Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 1/2000

01-07-2000 | Review Article

A Review of Alternative Approaches to Healthcare Resource Allocation

Authors: Dr Stavros Petrou, Jane Wolstenholme

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 1/2000

Login to get access

Abstract

The resources available for healthcare are limited compared with demand, if not need, and all healthcare systems, regardless of their financing and organisation, employ mechanisms to ration or prioritise finite healthcare resources. This paper reviews alternative approaches that can be used to allocate healthcare resources. It discusses the problems encountered when allocating healthcare resources according to free market principles. It then proceeds to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of alternative resource allocation approaches that can be applied to public health systems. These include: (i) approaches based on the concept of meeting the needs of the population to maximising its capacity to benefit from interventions; (ii) economic approaches that identify the most efficient allocation of resources with the view of maximising health benefits or other measures of social welfare; (iii) approaches that seek to ration healthcare by age; and (iv) approaches that resolve resource allocation disputes through debate and bargaining. At present, there appears to be no consensus about the relative importance of the potentially conflicting principles that can be used to guide resource allocation decisions. It is concluded that whatever shape tomorrow’s health service takes, the requirement to make equitable and efficient use of finite healthcare resources will remain.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frankel S. Health needs, health-care requirements, and the myth of infinite demand. Lancet 1991; 337: 1588–90PubMedCrossRef Frankel S. Health needs, health-care requirements, and the myth of infinite demand. Lancet 1991; 337: 1588–90PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mooney G. Economics, medicine and health care. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992 Mooney G. Economics, medicine and health care. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992
3.
go back to reference Klein R, Day P, Redmayne S. Managing scarcity: priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996 Klein R, Day P, Redmayne S. Managing scarcity: priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996
4.
go back to reference Harvey I. Philosophical perspectives on priority setting. In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 83–110 Harvey I. Philosophical perspectives on priority setting. In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 83–110
5.
go back to reference Culyer AJ. The morality of efficiency in health care: some uncomfortable implications. Health Econ 1992; 1: 7–18PubMedCrossRef Culyer AJ. The morality of efficiency in health care: some uncomfortable implications. Health Econ 1992; 1: 7–18PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Le Grand J, et al. Equity in health and social care. J Soc Policy 1992; 21 (4): 489–523CrossRef Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Le Grand J, et al. Equity in health and social care. J Soc Policy 1992; 21 (4): 489–523CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parker R. Social administration and scarcity. In: Butterworth E, Holman R, editors. Social welfare in modern Britain. London: Fontana, 1975: 204–12 Parker R. Social administration and scarcity. In: Butterworth E, Holman R, editors. Social welfare in modern Britain. London: Fontana, 1975: 204–12
8.
go back to reference McGuire A, Fenn P, Mayhew K. The economics of health care. In: McGuire A, Fenn P, Mayhew K, editors. Providing health care: the economics of alternative systems of finance and delivery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991: 5–45 McGuire A, Fenn P, Mayhew K. The economics of health care. In: McGuire A, Fenn P, Mayhew K, editors. Providing health care: the economics of alternative systems of finance and delivery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991: 5–45
9.
go back to reference Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the US health care system. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1253–8PubMedCrossRef Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the US health care system. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1253–8PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Culyer AJ. The normative economics of health care finance and provision. In: McGuire A, Fenn P, Mayhew K, editors. Providing health care: the economics of alternative systems of finance and delivery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991: 65–98 Culyer AJ. The normative economics of health care finance and provision. In: McGuire A, Fenn P, Mayhew K, editors. Providing health care: the economics of alternative systems of finance and delivery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991: 65–98
12.
go back to reference Le Grand J. The distribution of public expenditure: the case of health care. Economica 1978; 45: 125–42CrossRef Le Grand J. The distribution of public expenditure: the case of health care. Economica 1978; 45: 125–42CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD health data 1999: a comparative analysis of 29 countries. Paris: OECD, 1999: 29 Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD health data 1999: a comparative analysis of 29 countries. Paris: OECD, 1999: 29
14.
go back to reference Culyer AJ. Need and the National Health Service. London: Martin Robertson, 1976 Culyer AJ. Need and the National Health Service. London: Martin Robertson, 1976
15.
go back to reference Bradshaw J. A taxonomy of social need. In: McLachlan G, editor. Problems and progress in medical care. 7th series. London: Oxford University Press, 1972: 69–82 Bradshaw J. A taxonomy of social need. In: McLachlan G, editor. Problems and progress in medical care. 7th series. London: Oxford University Press, 1972: 69–82
16.
go back to reference Williams A. Priorities not needs. In: Corden A, Robertson E, Tolley K, editors. Meeting needs in an affluent society: a multidisciplinary perspective. Aldershot: Avebury Gower, 1992: 57–63 Williams A. Priorities not needs. In: Corden A, Robertson E, Tolley K, editors. Meeting needs in an affluent society: a multidisciplinary perspective. Aldershot: Avebury Gower, 1992: 57–63
17.
go back to reference Stevens A, Gabbay J. Needs assessment needs assessment. Health Trends 1991; 23: 20–3PubMed Stevens A, Gabbay J. Needs assessment needs assessment. Health Trends 1991; 23: 20–3PubMed
18.
go back to reference Coast J, Bevan G, Frankel S. An equitable basis for priority setting? In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 141–66 Coast J, Bevan G, Frankel S. An equitable basis for priority setting? In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 141–66
19.
go back to reference Eyles J, Birch S. A population needs-based approach to healthcare resource allocation and planning in Ontario: a link between policy goals and practice? Can J Public Health 1993; 84 (2): 112–7PubMed Eyles J, Birch S. A population needs-based approach to healthcare resource allocation and planning in Ontario: a link between policy goals and practice? Can J Public Health 1993; 84 (2): 112–7PubMed
20.
go back to reference McIntyre DE, Bourne DE, Klopper JML, et al. A methodology for resource allocation in health care for South Africa. S Afr Med J 1991; 80: 139–45PubMed McIntyre DE, Bourne DE, Klopper JML, et al. A methodology for resource allocation in health care for South Africa. S Afr Med J 1991; 80: 139–45PubMed
21.
go back to reference Car-Hill RA, Sheldon TA, Smith P, et al. Allocating resources to health authorities: development of method for small area analysis of use of inpatient services. BMJ 1994; 309: 1046–9CrossRef Car-Hill RA, Sheldon TA, Smith P, et al. Allocating resources to health authorities: development of method for small area analysis of use of inpatient services. BMJ 1994; 309: 1046–9CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wright J, Williams R, Wilkinson JR. Development and importance of health needs assessment. BMJ 1998; 316: 1310–3PubMedCrossRef Wright J, Williams R, Wilkinson JR. Development and importance of health needs assessment. BMJ 1998; 316: 1310–3PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Car-Hill RA, Sheldon T. Rationality and the use of formulae in the allocation of resources to health care. J Public Health Med 1992; 14 (2): 117–26 Car-Hill RA, Sheldon T. Rationality and the use of formulae in the allocation of resources to health care. J Public Health Med 1992; 14 (2): 117–26
25.
go back to reference Donaldson C, Mooney G. Needs assessment, priority setting, and contracts for health care: an economic view. BMJ 1991; 303: 1529–30PubMedCrossRef Donaldson C, Mooney G. Needs assessment, priority setting, and contracts for health care: an economic view. BMJ 1991; 303: 1529–30PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mooney G. Key issues in health economics. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994 Mooney G. Key issues in health economics. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994
27.
go back to reference O’Brien B, Viramontes JL. Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference. Med Decis Making 1994; 14: 289–97PubMedCrossRef O’Brien B, Viramontes JL. Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference. Med Decis Making 1994; 14: 289–97PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Maynard A, Bloor K. Our certain fate: rationing in health care. London: Office of Health Economics, 1998 Maynard A, Bloor K. Our certain fate: rationing in health care. London: Office of Health Economics, 1998
29.
go back to reference Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989; 5: 559–75PubMedCrossRef Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989; 5: 559–75PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Mehrez A, Gafni A. Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. Med Decis Making 1989; 9: 142–9PubMedCrossRef Mehrez A, Gafni A. Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. Med Decis Making 1989; 9: 142–9PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
go back to reference Coast J. Efficiency: the economic contribution to priority setting. In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 114–39 Coast J. Efficiency: the economic contribution to priority setting. In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 114–39
33.
go back to reference Karlsson G, Johannesson M. The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 9 (2): 113–20PubMedCrossRef Karlsson G, Johannesson M. The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 9 (2): 113–20PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rosser RM, Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol 1978; 7: 347–58PubMedCrossRef Rosser RM, Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol 1978; 7: 347–58PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Gudex C. QALYs and their use by the health service. Discussion Paper 20.York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 1986 Gudex C. QALYs and their use by the health service. Discussion Paper 20.York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 1986
36.
go back to reference Petrou S, Malek M, Davey PG. The reliability of cost-utility estimates in cost-per-QALYleague tables. Pharmacoeconomics 1993; 3 (5): 345–53PubMedCrossRef Petrou S, Malek M, Davey PG. The reliability of cost-utility estimates in cost-per-QALYleague tables. Pharmacoeconomics 1993; 3 (5): 345–53PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Donaldson C, Shackley P. Does ‘process utility’ exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 699–707PubMedCrossRef Donaldson C, Shackley P. Does ‘process utility’ exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 699–707PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Nord E, Pinto JL, Richardson J, et al. Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Econ 1999; 8 (1): 25–39PubMedCrossRef Nord E, Pinto JL, Richardson J, et al. Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Econ 1999; 8 (1): 25–39PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Madden L, Hussey R, Mooney G, et al. Public health and economics in tandem: programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice. Health Policy 1995; 33 (2): 161–8PubMedCrossRef Madden L, Hussey R, Mooney G, et al. Public health and economics in tandem: programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice. Health Policy 1995; 33 (2): 161–8PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Craig N, Parkin D, Gerard K. Clearing the fog on the Tyne: programme budgeting in Newcastle and North Tyneside Health Authority. Health Policy 1995; 33 (2): 127–45CrossRef Craig N, Parkin D, Gerard K. Clearing the fog on the Tyne: programme budgeting in Newcastle and North Tyneside Health Authority. Health Policy 1995; 33 (2): 127–45CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Bevan RG. The systems approach in government? Two case studies of programme budgeting. J Oper Res Soc 1983; 34 (8): 729–38 Bevan RG. The systems approach in government? Two case studies of programme budgeting. J Oper Res Soc 1983; 34 (8): 729–38
44.
go back to reference Daniel N. Rationing by age. In: Daniel N, editor. Am I my parent’s keeper? An essay on justice between the young and the old. NewYork (NY): Oxford University Press, 1988: 83–102 Daniel N. Rationing by age. In: Daniel N, editor. Am I my parent’s keeper? An essay on justice between the young and the old. NewYork (NY): Oxford University Press, 1988: 83–102
46.
go back to reference Grimley Evans J. Aging and rationing: physiology not age should determine care. BMJ 1991; 303: 869–70CrossRef Grimley Evans J. Aging and rationing: physiology not age should determine care. BMJ 1991; 303: 869–70CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Coast J, Donovan J. Conflict, complexity and confusion: the context for priority setting. In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 3–34 Coast J, Donovan J. Conflict, complexity and confusion: the context for priority setting. In: Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, editors. Priority setting: the health care debate. Chichester: Wiley, 1996: 3–34
49.
go back to reference Sabin JE. The second phase of priority setting. Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician’s perspective on priority setting. BMJ 1998; 317: 1002–4PubMedCrossRef Sabin JE. The second phase of priority setting. Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician’s perspective on priority setting. BMJ 1998; 317: 1002–4PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Oregon Health Services Commission. Prioritization of health services: a report to the governor and legislature. Portland (OR): Oregon Health Services Commission, 1991 Oregon Health Services Commission. Prioritization of health services: a report to the governor and legislature. Portland (OR): Oregon Health Services Commission, 1991
51.
go back to reference Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project part I: overview. BMJ 1997; 314: 131–4PubMedCrossRef Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project part I: overview. BMJ 1997; 314: 131–4PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Report of the Lonning Committee. Guidelines for priority setting in the Norwegian health service. Oslo: Universiteits Forlaget, 1987 Report of the Lonning Committee. Guidelines for priority setting in the Norwegian health service. Oslo: Universiteits Forlaget, 1987
53.
go back to reference Swedish Health Care and Medical Priorities Commission. No easy choices: the difficult priorities of health care. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, 1993 Swedish Health Care and Medical Priorities Commission. No easy choices: the difficult priorities of health care. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, 1993
54.
go back to reference National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health. From values to choices: report of the working group on health care prioritisation. Helsinki: Sosiaali-ja Terveysalam Tutkimus-ja Kehittämiskeskus (STAKES), 1995 National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health. From values to choices: report of the working group on health care prioritisation. Helsinki: Sosiaali-ja Terveysalam Tutkimus-ja Kehittämiskeskus (STAKES), 1995
55.
go back to reference Hoginsbaum F, Holmström S, Calltorp J. Making choices for health care. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1997 Hoginsbaum F, Holmström S, Calltorp J. Making choices for health care. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1997
Metadata
Title
A Review of Alternative Approaches to Healthcare Resource Allocation
Authors
Dr Stavros Petrou
Jane Wolstenholme
Publication date
01-07-2000
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 1/2000
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200018010-00004

Other articles of this Issue 1/2000

PharmacoEconomics 1/2000 Go to the issue

Review Article

Social Phobia