Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2020

01-09-2020 | Liver Surgery | Original Article

The impact of personalized nutritional support on postoperative outcome within the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for liver resections: results from the NutriCatt protocol

Authors: Francesco Ardito, Quirino Lai, Emanuele Rinninella, Antonio Mimmo, Maria Vellone, Elena Panettieri, Enrica Adducci, Marco Cintoni, Maria Cristina Mele, Antonio Gasbarrini, Felice Giuliante

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Malnutrition in liver surgery is correlated with higher postoperative complications and longer length of hospital stay (LOHS), the same items that ERAS programs try to optimize. However, to date, standardized dietary protocols have not been defined within ERAS programs. Aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on LOHS and postoperative complications, of a personalized nutritional protocol (NutriCatt) with diet and oral branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation, adopted within the ERAS program.

Methods

1960 consecutive liver resections were performed from January 2000 to September 2018. Exclusion criteria: perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, simultaneous colorectal and liver resections. Four groups for analysis: resections before 2009 (1st period); from 2009 to 2016 (2nd period, including laparoscopic resections); between 2016 and September 2017 (ERAS); after September 2017 (ERAS + NutriCatt).

Results

LOHS declined (p < 0.0001), from a median of 10 days (1st period) to 8, 7 and 6 in 2nd period, ERAS and ERAS + NutriCatt groups, respectively. At multivariable analysis for risk of LOHS > 8 days, the 2nd period, ERAS and ERAS + NutriCatt groups showed a protective effect. These results were confirmed for both minor and major resections. LOHS was significantly lower in ERAS + Nutricatt group than in ERAS group, without increasing risk of postoperative complications, although the rate of laparoscopic resections was similar in these two groups and complexity of liver resections was significantly higher in the last period.

