.x.CrossRef

Ai T, Xu Q, Li X, Li D. Interparental conflict and Chinese adolescents’ suicide ideation and suicide attempts: the mediating role of peer victimization. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(12):3502–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0837-y.CrossRef

Albert D, Steinberg L. Judgment and decision making in adolescence. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21(1):211–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00724.x.CrossRef

Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci. 1988;16(1):74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327.CrossRef

Bandura A, Walters RH. Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1963.

Bao Z, Jiang Y, Zhu J, Zhang W. School connectedness and deviant peer affiliation among Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of sleep problems. Curr Psychol. 2020;39(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00731-2.CrossRef

Bao Z, Li D, Zhang W, Wang Y. School climate and delinquency among Chinese adolescents: analyses of effortful control as a moderator and deviant peer affiliation as a mediator. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015;43(1):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9903-8.CrossRef

Bear GG, Gaskins C, Blank J, Chen FF. Delaware school climate survey-student: Its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability. J Sch Psychol. 2011;49(2):157–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.01.001.CrossRef

Bear GG, Yang C, Mantz L, Pasipanodya E, Hearn S, Boyer D. Technical manual for Delaware school survey: Scales of school climate, bullying victimization, student engagement, and positive, punitive, and social-emotional learning techniques. Delaware Positive Behavior Support (DE-PBS) and School Climate Transformation Projects; 2014

10.

Ben-Zur H, Zeidner M. Threat to life and risk-taking behaviors: a review of empirical findings and explanatory models. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009;13:109–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308330104.CrossRef

11.

Blakemore SJ. Avoiding social risk in adolescence. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018;27(2):116–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738144.CrossRef

12.

Boer M, Stevens GWJM, Finkenauer C, de Looze ME, van den Eijnden RJJM. Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: investigating directionality and mediating processes. Comput Hum Behav. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106645.CrossRef

13.

Bowman MA, Prelow HM, Weaver SR. Parenting behaviors, association with deviant peers, and delinquency in African American adolescents: a mediated-moderation model. J Youth Adolesc. 2007;36(4):517–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9117-7.CrossRef

14.

Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press; 1979.

15.

Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21(2):230–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005.CrossRef

16.

Buehler C, Krishnakumar A, Stone G, Anthony C, Pemberton S, Gerard J, Barber BK. Interparental conflict styles and youth problem behaviors: a two-sample replication study. J Marriage Fam. 1998;60:119–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/353446.CrossRef

17.

Chen W, Li D, Bao Z, Yan Y, Zhou Z. The impact of parent-child attachment on adolescent problematic internet use: a moderated mediation model. Acta Psychol Sin. 2015;47(5):611–23. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.J.1041.2015.00611.CrossRef

18.

Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.CrossRef

19.

Cooper B, Eva N, Zarea Fazlelahi F, Newman A, Lee A, Obschonka M. Addressing common method variance and endogeneity in vocational behavior research: a review of the literature and suggestions for future research. J Vocat Behav. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103472.CrossRef

20.

Daspe ME, Arbel R, Ramos MC, Shapiro LAS, Margolin G. Deviant peers and adolescent risky behaviors: the protective effect of nonverbal display of parental warmth. J Res Adolesc. 2019;29(4):863–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12418.CrossRef

21.

Davies PT, Coe JL, Martin MJ, Sturge-Apple ML, Cummings EM. The developmental costs and benefits of children’s involvement in interparental conflict. Dev Psychol. 2015;51(8):1026–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000024.CrossRef

22.

Davies PT, Hentges RF, Coe JL, Martin MJ, Sturge-Apple ML, Cummings EM. The multiple faces of interparental conflict: implications for cascades of children’s insecurity and externalizing problems. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016;125(5):664–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000170.CrossRef

23.

Davies PT, Martin MJ, Cummings EM. Interparental conflict and children’s social problems: insecurity and friendship affiliation as cascading mediators. Dev Psychol. 2018;54(1):83–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000410.CrossRef

24.

