Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 17/2003

01-12-2003 | Review Article

Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer

Authors: Dr Alberto Redaelli, Carole W. Cranor, Gary J. Okano, Pat Ray Reese

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 17/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most prevalent cancer worldwide, imposes a significant economic and humanistic burden on patients and society. One study conservatively estimated the annual expenditures for colorectal cancer to be approximately $US5.3 billion in 2000, including both direct and indirect costs. However, other investigators estimated inpatient costs alone incurred in the US in 1994 to be around $US5.14 billion. Therefore, the economic burden of colorectal cancer in the US could be projected to be somewhere in the range of $US5.5–6.5 billion by considering that inpatient costs approximate 80% of total direct costs. No worldwide data have been published, but assuming that the US represents 25–40% of total expenditures in oncology, as seen for breast and lung cancers, a rough estimate for colorectal cancer would be in the range of $US14–22 billion.
Screening helps increase patient survival by diagnosing colorectal cancer early. The ideal method among the four tests most used (faecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema) has not been identified. Economic studies of colorectal cancer screening are complex because of the many variables involved, as well as the fact that the outcomes must be followed for many years, and the lack of consensus on screening guidelines.
Intuitively, modelling colorectal cancer is one way to overcome these hurdles; published modelling studies predict colorectal cancer screening programs to be within the threshold of $US40 000 per life-year saved. The faecal occult blood test appears to be the only clearly effective test, both from a clinical and an economic viewpoint. Important limitations are the invasiveness and inconvenience of the screening procedures, except faecal occult blood test. Patients’ comfort and satisfaction are essential in improving compliance with screening recommendations, which appears to be low even in the US (35% of the general population aged over 40 years and 60% of the high-risk population), the country with the highest awareness and compliance in the world.
Since colorectal cancer is generally a disease of the elderly, its economic burden is expected to grow in the near future, mainly due to population aging. Potential avenues to pursue in order to contain or reduce the economic burden of colorectal cancer would be the design and implementation of efficient screening programmes, the improvement of patient awareness and compliance with screening guidelines, the development of appropriate prevention programs (i.e. primary and secondary), and earlier diagnosis.
Footnotes
1
Use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Colorectal cancer screening: technical review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1998. AHCPR Publication No. 98-0033, 1–154 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Colorectal cancer screening: technical review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1998. AHCPR Publication No. 98-0033, 1–154
4.
go back to reference Singh PN, Fraser GE. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 761–74PubMedCrossRef Singh PN, Fraser GE. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 761–74PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Schilsky RL. Cancers of the gastrointestinal tract: cancer of the colon. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 1144–97 Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Schilsky RL. Cancers of the gastrointestinal tract: cancer of the colon. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 1144–97
7.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 594–642PubMedCrossRef Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 594–642PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger DA, et al. Am Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 15460CrossRef Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger DA, et al. Am Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 15460CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ransohoff DF, Lang CA. Clinical guidelines: Part II. Screening for colorectal cancer with the fecal occult blood test: a back-ground paper. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 811–22PubMed Ransohoff DF, Lang CA. Clinical guidelines: Part II. Screening for colorectal cancer with the fecal occult blood test: a back-ground paper. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 811–22PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hoff G, Sauar J, Hofstad B, et al. The Norwegian guidelines for surveillance after polypectomy: 10-year intervals. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 834–6PubMedCrossRef Hoff G, Sauar J, Hofstad B, et al. The Norwegian guidelines for surveillance after polypectomy: 10-year intervals. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 834–6PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Madden MV. South African Gastroenterology Society guidelines for colonoscopy in premalignant conditions and after resection of large-bowel cancer. S Afr Med J 1992; 81: 369–70PubMed Madden MV. South African Gastroenterology Society guidelines for colonoscopy in premalignant conditions and after resection of large-bowel cancer. S Afr Med J 1992; 81: 369–70PubMed
12.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, St John DJ, Bond III, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer: guidelines based on new data. WHO Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ 1995; 73: 7–10PubMed Winawer SJ, St John DJ, Bond III, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer: guidelines based on new data. WHO Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ 1995; 73: 7–10PubMed
13.
go back to reference Palitz AM, Selby JV, Grossman S, et al. The colon cancer prevention program (CoCaP): rationale, implementation, and preliminary results. HMO Pract 1997; 11: 5–12PubMed Palitz AM, Selby JV, Grossman S, et al. The colon cancer prevention program (CoCaP): rationale, implementation, and preliminary results. HMO Pract 1997; 11: 5–12PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kaye JA, Shulman LN. Screening program for colorectal cancer: effect on stage distribution. HMO Pract 1992; 6: 13–5PubMed Kaye JA, Shulman LN. Screening program for colorectal cancer: effect on stage distribution. HMO Pract 1992; 6: 13–5PubMed
15.
go back to reference Atkin WS. Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a mass screening tool. Fur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 10: 219–23CrossRef Atkin WS. Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a mass screening tool. Fur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 10: 219–23CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leard LE, Savides TJ, Ganiats TG. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract 1997; 45: 211–8PubMed Leard LE, Savides TJ, Ganiats TG. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract 1997; 45: 211–8PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cromwell DM, Moore RD, Bresinger JD, et al. Cost analysis of alternative approaches to colorectal screening in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology 1998; 114: 893–901PubMedCrossRef Cromwell DM, Moore RD, Bresinger JD, et al. Cost analysis of alternative approaches to colorectal screening in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology 1998; 114: 893–901PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vernon SW. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a brief overview. Ann NY Acad Sci 1995; 768: 292–5PubMedCrossRef Vernon SW. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a brief overview. Ann NY Acad Sci 1995; 768: 292–5PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference DiPalma AM, Barnes SE, DiPalma JA. Patient participation in colon cancer screening programs. South Med J 1998; 91: 342–4PubMedCrossRef DiPalma AM, Barnes SE, DiPalma JA. Patient participation in colon cancer screening programs. South Med J 1998; 91: 342–4PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gob HS, Wong J. The Singapore polyposis registry. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1992; 21: 290–3 Gob HS, Wong J. The Singapore polyposis registry. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1992; 21: 290–3
21.
go back to reference The American Cancer Society 1996 Advisory Committee. Guidelines on diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. Cancer J Clin 1996; 46: 325–41CrossRef The American Cancer Society 1996 Advisory Committee. Guidelines on diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. Cancer J Clin 1996; 46: 325–41CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Greenwald P, McDonald SS. Cancer prevention: the roles of diet and chemoprevention. Cancer Control 1997; 4: 118–27PubMed Greenwald P, McDonald SS. Cancer prevention: the roles of diet and chemoprevention. Cancer Control 1997; 4: 118–27PubMed
23.
go back to reference Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Levin B, et al. A case-control study of dietary intake and other lifestyle risk factors for hyperplastic polyps. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 423–9PubMedCrossRef Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Levin B, et al. A case-control study of dietary intake and other lifestyle risk factors for hyperplastic polyps. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 423–9PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Platz EA, Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, et al. Dietary fiber and distal colorectal adenoma in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6: 661–70PubMed Platz EA, Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, et al. Dietary fiber and distal colorectal adenoma in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6: 661–70PubMed
25.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, et al. Dietary fiber and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in women. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 169–76PubMedCrossRef Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, et al. Dietary fiber and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in women. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 169–76PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Haile RW, Witte IS, Longnecker MP, et al. A sigmoidoscopy-based case-control study of polyps: macronutrients, fiber and meat consumption. Int J Cancer 1997; 73: 497–502PubMedCrossRef Haile RW, Witte IS, Longnecker MP, et al. A sigmoidoscopy-based case-control study of polyps: macronutrients, fiber and meat consumption. Int J Cancer 1997; 73: 497–502PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jacobs DR, Marquart L, Slavin J, et al. Whole grain intake and cancer: an expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer 1998; 30: 85–96PubMedCrossRef Jacobs DR, Marquart L, Slavin J, et al. Whole grain intake and cancer: an expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer 1998; 30: 85–96PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Slattery M, Edwards SL, Anderson K, et al. Vitamin E and colon cancer: is there an association? Nutr Cancer 1998; 30: 201–6PubMedCrossRef Slattery M, Edwards SL, Anderson K, et al. Vitamin E and colon cancer: is there an association? Nutr Cancer 1998; 30: 201–6PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hofstad B, Almendingen K, Vain M, et al. Growth and recurrence of colorectal polyps: a double-blind 3-year intervention with calcium and antioxidants. Digestion 1998; 59: 148–56PubMedCrossRef Hofstad B, Almendingen K, Vain M, et al. Growth and recurrence of colorectal polyps: a double-blind 3-year intervention with calcium and antioxidants. Digestion 1998; 59: 148–56PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Advisory Committee on Cancer Coordination and Control. Prevention in the North Carolina Cancer control plan 1996–2001. USA: American Cancer Society, NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources; 1996: I-9-I-18 Advisory Committee on Cancer Coordination and Control. Prevention in the North Carolina Cancer control plan 1996–2001. USA: American Cancer Society, NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources; 1996: I-9-I-18
32.
go back to reference Schatzkin A, Kelloff G. Chemo- and dietary prevention of colorectal cancer. Fur J Cancer 1995; 31A (7–8): 1198-204 Schatzkin A, Kelloff G. Chemo- and dietary prevention of colorectal cancer. Fur J Cancer 1995; 31A (7–8): 1198-204
33.
go back to reference Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Tosteson TD, et al. A clinical trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent colorectal adenoma. Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 141–7PubMedCrossRef Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Tosteson TD, et al. A clinical trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent colorectal adenoma. Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 141–7PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Jacobson IS, Neugut AI, Murray T, et al. Cigarette smoking and other behavioral risk factors for recurrence of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Cancer Causes Control 1994; 5: 215–20PubMedCrossRef Jacobson IS, Neugut AI, Murray T, et al. Cigarette smoking and other behavioral risk factors for recurrence of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Cancer Causes Control 1994; 5: 215–20PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Baron JA, Beach M, Mandel IS, et al. Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 101–7PubMedCrossRef Baron JA, Beach M, Mandel IS, et al. Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 101–7PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kelloff GJ, Hawk ET, Crowell JA, et al. Strategies for identification and clinical evaluation of promising chemopreventioe agents. Oncology 1996; 10: 1471–84PubMed Kelloff GJ, Hawk ET, Crowell JA, et al. Strategies for identification and clinical evaluation of promising chemopreventioe agents. Oncology 1996; 10: 1471–84PubMed
37.
go back to reference DuBois RN, Smalley WE. Cyclooxygenase, NSAIDs, and colo-rectal cancer. Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 898–906CrossRef DuBois RN, Smalley WE. Cyclooxygenase, NSAIDs, and colo-rectal cancer. Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 898–906CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Weiss HA, Forman D. Aspirin. NSAIDs and protection from colorectal cancer: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996; 220: 137–41PubMedCrossRef Weiss HA, Forman D. Aspirin. NSAIDs and protection from colorectal cancer: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996; 220: 137–41PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Smalley WE, DuBois RN. Colorectal cancer and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Adv Pharmacol 1997; 39: 1–20PubMedCrossRef Smalley WE, DuBois RN. Colorectal cancer and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Adv Pharmacol 1997; 39: 1–20PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Adis R&D Insight. Auckland: Adis International Ltd, 1999 Adis R&D Insight. Auckland: Adis International Ltd, 1999
42.
go back to reference IMSworld R&D Focus. London: IMS Global Services, 1998 IMSworld R&D Focus. London: IMS Global Services, 1998
43.
go back to reference Pharmaprojects database. Surrey: PJB Publications Ltd, 1997 Pharmaprojects database. Surrey: PJB Publications Ltd, 1997
44.
go back to reference Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Levin B et al. Aspirin and other NSAIDs and risk of colorectal adenomatous polyps among endoscoped individuals. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995; 4: 703–7PubMed Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Levin B et al. Aspirin and other NSAIDs and risk of colorectal adenomatous polyps among endoscoped individuals. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995; 4: 703–7PubMed
45.
go back to reference Sub O, Mettlin C, Petrelli NJ. Aspirin use, cancer, and polyps of the large bowel. Cancer 1993; 72: 1171–7CrossRef Sub O, Mettlin C, Petrelli NJ. Aspirin use, cancer, and polyps of the large bowel. Cancer 1993; 72: 1171–7CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, et al. Aspirin use and the risk for colorectal cancer and adenoma in male health professionals. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 241–6PubMed Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, et al. Aspirin use and the risk for colorectal cancer and adenoma in male health professionals. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 241–6PubMed
47.
go back to reference Logan RF, Little J, Hawtin PG, et al. Effect of aspirin and NSAIDs on colorectal adenomas: case-control study of sub-jects participating in the Nottingham faecal occult blood screening programme. BMJ 1993; 307: 285–9PubMedCrossRef Logan RF, Little J, Hawtin PG, et al. Effect of aspirin and NSAIDs on colorectal adenomas: case-control study of sub-jects participating in the Nottingham faecal occult blood screening programme. BMJ 1993; 307: 285–9PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Freeman DHJ, et al. Reduced risk of large-bowel adenomas among aspirin users. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. J Nall Cancer Just 1993; 85: 912–6CrossRef Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Freeman DHJ, et al. Reduced risk of large-bowel adenomas among aspirin users. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. J Nall Cancer Just 1993; 85: 912–6CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Nugent KP. Colorectal cancer: surgical prophylaxis and chemoprevention. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1995; 77: 372–6PubMed Nugent KP. Colorectal cancer: surgical prophylaxis and chemoprevention. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1995; 77: 372–6PubMed
50.
go back to reference Giardiello FM. NSAID-induced polyp regression in familial adenomatous polyposis patient. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1996; 25: 349–62PubMedCrossRef Giardiello FM. NSAID-induced polyp regression in familial adenomatous polyposis patient. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1996; 25: 349–62PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Duris I, Hruby D, Pekarkova B, et al. Calcium chemoprevention in colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43: 152–4PubMed Duris I, Hruby D, Pekarkova B, et al. Calcium chemoprevention in colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43: 152–4PubMed
52.
go back to reference Potter JD, Bostick RM, Grandits GA, et al. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with lower risk of adenomatous polyps of the large bowel: the Minnesota Cancer Prevention Research Unit Case-Control Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996; 5: 779–84PubMed Potter JD, Bostick RM, Grandits GA, et al. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with lower risk of adenomatous polyps of the large bowel: the Minnesota Cancer Prevention Research Unit Case-Control Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996; 5: 779–84PubMed
53.
go back to reference Vermorken JB, Claessen AM, van Tinteren H, et al. Active specific immunotherapy for stage II and stage III human colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 345–50PubMedCrossRef Vermorken JB, Claessen AM, van Tinteren H, et al. Active specific immunotherapy for stage II and stage III human colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 345–50PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Mayer RJ. Tumors of the large and small intestine. In: Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E, Wilson JD, et al., editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1994: 1424–31 Mayer RJ. Tumors of the large and small intestine. In: Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E, Wilson JD, et al., editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1994: 1424–31
55.
go back to reference Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50 (1): 7–33PubMedCrossRef Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50 (1): 7–33PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Cohen AM, Michelassi F, Galandiuk S. Colorectal cancer surgical practice guidelines. CRC Practice Guideline Committee. Oncology 1997; 11: 1051–7PubMed Cohen AM, Michelassi F, Galandiuk S. Colorectal cancer surgical practice guidelines. CRC Practice Guideline Committee. Oncology 1997; 11: 1051–7PubMed
58.
go back to reference NICE. Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgey for colorectal cancer. Technology Appraisal Guidance n.17. London: NICE, 2000 Dec NICE. Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgey for colorectal cancer. Technology Appraisal Guidance n.17. London: NICE, 2000 Dec
60.
go back to reference Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Available from URL: http://www.asco.org [Accessed 2003 Sep 30] Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Available from URL: http://​www.​asco.​org [Accessed 2003 Sep 30]
61.
go back to reference Taplin SH, Barlow W, Urban N, et al. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Nall Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 417–26CrossRef Taplin SH, Barlow W, Urban N, et al. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Nall Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 417–26CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Brown ML, Riley GF, Potosky AL. Obtaining long-term disease specific costs of care: application to Medicare enrollees diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Med Care 1999 Dec; 37 (12): 1249–59PubMedCrossRef Brown ML, Riley GF, Potosky AL. Obtaining long-term disease specific costs of care: application to Medicare enrollees diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Med Care 1999 Dec; 37 (12): 1249–59PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Ramsey SD, Berry K, Etzioni R. Lifetime cancer-attributable cost of care for long term survivors of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 Feb; 97 (2): 440–5PubMedCrossRef Ramsey SD, Berry K, Etzioni R. Lifetime cancer-attributable cost of care for long term survivors of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 Feb; 97 (2): 440–5PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Brown ML, Fintor L. The economic burden of cancer. In: Greenwald P, Kramer BS, Weed DL, editors. Cancer prevention and control. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1995: 69–81 Brown ML, Fintor L. The economic burden of cancer. In: Greenwald P, Kramer BS, Weed DL, editors. Cancer prevention and control. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1995: 69–81
65.
go back to reference Seifeldin R, Hantasch IJ. The economic burden associated with colon cancer in the USA. Clin Ther 1999; 21 (8): 1370–9PubMedCrossRef Seifeldin R, Hantasch IJ. The economic burden associated with colon cancer in the USA. Clin Ther 1999; 21 (8): 1370–9PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Eaddy M, Bramley T, Kozma C, et al. Cost of colorectal cancer in the South Carolina Medicaid (SCM) population. Abstract 1633 (cat. Health Service Research). ASCO International Conference; 2000 May 20–23; New Orleans (LA) Eaddy M, Bramley T, Kozma C, et al. Cost of colorectal cancer in the South Carolina Medicaid (SCM) population. Abstract 1633 (cat. Health Service Research). ASCO International Conference; 2000 May 20–23; New Orleans (LA)
67.
go back to reference Donowitz M. Gastrointestinal disease costs USA at least US$42 billion/year in 2001. Marketletter 2001 May 24 Donowitz M. Gastrointestinal disease costs USA at least US$42 billion/year in 2001. Marketletter 2001 May 24
68.
go back to reference Baker MS, Kessler LG, Urban N, et al. Estimating the treatment costs of breast and lung cancer. MedCare 1991; 29: 40–9 Baker MS, Kessler LG, Urban N, et al. Estimating the treatment costs of breast and lung cancer. MedCare 1991; 29: 40–9
69.
go back to reference Geddes M, Carli S, Ercolanelli M, et al. Colorectal, lung, and breast cancer care during the three years following the diagnosis: a population-based study. Tumori 1996; 82: 210–4PubMed Geddes M, Carli S, Ercolanelli M, et al. Colorectal, lung, and breast cancer care during the three years following the diagnosis: a population-based study. Tumori 1996; 82: 210–4PubMed
70.
go back to reference Audisio RA, Cazzaniga M, Robertson C, et al. Elective surgery for colerectal cancer in the aged: a clinical-economical evaluation. Br J Cancer 1997; 76: 382–4PubMedCrossRef Audisio RA, Cazzaniga M, Robertson C, et al. Elective surgery for colerectal cancer in the aged: a clinical-economical evaluation. Br J Cancer 1997; 76: 382–4PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Prospects for the future. Inpharma 1996; Suppl. 2: 7 Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Prospects for the future. Inpharma 1996; Suppl. 2: 7
72.
go back to reference Mushinski M. Variation in in-hospital charges for colorectal cancer treatment. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co 1998; 79: 19–27PubMed Mushinski M. Variation in in-hospital charges for colorectal cancer treatment. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co 1998; 79: 19–27PubMed
73.
go back to reference Etzioni R, Scott RD, Berry C, et al. The impact of including future medical care costs when estimating the costs attributable to a disease: a colorectal cancer case study. Health Econ 2001; 10: 245–56PubMedCrossRef Etzioni R, Scott RD, Berry C, et al. The impact of including future medical care costs when estimating the costs attributable to a disease: a colorectal cancer case study. Health Econ 2001; 10: 245–56PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Brown ML, Riley GF, Potosky AL, et al. Obtaining long-term disease specific costs of care: application to Medicare enrollees diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Med Care 1999; 37: 1249–59PubMedCrossRef Brown ML, Riley GF, Potosky AL, et al. Obtaining long-term disease specific costs of care: application to Medicare enrollees diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Med Care 1999; 37: 1249–59PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Khullar SK, DiSario JA. Colon cancer screening: sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1997; 7: 365–86PubMed Khullar SK, DiSario JA. Colon cancer screening: sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1997; 7: 365–86PubMed
76.
go back to reference Towler B, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the fecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. BMJ 1998; 317: 559–65PubMedCrossRef Towler B, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the fecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. BMJ 1998; 317: 559–65PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Heine JA, Rothenberger DA. Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer. World J Surg 1991; 15: 597–604PubMedCrossRef Heine JA, Rothenberger DA. Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer. World J Surg 1991; 15: 597–604PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Nelson RL. Screening of average-risk individuals for colorectal cancer and postoperative evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1996; 76: 35–45PubMedCrossRef Nelson RL. Screening of average-risk individuals for colorectal cancer and postoperative evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1996; 76: 35–45PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Lieberman DA. Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 1781–90PubMedCrossRef Lieberman DA. Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 1781–90PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference US Congress Office of Technology Assessment. The cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults. OTA-BP-H-146. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995 US Congress Office of Technology Assessment. The cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults. OTA-BP-H-146. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995
81.
go back to reference Marshall JR, Fay D, Lance P. Potential costs of flexible sig-moidoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 1411–7PubMedCrossRef Marshall JR, Fay D, Lance P. Potential costs of flexible sig-moidoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 1411–7PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Norum J. Prevention of colorectal cancer: a cost effectiveness approach to a screening model employing sigmoidoscopy. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 613–8PubMedCrossRef Norum J. Prevention of colorectal cancer: a cost effectiveness approach to a screening model employing sigmoidoscopy. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 613–8PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Gent KW, Bosnian FT, van Blankenstein M, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer: costs and effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1997; 223: 79–87 Gent KW, Bosnian FT, van Blankenstein M, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer: costs and effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1997; 223: 79–87
84.
go back to reference Weller D, Moss J, Hiller J, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: what are the costs? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995; 11: 26–39PubMedCrossRef Weller D, Moss J, Hiller J, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: what are the costs? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995; 11: 26–39PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Wagner JL, Herdman RC, Wadhwa S. Cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 807–17PubMed Wagner JL, Herdman RC, Wadhwa S. Cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 807–17PubMed
86.
go back to reference Virgo KS, Vernava AM, Longo WE, et al. Cost of patient follow-up after potentially curative colorectal cancer treatment. JAMA 1995; 273: 1837–41PubMedCrossRef Virgo KS, Vernava AM, Longo WE, et al. Cost of patient follow-up after potentially curative colorectal cancer treatment. JAMA 1995; 273: 1837–41PubMedCrossRef
87.
go back to reference Rex DK, Mark D, Clarke B, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for evaluation of symptomatic patients without evidence of bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 132–8PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Mark D, Clarke B, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for evaluation of symptomatic patients without evidence of bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 132–8PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference Frazier Al, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, et al. Cost effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 2000; 284 (15): 1954–61PubMedCrossRef Frazier Al, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, et al. Cost effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 2000; 284 (15): 1954–61PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Brown ML, Kessler LG. The use of gene tests to detect hereditary predisposition to cancer: economic considerations. J Nall Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1131–6CrossRef Brown ML, Kessler LG. The use of gene tests to detect hereditary predisposition to cancer: economic considerations. J Nall Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1131–6CrossRef
90.
go back to reference Straus W, Schaffner P, Gold K, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: awareness, utilization, and barriers [abstract]. Value Health 2001; 4 (2): 91 Straus W, Schaffner P, Gold K, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: awareness, utilization, and barriers [abstract]. Value Health 2001; 4 (2): 91
91.
go back to reference Subramanian S, Klosterman M, Amonkar MM, et al. Compliance with CRC screening guidelines: a review. Prev Med. In press Subramanian S, Klosterman M, Amonkar MM, et al. Compliance with CRC screening guidelines: a review. Prev Med. In press
93.
go back to reference Brown R, Sorensen S, Burrel A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of irinotecan + 5FU/FA alone as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer in the UK [abstract]. Value Health 2001; 4 (2): 54CrossRef Brown R, Sorensen S, Burrel A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of irinotecan + 5FU/FA alone as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer in the UK [abstract]. Value Health 2001; 4 (2): 54CrossRef
94.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Falk S, Jackson D. Clinical and economic benefits of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU and folinic acid as first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2002; 86 (11): 1677–83PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Falk S, Jackson D. Clinical and economic benefits of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU and folinic acid as first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2002; 86 (11): 1677–83PubMedCrossRef
95.
go back to reference Levy-Piedbois C, Durand-Zalesky I, Juliet H, et al. Cost effectiveness of second line treatment with irinotecan or infusional 5FU in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 15761CrossRef Levy-Piedbois C, Durand-Zalesky I, Juliet H, et al. Cost effectiveness of second line treatment with irinotecan or infusional 5FU in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 15761CrossRef
96.
go back to reference Schmitt C, Blijham G, Jolain B, et al. Medical care consumption in a phase III trial comparing irinotecan with infusional 5 FU in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after 5FU failure. Anticancer Drugs 1999; 10: 617–23PubMedCrossRef Schmitt C, Blijham G, Jolain B, et al. Medical care consumption in a phase III trial comparing irinotecan with infusional 5 FU in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after 5FU failure. Anticancer Drugs 1999; 10: 617–23PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Iveson TJ, Hickish T, Schmitt C, et al. Irinotecan in second line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: improved survival and cost effect compared with infusional 5FU. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35 (13): 1796–804PubMedCrossRef Iveson TJ, Hickish T, Schmitt C, et al. Irinotecan in second line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: improved survival and cost effect compared with infusional 5FU. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35 (13): 1796–804PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Neymark N, Adriaenssen I, Schmitt C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of irinotecan compared with best estimated infusional 5FU regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer [ab stract 461]. ASCO Conference; 1998 May 16–19; Los Angeles (CA) Neymark N, Adriaenssen I, Schmitt C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of irinotecan compared with best estimated infusional 5FU regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer [ab stract 461]. ASCO Conference; 1998 May 16–19; Los Angeles (CA)
99.
go back to reference Simons WR, Grace EM, et al. The comparative economic value of raltritrexed and 5FU plus leucovorin. Eur J Cancer 2000; Suppl. 3: 25 Simons WR, Grace EM, et al. The comparative economic value of raltritrexed and 5FU plus leucovorin. Eur J Cancer 2000; Suppl. 3: 25
100.
go back to reference Sculpher M, Palmer MK, Heyes A. Costs incurred by patients undergoing advanced colorectal cancer therapy: a comparison of raltitrexed and 5FU plus leucovorin. Pharmacoconomics 2000; 17 (4): 361–70CrossRef Sculpher M, Palmer MK, Heyes A. Costs incurred by patients undergoing advanced colorectal cancer therapy: a comparison of raltitrexed and 5FU plus leucovorin. Pharmacoconomics 2000; 17 (4): 361–70CrossRef
101.
go back to reference Groener MGH, van Ineveld BM, Byttebier G, et al. An economic evaluation of Tomudex (raltitrexed) and 5FU plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 1999; 10: 1283–8CrossRef Groener MGH, van Ineveld BM, Byttebier G, et al. An economic evaluation of Tomudex (raltitrexed) and 5FU plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 1999; 10: 1283–8CrossRef
102.
go back to reference Ollendorf D. Impact of uracil/tegafur plus oral calcium folinate on resource utilization. Oncology 1999; 13 (7 Suppl. 3): 42–3 Ollendorf D. Impact of uracil/tegafur plus oral calcium folinate on resource utilization. Oncology 1999; 13 (7 Suppl. 3): 42–3
103.
go back to reference Murad AM, de Andrade CA, Delfino C, et al. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of tegafur-uracil (UFT) vs 5FU for the management of colorectal cancer in Brazil and Argentina. Clin Drug Invest 1997; 13 (2): 90–8CrossRef Murad AM, de Andrade CA, Delfino C, et al. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of tegafur-uracil (UFT) vs 5FU for the management of colorectal cancer in Brazil and Argentina. Clin Drug Invest 1997; 13 (2): 90–8CrossRef
104.
go back to reference Ron IG, Lotan A, Inbar MJ, et al. Advanced colorectal carcinoma: redefining the role of oral ftorafur. Anticancer Drugs 1996; 7: 649–54PubMedCrossRef Ron IG, Lotan A, Inbar MJ, et al. Advanced colorectal carcinoma: redefining the role of oral ftorafur. Anticancer Drugs 1996; 7: 649–54PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference Cavallo MC, Gerzeli S, De Carli C, et al. The cost of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of five chemotherapy regimens used in a Northern Italy hospital. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 3 (1): 49–59 Cavallo MC, Gerzeli S, De Carli C, et al. The cost of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of five chemotherapy regimens used in a Northern Italy hospital. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 3 (1): 49–59
106.
go back to reference Norum J, Vonen B, Olsen JA, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy (5FU and leucovorin) in Dukes’ B and C colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 65–70PubMedCrossRef Norum J, Vonen B, Olsen JA, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy (5FU and leucovorin) in Dukes’ B and C colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 65–70PubMedCrossRef
107.
go back to reference Lokich JJ, Moore CL, Anderson NR. Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors. Part one: model projections for cost based on charges. Cancer 1996; 78: 294–9PubMedCrossRef Lokich JJ, Moore CL, Anderson NR. Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors. Part one: model projections for cost based on charges. Cancer 1996; 78: 294–9PubMedCrossRef
108.
go back to reference Brown ML, Nayfield SG, Shibley LM. Adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: economics returns to research and costeffectiveness of treatment. J Nall Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 424–30CrossRef Brown ML, Nayfield SG, Shibley LM. Adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: economics returns to research and costeffectiveness of treatment. J Nall Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 424–30CrossRef
109.
go back to reference Kuvshinoff B. Incremental cost-effectiveness of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes News 1998; 182: 8 Kuvshinoff B. Incremental cost-effectiveness of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes News 1998; 182: 8
110.
go back to reference Durand-Zaleski I, Roche B, Buyse M, et al. Economic implications of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in treatment of non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. J Nall Cancer Inst 1997; 89 (11): 790–5CrossRef Durand-Zaleski I, Roche B, Buyse M, et al. Economic implications of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in treatment of non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. J Nall Cancer Inst 1997; 89 (11): 790–5CrossRef
111.
go back to reference Sorensen S, Brown R, De Cock E, et al. An analysis of resource use in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in the UK [abstract]. Value Health 2001; 4 (2): 90CrossRef Sorensen S, Brown R, De Cock E, et al. An analysis of resource use in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in the UK [abstract]. Value Health 2001; 4 (2): 90CrossRef
112.
go back to reference Ross P, Heron J, Cunningham D. Cost of treating advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of treatment regimens. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A Suppl. 5: S13–7PubMedCrossRef Ross P, Heron J, Cunningham D. Cost of treating advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of treatment regimens. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A Suppl. 5: S13–7PubMedCrossRef
113.
go back to reference Blijham G. Impact of second-line therapy with irinotecan on healthcare resource use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes News 1998; 148: 34 Blijham G. Impact of second-line therapy with irinotecan on healthcare resource use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes News 1998; 148: 34
114.
go back to reference Durand-Zaleski I, Earlam S, Fordy C, et al. Cost effectiveness of systemic and regional chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Cancer 1998; 83 (5): 882–8PubMedCrossRef Durand-Zaleski I, Earlam S, Fordy C, et al. Cost effectiveness of systemic and regional chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Cancer 1998; 83 (5): 882–8PubMedCrossRef
115.
go back to reference Focan C, on behalf of Cancer Chronotherapy Group. Pharmaco-economic comparative evaluation between combination chronotherapy or standard chemotherapy for colorectal cancer [abstract PP17]. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36 (Suppl. 3): 14. 2nd European Conference of the Economics of Cancer; 2000 Sep 3–5; Brussels Focan C, on behalf of Cancer Chronotherapy Group. Pharmaco-economic comparative evaluation between combination chronotherapy or standard chemotherapy for colorectal cancer [abstract PP17]. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36 (Suppl. 3): 14. 2nd European Conference of the Economics of Cancer; 2000 Sep 3–5; Brussels
116.
go back to reference Trippoli S, Vaiani M, Cattei F, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil vs fluoruracil alone in metastatic colorectal cancer: cost effectiveness analysis [abstract PP63]. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36 (Suppl 3): 14. 2nd European Conference of the Economics of Cancer; 2000 Sep 3–5; Brussels Trippoli S, Vaiani M, Cattei F, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil vs fluoruracil alone in metastatic colorectal cancer: cost effectiveness analysis [abstract PP63]. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36 (Suppl 3): 14. 2nd European Conference of the Economics of Cancer; 2000 Sep 3–5; Brussels
117.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 1041–7PubMedCrossRef Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 1041–7PubMedCrossRef
118.
go back to reference Cavallo MC, Gerzeli S, De Carli C, et al. The cost of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of five chemotherapy regimens used in a Northern Italy hospital. Pharmacoeconomics-Italian Research Articles 2001; 3 (1): 4959 Cavallo MC, Gerzeli S, De Carli C, et al. The cost of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of five chemotherapy regimens used in a Northern Italy hospital. Pharmacoeconomics-Italian Research Articles 2001; 3 (1): 4959
119.
