Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Drugs
Published in: Drugs 14/2012

01-10-2012 | Adis Drug Evaluation

Bendamustine

A Review of its Use in the Management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia, Rituximab-Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma

Author: Sheridan M. Hoy

Published in: Drugs | Issue 14/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Bendamustine (Levact®) is an alkylating agent consisting of three structural elements: a 2-chloroethylamine alkylating group; a butyric acid side chain; and a benzimidazole ring. Although its precise mechanism of action is as yet unknown, it appears to exert its antineoplastic effects via a different mechanism to those of other alkylating agents. This article reviews the utilization of intravenous bendamustine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM), focusing on indications for which the agent is approved in the EU.
As monotherapy, bendamustine was effective in the first-line treatment of adults with CLL, significantly prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and improving the overall response (OR) rate after a median duration of follow-up of 35 months compared with chlorambucil in a randomized, open-label, multinational, phase III study. PFS and the OR rate were at least 2-fold greater with bendamustine than with chlorambucil when data from the overall patient population were stratified by Binet stage.
In the treatment of adults with rituximab-refractory indolent NHL, monotherapy with bendamustine was efficacious, with an OR achieved by at least three-quarters of patients in two noncomparative multicentre studies. Patients with follicular histology or those who had responded or were refractory to their previous chemotherapy regimen (including alkylator therapy) also appeared to respond to bendamustine monotherapy.
Front-line combination therapy with bendamustine plus prednisone was significantly more effective than combination therapy with melphalan plus prednisone in prolonging the time to treatment failure, according to a randomized, open-label multicentre, phase III study in adults with MM. Moreover, the benefits of bendamustine plus prednisone appeared to be maintained beyond 30 months, with a retrospective calculation of PFS demonstrating a borderline statistical significance in favour of bendamustine plus prednisone over melphalan plus prednisone.
The tolerability profile of bendamustine in adults with CLL, indolent NHL or MM was mostly consistent with the known toxicities of the agent, with adverse events often managed with dose modifications.
Although further data are required to fully establish the comparative efficacy of intravenous bendamustine in the management of CLL, rituximab-refractory indolent NHL or MM, it appears to be a useful addition to the armamentarium of currently available therapies for these haematological malignancies.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
Scott LJ, Lyseng-Williamson KA. Lenalidomide: a review of its use in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Drugs 2011; 71 (5): 625–49PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
7.
Barman Balfour JA, Goa KL. Bendamustine. Drugs 2001; 61 (5): 631–8; discussion 639-40CrossRef
8.
Plosker GL, Carter NJ. Bendamustine: a review of its use in the management of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Drugs 2008; 68 (18): 2645–60PubMedCrossRef
9.
Garnock-Jones KP. Bendamustine: a review of its use in the management of indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Drugs 2010; 70 (13): 1703–18PubMedCrossRef
10.
Leoni LM, Bailey B, Reifert J, et al. Bendamustine (Treanda) displays a distinct pattern of cytotoxicity and unique mechanistic features compared with other alkylating agents. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14 (1): 309–17PubMedCrossRef
11.
Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited. Levact® i.v. (bendamustine HCl): product monograph [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​napponcology.​co.​uk/​_​pdfs/​Levact%20product%20monograph%20March%202011.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jul 27]
12.
Leoni LM, Hartley JA. Mechanism of action: the unique pattern of bendamustine-induced cytotoxicity. Semin Hematol 2011; 48 (2 Suppl. 1): S12–23PubMedCrossRef
13.
Leoni LM. Bendamustine: rescue of an effective antineoplastic agent from the mid-twentieth century. Semin Hematol 2011; 48 (2 Suppl. 1): S4–11PubMedCrossRef
14.
Beeharry N, Rattner JB, Bellacosa A, et al. Dose dependent effects on cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair by bendamustine. PLoS One 2012 Jun; 7 (6): e40342PubMedCrossRef
15.
Roué G, López-Guerra M, Milpied P, et al. Bendamustine is effective in p53-deficient B-cell neoplasms and requires oxidative stress and caspase-independent signaling. Clin Cancer Res 2008 Nov; 14 (21): 6907–15PubMedCrossRef
16.
Teichert J, Baumann F, Chao Q, et al. Characterization of two phase I metabolites of bendamustine in human liver microsomes and in cancer patients treated with bendamustine hydrochloride. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2007; 59: 759–70PubMedCrossRef
17.
Owen JS, Melhem M, Passarell JA, et al. Bendamustine pharmacokinetic profile and exposure-response relationships in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010; 66 (6): 1039–49PubMedCrossRef
18.
Kahl BS, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP, et al. Bendamustine is effective therapy in patients with rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from a multicenter study. Cancer 2010; 116 (1): 106–14PubMed
19.
Knauf WU, Lissichkov T, Aldaoud A, et al. Phase III randomized study of bendamustine compared with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (26): 4378–84PubMedCrossRef
20.
Knauf WU, Lissitchkov T, Aldaoud A, et al. Bendamustine compared with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: updated results of a randomized phase III trial. Br J Haematol. Epub 2012 Aug 4
21.
Knauf WU, Lissitchkov T, Aldaoud A, et al. Bendamustine in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: consistent superiority over chlorambucil in elderly patients and across clinically defined risk groups [abstract no. 2367 plus poster]. 51st Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology; 2009 Dec 5–8; New Orleans (LA)
22.
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M, et al. National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 1996 Jun; 87 (12): 4990–7PubMed
23.
Woods B, Hawkins N, Dunlop W, et al. Bendamustine versus chlorambucil for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in England and Wales: a cost-utility analysis. Value Health 2012; 15 (5): 759–70PubMedCrossRef
24.
Holtzer-Goor K, Vandekerckhove S, van den Steen D, et al. Modelling the 10-year cost effectiveness of bendamustine as first line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the Netherlands [abstract no. 1089 plus poster]. Haematologica 2012 Jun; 97 Suppl. 1: 443
25.
Friedberg JW, Cohen P, Chen L, et al. Bendamustine in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent and transformed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results from a phase II multicenter, single-agent study [published erratum appears in J Clin Oncol 2008 Apr; 26 (11): 1911]. J Clin Oncol 2008 Jan; 26 (2): 204–10PubMedCrossRef
26.
Cheson BD, Friedberg JW, Kahl BS, et al. Bendamustine produces durable responses with an acceptable safety profile in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leukemia 2010; 10 (6): 452–7CrossRef
27.
Cheson BD, Friedberg JW, Kahl, BS, et al. Bendamustine produces durable responses with an acceptable long-term safety profile in patients with rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a pooled analysis [poster no. II-657]. 51st American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; 2009 Dec 5–8; New Orleans (LA)
28.
Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol 1999 Apr; 17 (4): 1244–53
29.
Pönisch W, Mitrou PS, Merkle K, et al. Treatment of bendamustine and prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma results in superior complete response rate, prolonged time to treatment failure and improved quality of life compared to treatment with melphalan and prednisone: a randomized phase III study of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006; 132 (4): 205–12PubMedCrossRef
30.
Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma: correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 1975 Sep; 36 (3): 842–54PubMedCrossRef
31.
Alexanian R, Bonnet J, Gehan E, et al. Combination chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. Cancer 1972 Aug; 30 (2): 382–9PubMedCrossRef
32.
Peest D, Coldewey R, Deicher H, et al. Prognostic value of clinical, laboratory, and histological characteristics in multiple myeloma: improved definition of risk groups. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A (7): 978–83PubMedCrossRef
33.
Peest D, Deicher H, Coldewey R, et al. A comparison of polychemotherapy and melphalan/prednisone for primary remission induction, and interferon-alpha for maintenance treatment, in multiple myeloma: a prospective trial of the German Myeloma Treatment Group. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A (2): 146–51PubMedCrossRef
34.
Cheson BD, Kroll ML. Bendamustine induced neurotoxicity. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2009 Nov; 7 (11): 743–6PubMed
35.
36.
Eichhorst B, Dreyling M, Robak T, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2011 Sep; 22 Suppl. 6: vi50-4
37.
Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood 2008 Jun; 111 (12): 5446–56PubMedCrossRef
38.
Faderl S, Ferrajoli A, Frankfurt O, et al. Treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia with nonchemotherapeutic agents: experience with single-agent and combination therapy. Leukemia 2009 Mar; 23 (3): 457–66PubMedCrossRef
39.
Cheson BD, Ashforth E. Newer strategies for overcoming rituximab resistance in non-Hodgkins lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2009; 7 (2 Suppl. 5): 8–16
40.
Dreyling M, Ghielmini M, Marcus R, et al. Newly diagnosed and relapsed follicular lymphoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2011 Sep; 22 Suppl. 6: vi59–63PubMedCrossRef
41.
42.
43.
Harousseau J-L, Dreyling M. Multiple myeloma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010 May; 21 Suppl. 5: v155–7PubMedCrossRef
44.
45.
Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) versus CHOP plus rituximab (CHOP-R) as first-line treatment in patients with indolent and mantle cell lymphomas (MCL): updated results from the StiL NHL1 study [abstract no. 3]. J Clin Oncol 2012 Jun; 30 Suppl.
46.
Cheson_BD, Wendtner C-M, Pieper A, et al. Optimal use of bendamustine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and multiple myeloma: treatment recommendations from an international consensus panel. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2010 Feb; 10 (1): 21–7PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bendamustine
A Review of its Use in the Management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia, Rituximab-Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma
Author
Sheridan M. Hoy
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs / Issue 14/2012
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11209510-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 14/2012

Drugs 14/2012 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum to: Docetaxel

Review Article

Sedation for Critically Ill or Injured Adults in the Intensive Care Unit

Review Article

Opioid-Induced Bowel Dysfunction

Adis Drug Profile

Nomegestrol Acetate/Estradiol

Current Opinion

Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Review Article

Current and Emerging Systemic Treatment Strategies for Psoriasis