Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2022

Open Access 19-07-2021 | Original Article

Long-term sensibility outcomes of secondary digital nerve reconstruction with sural nerve autografts: a retrospective study

Authors: Tomasz Dębski, Marcin Złotorowicz, Bartłomiej Henryk Noszczyk

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recovery of sensibility after digital nerve injury is crucial for restoring normal hand function. We evaluated long-term outcomes of digital nerve reconstruction with autografts.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who underwent secondary reconstruction of digital nerves with nerve autografting. Recovery of sensibility was evaluated based on the following: patient self-assessment, two-point discrimination (2PD), and a total sensation score (sum of proprioception, temperature sensation, and sharp/dull discrimination). Mixed models regression was used to study predictors of sensibility outcomes. The predictors analyzed were age, sex, smoking status, number of fingers involved in a patient (as a measure of injury severity), time to reconstruction, and time to follow-up.

Results

In 61 patients, 174 digital nerves in 126 fingers were reconstructed after an average of 33.1 weeks from injury. The mean follow-up was 6.4 years from reconstruction. The mean graft length was 3.6 cm. Self-rated sensibility in the affected area was very good in 13% of patients, good in 33%, satisfactory in 40%, and poor in 24%. 2PD at 6 mm was present in 17% of patients, at 10 mm in 12%, and at 15 mm in 18% (mean 2PD was 10.8). Proprioception was preserved in 107 (85%) fingers, sensation of temperature was preserved in 99 (75%) of fingers, and sharp/dull discrimination in 88 (70%) fingers. Time from injury to reconstruction was the only significant predictor of the total sensation score.

