Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Original Paper

Long-term evaluation of ocular hypertension with primary angle closure and primary open angles

Authors: Ramanjit Sihota, Harathy Selvan, Ajay Sharma, Amisha Gupta, Viney Gupta, Tanuj Dada, Ashish Datt Upadhyay

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term course of primary angle-closure ocular hypertension and primary open-angle ocular hypertension and possible risk factors for progression to glaucoma.

Methods

A total of 109 eyes of 109 ocular hypertension (OHT) patients with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years having complete ocular/medical records were evaluated. They were classified into primary angle closure or primary open angle based on gonioscopy at baseline. Baseline and review data of Humphrey field analyser, HFA, and Heidelberg retinal tomography, HRT, were recorded. Guided progression analysis (GPA) and univariate Cox regression were used for time to event analysis in identifying progression to glaucoma.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 12.18 ± 4.8 years, progression to glaucoma was 17.43% (19 eyes), out of whom 5.5% (6 eyes) showed ≥ 3 loci on GPA. Sub-classifying them, progression to primary angle-closure glaucoma was 19.72%, and that of primary open-angle glaucoma was 13.16%. The mean time to progression was 9.34 ± 3.6 years. Significant risk factors included small disc area (≤ 1.99 sq.mm on HRT), requirement of ≥ 2 drugs to maintain target IOP and those engaged in activities yielding a Valsalva effect in daily life. Coronary artery disease (CAD) and systemic use of steroids were associated with increased severity.

Conclusion

Overall progression of OHT to glaucoma was 17.43% over a mean of 9 years, with target IOP of ≤ 18 mm Hg. Patients with smaller discs, CAD, exercising Valsalva type activities and using ≥ 2 glaucoma medications or systemic steroids should be closely monitored.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R et al (2003) Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology 110:1484–1490CrossRefPubMed Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R et al (2003) Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology 110:1484–1490CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA et al (2004) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 111:1439–1448CrossRefPubMed Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA et al (2004) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 111:1439–1448CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al (2002) The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960 120:701–713 (discussion 829–830) CrossRef Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al (2002) The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960 120:701–713 (discussion 829–830) CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sihota R (2011) An Indian perspective on primary angle closure and glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 59:76CrossRef Sihota R (2011) An Indian perspective on primary angle closure and glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 59:76CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Thomas R, Parikh R, Muliyil J et al (2003) Five-year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81:480–485CrossRefPubMed Thomas R, Parikh R, Muliyil J et al (2003) Five-year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81:480–485CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim YY, Jung HR (1997) Clarifying the nomenclature for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 42:125–136CrossRefPubMed Kim YY, Jung HR (1997) Clarifying the nomenclature for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 42:125–136CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Arnalich-Montiel F, Casas-Llera P, Muñoz-Negrete FJ et al (2009) Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 247:391–397CrossRef Arnalich-Montiel F, Casas-Llera P, Muñoz-Negrete FJ et al (2009) Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 247:391–397CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kass MA, Gordon MO, Gao F et al (1960) Delaying treatment of ocular hypertension: the ocular hypertension treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 2010(128):276–287 Kass MA, Gordon MO, Gao F et al (1960) Delaying treatment of ocular hypertension: the ocular hypertension treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 2010(128):276–287
9.
go back to reference Gordon MO, Gao F, Beiser JA et al (1960) The 10-year incidence of glaucoma among patients with treated and untreated ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 2011(129):1630–1631 Gordon MO, Gao F, Beiser JA et al (1960) The 10-year incidence of glaucoma among patients with treated and untreated ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 2011(129):1630–1631
10.
go back to reference Thomas R, Parikh R, George R et al (2003) Five-year risk of progression of ocular hypertension to primary open angle glaucoma. A population-based study. Indian J Ophthalmol 51:329–333PubMed Thomas R, Parikh R, George R et al (2003) Five-year risk of progression of ocular hypertension to primary open angle glaucoma. A population-based study. Indian J Ophthalmol 51:329–333PubMed
11.
go back to reference Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2003) Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol 135:131–137CrossRefPubMed Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2003) Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol 135:131–137CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT et al (2001) Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1492–1499CrossRefPubMed Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT et al (2001) Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1492–1499CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fayers T, Strouthidis NG, Garway-Heath DF (2007) Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis. Ophthalmology 114:1973–1980CrossRefPubMed Fayers T, Strouthidis NG, Garway-Heath DF (2007) Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis. Ophthalmology 114:1973–1980CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Martinez de la Casa JM et al (2009) Clinicians agreement in establishing glaucomatous progression using the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 116:14–24CrossRefPubMed Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Martinez de la Casa JM et al (2009) Clinicians agreement in establishing glaucomatous progression using the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 116:14–24CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V et al (2005) Comparing glaucomatous optic neuropathy in primary open angle and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma eyes by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 25:408–415CrossRef Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V et al (2005) Comparing glaucomatous optic neuropathy in primary open angle and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma eyes by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 25:408–415CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hayamizu F, Yamazaki Y, Nakagami T et al (2013) Optic disc size and progression of visual field damage in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ 7:807–813 Hayamizu F, Yamazaki Y, Nakagami T et al (2013) Optic disc size and progression of visual field damage in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ 7:807–813
17.
go back to reference Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C et al (2016) Baseline factors predicting the risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to primary open-angle glaucoma during a 10-year follow-up. Eye Lond Engl 30:784–795 Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C et al (2016) Baseline factors predicting the risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to primary open-angle glaucoma during a 10-year follow-up. Eye Lond Engl 30:784–795
18.
go back to reference Landers J, Goldberg I, Graham SL (2002) Analysis of risk factors that may be associated with progression from ocular hypertension to primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 30:242–247CrossRefPubMed Landers J, Goldberg I, Graham SL (2002) Analysis of risk factors that may be associated with progression from ocular hypertension to primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 30:242–247CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sihota R, Dada T, Aggarwal A et al (2007) Does an iridotomy provide protection against narrowing of the anterior chamber angle during Valsalva maneuvre in eyes with primary angle closure. Eye 22:389–393CrossRefPubMed Sihota R, Dada T, Aggarwal A et al (2007) Does an iridotomy provide protection against narrowing of the anterior chamber angle during Valsalva maneuvre in eyes with primary angle closure. Eye 22:389–393CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sihota R, Konkal VL, Dada T et al (2008) Prospective, long-term evaluation of steroid-induced glaucoma. Eye Lond Engl 22:26–30 Sihota R, Konkal VL, Dada T et al (2008) Prospective, long-term evaluation of steroid-induced glaucoma. Eye Lond Engl 22:26–30
22.
go back to reference Giraud J-M, May F, Manet G et al (2010) Analysis of progression with GPA (guided progression analysis) and mean deviation (MD) indexes of automated perimetry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3997 Giraud J-M, May F, Manet G et al (2010) Analysis of progression with GPA (guided progression analysis) and mean deviation (MD) indexes of automated perimetry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3997
23.
go back to reference Renard JPG, Giraud JM, Aryal-Charles N et al (2014) Progression of visual field in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma: PROG-F study1 Preliminary results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:5618 Renard JPG, Giraud JM, Aryal-Charles N et al (2014) Progression of visual field in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma: PROG-F study1 Preliminary results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:5618
26.
go back to reference Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ et al (2009) Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol 93:1576–1579CrossRefPubMed Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ et al (2009) Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol 93:1576–1579CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long-term evaluation of ocular hypertension with primary angle closure and primary open angles
Authors
Ramanjit Sihota
Harathy Selvan
Ajay Sharma
Amisha Gupta
Viney Gupta
Tanuj Dada
Ashish Datt Upadhyay
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0872-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

International Ophthalmology 4/2019 Go to the issue