Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Original Article

Locked Nailing for Shortened Subtrochanteric Nonunions: A One-stage Treatment

Author: Chi-Chuan Wu, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Subtrochanteric nonunions may involve considerable shortening. A convincing method of concomitantly treating both combined disorders has not been reported. Twenty-three consecutive patients with these combined disorders were treated by femoral condylar skeletal traction, one-stage lengthening to 4 cm maximum, static locked nail stabilization, and corticocancellous bone grafting. Indications for this technique included subtrochanteric aseptic nonunions, patient younger than 60 years, and 2.0 to 5.0 cm shortening. Postoperatively, protected weightbearing ambulation was encouraged as early as possible. Twenty-one patients were followed for a minimum of 1.2 years (mean, 3.2 years; range, 1.2–6.7 years). All nonunions healed with a union rate of 100% (21 of 21) and a median union period of 4.0 months (range, 3.5–11 months). One nonunion healed at 11 months despite nail breakage. In all patients, hip function improved from unsatisfactory grades preoperatively to satisfactory grades at latest followup. Knee function grade remained satisfactory throughout the treatment course in all patients. Although no surgical technique has clearly proven superior in treating subtrochanteric nonunions associated with considerable shortening, the described approach may be the optimal treatment alternative. Protected weightbearing to reduce nail stress throughout the treatment course improves the success rate.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Albright JA, Johnson TR, Saha S. Principles of internal fixation. In: Ghista DN, Roof R, eds. Orthopedic Mechanics: Procedures and Devices. London, England: Academic Press Co; 1978:123–229. Albright JA, Johnson TR, Saha S. Principles of internal fixation. In: Ghista DN, Roof R, eds. Orthopedic Mechanics: Procedures and Devices. London, England: Academic Press Co; 1978:123–229.
2.
go back to reference Barquet A, Mayora G, Freqeiro J, Lopez L, Rienzi D, Francescoli L. The treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions with the long gamma nail: twenty-six patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:346–353.PubMedCrossRef Barquet A, Mayora G, Freqeiro J, Lopez L, Rienzi D, Francescoli L. The treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions with the long gamma nail: twenty-six patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:346–353.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brien WW, Wiss DA, Becker V Jr, Lehman T. Subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comparison of the Zickel nail, 95 degrees blade plate, and interlocking nail. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5:458–464.PubMedCrossRef Brien WW, Wiss DA, Becker V Jr, Lehman T. Subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comparison of the Zickel nail, 95 degrees blade plate, and interlocking nail. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5:458–464.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Charnley GJ, Ward AJ. Reconstruction femoral nailing for nonunion of subtrochanteric fracture: a revision technique following dynamic condylar screw failure. Int Orthop. 1996;20:55–57.PubMedCrossRef Charnley GJ, Ward AJ. Reconstruction femoral nailing for nonunion of subtrochanteric fracture: a revision technique following dynamic condylar screw failure. Int Orthop. 1996;20:55–57.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference de Vries JS, Kloen P, Borens O, Marti RK, Helfet DL. Treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions. Injury. 2006;37:203–211.PubMedCrossRef de Vries JS, Kloen P, Borens O, Marti RK, Helfet DL. Treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions. Injury. 2006;37:203–211.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gautier E, Perren SM, Ganz R. Principles of internal fixation. Curr Orthop. 1992;6:220–232.CrossRef Gautier E, Perren SM, Ganz R. Principles of internal fixation. Curr Orthop. 1992;6:220–232.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:185–188.PubMedCrossRef Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:185–188.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hoppenfeld S. Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1976. Hoppenfeld S. Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1976.
11.
go back to reference Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G. Closed locked intramedullary nailing: its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:709–720.PubMed Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G. Closed locked intramedullary nailing: its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:709–720.PubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Mize RD, Bucholz RW, Grogan DP. Surgical treatment of displaced, comminuted fractures of the distal end of the femur: an extensile approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:871–879.PubMed Mize RD, Bucholz RW, Grogan DP. Surgical treatment of displaced, comminuted fractures of the distal end of the femur: an extensile approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:871–879.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Seinsheimer F. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:300–306.PubMed Seinsheimer F. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:300–306.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Van Heest A, Swiontkowski M. Bone-graft substitutes. Lancet. 1999;353(suppl 1):SI28–29.PubMed Van Heest A, Swiontkowski M. Bone-graft substitutes. Lancet. 1999;353(suppl 1):SI28–29.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Waddell JP. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: a review of 130 patients. J Trauma. 1979;19:582–591.PubMedCrossRef Waddell JP. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: a review of 130 patients. J Trauma. 1979;19:582–591.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wu CC. Femoral supracondylar malunions with varus medial condyle and shortening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;456:226–232.PubMedCrossRef Wu CC. Femoral supracondylar malunions with varus medial condyle and shortening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;456:226–232.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wu CC, Lee ZL. One-stage lengthening using a locked nailing technique for distal femoral shaft nonunions associated with shortening. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:75–80.PubMedCrossRef Wu CC, Lee ZL. One-stage lengthening using a locked nailing technique for distal femoral shaft nonunions associated with shortening. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:75–80.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wu CC, Lee ZL. Low success rate of non-intervention after breakage of interlocking nails. Int Orthop. 2005;29:105–108.PubMedCrossRef Wu CC, Lee ZL. Low success rate of non-intervention after breakage of interlocking nails. Int Orthop. 2005;29:105–108.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee ZL. Subtrochanteric fractures treated with interlocking nailing. J Trauma. 1991;31:326–333.PubMedCrossRef Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee ZL. Subtrochanteric fractures treated with interlocking nailing. J Trauma. 1991;31:326–333.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee ZL. A simple surgical technique to treat aseptic nonunion-associated femoral length discrepancy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111:160–164.PubMedCrossRef Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee ZL. A simple surgical technique to treat aseptic nonunion-associated femoral length discrepancy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111:160–164.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Locked Nailing for Shortened Subtrochanteric Nonunions: A One-stage Treatment
Author
Chi-Chuan Wu, MD
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0380-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2009 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Is Patient Selection Important for Hip Resurfacing?

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Imaging and Navigation Measurement of Acetabular Component Position in THA

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Modular Tantalum Augments for Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008

Survivorship of 2000 Tapered Titanium Porous Plasma-sprayed Femoral Components