Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 2/2020

01-06-2020 | Liposarcoma | Original Article

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of a Series of Patients Treated at a Single Institution

Authors: Shraddha Patkar, Abhay K Kattepur, Rajesh Shinde, Mahesh Goel

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare heterogeneous tumors arising in the retroperitoneum with unique biological and behavioral patterns that are thought to be closely linked to histology. The aim of the study was to audit our results and analyze various clinico-pathological factors including surgical excision, histology, and their implications on the recurrences and survival outcomes in RPS. Retrospective analysis of patients treated at a tertiary referral center in India from March 2008 to July 2017 was performed. The clinico-pathological variables were analyzed for their association with tumor recurrence and survival with special emphasis on histological subtype. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). One hundred consecutive patients operated for RPS were analyzed. Of these, 27 were operated for recurrent tumors. Liposarcomas (LPS) and leiomyosarcomas (LMS) constituted 50% (n = 50) and 30% (n = 30) of patients respectively. Complete tumor excision was achieved in 83%, with 43% patients undergoing adjacent organ resection. At a median follow-up of 25.3 months, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30 months and 87.8 months respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor grade was the only factor to significantly affect survival (p = 0.001 for DFS and 0.005 for OS). There was no difference in survival outcomes between infiltrative and adhesive tumors with respect to adjacent organ invasion (p = 0.361 for OS). Tumor grade remains an important prognostic factor affecting disease-free and overall survival in retroperitoneal sarcomas irrespective of tumor size, site, and histology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Panda N, Das R, Banerjee S, Chatterjee S, Gumta M, Bandyopadhyay SK (2015) Retroperitoneal sarcoma: outcome analysis in a teaching hospital in Eastern India- a perspective. Indian J Surg Oncol 6(2):99–105CrossRef Panda N, Das R, Banerjee S, Chatterjee S, Gumta M, Bandyopadhyay SK (2015) Retroperitoneal sarcoma: outcome analysis in a teaching hospital in Eastern India- a perspective. Indian J Surg Oncol 6(2):99–105CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tan MCB, Brennan MF, Kuk D, Agaram NP, Antonescu CR, Qin LX, Moraco N, Crago AM, Singer S (2016) Histology-based classification predicts pattern of recurrence and improves risk stratification in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Ann Surg 263(3):593–600CrossRef Tan MCB, Brennan MF, Kuk D, Agaram NP, Antonescu CR, Qin LX, Moraco N, Crago AM, Singer S (2016) Histology-based classification predicts pattern of recurrence and improves risk stratification in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Ann Surg 263(3):593–600CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Francis IR, Cohan RH, Varma DGK, Sondak VK (2005) Retroperitoneal sarcomas. Cancer Imaging 5:89–94CrossRef Francis IR, Cohan RH, Varma DGK, Sondak VK (2005) Retroperitoneal sarcomas. Cancer Imaging 5:89–94CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matthyssens LE, Creytens D, Ceelen WP (2015) Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: current insights in diagnosis and treatment. Front Surg 2:4CrossRef Matthyssens LE, Creytens D, Ceelen WP (2015) Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: current insights in diagnosis and treatment. Front Surg 2:4CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coindre JM (2006) Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1448–1453PubMed Coindre JM (2006) Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1448–1453PubMed
7.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
8.
go back to reference MacNeill AJ, Gronchi A, Miceli R, Bonvalot S, Swallow CJ, Hohenberger P, van Coevorden F, Rutkowski P, Callegaro D, Hayes AJ, Honoré C, Fairweather M, Cannell A, Jakob J, Haas RL, Szacht M, Fiore M, Casali PG, Pollock RE, Barretta F, Raut CP, Strauss DC (2018) Postoperative morbidity after radical resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a report from the Transatlantic RPS Working Group. Ann Surg 267(5):959–964CrossRef MacNeill AJ, Gronchi A, Miceli R, Bonvalot S, Swallow CJ, Hohenberger P, van Coevorden F, Rutkowski P, Callegaro D, Hayes AJ, Honoré C, Fairweather M, Cannell A, Jakob J, Haas RL, Szacht M, Fiore M, Casali PG, Pollock RE, Barretta F, Raut CP, Strauss DC (2018) Postoperative morbidity after radical resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a report from the Transatlantic RPS Working Group. Ann Surg 267(5):959–964CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hogg HDJ, Manas DM, Lee D, Dildey P, Scott J, Lunec J, French JJ (2016) Surgical outcome and patterns of recurrence for retroperitoneal sarcoma at a single centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:192–197CrossRef Hogg HDJ, Manas DM, Lee D, Dildey P, Scott J, Lunec J, French JJ (2016) Surgical outcome and patterns of recurrence for retroperitoneal sarcoma at a single centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:192–197CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wan Jie NG, Tan GHC, Chia CS et al (2017) Tumor biology remains the main determinant of prognosis in retroperitoneal sarcomas: a 14-year single-center experience. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 13:e458–e465CrossRef Wan Jie NG, Tan GHC, Chia CS et al (2017) Tumor biology remains the main determinant of prognosis in retroperitoneal sarcomas: a 14-year single-center experience. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 13:e458–e465CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fairweather M, Wang J, Jo VY, Baldini EH, Bertagnolli MM, Raut CP (2017) Incidence and adverse prognostic implications of histopathologic organ invasion in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. J Am Coll Surg 224:876–883CrossRef Fairweather M, Wang J, Jo VY, Baldini EH, Bertagnolli MM, Raut CP (2017) Incidence and adverse prognostic implications of histopathologic organ invasion in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. J Am Coll Surg 224:876–883CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gronchi A, Miceli R, Shurell E, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Anaya DA, Kattan MW, Honoré C, Lev DC, Colombo C, Bonvalot S, Mariani L, Pollock RE (2013) Outcome prediction in primary resected retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific overall survival and disease-free survival nomograms built on major sarcoma center data sets. J Clin Oncol 31:1649–1655CrossRef Gronchi A, Miceli R, Shurell E, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Anaya DA, Kattan MW, Honoré C, Lev DC, Colombo C, Bonvalot S, Mariani L, Pollock RE (2013) Outcome prediction in primary resected retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific overall survival and disease-free survival nomograms built on major sarcoma center data sets. J Clin Oncol 31:1649–1655CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sandrucci S, Ponzetti A, Gianotti C et al (2018) Different quality of treatment in retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) according to hospital-case volume and surgeon-case volume: a retrospective regional analysis in Italy. Clin Sarcoma Res 8:3CrossRef Sandrucci S, Ponzetti A, Gianotti C et al (2018) Different quality of treatment in retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) according to hospital-case volume and surgeon-case volume: a retrospective regional analysis in Italy. Clin Sarcoma Res 8:3CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abdelfatah E, Guzzetta AA, Nagarajan N, Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM, Choti MA, Schulick R, Montgomery EA, Meyer C, Thornton K, Herman J, Terezakis S, Frassica D, Ahuja N (2016) Long-term outcomes in treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas: a 15 year single-institution evaluation of prognostic features. J Surg Oncol 114(1):56–64CrossRef Abdelfatah E, Guzzetta AA, Nagarajan N, Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM, Choti MA, Schulick R, Montgomery EA, Meyer C, Thornton K, Herman J, Terezakis S, Frassica D, Ahuja N (2016) Long-term outcomes in treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas: a 15 year single-institution evaluation of prognostic features. J Surg Oncol 114(1):56–64CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang Z, Wu J, Lv A, Li CP, Tian XY, Hao CY (2018) Anterior approach to en bloc resection in left-sided retroperitoneal sarcoma with adjacent organ involvement: a study of 25 patients in a single center. Med Sci Monit 24:961–969CrossRef Wang Z, Wu J, Lv A, Li CP, Tian XY, Hao CY (2018) Anterior approach to en bloc resection in left-sided retroperitoneal sarcoma with adjacent organ involvement: a study of 25 patients in a single center. Med Sci Monit 24:961–969CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stahl JM, Corso CD, Park HS, An Y, Rutter CE, Han D, Roberts KB (2017) The effect of microscopic margin status on survival in adult retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:168–174CrossRef Stahl JM, Corso CD, Park HS, An Y, Rutter CE, Han D, Roberts KB (2017) The effect of microscopic margin status on survival in adult retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:168–174CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Klooster B, Rajeev R, Chrabaszcz S et al (2016) Is long-term survival possible after margin-positive resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS)? J Surg Oncol 113:823–827CrossRef Klooster B, Rajeev R, Chrabaszcz S et al (2016) Is long-term survival possible after margin-positive resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS)? J Surg Oncol 113:823–827CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Guiliano K, Nagarajan N, Canner JK et al (2016) Predictors of improved survival for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Surgery 160:1628–1635CrossRef Guiliano K, Nagarajan N, Canner JK et al (2016) Predictors of improved survival for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Surgery 160:1628–1635CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Berger NG, Silva JP, Mogal H et al (2018) Overall survival after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma at academic cancer centers versus community cancer centers: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Surgery 163:318–323CrossRef Berger NG, Silva JP, Mogal H et al (2018) Overall survival after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma at academic cancer centers versus community cancer centers: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Surgery 163:318–323CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rosa F, Fiorillo C, Tortorelli AP et al (2016) Surgical management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: role of curative resection. Am Surg 82(2):128–133PubMed Rosa F, Fiorillo C, Tortorelli AP et al (2016) Surgical management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: role of curative resection. Am Surg 82(2):128–133PubMed
23.
go back to reference Maurice MJ, Yih JM, Ammori JB, Abouassaly R (2017) Predictors of surgical quality for retroperitoneal sarcoma: volume matters. J Surg Oncol 116:766–774CrossRef Maurice MJ, Yih JM, Ammori JB, Abouassaly R (2017) Predictors of surgical quality for retroperitoneal sarcoma: volume matters. J Surg Oncol 116:766–774CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of a Series of Patients Treated at a Single Institution
Authors
Shraddha Patkar
Abhay K Kattepur
Rajesh Shinde
Mahesh Goel
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Electronic ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01036-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 2/2020 Go to the issue