Conclusion

Our data indicate that earlier reconstruction is associated with a favorable outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paprottka FJ, Wolf P, Harder Y, et al. Sensory recovery outcome after digital nerve repair in relation to different reconstructive techniques: meta-analysis and systematic review. Plast Surg Int. 2013;2013:704589.PubMedPubMedCentral Paprottka FJ, Wolf P, Harder Y, et al. Sensory recovery outcome after digital nerve repair in relation to different reconstructive techniques: meta-analysis and systematic review. Plast Surg Int. 2013;2013:704589.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Mermans JF, Franssen BBGM, Serroyen J, Van der Hulst RRWJ. Digital nerve injuries: a review of predictors of sensory recovery after microsurgical digital nerve repair. Hand. 2012;7(3):233–41.CrossRef Mermans JF, Franssen BBGM, Serroyen J, Van der Hulst RRWJ. Digital nerve injuries: a review of predictors of sensory recovery after microsurgical digital nerve repair. Hand. 2012;7(3):233–41.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:698256.CrossRef Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:698256.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jerosch-Herold C. A study of the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests for assessment of recovery after median nerve injury and repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(3):255–60.CrossRef Jerosch-Herold C. A study of the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests for assessment of recovery after median nerve injury and repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(3):255–60.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wong KH, Coert JH, Robinson PH, Meek MF. Comparison of assessment tools to score recovery of function after repair of traumatic lesions of the median nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40(4):219–24.CrossRef Wong KH, Coert JH, Robinson PH, Meek MF. Comparison of assessment tools to score recovery of function after repair of traumatic lesions of the median nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40(4):219–24.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rosén B. Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation. J Hand Ther. 1996;9(4):315–27.CrossRef Rosén B. Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation. J Hand Ther. 1996;9(4):315–27.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zeineldin AA, Mohammed MAS, Elhoseny AAL. Comparative study between primary versus delayed peripheral nerve repair after various types of injury. Menoufia Med J. 2015;28(1):80–6.CrossRef Zeineldin AA, Mohammed MAS, Elhoseny AAL. Comparative study between primary versus delayed peripheral nerve repair after various types of injury. Menoufia Med J. 2015;28(1):80–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Surgery of the peripheral nerve. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Surgery of the peripheral nerve. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988.
10.
go back to reference Stang F, Stollwerck P, Prommersberger KJ, van Schoonhoven J. Posterior interosseus nerve vs. medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm: differences in digital nerve reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(6):875–80.CrossRef Stang F, Stollwerck P, Prommersberger KJ, van Schoonhoven J. Posterior interosseus nerve vs. medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm: differences in digital nerve reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(6):875–80.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chen C, Tang P, Zhang X. Finger sensory reconstruction with transfer of the proper digital nerve dorsal branch. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(1):82–9.CrossRef Chen C, Tang P, Zhang X. Finger sensory reconstruction with transfer of the proper digital nerve dorsal branch. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(1):82–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chen C, Tang P, Zhang X. Reconstruction of proper digital nerve defects in the thumb using a pedicle nerve graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5):1089–97.CrossRef Chen C, Tang P, Zhang X. Reconstruction of proper digital nerve defects in the thumb using a pedicle nerve graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5):1089–97.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ijpma FF, Nicolai JP, Meek MF. Sural nerve donor-site morbidity: thirty-four years of follow-up. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(4):391–5.CrossRef Ijpma FF, Nicolai JP, Meek MF. Sural nerve donor-site morbidity: thirty-four years of follow-up. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(4):391–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hallgren A, Björkman A, Chemnitz A, Dahlin LB. Subjective outcome related to donor site morbidity after sural nerve graft harvesting: a survey in 41 patients. BMC Surg. 2013;24(13):39.CrossRef Hallgren A, Björkman A, Chemnitz A, Dahlin LB. Subjective outcome related to donor site morbidity after sural nerve graft harvesting: a survey in 41 patients. BMC Surg. 2013;24(13):39.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Arslantunali D, Dursun T, Yucel D, Hasirci N, Hasirci V. Peripheral nerve conduits: technology update. Med Devices. 2014;7:405–24. Arslantunali D, Dursun T, Yucel D, Hasirci N, Hasirci V. Peripheral nerve conduits: technology update. Med Devices. 2014;7:405–24.
16.
go back to reference Kehoe S, Zhang XF, Boyd D. FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: a review of materials and efficacy. Injury. 2012;43(5):553–72.CrossRef Kehoe S, Zhang XF, Boyd D. FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: a review of materials and efficacy. Injury. 2012;43(5):553–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kaushik AP, Hammert WC. Options for digital nerve gap. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(1):141–4.CrossRef Kaushik AP, Hammert WC. Options for digital nerve gap. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(1):141–4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rinker BD, Ingari JV, Greenberg JA, Thayer WP, Safa B, Buncke GM. Outcomes of short-gap sensory nerve injuries reconstructed with processed nerve allografts from a multicenter registry study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015;31(5):384–90.CrossRef Rinker BD, Ingari JV, Greenberg JA, Thayer WP, Safa B, Buncke GM. Outcomes of short-gap sensory nerve injuries reconstructed with processed nerve allografts from a multicenter registry study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015;31(5):384–90.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lohmeyer JA, Kern Y, Schmauss D, et al. Prospective clinical study on digital nerve repair with collagen nerve conduits and review of literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014;30(4):227–34.PubMed Lohmeyer JA, Kern Y, Schmauss D, et al. Prospective clinical study on digital nerve repair with collagen nerve conduits and review of literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014;30(4):227–34.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mass DP. A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1036–45 (discussion 1046-8).CrossRef Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mass DP. A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1036–45 (discussion 1046-8).CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rinker B, Liau JY. A prospective randomized study comparing woven polyglycolic acid and autogenous vein conduits for reconstruction of digital nerve gaps. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(5):775–81.CrossRef Rinker B, Liau JY. A prospective randomized study comparing woven polyglycolic acid and autogenous vein conduits for reconstruction of digital nerve gaps. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(5):775–81.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, McKiernan M, Khan K, McCann J. Results of clinical assessment after primary digital nerve repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19(2):255–7.CrossRef Al-Ghazal SK, McKiernan M, Khan K, McCann J. Results of clinical assessment after primary digital nerve repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19(2):255–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Safa B, Rinker B, Weber RV, et al. Comparisons of patient smoking status and functional recovery following peripheral nerve repair with processed nerve allograft. In: Paper presented at: 2015 American Association for Hand Surgery Meeting. January 21–24, 2015, Paradise Island, Bahamas. http://meeting.handsurgery.org/abstracts/2015/95.cgi. Accessed June 2017. Safa B, Rinker B, Weber RV, et al. Comparisons of patient smoking status and functional recovery following peripheral nerve repair with processed nerve allograft. In: Paper presented at: 2015 American Association for Hand Surgery Meeting. January 21–24, 2015, Paradise Island, Bahamas. http://​meeting.​handsurgery.​org/​abstracts/​2015/​95.​cgi. Accessed June 2017.
24.
go back to reference Bulut T, Akgün U, Çıtlak A, Aslan C, Şener U, Şener M. Prognostic factors in sensory recovery after digital nerve repair. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):157–61.PubMed Bulut T, Akgün U, Çıtlak A, Aslan C, Şener U, Şener M. Prognostic factors in sensory recovery after digital nerve repair. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):157–61.PubMed
25.
go back to reference He B, Zhu Z, Zhu Q, et al. Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(6):661–72.CrossRef He B, Zhu Z, Zhu Q, et al. Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(6):661–72.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fakin RM, Calcagni M, Klein HJ, Giovanoli P. Long-term clinical outcome after epineural coaptation of digital nerves. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016;41(2):148–54.CrossRef Fakin RM, Calcagni M, Klein HJ, Giovanoli P. Long-term clinical outcome after epineural coaptation of digital nerves. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016;41(2):148–54.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Long-term sensibility outcomes of secondary digital nerve reconstruction with sural nerve autografts: a retrospective study
Authors
Tomasz Dębski
Marcin Złotorowicz
Bartłomiej Henryk Noszczyk
Publication date
19-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01747-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue