Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 2/2006

01-02-2006 | Original Research Article

Efficacy and Safety of 24 Weeks of Therapy with Bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and Potassium Chloride Compared with Enalapril 10 mg/day and Amlodipine 5 mg/day in Patients with Mild to Moderate Primary Hypertension

A Multicentre, Randomised, Open Study

Authors: Dr S. Rasmussen, N. Borrild, J. Vang Andersen

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of therapy with low-dose bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride was compared with that of enalapril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension.
Study design: This was a multicentre study in general practice with patients randomised in a double-blind fashion and on open-label treatment. After a washout phase that lasted 4–6 weeks, 312 patients with a diastolic blood pressure of between 100 and 115mm Hg were randomised in a double-blind fashion to treatment with either bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day and potassium chloride (n = 117), bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride (n = 60), amlodipine 5 mg/day (n = 61) or enalapril 10 mg/day (n = 60), all given once daily (numbers in parentheses indicate the intention-to-treat population, with a total of 298 patients). The primary efficacy parameter was the reduction in diastolic blood pressure. Effects on systolic blood pressure, heart rate, biochemical variables, adverse events and quality of life were studied as secondary efficacy parameters.
Results: All treatments reduced diastolic blood pressure significantly; reductions were as follows: 6.8mm Hg with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day, 9.1mm Hg with bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day, 10.8mm Hg with amlodipine 5 mg/day and 6.8mm Hg with enalapril 10 mg/day. The reduction in diastolic blood pressure on amlodipine was significantly greater than on bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day and enalapril 10 mg/day (p = 0.013). The percentage of patients achieving a diastolic blood pressure of <95mm Hg was 34% (SD 4.4) with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day, 48% (SD 6.5) with bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day (p = 0.075 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day), 57% (SD 6.3) with amlodipine 5 mg/day (p = 0.004 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day) and 41% (SD 6.4) with enalapril 10 mg/day (p = 0.41 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day) [mean reductions]. The effect on systolic blood pressure was similar with all treatments. No clinically significant changes occurred in heart rate, serum potassium, blood glucose, serum urate or serum cholesterol levels. The incidences of adverse events were similar in the low-dose bendroflumethiazide groups, with significantly higher incidences in the enalapril and amlodipine groups. Quality of life was similar in the different treatment groups, but the study had limited power to detect any difference in this parameter.
Conclusion: The present study has confirmed, in a general practice population, that low-dose bendroflumethiazide (bendroflumethiazide 1.25–2.5 mg/day) in combination with potassium chloride is a well tolerated and efficacious first-line treatment for patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–72PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–72PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, et al. Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity: the Swedish trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study. Lancet 1999; 354: 1751–6PubMedCrossRef Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, et al. Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity: the Swedish trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study. Lancet 1999; 354: 1751–6PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP). Lancet 1999; 353: 611–6PubMedCrossRef Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP). Lancet 1999; 353: 611–6PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifidipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet 2000; 356: 366–72PubMedCrossRef Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifidipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet 2000; 356: 366–72PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hansson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P, et al. Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and β-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) Study. Lancet 2000; 356: 359–65PubMedCrossRef Hansson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P, et al. Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and β-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) Study. Lancet 2000; 356: 359–65PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wing LMH, Reid CM, Ryan P, et al. A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 583–92PubMedCrossRef Wing LMH, Reid CM, Ryan P, et al. A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 583–92PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference The ALLHAT officers and coordinators for the ALLHAT collaborative research group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs. diuretic. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288(23): 2981–97CrossRef The ALLHAT officers and coordinators for the ALLHAT collaborative research group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs. diuretic. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288(23): 2981–97CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Appel LJ. The verdict from ALLHAT: thiazide diuretics are the preferred initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA 2002; 288(23): 3039–42PubMedCrossRef Appel LJ. The verdict from ALLHAT: thiazide diuretics are the preferred initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA 2002; 288(23): 3039–42PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Carlsen JE, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Relation between dose of bendrofluazide, antihypertensive effect, and adverse biochemical effects. BMJ 1990; 300: 975–8PubMedCrossRef Carlsen JE, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Relation between dose of bendrofluazide, antihypertensive effect, and adverse biochemical effects. BMJ 1990; 300: 975–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Omvik P, Thaulow E, Herland OB, et al. Double blind, parallel, comparative study on quality of life during treatment with amlodipine or enalapril in mild or moderate hypertensive patients: a multicentre study. J Hypertens 1993; 11: 103–13PubMedCrossRef Omvik P, Thaulow E, Herland OB, et al. Double blind, parallel, comparative study on quality of life during treatment with amlodipine or enalapril in mild or moderate hypertensive patients: a multicentre study. J Hypertens 1993; 11: 103–13PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Girvin B, Johnston GD. A randomized comparison of a conventional dose, a low dose and alternate-day dosing of bendrofluazide in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 1049–54PubMedCrossRef Girvin B, Johnston GD. A randomized comparison of a conventional dose, a low dose and alternate-day dosing of bendrofluazide in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 1049–54PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Strandberg TE, Pitkala K. What is the most important component of blood pressure: systolic, diastolic or pulse pressure. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2003; 12: 293–7PubMedCrossRef Strandberg TE, Pitkala K. What is the most important component of blood pressure: systolic, diastolic or pulse pressure. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2003; 12: 293–7PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–72PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–72PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Amery A, Birkenhäger W, Bulpitt C, et al. Diuretics: a risk in the long-term treatment of hypertensive patients? J Hypertens 1988; 6: 925–30CrossRef Amery A, Birkenhäger W, Bulpitt C, et al. Diuretics: a risk in the long-term treatment of hypertensive patients? J Hypertens 1988; 6: 925–30CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Freis ED. The efficacy and safety of diuretics in treating hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 223–6PubMed Freis ED. The efficacy and safety of diuretics in treating hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 223–6PubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and Safety of 24 Weeks of Therapy with Bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and Potassium Chloride Compared with Enalapril 10 mg/day and Amlodipine 5 mg/day in Patients with Mild to Moderate Primary Hypertension
A Multicentre, Randomised, Open Study
Authors
Dr S. Rasmussen
N. Borrild
J. Vang Andersen
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200626020-00004

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Clinical Drug Investigation 2/2006 Go to the issue