Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2010

01-07-2010 | Original Article

Long-term performance evaluation of positron emission tomography: analysis and proposal of a maintenance protocol for long-term utilization

Authors: Shoichi Watanuki, Manabu Tashiro, Masayasu Miyake, Yoichi Ishikawa, Masatoshi Itoh, Kazuhiko Yanai, Yasuhiro Sakemi, Hiroshi Fukuda, Keizo Ishii

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanners require periodic monitoring in order to maintain scanner performance. The aim of the present study was to examine the deterioration of PET scanner performance caused by aging.

Methods

We retrospectively examined PET scanner performance alterations in terms of sensitivity, spatial resolution, false coincidences due to scatter and random coincidences based on 13 years of follow-up data, including data when the PET scanner underwent an overhaul at the 10th year after installation. Sensitivity and scatter fraction were calculated by using cross calibration factor (CCF) measurement data, which are collected routinely. Efficacy of the examining the sensitivity and scatter was confirmed by NEMA measurements. Trans-axial resolution was measured as full width at half-maximum (FWHM) and full width at tenth-maximum (FWTM) at 0–20 cm offset from the field of view (FOV) center at the time of installation, 8 years after installation, and immediately after the overhaul. Random coincidence rate fraction was measured in a wide range of count rates before and after the overhaul.

Results and discussion

The results indicated that the total reduction of sensitivity during the first 10 years was 41% of the initial value in terms of NEMA measurement, and that the annual reduction of sensitivity progressed at a rate of 4.7% per year in terms of CCF measurement data. The changes in sensitivity can be calculated using CCF measurement data. Regarding the spatial resolution, mean FWHM and FWTM values were increased by 1.7 and 3.6%, respectively, in 8 years after installation. The relative scatter fraction was significantly increased compared with that before the overhaul. The random fraction decreased by 10–15% after the overhaul within a certain range of random count rates (1–120 kcps). In the case of our scanner, the parameter that displayed the largest change was the sensitivity, and this change was thought to be caused by the reduction of photomultiplier tube (PMT) gain, although the changes in PMT gain can cause various types of performance deterioration, as investigated in this study.

