Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 5/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Original Clinical Article

Long-term outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning

Authors: Jolanda J. de Poorter, Tom J. Beunder, Barzi Gareb, Hubert J. Oostenbroek, Gert H. J. M. Bessems, Joris C. T. van der Lugt, Patrick G. M. Maathuis, Michiel A. J. van der Sande

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the commonest hip disorder in adolescents. In situ pinning is commonly performed, yet lately there has been an increase in procedures with open reduction and internal fixation. These procedures, however, are technically demanding with relatively high complication rates and unknown long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, reports on long-term results of in situ fixation are not equivocal. This study evaluates the possible higher risk of worse outcome after in situ pinning of SCFE.

Methods

All patients treated for SCFE with in situ fixation between 1980 and 2002 in four different hospitals were asked to participate. Patients were divided into three groups, based on severity of the slip. Patients were invited to the outpatient clinic for physical examination and X-rays, and to fill out the questionnaires HOOS, EQ5D, and SF36. ANOVA and chi-squared tests were used to analyze differences between groups.

Results

Sixty-one patients with 78 slips filled out the questionnaires. Patients with severe slips had worse scores on HOOS, EQ5D, and SF36. 75 % of patients with severe slips had severe osteoarthritis, compared to 2 % of mild and 11 % of moderate slips.

Conclusion

Hips with mild and moderate SCFE generally had good functional and radiological outcome at a mean follow-up of 18 years, and for these hips there seems to be no indication for open procedures. However, severe slips have a significantly worse outcome, and open reduction and internal fixation could therefore be considered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhatia NN, Pirpiris M, Otsuka NY (2006) Body mass index in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 26:197–199CrossRefPubMed Bhatia NN, Pirpiris M, Otsuka NY (2006) Body mass index in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 26:197–199CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lehmann CL, Arons RR, Loder RT et al (2006) The epidemiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an update. J Pediatr Orthop 26:286–290CrossRefPubMed Lehmann CL, Arons RR, Loder RT et al (2006) The epidemiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an update. J Pediatr Orthop 26:286–290CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jingushi S, Suenaga E (2004) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: etiology and treatment. J Orthop Sci 9:214–219CrossRefPubMed Jingushi S, Suenaga E (2004) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: etiology and treatment. J Orthop Sci 9:214–219CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Loder RT, Dietz FR (2012) What is the best evidence for the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis? J Pediatr Orthop 32(Suppl 2):S158–S165CrossRefPubMed Loder RT, Dietz FR (2012) What is the best evidence for the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis? J Pediatr Orthop 32(Suppl 2):S158–S165CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Aronsson DD, Loder RT, Breur GJ et al (2006) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:666–679CrossRefPubMed Aronsson DD, Loder RT, Breur GJ et al (2006) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:666–679CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M et al (2000) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand 71:370–375CrossRefPubMed Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M et al (2000) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand 71:370–375CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV (1981) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:85–95PubMed Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV (1981) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:85–95PubMed
8.
go back to reference Carney BT, Weinstein SL, Noble J (1991) Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:667–674PubMed Carney BT, Weinstein SL, Noble J (1991) Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:667–674PubMed
9.
go back to reference Southwick WO (1967) Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:807–835PubMed Southwick WO (1967) Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:807–835PubMed
10.
go back to reference Witbreuk MM, Bolkenbaas M, Mullender MG et al (2009) The results of downgrading moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis by an early Imhauser femur osteotomy. J Child Orthop 3:405–410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Witbreuk MM, Bolkenbaas M, Mullender MG et al (2009) The results of downgrading moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis by an early Imhauser femur osteotomy. J Child Orthop 3:405–410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Alves C, Steele M, Narayanan U et al (2012) Open reduction and internal fixation of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis by means of surgical dislocation does not decrease the rate of avascular necrosis: a preliminary study. J Child Orthop 6:277–283CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alves C, Steele M, Narayanan U et al (2012) Open reduction and internal fixation of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis by means of surgical dislocation does not decrease the rate of avascular necrosis: a preliminary study. J Child Orthop 6:277–283CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Tibor LM, Sink EL (2013) Risks and benefits of the modified Dunn approach for treatment of moderate or severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 33(Suppl 1):S99–S102CrossRefPubMed Tibor LM, Sink EL (2013) Risks and benefits of the modified Dunn approach for treatment of moderate or severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 33(Suppl 1):S99–S102CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Larson AN, Sierra RJ, Yu EM et al (2012) Outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning. J Pediatr Orthop 32:125–130CrossRefPubMed Larson AN, Sierra RJ, Yu EM et al (2012) Outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning. J Pediatr Orthop 32:125–130CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M et al (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M et al (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference EuroQol (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef EuroQol (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV (1981) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:85–95PubMed Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV (1981) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:85–95PubMed
19.
go back to reference Carney BT, Weinstein SL, Noble J (1991) Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:667–674PubMed Carney BT, Weinstein SL, Noble J (1991) Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:667–674PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hansson G, Billing L, Hogstedt B et al (1998) Long-term results after nailing in situ of slipped upper femoral epiphysis. A 30-year follow-up of 59 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:70–77CrossRefPubMed Hansson G, Billing L, Hogstedt B et al (1998) Long-term results after nailing in situ of slipped upper femoral epiphysis. A 30-year follow-up of 59 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:70–77CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Larson AN, Sierra RJ, Yu EM et al (2012) Outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning. J Pediatr Orthop 32:125–130CrossRefPubMed Larson AN, Sierra RJ, Yu EM et al (2012) Outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning. J Pediatr Orthop 32:125–130CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Escott BG, De La Rocha A, Jo CH et al (2015) Patient-reported health outcomes after in situ percutaneous fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an average twenty-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1929–1934CrossRefPubMed Escott BG, De La Rocha A, Jo CH et al (2015) Patient-reported health outcomes after in situ percutaneous fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an average twenty-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1929–1934CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long-term outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning
Authors
Jolanda J. de Poorter
Tom J. Beunder
Barzi Gareb
Hubert J. Oostenbroek
Gert H. J. M. Bessems
Joris C. T. van der Lugt
Patrick G. M. Maathuis
Michiel A. J. van der Sande
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0759-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 5/2016 Go to the issue