Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the post-abortion period among women seeking abortion in mainland China: intentions and barriers

Authors: Zhongchen Luo, Lingling Gao, Ronald Anguzu, Juanjuan Zhao

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to describe the intentions of and barriers to the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in the post-abortion period among women seeking abortion in mainland China.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2015 to December 2015 using a waiting room questionnaire. A total of 381 women seeking abortions were recruited at a public hospital abortion clinic. The outcome variable was an ‘intention-to-use’ LARCs in the immediate post-abortion period. Chi-square tests were used to assess associations between categorical variables. Statistically significant variables (p ≤ 0.05) were then further analyzed by logistic regression.

Results

Among 381 respondents, 42.5% intended to use LARCs in the immediate post-abortion period; 35.2% intended to use intra-uterine devices (IUDs); and 13.9% intended to use implants. Previous use of LARC was a predictor for an intention to use LARCs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–5.47). Participants with one or no child had reduced odds for an intention to use LARC (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.15–0.47 and OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68, respectively). Women with a higher sex frequency (at least once per week) showed increased odds for LARC use (OR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.03–10.78) and married women were more likely to use LARC than single women (OR = 1.57; 95% CI:1.00–2.47). Women who planned to have another baby within two years were more likely not to use LARCs in the immediate post-abortion period (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.43–2.12). Barriers to the use of LARCs were anxiety relating to impaired future fertility (56.2%), LARCs being harmful to health (45.2%), irregular bleeding (44.3%), risk of IUD failure (41.6%) and lack of awareness with respect to LARCs (36.1%).

Conclusions

Intention to use LARCs was predicted by marital status, frequency of sexual activity, number of children, planned timing of next pregnancy, and previous LARC use. Impaired future fertility, being harmful to health, irregular bleeding, risk of complications, and lack of awareness with regards to LARCs were the main barriers in their potential use.
Literature
2.
go back to reference National Health And Family Commission. China health and family planning statistical yearbook, vol. 2015. BeiJing: China Union Medical University Press; 2015. p. 225–6. National Health And Family Commission. China health and family planning statistical yearbook, vol. 2015. BeiJing: China Union Medical University Press; 2015. p. 225–6.
5.
go back to reference Kolman KB, Hadley SK, Jordahliafrato MA. Long-acting reversible contraception: who, what, when, and how. J Fam Pract. 2015;64:479–84.PubMed Kolman KB, Hadley SK, Jordahliafrato MA. Long-acting reversible contraception: who, what, when, and how. J Fam Pract. 2015;64:479–84.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kilander H, Alehagen S, Svedlund L, Westlund K, Thor J, Brynhildsen J. Likelihood of repeat abortion in a Swedish cohort according to the choice of post-abortion contraception: a longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12874. Kilander H, Alehagen S, Svedlund L, Westlund K, Thor J, Brynhildsen J. Likelihood of repeat abortion in a Swedish cohort according to the choice of post-abortion contraception: a longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​aogs.​12874.
12.
go back to reference Wu X. Current situation analysis of contraception after abortion due to unintended pregnancy in unmarried women in Enping City[J]. China Modern Med. 2017;7:158–60. [In Chinese] Wu X. Current situation analysis of contraception after abortion due to unintended pregnancy in unmarried women in Enping City[J]. China Modern Med. 2017;7:158–60. [In Chinese]
20.
go back to reference Anguzu R, Tweheyo R, Sekandi JN, Zalwango V, Muhumuza C, Tusiime S, et al. Knowledge and attitudes towards use of long acting reversible contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Lubaga division, Kampala district, Uganda. BMC Res Notes. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-153. Anguzu R, Tweheyo R, Sekandi JN, Zalwango V, Muhumuza C, Tusiime S, et al. Knowledge and attitudes towards use of long acting reversible contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Lubaga division, Kampala district, Uganda. BMC Res Notes. 2014; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1756-0500-7-153.
26.
go back to reference Wei Z, Liu H. Influence of informed choice on induced abortion. Reprod Contracept. 2009;29:264–8. [In Chinese] Wei Z, Liu H. Influence of informed choice on induced abortion. Reprod Contracept. 2009;29:264–8. [In Chinese]
28.
go back to reference Xu JX, Connell C, Chi IC. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion-a report on the Chinese experience[J]. Adv Contracept. 1992;8(4):281–90.CrossRefPubMed Xu JX, Connell C, Chi IC. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion-a report on the Chinese experience[J]. Adv Contracept. 1992;8(4):281–90.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Zhao H. Current Status of Family Planning/Reproductive Health and Evaluation of Quality of Care among Internal Migrants in Three Chinese Large Cities. Shanghai: Fudan University; 2011. [Dissertation in Chinese] Zhao H. Current Status of Family Planning/Reproductive Health and Evaluation of Quality of Care among Internal Migrants in Three Chinese Large Cities. Shanghai: Fudan University; 2011. [Dissertation in Chinese]
Metadata
Title
Long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the post-abortion period among women seeking abortion in mainland China: intentions and barriers
Authors
Zhongchen Luo
Lingling Gao
Ronald Anguzu
Juanjuan Zhao
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0543-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Reproductive Health 1/2018 Go to the issue