Conclusion

We observed that the sensitivity of our PET scanner generally deteriorated due to aging. Sensitivity monitoring using CCF measurements can be an easy and useful method for monitoring and maintaining the performance of PET scanners against aging. Since the data were obtained from a single scanner, the authors would encourage the initiation of a follow-up study involving various scanners.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jhanwar YS, Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(8):1326–34.PubMed Jhanwar YS, Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(8):1326–34.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Herholz K, Carter SF, Jones M. Positron emission tomography imaging in dementia. Br J Radiol. 2007;80 Spec No 2:S160–7. Herholz K, Carter SF, Jones M. Positron emission tomography imaging in dementia. Br J Radiol. 2007;80 Spec No 2:S160–7.
3.
go back to reference Knuuti J, Schelbert HR, Bax JJ. The need for standardisation of cardiac FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of myocardial viability in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(9):1257–66.CrossRefPubMed Knuuti J, Schelbert HR, Bax JJ. The need for standardisation of cardiac FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of myocardial viability in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(9):1257–66.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cook GJ. Pitfalls in PET/CT interpretation. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;51(3):235–43.PubMed Cook GJ. Pitfalls in PET/CT interpretation. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;51(3):235–43.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Halldin C, Gulyas B, Langer O, Farde L. Brain radioligands-state of the art and new trends. Q J Nucl Med. 2001;45(2):139–52.PubMed Halldin C, Gulyas B, Langer O, Farde L. Brain radioligands-state of the art and new trends. Q J Nucl Med. 2001;45(2):139–52.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Watanuki S, Ishii K, Itoh M, Orihara H. Reliability of a positron emission tomography system (CTI:PT931/04-12). Kaku Igaku. 2002;39(2):155–60. Watanuki S, Ishii K, Itoh M, Orihara H. Reliability of a positron emission tomography system (CTI:PT931/04-12). Kaku Igaku. 2002;39(2):155–60.
7.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission. Part 1. Positron emission tomographs. In: International, Electrotechnical, and Commission, editors. IEC Standard 61675-1: radionuclide imaging devices—characteristics and test conditions. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1998. International Electrotechnical Commission. Part 1. Positron emission tomographs. In: International, Electrotechnical, and Commission, editors. IEC Standard 61675-1: radionuclide imaging devices—characteristics and test conditions. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1998.
8.
go back to reference American College of Radiology. ACR technical standard for medical nuclear physics performance monitoring of PET-CT imaging equipment. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2006. American College of Radiology. ACR technical standard for medical nuclear physics performance monitoring of PET-CT imaging equipment. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2006.
9.
go back to reference Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems. Standard for maintenance of positron emission tomographs. JESRA TI-0001-1994; 1994. Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems. Standard for maintenance of positron emission tomographs. JESRA TI-0001-1994; 1994.
10.
go back to reference Fujiwara T, Watanuki S, Yamamoto S, Miyake M, Seo S, Itoh M, Ishii K, Orihara H, Fukuda H, Satoh T, Kitamura K, Tanaka K, Takahashi S. Performance evaluation of a large axial field-of-view PET scanner: SET-2400 W. Ann Nucl Med. 1997;11(4):307–13.CrossRefPubMed Fujiwara T, Watanuki S, Yamamoto S, Miyake M, Seo S, Itoh M, Ishii K, Orihara H, Fukuda H, Satoh T, Kitamura K, Tanaka K, Takahashi S. Performance evaluation of a large axial field-of-view PET scanner: SET-2400 W. Ann Nucl Med. 1997;11(4):307–13.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bettinardi V, Danna M, Savi A, Lecchi M, Castiglioni I, Gilardi MC, Bammer H, Lucignani G, Fazio F. Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(6):867–81.CrossRefPubMed Bettinardi V, Danna M, Savi A, Lecchi M, Castiglioni I, Gilardi MC, Bammer H, Lucignani G, Fazio F. Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(6):867–81.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Mulnix T, Humm JL, Watson CC. PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2–2001 standard. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(5):813–21.PubMed Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Mulnix T, Humm JL, Watson CC. PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2–2001 standard. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(5):813–21.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Reist HW, Stadelmann O, Kleeb W. Study on the stability of the calibration and normalization in PET and the influence of drifts on the accuracy of quantification. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(11):732–5.CrossRefPubMed Reist HW, Stadelmann O, Kleeb W. Study on the stability of the calibration and normalization in PET and the influence of drifts on the accuracy of quantification. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(11):732–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Spinks T, Jones T, Heather J, Gilardi M. Quality control procedures in positron tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(11):736–40.CrossRefPubMed Spinks T, Jones T, Heather J, Gilardi M. Quality control procedures in positron tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(11):736–40.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Matsumoto K, Yamamoto S, Wada Y, Shimizu K, Murase K, Senda M. Reliability of plural measuring instruments for quantitative PET measurement -performance of dose-calibrator, auto well gamma counter, continuous blood sampling system, and PET scanner. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;64(10):1227–34.PubMed Matsumoto K, Yamamoto S, Wada Y, Shimizu K, Murase K, Senda M. Reliability of plural measuring instruments for quantitative PET measurement -performance of dose-calibrator, auto well gamma counter, continuous blood sampling system, and PET scanner. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;64(10):1227–34.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Zhang H, Alyafei S, Inoue T, Tomiyoshi K, Endo K. Performance stability of SHR-2000 high resolution PET for animal research. Ann Nucl Med. 1999;13(1):65–70.CrossRefPubMed Zhang H, Alyafei S, Inoue T, Tomiyoshi K, Endo K. Performance stability of SHR-2000 high resolution PET for animal research. Ann Nucl Med. 1999;13(1):65–70.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 2-1994 performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1994. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 2-1994 performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1994.
18.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 2-2001: performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2001. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 2-2001: performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2001.
19.
go back to reference Uribe J, Li H, Baghaei H, Aykac M, Wang Y, Liu Y, Xing T, Wong WH. Effect of photomultiplier gain-drift and radiation exposure on 2D-map decoding of detector arrays used in positron emission tomography. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf. 2001;4:1960–4. Uribe J, Li H, Baghaei H, Aykac M, Wang Y, Liu Y, Xing T, Wong WH. Effect of photomultiplier gain-drift and radiation exposure on 2D-map decoding of detector arrays used in positron emission tomography. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf. 2001;4:1960–4.
20.
go back to reference Melcher CL. Scintillators for Well Logging Applications. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research. 1989;(B40-41):1214–8. Melcher CL. Scintillators for Well Logging Applications. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research. 1989;(B40-41):1214–8.
21.
go back to reference Belakhlef S, Church C, Hays A, Fraser R, Lakhanpal S. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008;36(3):147–50.CrossRefPubMed Belakhlef S, Church C, Hays A, Fraser R, Lakhanpal S. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008;36(3):147–50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Williams JJ, McDaniel DL, Kim CL, West LJ. Detector characterization of discovery ST whole-body PET scanner. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec. 2003;2:717–21. Williams JJ, McDaniel DL, Kim CL, West LJ. Detector characterization of discovery ST whole-body PET scanner. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec. 2003;2:717–21.
23.
go back to reference Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems. Performance measurement of positron emission tomographs; JESRA X-0073*A-2005. Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems; 2005. Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems. Performance measurement of positron emission tomographs; JESRA X-0073*A-2005. Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems; 2005.
Metadata
Title
Long-term performance evaluation of positron emission tomography: analysis and proposal of a maintenance protocol for long-term utilization
Authors
Shoichi Watanuki
Manabu Tashiro
Masayasu Miyake
Yoichi Ishikawa
Masatoshi Itoh
Kazuhiko Yanai
Yasuhiro Sakemi
Hiroshi Fukuda
Keizo Ishii
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-010-0381-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2010 Go to the issue