Conclusions

Adoption of a personalized nutritional protocol with BCAA supplementation within the ERAS program for liver resections was a safe and effective approach that may impact on reducing the LOHS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617PubMed Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641PubMed Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641PubMed
3.
go back to reference ERAS Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261:1153–1159 ERAS Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261:1153–1159
4.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440PubMed Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31(6):817–830PubMed Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31(6):817–830PubMed
6.
go back to reference Richardson J, DiFabio F, Clarke H et al (2015) Implementation of enhanced recovery programme for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: feasibility, safety and cost analysis. Pancreatology 15:185–190PubMed Richardson J, DiFabio F, Clarke H et al (2015) Implementation of enhanced recovery programme for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: feasibility, safety and cost analysis. Pancreatology 15:185–190PubMed
7.
go back to reference Xiong J, Szatmary P, Huang W et al (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 95:e3497PubMedPubMedCentral Xiong J, Szatmary P, Huang W et al (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 95:e3497PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 36:2879–2887PubMed Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 36:2879–2887PubMed
9.
go back to reference Tang J, Humes DJ, Gemmil E et al (2013) Reduction in length of stay for patients undergoing oesophageal and gastric resections with implementation of enhanced recovery packages. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:323–328PubMedPubMedCentral Tang J, Humes DJ, Gemmil E et al (2013) Reduction in length of stay for patients undergoing oesophageal and gastric resections with implementation of enhanced recovery packages. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:323–328PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Muehling B, Schelzig H, Steffen P et al (2009) A prospective randomized trial comparing traditional and fast-track patient care in elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair. World J Surg 33:577–585PubMed Muehling B, Schelzig H, Steffen P et al (2009) A prospective randomized trial comparing traditional and fast-track patient care in elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair. World J Surg 33:577–585PubMed
11.
go back to reference Jones EL, Wainwright TW, Foster JD et al (2014) A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopedic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 96:89–94PubMedPubMedCentral Jones EL, Wainwright TW, Foster JD et al (2014) A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopedic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 96:89–94PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Santillan A, Govan L, Zahurak ML et al (2008) Feasibility and economic impact of a clinical pathway for pap test utilization in Gynecologic Oncology practice. Gynecol Oncol 109:388–393PubMed Santillan A, Govan L, Zahurak ML et al (2008) Feasibility and economic impact of a clinical pathway for pap test utilization in Gynecologic Oncology practice. Gynecol Oncol 109:388–393PubMed
13.
go back to reference van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM et al (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95(8):969–975PubMed van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM et al (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95(8):969–975PubMed
14.
go back to reference Coolsen MM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM et al (2013) A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB (Oxford) 15(4):245–251 Coolsen MM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM et al (2013) A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB (Oxford) 15(4):245–251
15.
go back to reference Dunne DF, Yip VS, Jones RP et al (2014) Enhanced recovery in the resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 110(2):197–202PubMed Dunne DF, Yip VS, Jones RP et al (2014) Enhanced recovery in the resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 110(2):197–202PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hughes MJ, Chong J, Harrison E et al (2016) Short-term outcomes after liver resection for malignant and benign disease in the age of ERAS. HPB (Oxford) 18(2):177–182 Hughes MJ, Chong J, Harrison E et al (2016) Short-term outcomes after liver resection for malignant and benign disease in the age of ERAS. HPB (Oxford) 18(2):177–182
17.
go back to reference Page AJ, Gani F, Crowley KT et al (2016) Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection. Br J Surg 103(5):564–571PubMed Page AJ, Gani F, Crowley KT et al (2016) Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection. Br J Surg 103(5):564–571PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ovaere S, Boscart I, Parmentier I et al (2018) The effectiveness of a clinical pathway in liver surgery: a case-control study. J Gastrointest Surg 22(4):684–694PubMed Ovaere S, Boscart I, Parmentier I et al (2018) The effectiveness of a clinical pathway in liver surgery: a case-control study. J Gastrointest Surg 22(4):684–694PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ni TG, Yang HT, Zhang H et al (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 21(30):9209–9216PubMedPubMedCentral Ni TG, Yang HT, Zhang H et al (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 21(30):9209–9216PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Li L, Chen J, Liu Z et al (2017) Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care after hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(38):e8052 Li L, Chen J, Liu Z et al (2017) Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care after hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(38):e8052
21.
go back to reference Rouxel P, Beloeil H (2019) Enhanced recovery after hepatectomy: a systematic review. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 38(1):29–34PubMed Rouxel P, Beloeil H (2019) Enhanced recovery after hepatectomy: a systematic review. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 38(1):29–34PubMed