Davies PT, Thompson MJ, Hentges RF, Parry LQ, Sturge-Apple ML. Interparental conflict as a quadratic predictor of children’s reactivity to interparental conflict and school adjustment: steeling effects or risk saturation? Child Dev. 2022;93(2):594–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13720.CrossRef

25.

DeLay D, Ha T, Van Ryzin M, Winter C, Dishion TJ. Changing friend selection in middle school: a social network analysis of a randomized intervention study designed to prevent adolescent problem behavior. Prev Sci. 2016;17(3):285–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0605-4.CrossRef

26.

Ding Y, Li D, Li X, Xiao J, Zhang H, Wang Y. Profiles of adolescent traditional and cyberbullying and victimization: the role of demographic, individual, family, school, and peer factors. Comput Hum Behav. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106439.CrossRef

27.

Dorio NB, Clark KN, Demaray MK, Doll EM. School climate counts: a longitudinal analysis of school climate and middle school bullying behaviors. Int J Bullying Prev. 2019;2(4):292–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00038-2.CrossRef

28.

Dou K, Lin XQ, Wang YJ. Negative parenting and risk-taking behaviors in Chinese adolescents: Testing a sequential mediation model in a three-wave longitudinal study. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105631.CrossRef

29.

Dou K, Wang LX, Cheng DL, Li YY, Zhang MC. Longitudinal association between poor parental supervision and risk-taking behavior: the role of self-control and school climate. J Adolesc. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12043.CrossRef

30.

Duell N, Steinberg L. Differential correlates of positive and negative risk taking in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2020;49(6):1162–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01237-7.CrossRef

31.

Duell N, Steinberg L, Icenogle G, Chein J, Chaudhary N, Di Giunta L, Dodge KA, Fanti KA, Lansford JE, Oburu P, Pastorelli C, Skinner AT, Sorbring E, Tapanya S, Uribe Tirado LM, Alampay LP, Al-Hassan SM, Takash HMS, Bacchini D, Chang L. Age patterns in risk taking across the world. J Youth Adolesc. 2018;47(5):1052–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0752-y.CrossRef

32.

Eldik WM, Haan AD, Arends LR, Prinzie P. Moderation of associations between interparental stress and (mal)adaptation by adolescents’ personality: contrasting differential susceptibility and diathesis-stress models. J Pers. 2020;89(4):617–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12603.CrossRef

33.

Farrell AD, Thompson EL, Mehari KR. Dimensions of peer influences and their relationship to adolescents’ aggression, other problem behaviors and prosocial behavior. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(6):1351–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0601-4.CrossRef

34.

Figner B, Mackinlay RJ, Wilkening F, Weber EU. Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009;35(3):709–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014983.CrossRef

35.

Fosco GM, Bray BC. Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict: implications for adolescent adjustment. J Fam Psychol. 2016;30(5):533–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000192.CrossRef

36.

Fosco GM, Feinberg ME. Interparental conflict and long-term adolescent substance use trajectories: the role of adolescent threat appraisals. J Fam Psychol. 2018;32(2):175–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000356.CrossRef

37.

Fosco GM, Sloan CJ, Fang S, Feinberg ME. Family vulnerability and disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective pathways to child maladjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022;63(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13458.CrossRef

38.

Freeman C, Dirks M, Weinberg A. Neural response to rewards predicts risk-taking in late but not early adolescent females. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100808.CrossRef

39.

Graupensperger S, Benson AJ, Bray BC, Evans MB. Social cohesion and peer acceptance predict student-athletes’ attitudes toward health-risk behaviors: a within- and between-group investigation. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(12):1280–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.07.003.CrossRef

40.

Grills AE, Ollendick TH. Multiple informant agreement and the anxiety disorders interview schedule for parents and children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003;42(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200301000-00008.CrossRef

41.

Gullone E, Moore S, Moss S, Boyd C. The adolescent risk-taking questionnaire. J Adolesc Res. 2000;15(2):231–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558400152003.CrossRef

42.

Harman HH. Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press; 1976.

43.

Hess S. Effects of inter-parental conflict on children’s social well-being and the mediation role of parenting behavior. Appl Res Qual Life. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-10022-y.CrossRef

44.

Holbert RL, Stephenson MT. Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995–2000. Hum Commun Res. 2002;28(4):531–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x.CrossRef

45.

Hsu YT, Kawachi I. Timing of family adversity during adolescence and its impact on alcohol and tobacco initiation: a longitudinal study among Taiwanese adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019;50(2):257–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-018-0838-0.CrossRef

46.

Jia J, Li D, Li X, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Sun W, Zhao L. Peer victimization and adolescent internet addiction: the mediating role of psychological security and the moderating role of teacher-student relationships. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;85:116–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.042.CrossRef

47.

Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Kouros CD. Interparental conflict and child adjustment. In: Cicchetti D, editor. Developmental psychopathology: risk, resilience, and intervention, vol. 4. New York: Wiley; 2016. p. 608–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy412.CrossRef

48.

Ju C, Wu R, Zhang B, You X, Luo Y. Parenting style, coping efficacy, and risk-taking behavior in Chinese young adults. J Pac Rim Psychol. 2020;14:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.24.CrossRef

49.

Kerig PK. Assessing the links between interparental conflict and child adjustment: the conflicts and problem-solving scales. J Fam Psychol. 1996;10(4):454–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.10.4.454.CrossRef

50.

Koçak A, Mouratidis A, Sayıl M, Kındap-Tepe Y, Uçanok Z. Interparental conflict and adolescents’ relational aggression and loneliness: the mediating role of maternal psychological control. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(12):3546–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0854-x.CrossRef

51.

Lagattuta KH, Sayfan L, Bamford C. Do you know how I feel? Parents underestimate worry and overestimate optimism compared to child self-report. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012;113(2):211–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.001.CrossRef

52.

Lei H, Zhang Q, Li X, Yang H, Du W, Shao J. Cumulative risk and problem behaviors among Chinese left-behind children: a moderated mediation model. Sch Psychol Int. 2019;40(3):309–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319835255.CrossRef

53.

Li D, Li X, Wang Y, Zhao L, Bao Z, Wen F. School connectedness and problematic internet use in adolescents: a moderated mediation model of deviant peer affiliation and self-control. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41(8):1231–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9761-9.CrossRef

54.

Li J, Li D, Jia J, Li X, Wang Y, Li Y. Family functioning and internet addiction among adolescent males and females: a moderated mediation analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;91:289–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.032.CrossRef

55.

Li X, Newman J, Li D, Zhang H. Temperament and adolescent problematic internet use: the mediating role of deviant peer affiliation. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;60:342–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.075.CrossRef

56.

Liu Y, Li D, Jia J, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Wang Y, Sun W. Perceived school climate and problematic internet use among Chinese adolescents: psychological insecurity and negative peer affiliation as mediators. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021;35(1):113–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000684.CrossRef

57.

López-Larrosa S, Mendiri P, Sánchez-Souto V. Exploring the relationship between interparental conflict and emotional security: what happens with adolescents in residential care compared to those living with their families? Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;101:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.054.CrossRef

58.

Loukas A, Cance JD, Batanova M. Trajectories of school connectedness across the middle school years. Youth Soc. 2016;48(4):557–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x13504419.CrossRef

59.

Lux U, Walper S. A systemic perspective on children’s emotional insecurity in relation to father: links to parenting, interparental conflict and children’s social well-being. Attach Hum Dev. 2019;21(5):467–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1582597.CrossRef

60.

Martin MJ, Conger RD, Robins RW. Family stress processes and drug and alcohol use by Mexican American adolescents. Dev Psychol. 2019;55(1):170–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000629.CrossRef

61.

Mastrotheodoros S, Van der Graaff J, Deković M, Meeus WHJ, Branje SJT. Interparental conflict management strategies and parent-adolescent relationships: disentangling between-person from within-person effects across adolescence. J Marriage Fam. 2019;81(1):185–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12528.CrossRef

62.

McCoy SS, Dimler LM, Samuels DV, Natsuaki MN. Adolescent susceptibility to deviant peer pressure: does gender matter? Adolesc Res Rev. 2019;4(1):59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0071-2.CrossRef

63.

Mehus CJ, Forster M, Chan G, Hemphill SA, Toumbourou JW, McMorris BJ. Longitudinal, reciprocal relationships between family management and antisocial peer associations. J Adolesc. 2018;68:146–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.015.CrossRef

64.

Merino L, Herrero M, Martínez-Pampliega A. Interparental conflict appraisals and adolescents’ maladaptation in siblings: an actor-partner interdependence model. J Child Fam Stud. 2022;31:1968–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02271-8.CrossRef

65.

Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2012.

66.

Peng S, Zhou B, Wang X, Zhang H, Hu X. Does high teacher autonomy support reduce smartphone use disorder in Chinese adolescents? A moderated mediation model. Addict Behav. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106319.CrossRef

67.

Pereyra SB, Bean RA. Latino adolescent substance use: a mediating model of inter-parental conflict, deviant peer associations, and parenting. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;76:154–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.03.001.CrossRef

68.

Petraitis J, Flay BR, Miller TQ. Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: organizing pieces in the puzzle. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(1):67–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.67.CrossRef

69.

Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRef

70.

Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In: Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB, editors. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008. p. 13–54.CrossRef

71.

Preacher KJ, Kelley K. Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychol Methods. 2011;16(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658.CrossRef

72.

Rudolph KD, Lansford JE, Agoston AM, Sugimura N, Schwartz D, Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE. Peer victimization and social alienation: predicting deviant peer affiliation in middle school. Child Dev. 2014;85(1):124–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12112.CrossRef

73.

Shin JH, Hong JS, Yoon J, Espelage DL. Interparental conflict, parenting behavior, and children’s friendship quality as correlates of peer aggression and peer victimization among aggressor/victim subgroups in South Korea. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(10):1933–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513511695.CrossRef

74.

Siraj R, Najam B, Ghazal S. Sensation seeking, peer influence, and risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Educ Res Int. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8403024.CrossRef

75.

Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivar Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.CrossRef

76.

Steinberg L, Monahan KC. Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Dev Psychol. 2007;43(6):1531–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531.CrossRef

77.

Sudraba V, Millere A, Deklava L, Millere E, Zumente Z, Circenis K, Millere I. Stress coping strategies of drug and alcohol addicted patients in Latvia. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2015;205:632–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.099.CrossRef

78.

Sullivan K, Zhu Q, Wang C, Boyanton D. Relations among peer victimization, aggression, and school climate among elementary school students in China. School Psychol Rev. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1898290.CrossRef

79.

Sznitman SR, Romer D. Student drug testing and positive school climates: testing the relation between two school characteristics and drug use behavior in a longitudinal study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2014.75.65.CrossRef

80.

Teng Z, Bear GG, Yang C, Nie Q, Guo C. Moral disengagement and bullying perpetration: a longitudinal study of the moderating effect of school climate. School Psychol. 2020;35(1):99–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000348.CrossRef

81.

Thompson EL, Mehari KR, Farrell AD. Deviant peer factors during early adolescence: cause or consequence of physical aggression? Child Dev. 2020;91(2):415–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13242.CrossRef

82.

Thompson MJ, Davies PT, Hentges RF, Sturge-Apple ML. Delineating the developmental sequelae of children’s risky involvement in interparental conflict. Dev Psychopathol. 2022;34(3):922–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420001959.CrossRef

83.

van Dijk R, van der Valk IE, Deković M, Branje S. A meta-analysis on interparental conflict, parenting, and child adjustment in divorced families: examining mediation using meta-analytic structural equation models. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101861.CrossRef

84.

van Eldik WM, de Haan AD, Parry LQ, Davies PT, Luijk M, Arends LR, Prinzie P. The interparental relationship: meta-analytic associations with children’s maladjustment and responses to interparental conflict. Psychol Bull. 2020;146(7):553–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000233.CrossRef

85.

Varela JJ, Sánchez PA, De Tezanos-Pinto P, Chuecas J, Benavente M. School climate, bullying and mental health among Chilean adolescents. Child Indic Res. 2021;14:2249–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09834-z.CrossRef

86.

Walker DA, Holtfreter K. Teen pregnancy, depression, and substance abuse: the conditioning effect of deviant peers. Deviant Behav. 2019;42(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1666610.CrossRef

87.

Wang LX, Dou K, Li JB, Zhang MC, Guan JY. The association between interparental conflict and problematic internet use among Chinese adolescents: testing a moderated mediation model. Comput Hum Behav. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106832.CrossRef

88.

Wang MT. School climate support for behavioral and psychological adjustment: testing the mediating effect of social competence. Sch Psychol Q. 2009;24(4):240–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017999.CrossRef

89.

Wang Z, Liu C, Li T, Zhao F. Paternal parenting and depressive symptoms among adolescents: A moderated mediation model of deviant peer affiliation and school climate. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105630.CrossRef

90.

Weymouth BB, Fosco GM, Mak HW, Mayfield K, LoBraico EJ, Feinberg ME. Implications of interparental conflict for adolescents’ peer relationships: a longitudinal pathway through threat appraisals and social anxiety symptoms. Dev Psychol. 2019;55(7):1509–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000731.CrossRef

91.

Xu F, Chen X, Xing H, Wang H. Interparental conflict and Chinese children’s social development. J Fam Issues. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x211042843.CrossRef

92.

Yang C, Sharkey JD, Reed LA, Dowdy E. Cyberbullying victimization and student engagement among adolescents: does school climate matter? School Psychol. 2020;35(2):158–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000353.CrossRef

93.

Yoon D. Peer-relationship patterns and their association with types of child abuse and adolescent risk behaviors among youth at-risk of maltreatment. J Adolesc. 2020;80:125–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.02.008.CrossRef

94.

Yoon D, Snyder SM, Yoon S. Child maltreatment types and adolescent substance use: the role of deviant peer affiliation. Child Fam Soc Work. 2020;25(2):355–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12691.CrossRef

95.

Yoon D, Snyder SM, Yoon S, Coxe KA. Longitudinal association between deviant peer affiliation and externalizing behavior problems by types of child maltreatment. Child Abuse Neglect. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104759.CrossRef

96.

Yoon D, Yoon S, Yoon M, Snyder SM. Developmental trajectories of deviant peer affiliation in adolescence: associations with types of child maltreatment and substance use. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104446.CrossRef

97.

Zhai B, Li D, Li X, Liu Y, Zhang J, Sun W, Wang Y. Perceived school climate and problematic internet use among adolescents: mediating roles of school belonging and depressive symptoms. Addict Behav. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106501.CrossRef

Title: Longitudinal association between interparental conflict and risk-taking behavior among Chinese adolescents: testing a moderated mediation model
Authors: Wan-Yu Ye
Kai Dou
Lin-Xin Wang
Xiao-Qi Lin
Ming-Chen Zhang
Publication date: 01-12-2023
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1753-2000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-023-00556-4

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Longitudinal association between interparental conflict and risk-taking behavior among Chinese adolescents: testing a moderated mediation model

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Patterns of attentional biases in children and emotional symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave longitudinal study

Posttraumatic stress symptoms in adolescents and young adults with a chronic somatic disease: a mixed-methods study

Outpatient screening for anxiety and depression symptoms in adolescents with type 1 diabetes - a cross-sectional survey

“A turn in the road, but still a rough journey” - Parent and child perspectives of outcomes after pre-adolescent inpatient psychiatric admission

Gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults

Correction: Risk and protective factors related to changes in mental health among adolescents since COVID-19 in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional study