Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-02-2021 | Liver Transplantation | Original Article

The role of the comprehensive complication index for the prediction of survival after liver transplantation

Authors: Quirino Lai, Fabio Melandro, Greg Nowak, Daniele Nicolini, Samuele Iesari, Elisa Fasolo, Gianluca Mennini, Antonio Romano, Federico Mocchegiani, Kevin Ackenine, Marina Polacco, Laura Marinelli, Olga Ciccarelli, Giacomo Zanus, Marco Vivarelli, Umberto Cillo, Massimo Rossi, Bo-Göran Ericzon, Jan Lerut

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

In the last years, several scoring systems based on pre- and post-transplant parameters have been developed to predict early post-LT graft function. However, some of them showed poor diagnostic abilities. This study aims to evaluate the role of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) as a useful scoring system for accurately predicting 90-day and 1-year graft loss after liver transplantation. A training set (n = 1262) and a validation set (n = 520) were obtained. The study was registered at https://​www.​ClinicalTrials.​gov (ID: NCT03723317). CCI exhibited the best diagnostic performance for 90 days in the training (AUC = 0.94; p < 0.001) and Validation Sets (AUC = 0.77; p < 0.001) when compared to the BAR, D-MELD, MELD, and EAD scores. The cut-off value of 47.3 (third quartile) showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 48.3 and 7.0 in the two sets, respectively. As for 1-year graft loss, CCI showed good performances in the training (AUC = 0.88; p < 0.001) and validation sets (AUC = 0.75; p < 0.001). The threshold of 47.3 showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 21.0 and 5.4 in the two sets, respectively. All the other tested scores always showed AUCs < 0.70 in both the sets. CCI showed a good stratification ability in terms of graft loss rates in both the sets (log-rank p < 0.001). In the patients exceeding the CCI ninth decile, 1-year graft survival rates were only 0.7% and 23.1% in training and validation sets, respectively. CCI shows a very good diagnostic power for 90-day and 1-year graft loss in different sets of patients, indicating better accuracy with respect to other pre- and post-LT scores.
Clinical Trial Notification: NCT03723317.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M et al (2001) A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33:464–470CrossRef Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M et al (2001) A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33:464–470CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Freeman RB (2012) A decade of model for end-stage liver disease: lessons learned and need for re-evaluation of allocation policies. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 17:211–215CrossRef Freeman RB (2012) A decade of model for end-stage liver disease: lessons learned and need for re-evaluation of allocation policies. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 17:211–215CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Silberhumer GR, Hetz H, Rasoul-Rockenschaub S et al (2006) Is MELD score sufficient to predict not only death on waiting list, but also post-transplant survival? Transplant Int 19:275–281CrossRef Silberhumer GR, Hetz H, Rasoul-Rockenschaub S et al (2006) Is MELD score sufficient to predict not only death on waiting list, but also post-transplant survival? Transplant Int 19:275–281CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Klein KB, Stafinski TD, Menon D (2013) Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 8:e80661CrossRef Klein KB, Stafinski TD, Menon D (2013) Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 8:e80661CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Halldorson JB, Bakthavatsalam R, Fix O et al (2009) D-MELD, a simple predictor of post liver transplant mortality for optimization of donor/recipient matching. Am J Transplant 9:318–326CrossRef Halldorson JB, Bakthavatsalam R, Fix O et al (2009) D-MELD, a simple predictor of post liver transplant mortality for optimization of donor/recipient matching. Am J Transplant 9:318–326CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Slankamenac K et al (2011) Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era. Ann Surg 254:745–753CrossRef Dutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Slankamenac K et al (2011) Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era. Ann Surg 254:745–753CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B et al (2010) Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transplant 16:943–949CrossRef Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B et al (2010) Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transplant 16:943–949CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRef Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yamashita S, Sheth RA, Niekamp AS et al (2017) Comprehensive complication index predicts cancer-specific survival after resection of colorectal metastases independent of RAS mutational status. Ann Surg 266:1045–1054CrossRef Yamashita S, Sheth RA, Niekamp AS et al (2017) Comprehensive complication index predicts cancer-specific survival after resection of colorectal metastases independent of RAS mutational status. Ann Surg 266:1045–1054CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rössler F, Sapisochin G, Song G et al (2016) Defining benchmarks for major liver surgery: a multicentre analysis of 5202 living liver donors. Ann Surg 264:492–500CrossRef Rössler F, Sapisochin G, Song G et al (2016) Defining benchmarks for major liver surgery: a multicentre analysis of 5202 living liver donors. Ann Surg 264:492–500CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kalisvaart M, de Haan JE, Polak WG et al (2017) Comparison of postoperative outcomes between donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death liver transplantation using the comprehensive complication index. Ann Surg 266:772–778CrossRef Kalisvaart M, de Haan JE, Polak WG et al (2017) Comparison of postoperative outcomes between donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death liver transplantation using the comprehensive complication index. Ann Surg 266:772–778CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sainani KL (2013) Multivariate regression: the pitfalls of automated variable selection. PM R 5:791–794CrossRef Sainani KL (2013) Multivariate regression: the pitfalls of automated variable selection. PM R 5:791–794CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Freeman RB Jr, Wiesner RH, Harper A, UNOS/OPTN Liver Disease Severity Score, UNOS/OPTN Liver, and Intestine, and UNOS/OPTN Pediatric Transplantation Committees et al (2002) The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transplant 8:851–858CrossRef Freeman RB Jr, Wiesner RH, Harper A, UNOS/OPTN Liver Disease Severity Score, UNOS/OPTN Liver, and Intestine, and UNOS/OPTN Pediatric Transplantation Committees et al (2002) The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transplant 8:851–858CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Duan BW, Lu SC, Wu JS et al (2014) Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score does not predict outcomes of hepatitis B-induced acute-on-chronic liver failure in transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 46:3502–3506CrossRef Duan BW, Lu SC, Wu JS et al (2014) Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score does not predict outcomes of hepatitis B-induced acute-on-chronic liver failure in transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 46:3502–3506CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yadav SK, Saraf N, Saigal S et al (2017) High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: experience in 1000 recipients. Clin Transplant 31:e13006CrossRef Yadav SK, Saraf N, Saigal S et al (2017) High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: experience in 1000 recipients. Clin Transplant 31:e13006CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weismüller TJ, Fikatas P, Schmidt J et al (2011) Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany—limitations of the ‘sickest first’-concept. Transplant Int 24:91–99CrossRef Weismüller TJ, Fikatas P, Schmidt J et al (2011) Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany—limitations of the ‘sickest first’-concept. Transplant Int 24:91–99CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rana A, Hardy MA, Halazun KJ et al (2008) Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 8:2537–2546CrossRef Rana A, Hardy MA, Halazun KJ et al (2008) Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 8:2537–2546CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Montano-Loza AJ, Duarte-Rojo A, Meza-Junco J et al (2015) Inclusion of sarcopenia within MELD (MELD-Sarcopenia) and the prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 6:e102CrossRef Montano-Loza AJ, Duarte-Rojo A, Meza-Junco J et al (2015) Inclusion of sarcopenia within MELD (MELD-Sarcopenia) and the prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 6:e102CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Avolio AW, Cillo U, Salizzoni M, Donor-to-Recipient Italian Liver Transplant (D2R-ILTx) Study Group et al (2011) Balancing donor and recipient risk factors in liver transplantation: the value of D-MELD with particular reference to HCV recipients. Am J Transplant 11:2724–2736CrossRef Avolio AW, Cillo U, Salizzoni M, Donor-to-Recipient Italian Liver Transplant (D2R-ILTx) Study Group et al (2011) Balancing donor and recipient risk factors in liver transplantation: the value of D-MELD with particular reference to HCV recipients. Am J Transplant 11:2724–2736CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ma Y, Wang Q, Yang J et al (2015) Comparison of different scoring systems based on both donor and recipient characteristics for predicting outcome after living donor liver transplantation. PLoS ONE 10:e0136604CrossRef Ma Y, Wang Q, Yang J et al (2015) Comparison of different scoring systems based on both donor and recipient characteristics for predicting outcome after living donor liver transplantation. PLoS ONE 10:e0136604CrossRef
22.