go back to reference Nicholls CJ, Cassidy J, Freemantle N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU/FA compared with 5FU/FA alone. J Drug Assess 2001; 4 (Pt 3): 255–64 Nicholls CJ, Cassidy J, Freemantle N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU/FA compared with 5FU/FA alone. J Drug Assess 2001; 4 (Pt 3): 255–64
120.
go back to reference Nicholls CJ, Cassidy J, Freemantle N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of combination chemotherapy oxaliplatin or inrinotecan plus 5-FU/FA compared with 5-FU/FA alone. J Drug Assessment 2001; 4 (Pt 4): 215–26 Nicholls CJ, Cassidy J, Freemantle N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of combination chemotherapy oxaliplatin or inrinotecan plus 5-FU/FA compared with 5-FU/FA alone. J Drug Assessment 2001; 4 (Pt 4): 215–26
121.
go back to reference Giuliani G, Lucioni C, Mazzi S, et al. Economic evaluation of oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/FA (Mayo regimen) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Pharmacoeconomics - Italian Research Articles 2002; 4 (1): 31–8 Giuliani G, Lucioni C, Mazzi S, et al. Economic evaluation of oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/FA (Mayo regimen) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Pharmacoeconomics - Italian Research Articles 2002; 4 (1): 31–8
122.
go back to reference Hart WM, Pronk L, Obina S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of irinotecan plus 5-FU/FA compared with 5-FU/FA alone as first line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer [abstract 2262] 38th Annual Meeting ASCO; 2002 May 18–21; Orlando (FL) Hart WM, Pronk L, Obina S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of irinotecan plus 5-FU/FA compared with 5-FU/FA alone as first line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer [abstract 2262] 38th Annual Meeting ASCO; 2002 May 18–21; Orlando (FL)
123.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guidance on the use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Technology appraisal no. 33, March 2002. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk [Accessed 2003 Sep 2] National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guidance on the use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Technology appraisal no. 33, March 2002. Available from URL: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk [Accessed 2003 Sep 2]
124.
go back to reference Norum J, Balteskard L, Edna TH, et al. Raltritrexed or nordicFLv regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study focusing on QOL, patients’ preferences and health economics. J Chemother 2002; 14 (3): 301–8PubMed Norum J, Balteskard L, Edna TH, et al. Raltritrexed or nordicFLv regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study focusing on QOL, patients’ preferences and health economics. J Chemother 2002; 14 (3): 301–8PubMed
125.
go back to reference Postma MI., van Hartskamp D., Jansman FG et al. Cost analysis of capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV for colorectal cancer in patients in the Netherlands [abstract PCN 10]. ISPOR European Conference; 2002 Nov 3–5; Rotterdam Postma MI., van Hartskamp D., Jansman FG et al. Cost analysis of capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV for colorectal cancer in patients in the Netherlands [abstract PCN 10]. ISPOR European Conference; 2002 Nov 3–5; Rotterdam
126.
go back to reference van den Hour WB, van den Brink M, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer treatments. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 953–63CrossRef van den Hour WB, van den Brink M, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer treatments. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 953–63CrossRef
127.
go back to reference Vorobyov P, Sum M, Avxentieva M, et al. Economical evaluation of raltitrexed vs 5-FU/LV for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer [abstract PCN 6]. ISPOR European Conference; 2002 Nov 3–5; Rotterdam Vorobyov P, Sum M, Avxentieva M, et al. Economical evaluation of raltitrexed vs 5-FU/LV for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer [abstract PCN 6]. ISPOR European Conference; 2002 Nov 3–5; Rotterdam
129.
go back to reference Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 1999; 49: 8–31PubMedCrossRef Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 1999; 49: 8–31PubMedCrossRef
130.
go back to reference Ries LAG, Wingo PA, Miller DS, et al. The annual report of the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. American Cancer Society. Cancer 2000 May 15; 88 (10): 2398–424PubMedCrossRef Ries LAG, Wingo PA, Miller DS, et al. The annual report of the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. American Cancer Society. Cancer 2000 May 15; 88 (10): 2398–424PubMedCrossRef
131.
go back to reference Brown ML, Fintor L. The economic burden of cancer. In: Greenwald P, Kramer BS, Weed DL, editiors. Cancer prevention and control. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1995: 69–81 Brown ML, Fintor L. The economic burden of cancer. In: Greenwald P, Kramer BS, Weed DL, editiors. Cancer prevention and control. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1995: 69–81
132.
go back to reference Seifeldin R, Hantsch J. The economic burden associated with colon cancer in the United States. Clin Ther 1999; 21 (8): 1370–9PubMedCrossRef Seifeldin R, Hantsch J. The economic burden associated with colon cancer in the United States. Clin Ther 1999; 21 (8): 1370–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer
Authors
Dr Alberto Redaelli
Carole W. Cranor
Gary J. Okano
Pat Ray Reese
Publication date
01-12-2003
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 17/2003
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200321170-00001