Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Local Anesthesia in Dentistry | Original Scientific Report

Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial

Authors: Mujgan Caliskan, Koray Kosmaz, Ismail Ege Subasi, Aylin Acar, Ismail Evren, Gurhan Bas, Ali Timucin Atayoglu

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pilonidal disease is a common problem in primary health care which may require immediate surgical referral. Although various management options have been proposed, so far there is no gold standard treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine which of the following techniques was superior as regards postoperative complications and recurrence, midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap or Karydakis flap.

Methods

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the Department of General Surgery. Patients with non-complicated pilonidal sinus were enrolled in the study from April 2009 to January 2012. All patients were randomized the day of surgery at the coordinating center by means of a computer program. Patients were randomized to receive midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap or Karydakis flap. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia and patients were discharged 6 h after surgery. Demographic characteristics, skin color, body hair type, family history, preoperative complaints and duration of symptoms, cyst size, intraoperative iatrogenic cyst rupture, the presence of a tuft of hairs in the cyst, surgical techniques, duration of drainage, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and recurrence were evaluated.

Results

One hundred and ninety-two patients with non-complicated pilonidal sinus were enrolled. Seventy-two patients were randomized to midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, 67 patients to midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap and 53 patients to Karydakis flap. The mean age was 25.66 ± 7.67 years. At 76-month follow-up, the overall complications and recurrence rates were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In cases of non-complicated pilonidal sinus, we recommend surgical management using local anesthesia, outpatient surgery and the surgical approach with which the surgeon is most familiar.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Khanna A, Rombeau JL (2011) Pilonidal disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24(1):46–53CrossRef Khanna A, Rombeau JL (2011) Pilonidal disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24(1):46–53CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Humphries AE, James E (2010) Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 90(1):113–124CrossRef Humphries AE, James E (2010) Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 90(1):113–124CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Velasco AL, Dunlap WW (2009) Pilonidal disease and hidradenitis. Surg Clin North Am 89(3):689–701CrossRef Velasco AL, Dunlap WW (2009) Pilonidal disease and hidradenitis. Surg Clin North Am 89(3):689–701CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2010) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20:CD006213 Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2010) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20:CD006213
6.
go back to reference Oncel M, Kurt N, Kement M, Colak E, Eser M, Uzun H (2002) Excision and marsupialization versus sinus excision for the treatment of limited chronic pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized trial. Tech Coloproctol 6(3):165–169CrossRef Oncel M, Kurt N, Kement M, Colak E, Eser M, Uzun H (2002) Excision and marsupialization versus sinus excision for the treatment of limited chronic pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized trial. Tech Coloproctol 6(3):165–169CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Onishi K, Maruyama Y (2001) Sacral adipofascial turn-over flap for the excisional defect of pilonidal sinus. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(7):2006–2010CrossRef Onishi K, Maruyama Y (2001) Sacral adipofascial turn-over flap for the excisional defect of pilonidal sinus. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(7):2006–2010CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jensen SL, Harling H (1988) Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess. Br J Surg 75(1):60–61CrossRef Jensen SL, Harling H (1988) Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess. Br J Surg 75(1):60–61CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nursal TZ, Ezer A, Calişkan K, Törer N, Belli S, Moray G (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V–Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 199(2):170–177CrossRef Nursal TZ, Ezer A, Calişkan K, Törer N, Belli S, Moray G (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V–Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 199(2):170–177CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J (2008) Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336(7649):868–871CrossRef McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J (2008) Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336(7649):868–871CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bascom J, Bascom T (2002) Failed pilonidal sinus surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg 137(10):1146–1150CrossRef Bascom J, Bascom T (2002) Failed pilonidal sinus surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg 137(10):1146–1150CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Flannery BP, Kidd HA (1967) A review of pilonidal sinus lesions and a method of treatment. Postgrad Med J 43(499):353–358CrossRef Flannery BP, Kidd HA (1967) A review of pilonidal sinus lesions and a method of treatment. Postgrad Med J 43(499):353–358CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Karydakis GE (1992) Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust NZJ Surg 62(5):385–389CrossRef Karydakis GE (1992) Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust NZJ Surg 62(5):385–389CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Obein SA (1988) A new technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 31(11):879–885CrossRef Obein SA (1988) A new technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 31(11):879–885CrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K (2002) Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 45(11):1458–1467CrossRef Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K (2002) Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 45(11):1458–1467CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Faux W, Pillai SC, Gold DM (2005) Limberg flap for pilonidal disease: the "no-protractor" approach, 3 steps to success. Tech Coloproctol 9(2):153–155CrossRef Faux W, Pillai SC, Gold DM (2005) Limberg flap for pilonidal disease: the "no-protractor" approach, 3 steps to success. Tech Coloproctol 9(2):153–155CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bessa SS (2013) Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):491–498CrossRef Bessa SS (2013) Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):491–498CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Arslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O (2014) Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol 18(1):29–37CrossRef Arslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O (2014) Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol 18(1):29–37CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Onder A, Girgin S, Kapan M, Mehmet T, Zulfu A, Yilmaz P et al (2012) Pilonidal sinus disease: risk factors for postoperative complications and recurrence. Int Surg 97(3):224–229 Onder A, Girgin S, Kapan M, Mehmet T, Zulfu A, Yilmaz P et al (2012) Pilonidal sinus disease: risk factors for postoperative complications and recurrence. Int Surg 97(3):224–229
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial
Authors
Mujgan Caliskan
Koray Kosmaz
Ismail Ege Subasi
Aylin Acar
Ismail Evren
Gurhan Bas
Ali Timucin Atayoglu
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05331-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

World Journal of Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue