Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Article

Local anesthetic wound infusion versus standard analgesia in paediatric post-operative pain control

Authors: M. S. Machoki, A. J. W. Millar, H. Albetyn, S. G. Cox, J. Thomas, A. Numanoglu

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Local anesthetic wound infusion has shown promising results in adults. Its use in children is limited to some centers and there are only a few prospective trials in this group of patients.

Methods

Sub-fascial continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion (CLAWI) (0.2 % Bupivacaine) plus intravenous paracetamol and rescue intravenous morphine was compared to: (a) Epidural bupivacaine (EPI) plus paracetamol and rescue intravenous morphine for patients undergoing laparotomy. (b) Intravenous morphine and paracetamol (standard post-operative analgesia—SAPA) in children undergoing Lanz incision laparotomy for complicated appendicitis. ‘InfiltralLong’, PANJUNK® catheters were placed sub-fascially after peritoneal closure for post-operative bupivacaine infusion. Pain scores were recorded regularly by the same blinded pain specialist. The primary outcomes were pain control and total morphine. The secondary outcomes were time to full feeds, mobilization requirement for urinary catheter and complications.

Results

Sixty patients (18 laparotomy-CLAWI, 17 laparotomy-EPI and 12 appendectomy-CLAWI, and 13 appendectomy-SAPA) were analyzed. The average pain score was 2.5 (1–4) in the CLAWI groups, 3.0 (1–5) in the EPI group and 3.5 (2–5) in the SAPA group. Morphine requirements were markedly less for CLAWI. SAPA and EPI groups required urinary catheters for longer and took longer to mobilize (average 4 days compared to 2 days for CLAWI). There were no wound or bupivacaine complications in the CLAWI group.

Conclusion

Continuous subfascial bupivacaine infusion is reliable, safe and effective in paediatric post-operative pain control with considerably reduced opiate requirements.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Ingelmo PM, Gelsumino C, Acosta AP et al (2007) Epidural analgesia in children: planning, organization and development of a new program. Minerva Anestesiol 73:575–585PubMed Ingelmo PM, Gelsumino C, Acosta AP et al (2007) Epidural analgesia in children: planning, organization and development of a new program. Minerva Anestesiol 73:575–585PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hall RW, Kronsberg SS, Barton BA et al (2005) Morphine, hypotension, and adverse outcomes among preterm neonates: who’s to blame? Secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial. Pediatrics 115:1351–1359. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1398 CrossRefPubMed Hall RW, Kronsberg SS, Barton BA et al (2005) Morphine, hypotension, and adverse outcomes among preterm neonates: who’s to blame? Secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial. Pediatrics 115:1351–1359. doi:10.​1542/​peds.​2004-1398 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fustran Guerrero N, Dalmau Llitjós A, Sabaté Pes A (2011) Continuous infusion of local anesthetic at the site of the abdominal surgical wound for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 58:337–344CrossRefPubMed Fustran Guerrero N, Dalmau Llitjós A, Sabaté Pes A (2011) Continuous infusion of local anesthetic at the site of the abdominal surgical wound for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 58:337–344CrossRefPubMed
12.
14.
go back to reference O’Brien PC, Fleming TR (1979) A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 35:549–556CrossRefPubMed O’Brien PC, Fleming TR (1979) A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 35:549–556CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Taylor EM, Boyer K, Campbell FA (2008) Pain in hospitalized children: a prospective cross-sectional survey of pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a Canadian pediatric teaching hospital. Pain Res Manag J Can Pain Soc J la société Can pour le Trait la douleur 13:25–32 Taylor EM, Boyer K, Campbell FA (2008) Pain in hospitalized children: a prospective cross-sectional survey of pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a Canadian pediatric teaching hospital. Pain Res Manag J Can Pain Soc J la société Can pour le Trait la douleur 13:25–32
20.
go back to reference Lu C-W, Lin T-Y, Shieh J-S et al (2013) Antimicrobial effect of continuous lidocaine infusion in a Staphylococcus aureus-induced wound infection in a mouse model. Ann Plast Surg 1. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e318276d8e7 Lu C-W, Lin T-Y, Shieh J-S et al (2013) Antimicrobial effect of continuous lidocaine infusion in a Staphylococcus aureus-induced wound infection in a mouse model. Ann Plast Surg 1. doi:10.​1097/​SAP.​0b013e318276d8e7​
23.
go back to reference Hollmann MW, Duriex ME (2000) Local Anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology 93(3):858–875CrossRefPubMed Hollmann MW, Duriex ME (2000) Local Anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology 93(3):858–875CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tilleul P, Aissou M, Bocquet F et al (2012) Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing epidural, patient-controlled intravenous morphine, and continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 108:998–1005. doi:10.1093/bja/aes091 CrossRefPubMed Tilleul P, Aissou M, Bocquet F et al (2012) Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing epidural, patient-controlled intravenous morphine, and continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 108:998–1005. doi:10.​1093/​bja/​aes091 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Local anesthetic wound infusion versus standard analgesia in paediatric post-operative pain control
Authors
M. S. Machoki
A. J. W. Millar
H. Albetyn
S. G. Cox
J. Thomas
A. Numanoglu
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3796-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Pediatric Surgery International 11/2015 Go to the issue