22.
go back to reference Melloul E, Hübner M, Scott M et al (2016) Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg 40(10):2425–2440PubMed Melloul E, Hübner M, Scott M et al (2016) Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg 40(10):2425–2440PubMed
23.
go back to reference Tangvik RJ, Tell GS, Eisman JA et al (2014) The nutritional strategy: four questions predict morbidity, mortality and health care costs. Clin Nutr 33(4):634–641PubMed Tangvik RJ, Tell GS, Eisman JA et al (2014) The nutritional strategy: four questions predict morbidity, mortality and health care costs. Clin Nutr 33(4):634–641PubMed
24.
go back to reference Sungurtekin H, Sungurtekin U, Balci C et al (2004) The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intraabdominal surgery. J Am Coll Nutr 23(3):227–232PubMed Sungurtekin H, Sungurtekin U, Balci C et al (2004) The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intraabdominal surgery. J Am Coll Nutr 23(3):227–232PubMed
25.
go back to reference Evans DC, Martindale RG, Kiraly LN et al (2014) Nutrition optimization prior to surgery. Nutr Clin Pract 29(1):10–21PubMed Evans DC, Martindale RG, Kiraly LN et al (2014) Nutrition optimization prior to surgery. Nutr Clin Pract 29(1):10–21PubMed
26.
go back to reference Pichard C, Kyle UG, Morabia A et al (2004) Nutritional assessment: lean body mass depletion at hospital admission is associated with an increased length of stay. Am J Clin Nutr 79(4):613–618PubMed Pichard C, Kyle UG, Morabia A et al (2004) Nutritional assessment: lean body mass depletion at hospital admission is associated with an increased length of stay. Am J Clin Nutr 79(4):613–618PubMed
27.
go back to reference Walcott-Sapp S, Billingsley KG (2018) Preoperative optimization for major hepatic resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403(1):23–35PubMed Walcott-Sapp S, Billingsley KG (2018) Preoperative optimization for major hepatic resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403(1):23–35PubMed
28.
go back to reference Rinninella E, Persiani R, D’Ugo D et al (2018) NutriCatt protocol in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for colorectal surgery: the nutritional support improves clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes. Nutrition 50:74–81PubMed Rinninella E, Persiani R, D’Ugo D et al (2018) NutriCatt protocol in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for colorectal surgery: the nutritional support improves clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes. Nutrition 50:74–81PubMed
29.
go back to reference Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M et al. (2003) Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 22(4):415–421 Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M et al. (2003) Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 22(4):415–421
30.
go back to reference Heymsfield SB, Martin-Nguyen A, Fong TM et al (2008) Body circumferences: clinical implications emerging from a new geometric model. Nutr Metab (Lond) 5:24 Heymsfield SB, Martin-Nguyen A, Fong TM et al (2008) Body circumferences: clinical implications emerging from a new geometric model. Nutr Metab (Lond) 5:24
31.
go back to reference Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, ESPEN et al (2004) Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr 23(6):1430–1453PubMed Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, ESPEN et al (2004) Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr 23(6):1430–1453PubMed
32.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien PA (2000) Terminology committee of the IHPBA. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg 2:333–339 Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien PA (2000) Terminology committee of the IHPBA. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg 2:333–339
33.
go back to reference Giuliante F, Nuzzo G, Ardito F et al (2008) Extraparenchymal control of hepatic veins during mesohepatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 206:496–502PubMed Giuliante F, Nuzzo G, Ardito F et al (2008) Extraparenchymal control of hepatic veins during mesohepatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 206:496–502PubMed
34.
go back to reference Giuliante F, Ardito F, Vellone M et al (2009) Role of the surgeon as a variable in long-term survival after liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Surg Oncol 100:538–545PubMed Giuliante F, Ardito F, Vellone M et al (2009) Role of the surgeon as a variable in long-term survival after liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Surg Oncol 100:538–545PubMed
35.
go back to reference Ardito F, Vellone M, Barbaro B et al (2013) Right and extended-right hepatectomies for unilobar colorectal metastases: impact of portal vein embolization on long-term outcome and liver recurrence. Surgery 153(6):801–810PubMed Ardito F, Vellone M, Barbaro B et al (2013) Right and extended-right hepatectomies for unilobar colorectal metastases: impact of portal vein embolization on long-term outcome and liver recurrence. Surgery 153(6):801–810PubMed
36.
go back to reference Giuliante F, Ardito F (2015) Minimally invasive liver surgery in a hepato-biliary unit: learning curve and indications. Updates Surg 67(2):201–206PubMed Giuliante F, Ardito F (2015) Minimally invasive liver surgery in a hepato-biliary unit: learning curve and indications. Updates Surg 67(2):201–206PubMed
37.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Subtil F, Rabilloud M (2014) Estimating the optimal threshold for a diagnostic biomarker in case of complex biomarker distributions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 14:53PubMedPubMedCentral Subtil F, Rabilloud M (2014) Estimating the optimal threshold for a diagnostic biomarker in case of complex biomarker distributions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 14:53PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv 22:31–72 Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv 22:31–72
40.
go back to reference Lunt M (2014) Selecting an appropriate caliper can be essential for achieving good balance with propensity score matching. Am J Epidemiol 179:226–235PubMed Lunt M (2014) Selecting an appropriate caliper can be essential for achieving good balance with propensity score matching. Am J Epidemiol 179:226–235PubMed
41.
go back to reference Rinninella E, Cintoni M, De Lorenzo A et al (2019) May nutritional status worsen during hospital stay? A sub-group analysis from a cross-sectional study. Intern Emerg Med 14(1):51–57PubMed Rinninella E, Cintoni M, De Lorenzo A et al (2019) May nutritional status worsen during hospital stay? A sub-group analysis from a cross-sectional study. Intern Emerg Med 14(1):51–57PubMed
42.
go back to reference Uccella S, Mele MC, Quagliozzi L et al (2018) Assessment of preoperative nutritional status using BIA-derived phase angle (PhA) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: correlation with the extent of cytoreduction and complications. Gynecol Oncol 149(2):263–269PubMed Uccella S, Mele MC, Quagliozzi L et al (2018) Assessment of preoperative nutritional status using BIA-derived phase angle (PhA) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: correlation with the extent of cytoreduction and complications. Gynecol Oncol 149(2):263–269PubMed
43.
go back to reference Beppu T, Nitta H, Hayashi H et al (2015) Effect of branched-chain amino acid supplementation on functional liver regeneration in patients undergoing portal vein embolization and sequential hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 50(12):1197–1205PubMed Beppu T, Nitta H, Hayashi H et al (2015) Effect of branched-chain amino acid supplementation on functional liver regeneration in patients undergoing portal vein embolization and sequential hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 50(12):1197–1205PubMed
44.
go back to reference Desjardin M, Desolneux G, Brouste V et al (2017) Parenchymal sparing surgery for colorectal liver metastases: the need for a common definition. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(12):2285–2291PubMed Desjardin M, Desolneux G, Brouste V et al (2017) Parenchymal sparing surgery for colorectal liver metastases: the need for a common definition. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(12):2285–2291PubMed
45.
go back to reference Matsuki R, Mise Y, Saiura A et al (2016) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for deep-placed colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 160(5):1256–1263PubMed Matsuki R, Mise Y, Saiura A et al (2016) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for deep-placed colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 160(5):1256–1263PubMed
46.
go back to reference Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146(3):348–356PubMed Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146(3):348–356PubMed
47.
go back to reference Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777PubMed Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777PubMed
48.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Kim DG, Lee MD (2011) Effects of branched-chain amino acid infusions on liver regeneration and plasma amino acid patterns in partially hepatectomized rats. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1280–1285PubMed Kim SJ, Kim DG, Lee MD (2011) Effects of branched-chain amino acid infusions on liver regeneration and plasma amino acid patterns in partially hepatectomized rats. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1280–1285PubMed
49.
go back to reference Meng WC, Leung KL, Ho RL et al (1999) Prospective randomized control study on the effect of branched chain amino acids in patients with liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 69:811–815PubMed Meng WC, Leung KL, Ho RL et al (1999) Prospective randomized control study on the effect of branched chain amino acids in patients with liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 69:811–815PubMed
50.
go back to reference Chen L, Chen Y, Wang X et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of oral branched-chain amino acid supplementation in patients undergoing interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Nutr J 14:67PubMedPubMedCentral Chen L, Chen Y, Wang X et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of oral branched-chain amino acid supplementation in patients undergoing interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Nutr J 14:67PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Kikuchi Y, Hiroshima Y, Matsuo K et al (2016) A randomized clinical trial of preoperative administration of branched-chain amino acids to prevent postoperative ascites in patients with liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 23(11):3727–3735PubMed Kikuchi Y, Hiroshima Y, Matsuo K et al (2016) A randomized clinical trial of preoperative administration of branched-chain amino acids to prevent postoperative ascites in patients with liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 23(11):3727–3735PubMed
52.
go back to reference Matsumura M, Mise Y, Saiura A et al (2016) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy does not increase intrahepatic recurrence in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 23(11):3718–3726PubMed Matsumura M, Mise Y, Saiura A et al (2016) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy does not increase intrahepatic recurrence in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 23(11):3718–3726PubMed
53.
go back to reference Memeo R, de Blasi V, Adam R, et al., French Colorectal Liver Metastases Working Group, Association Française de Chirurgie (AFC) (2016) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases are associated with a lower morbidity and similar oncological results: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB (Oxford) 18 (9):781–790 Memeo R, de Blasi V, Adam R, et al., French Colorectal Liver Metastases Working Group, Association Française de Chirurgie (AFC) (2016) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases are associated with a lower morbidity and similar oncological results: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB (Oxford) 18 (9):781–790
Metadata
Title
The impact of personalized nutritional support on postoperative outcome within the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for liver resections: results from the NutriCatt protocol
Authors
Francesco Ardito
Quirino Lai
Emanuele Rinninella
Antonio Mimmo
Maria Vellone
Elena Panettieri
Enrica Adducci
Marco Cintoni
Maria Cristina Mele
Antonio Gasbarrini
Felice Giuliante
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00787-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Updates in Surgery 3/2020 Go to the issue