go back to reference de Campos Junior ID, Stucchi RS, Udo EY et al (2015) Application of the BAR score as a predictor of short- and long-term survival in liver transplantation patients. Hepatol Int 9:113–119CrossRef de Campos Junior ID, Stucchi RS, Udo EY et al (2015) Application of the BAR score as a predictor of short- and long-term survival in liver transplantation patients. Hepatol Int 9:113–119CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pareja E, Cortes M, Hervás D et al (2015) A score model for the continuous grading of early allograft dysfunction severity. Liver Transplant 21:38–46CrossRef Pareja E, Cortes M, Hervás D et al (2015) A score model for the continuous grading of early allograft dysfunction severity. Liver Transplant 21:38–46CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Muller X, Marcon F, Sapisochin G et al (2018) Defining benchmarks in liver transplantation: a multicentre outcome analysis determining best achievable results. Ann Surg 267:419–425CrossRef Muller X, Marcon F, Sapisochin G et al (2018) Defining benchmarks in liver transplantation: a multicentre outcome analysis determining best achievable results. Ann Surg 267:419–425CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shimizu S, Saito H, Kono Y et al (2019) The prognostic significance of the comprehensive complication index in patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today 49:913–920CrossRef Shimizu S, Saito H, Kono Y et al (2019) The prognostic significance of the comprehensive complication index in patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today 49:913–920CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tu RH, Lin JX, Li P et al (2018) Comprehensive complication index predicts cancer-specific survival of patients with postoperative complications after curative resection of gastric cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018:4396018PubMedPubMedCentral Tu RH, Lin JX, Li P et al (2018) Comprehensive complication index predicts cancer-specific survival of patients with postoperative complications after curative resection of gastric cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018:4396018PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Artiles-Armas M, Roque-Castellano C, Conde-Martel A, Marchena-Gómez J (2019) The comprehensive complication index is related to frailty in elderly surgical patients. J Surg Res 244:218–224CrossRef Artiles-Armas M, Roque-Castellano C, Conde-Martel A, Marchena-Gómez J (2019) The comprehensive complication index is related to frailty in elderly surgical patients. J Surg Res 244:218–224CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ray S, Mehta NN, Mangla V et al (2019) A comparison between the comprehensive complication index and the Clavien-Dindo grading as a measure of postoperative outcome in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery—a prospective study. J Surg Res 244:417–424CrossRef Ray S, Mehta NN, Mangla V et al (2019) A comparison between the comprehensive complication index and the Clavien-Dindo grading as a measure of postoperative outcome in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery—a prospective study. J Surg Res 244:417–424CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Goel A, Mehta N, Guy J et al (2014) Hepatic artery and biliary complications in liver transplant recipients undergoing pretransplant transarterial chemoembolization. Liver Transplant 20:1221–1228CrossRef Goel A, Mehta N, Guy J et al (2014) Hepatic artery and biliary complications in liver transplant recipients undergoing pretransplant transarterial chemoembolization. Liver Transplant 20:1221–1228CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sneiders D, Houwen T, Pengel LHM et al (2018) Systematic review and meta-analysis of posttransplant hepatic artery and biliary complications in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation. Transplantation 102:88–96CrossRef Sneiders D, Houwen T, Pengel LHM et al (2018) Systematic review and meta-analysis of posttransplant hepatic artery and biliary complications in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation. Transplantation 102:88–96CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Yoo S, Jang EJ, Yi NJ et al (2019) Effect of institutional case volume on in-hospital mortality after living donor liver transplantation: analysis of 7073 cases between 2007 and 2016 in Korea. Transplantation 103:952–958CrossRef Yoo S, Jang EJ, Yi NJ et al (2019) Effect of institutional case volume on in-hospital mortality after living donor liver transplantation: analysis of 7073 cases between 2007 and 2016 in Korea. Transplantation 103:952–958CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ozhathil DK, Li YF, Smith JK et al (2011) Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants. Liver Transplant 17:1191–1199CrossRef Ozhathil DK, Li YF, Smith JK et al (2011) Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants. Liver Transplant 17:1191–1199CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The role of the comprehensive complication index for the prediction of survival after liver transplantation
Authors
Quirino Lai
Fabio Melandro
Greg Nowak
Daniele Nicolini
Samuele Iesari
Elisa Fasolo
Gianluca Mennini
Antonio Romano
Federico Mocchegiani
Kevin Ackenine
Marina Polacco
Laura Marinelli
Olga Ciccarelli
Giacomo Zanus
Marco Vivarelli
Umberto Cillo
Massimo Rossi
Bo-Göran Ericzon
Jan Lerut
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00878-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Updates in Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue