Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Liver Surgery | Study protocol

Patient-individualized resection planning in liver surgery using 3D print and virtual reality (i-LiVR)—a study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

Authors: Tobias Huber, Laura Isabel Hanke, Christian Boedecker, Lukas Vradelis, Janine Baumgart, Stefan Heinrich, Fabian Bartsch, Jens Mittler, Alicia Schulze, Christian Hansen, Florentine Hüttl, Hauke Lang

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A multitude of different diseases—benign and malign—can require surgery of the liver. The liver is an especially challenging organ for resection planning due to its unique and interindividually variable anatomy. This demands a high amount of mental imagination from the surgeon in order to plan accordingly - a skill, which takes years of training to acquire and which is difficult to teach. Since the volume of the functional remnant liver is of great importance, parenchyma sparing resections are favoured. 3D reconstructions of computed tomography imaging enable a more precise understanding of anatomy and facilitate resection planning. The modality of presentation of these 3D models ranges from 2D monitors to 3D prints and virtual reality applications.

Methods

The presented trial compares three different modes of demonstration of a 3D reconstruction of CT scans of the liver, which are 3D print, a demonstration on a regular computer screen or using a head-mounted virtual reality headset, with the current gold standard of viewing the CT scan on a computer screen. The group size was calculated with n=25 each. Patients with major liver resections in a laparoscopic or open fashion are eligible for inclusion. Main endpoint is the comparison of the quotient between planned resection volume and actual resection volume between these groups. Secondary endpoints include usability for the surgical team as well as patient specifics and perioperative outcome measures and teaching issues.

Discussion

The described study will give insight in systematic planning of liver resections and the comparison of different demonstration modalities of 3D reconstruction of preoperative CT scans and the preference of technology. Especially teaching of these demanding operations is underrepresented in prior investigations.

Trial registration

Prospective trials registration at the German Clinical Trials register with the registration number DRKS00027865. Registration Date: January 24, 2022.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bundesamt S. de Statis, statistisches Jahrbuch 2017. 2017. Bundesamt S. de Statis, statistisches Jahrbuch 2017. 2017.
2.
go back to reference Aloia TA. Extending the limits of resection for colorectal liver metastases: bilateral disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(1):193–5.CrossRef Aloia TA. Extending the limits of resection for colorectal liver metastases: bilateral disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(1):193–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Erdogan D, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. Morbidity and mortality after liver resection for benign and malignant hepatobiliary lesions. Liver Int. 2009;29(2):175–80.CrossRef Erdogan D, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. Morbidity and mortality after liver resection for benign and malignant hepatobiliary lesions. Liver Int. 2009;29(2):175–80.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Emond JC, Renz JF. Surgical anatomy of the liver and its application to hepatobiliary surgery and transplantation. Semin Liver Dis. 1994;14(2):158–68.CrossRef Emond JC, Renz JF. Surgical anatomy of the liver and its application to hepatobiliary surgery and transplantation. Semin Liver Dis. 1994;14(2):158–68.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Majno P, Mentha G, Toso C, Morel P, Peitgen HO, Fasel JH. Anatomy of the liver: an outline with three levels of complexity--a further step towards tailored territorial liver resections. J Hepatol. 2014;60(3):654–62.CrossRef Majno P, Mentha G, Toso C, Morel P, Peitgen HO, Fasel JH. Anatomy of the liver: an outline with three levels of complexity--a further step towards tailored territorial liver resections. J Hepatol. 2014;60(3):654–62.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, Schroeder T, Frühauf NR, Malagó M, et al. Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg. 2005;140(7):629–38 discussion 38.CrossRef Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, Schroeder T, Frühauf NR, Malagó M, et al. Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg. 2005;140(7):629–38 discussion 38.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Paschold M, Huettl F, Kneist W, Boedecker C, Poplawski A, Huber T, et al. Local, semi-automatic, three-dimensional liver reconstruction or external provider? An analysis of performance and time expense. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405(2):173–9.CrossRef Paschold M, Huettl F, Kneist W, Boedecker C, Poplawski A, Huber T, et al. Local, semi-automatic, three-dimensional liver reconstruction or external provider? An analysis of performance and time expense. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405(2):173–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mönch J, Mühler K, Hansen C, Oldhafer KJ, Stavrou G, Hillert C, et al. The LiverSurgeryTrainer: training of computer-based planning in liver resection surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8(5):809–18.CrossRef Mönch J, Mühler K, Hansen C, Oldhafer KJ, Stavrou G, Hillert C, et al. The LiverSurgeryTrainer: training of computer-based planning in liver resection surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8(5):809–18.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hansen C, Zidowitz S, Preim B, Stavrou G, Oldhafer KJ, Hahn HK. Impact of model-based risk analysis for liver surgery planning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(3):473–80.CrossRef Hansen C, Zidowitz S, Preim B, Stavrou G, Oldhafer KJ, Hahn HK. Impact of model-based risk analysis for liver surgery planning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(3):473–80.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Selle D, Preim B, Schenk A, Peitgen HO. Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21(11):1344–57.CrossRef Selle D, Preim B, Schenk A, Peitgen HO. Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21(11):1344–57.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Huber T, Huettl F, Tripke V, Baumgart J, Lang H. Experiences with three-dimensional printing in complex liver surgery. Ann Surg. 2021;273(1):e26–e7.CrossRef Huber T, Huettl F, Tripke V, Baumgart J, Lang H. Experiences with three-dimensional printing in complex liver surgery. Ann Surg. 2021;273(1):e26–e7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bangeas P, Tsioukas V, Papadopoulos VN, Tsoulfas G. Role of innovative 3D printing models in the management of hepatobiliary malignancies. World J Hepatol. 2019;11(7):574–85.CrossRef Bangeas P, Tsioukas V, Papadopoulos VN, Tsoulfas G. Role of innovative 3D printing models in the management of hepatobiliary malignancies. World J Hepatol. 2019;11(7):574–85.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chheang V, Saalfeld P, Joeres F, Boedecker C, Huber T, Huettl F, et al. A collaborative virtual reality environment for liver surgery planning. Comput Graph. 2021;99:234–46.CrossRef Chheang V, Saalfeld P, Joeres F, Boedecker C, Huber T, Huettl F, et al. A collaborative virtual reality environment for liver surgery planning. Comput Graph. 2021;99:234–46.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Boedecker C, Huettl F, Saalfeld P, Paschold M, Kneist W, Baumgart J, et al. Using virtual 3D-models in surgical planning: workflow of an immersive virtual reality application in liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(3):911–5.CrossRef Boedecker C, Huettl F, Saalfeld P, Paschold M, Kneist W, Baumgart J, et al. Using virtual 3D-models in surgical planning: workflow of an immersive virtual reality application in liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(3):911–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lang H, Huber T. Virtual and augmented reality in liver surgery. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):e8.CrossRef Lang H, Huber T. Virtual and augmented reality in liver surgery. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):e8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Huettl F, Saalfeld P, Hansen C, Preim B, Poplawski A, Kneist W, et al. Virtual reality and 3D printing improve preoperative visualization of 3D liver reconstructions-results from a preclinical comparison of presentation modalities and user's preference. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(13):1074.CrossRef Huettl F, Saalfeld P, Hansen C, Preim B, Poplawski A, Kneist W, et al. Virtual reality and 3D printing improve preoperative visualization of 3D liver reconstructions-results from a preclinical comparison of presentation modalities and user's preference. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(13):1074.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.CrossRef Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum–Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94.CrossRef Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum–Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lowndes BR, Forsyth KL, Blocker RC, Dean PG, Truty MJ, Heller SF, et al. NASA-TLX assessment of surgeon workload variation across specialties. Ann Surg. 2020;271(4):686–92.CrossRef Lowndes BR, Forsyth KL, Blocker RC, Dean PG, Truty MJ, Heller SF, et al. NASA-TLX assessment of surgeon workload variation across specialties. Ann Surg. 2020;271(4):686–92.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRef Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient-individualized resection planning in liver surgery using 3D print and virtual reality (i-LiVR)—a study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial
Authors
Tobias Huber
Laura Isabel Hanke
Christian Boedecker
Lukas Vradelis
Janine Baumgart
Stefan Heinrich
Fabian Bartsch
Jens Mittler
Alicia Schulze
Christian Hansen
Florentine Hüttl
Hauke Lang
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06347-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue