Top

Published in:

01-09-2006 | Leading Article

Adaptive Skeletal Responses to Mechanical Loading during Adolescence

Authors: Dr David A. Greene, Geraldine A. Naughton

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 9/2006

Abstract

Adolescence, defined as the period between puberty and maturity, provides a window of opportunity for positive skeletal adaptations to mechanical loading unlike any other period in life. Age-related bone loss highlights the importance of accumulating sufficient bone mass during formative years. Adolescents who regularly engage in weight-bearing mechanical loading appear advantaged in site-specific markers of bone mass. The positive influence of physical activity on bone mineral accrual during growth has been extensively studied; however, few studies have examined skeletal responses to mechanical loading during adolescence. Weight-bearing physical activity, particularly high-impact sports such as gymnastics, is recognised as being more osteogenic than weight-supported activities. Unilateral loading activities such as tennis or squash provide a direct comparison of skeletal response without sampling bias or genetic confounding. Intervention and longitudinal studies show evidence of positive skeletal adaptations; however, sustainability of skeletal advantages remains unclear. Limitations inherent with single-plane dual x-ray absorptiometry technology are well recognised. The integration of densitometric data with structural responses to mechanical loading using 3-dimensional imaging technologies such as peripheral quantitative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging appears vital to enhancing our understanding of adolescent musculoskeletal health.

Einhorn TA. Bone strength: the bottom line. Calcif Tissue Int 1992; 51: 333–9PubMedCrossRef

Blimkie C, Rice S, Webber C, et al. Effects of resistance training on bone mineral content and density in adolescent females. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 74 (9): 1025–33PubMedCrossRef

Bass S, Bradney M, Pearce G, et al. Short stature and delayed puberty in gymnasts: influence of selection bias on leg length and the duration of training on trunk length. J Pediatr 2000; 136 (2): 149–55PubMedCrossRef

Bass S, Delmas P, Pearce G, et al. The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific. J Clin Invest 1999; 104 (6): 795–804PubMedCrossRef

Magarey A, Boulton T, Chatterton B, et al. Bone growth from 11 to 17 years: relationship to growth, gender and changes with pubertal status including timing of menarche. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88 (2): 139–46PubMedCrossRef

Nattiv A, Armsey TJ. Stress injury to bone in the female athlete. Clin Sports Med 1997; 16 (2): 197–225PubMedCrossRef

Bailey D, Faulkner R, McKay H. Growth, physical activity, and bone mineral acquisition. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1996; 24: 233–66PubMedCrossRef

Gilsanz V, Skaggs DL, Kovanlikaya A. Differential effect of race on the axial and appendicular skeletons of children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83 (5): 1420–7PubMedCrossRef

Forwood M. Mechanical effects on the skeleton: are there clinical implications? Osteoporos Int 2001; 12 (1): 77–83PubMedCrossRef

10.

Frost HM. Bone ‘mass’ and the ‘mechanostat’: a proposal. Anat Rec 1987; 219: 1–9PubMedCrossRef

11.

Burr D, Robling A, Turner CR. Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals. Bone 2002; 30 (5): 781–6PubMedCrossRef

12.

Robling A, Burr D, Turner CR. Partitioning a daily mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts improves the osteogenic response to loading. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15 (8): 1596–602PubMedCrossRef

13.

Robling AG, Duijvelaar KM, Geevers JV. Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force. Bone 2001; 29 (2): 105–13PubMedCrossRef

14.

Seeman E. Periosteal bone formation-a neglected determinant of bone strength. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (4): 320–3PubMedCrossRef

15.

Greene DA, Naughton GA, Briody JN, et al. Bone strength index in adolescent girls: does physical activity make a difference? Br J Sports Med 2005; 39 (9): 622–7PubMedCrossRef

16.

Taaffe D, Robinson T, Snow C, et al. High-impact exercise promotes bone gain in well-trained female athletes. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12 (2): 255–60PubMedCrossRef

17.

Heinonen A, Oja P, Kannus P, et al. Bone mineral density in female athletes representing sports with different loading characteristics of the skeleton. Bone 1995; 17: 197–203PubMedCrossRef

18.

Heinrich CH, Going SB, Pamenter RW, et al. Bone mineral content of cyclically menstruating female resistance and endurance trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22 (5): 558–63PubMedCrossRef

19.

Daly R, Rich P, Klein R, et al. Effects of high-impact exercise on ultrasonic and biochemical indices of skeletal status: a prospective study in young male gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14 (7): 1222–30PubMedCrossRef

20.

Proctor K, Adams W, Shaffrath J, et al. Upper-limb bone mineral density of female collegiate gymnasts versus controls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34 (11): 1830–5PubMedCrossRef

21.

Grimston S, Willows N, Hanley D. Mechanical loading regime and its relationship to bone mineral density in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25 (11): 1203–10PubMed

22.

Conroy B, Kraemer W, Maresh C, et al. Bone mineral density in elite junior olympic weightlifters. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25 (10): 1103–9PubMed

23.

Pettersson U, Nordstrom P, Alfredson H, et al. Effect of high impact activity on bone mass and size in adolescent females: a comparative study between two different types of sports. Calcif Tissue Int 2000; 67 (3): 207–14PubMedCrossRef

24.

Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Irjala K, et al. A 1-year prospective study on the relationship between physical activity, markers of bone metabolism, and bone acquisition in peripubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 95 (10): 3726–32CrossRef

25.

Robinson T, Snow-Harter C, Taaffe D, et al. Gymnasts exhibit higher bone mass than runners despite similar prevalence of amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10 (1): 26–35PubMedCrossRef

26.

Bennell K, Khan K, Matthews B, et al. Activity associated differences in bone mineral are evident before puberty: a cross-sectional study of 130 female novice dancers and controls. Ped Exerc Sci 2000; 12: 371–81

27.

Duncan C, Blimkie C, Cowell C, et al. Bone mineral density in adolescent female athletes: relationship to exercise type and muscle strength. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34 (2): 286–94PubMedCrossRef

28.

Faulkner RA, Bailey DA, Drinkwater DT, et al. Regional and total body bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and total body tissue composition in children 8-16 years of age. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53 (1): 7–12PubMedCrossRef

29.

Bass S, Saxon L, Daly R, et al. The effect of mechanical loading on the size and shape of bone in pre-, peri-, and postpubertal girls: a study in tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17 (12): 2274–80PubMedCrossRef

30.

Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, et al. Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123 (1): 27–31PubMed

31.

Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, et al. Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18 (2): 352–9PubMedCrossRef

32.

MacKelvie K, McKay H, Petit M, et al. Bone mineral response to a 7-month randomized controlled, school-based jumping intervention in 121 prepubertal boys: associations with ethnicity and body mass index. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17 (5): 834–44PubMedCrossRef

33.

MacKelvie KJ, Petit MA, Khan KM, et al. Bone mass and structure are enhanced following a 2-year randomized controlled trial of exercise in prepubertal boys. Bone 2004; 34: 755–64PubMedCrossRef

34.

Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, et al. Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: a controlled prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13 (12): 1814–21PubMedCrossRef

35.

Wiebe PN, Blimkie CJR, Farpour-Lambert N, et al. Correlates and determinants of bone mineral density in pre-pubertal girls. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2002; 14 (4): 345–58

36.

Fuchs RK, Bauer JJ, Snow CM. Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16 (1): 148–56PubMedCrossRef

37.

MacKelvie K, McKay H, Khan K, et al. A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls. J Pediatr 2001; 139 (4): 501–8PubMedCrossRef

38.

McKay H, Petit M, Schutz R, et al. Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density after modified physical education classes: a randomized school-based exercise intervention study in prepubescent and early pubescent children. J Pediatr 2000; 136 (2): 156–62PubMedCrossRef

39.

Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kannus P, et al. High-impact exercise and bones of growing girls: a 9-month controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11 (12): 1010–7PubMedCrossRef

40.

Witzke K, Snow C. Effects of plyometric jump training on bone mass in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32 (6): 1051–7PubMedCrossRef

41.

Bailey D, McKay H, Mirwald R, et al. A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14 (10): 1672–9PubMedCrossRef

42.

Sundberg M, Gardsell P, Johnell O, et al. Peripubertal moderate exercise increases bone mass in boys but not in girls: a population-based intervention study. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12 (3): 230–8PubMedCrossRef

43.

Courteix D, Lespessailles E, Jaffre C, et al. Bone material acquisition and somatic development in highly trained girl gymnasts. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88 (8): 803–8PubMedCrossRef

44.

Gustavsson A, Olsson T, Nordstrom P. Rapid loss of bone mineral density of the femoral neck after cessation of ice hockey training: a 6-year longitudinal study in males. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18 (11): 1964–9PubMedCrossRef

45.

Bennell K, Malcolm S, Khan K, et al. Bone mass and bone turnover in power athletes, endurance athletes, and controls: a 12-month longitudinal study. Bone 1997; 20 (5): 477–84PubMedCrossRef

46.

Kontulainen S, Kannus P, Pasanen M, et al. Does previous participation in high-impact training result in residual bone gain in growing girls? One year follow-up of a 9-month jumping intervention. Int J Sports Med 2002; 23 (8): 575–81

47.

Snow C, Williams D, LaRiviere J, et al. Bone gains and losses follow seasonal training and detraining in gymnasts. Calcif Tissue Int 2001; 69 (1): 7–12PubMedCrossRef

48.

Bolotin HH, Sievanen H. Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 799–805PubMedCrossRef

49.

Haapasalo H, Kountulainen S, Sievanen H, et al. Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 2000; 27 (3): 351–7PubMedCrossRef

50.

Jarvinen TL, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al. Randomized controlled study of effects of sudden impact loading on rat femur. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13 (9): 1475–82PubMedCrossRef

51.

Nelson DA, Koo WW. Interpretation of absorptiometric bone mass measurements in the growing skeleton: issues and limitations. Calcif Tissue Int 1999; 65: 1–3PubMedCrossRef

52.

Faulkner R, Forwood M, Beck T, et al. Strength indices of the proximal femur and shaft in prepubertal female gymnasts. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35 (3): 513–8PubMedCrossRef

53.

Petit M, McKay H, MacKelvie K, et al. A randomized school-based jumping intervention confers site and maturity-specific benefits on bone structural properties in girls: a hip structural analysis study. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17 (3): 363–72PubMedCrossRef

54.

Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Zanchetta JR. Mechanical validation of a tomographic (pQCT) index for noninvasive estimation of rat femur bending strength. Bone 1996; 18 (2): 97–102PubMedCrossRef

Title: Adaptive Skeletal Responses to Mechanical Loading during Adolescence
Authors: Dr David A. Greene
Geraldine A. Naughton
Publication date: 01-09-2006
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Sports Medicine / Issue 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636090-00001

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Adaptive Skeletal Responses to Mechanical Loading during Adolescence

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2006

The Science of Softball

Physical Activity and Feelings of Energy and Fatigue

From Sports Injury Prevention to Safety Promotion in Sports

Using Recovery Modalities between Training Sessions in Elite Athletes

Physiological Response to Water Immersion