Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 1/2006

01-01-2006 | Commentary

‘Hedged’ Prescribing for Partially Compliant Patients

How Accurate Are Available Scaling Methods?

Authors: John Urquhart, Bernard Vrijens

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Excerpt

The term ‘hedge’ has multiple meanings; its use here is analogous to its meaning in financial markets, i.e. ‘to protect oneself from losing or failing by a counterbalancing action’.[1] The paper by Blesius et al.[2] strives to achieve a therapeutically useful degree of ‘counterbalancing action’ in the prescribing of oral anticoagulants by switching between either of two available drugs and/or between once- and twice-daily dosing. Their approach deserves attention and consideration for extension into other fields of ambulatory pharmacotherapy as a risk-management tool. …
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th ed. Springfield (MA): Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2001 Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th ed. Springfield (MA): Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2001
2.
go back to reference Blesius A, Chabaud S, Cucherat M, et al. Compliance-guided therapy: a new insight into the potential role of clinical pharmacologists. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 45(1): 95–104CrossRef Blesius A, Chabaud S, Cucherat M, et al. Compliance-guided therapy: a new insight into the potential role of clinical pharmacologists. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 45(1): 95–104CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Urquhart J. Variable compliance and persistence with prescribed drug dosing regimens: implications for benefits, risks, and economics of pharmacotherapy. In: Strom B, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley, 2005: 767–89 Urquhart J. Variable compliance and persistence with prescribed drug dosing regimens: implications for benefits, risks, and economics of pharmacotherapy. In: Strom B, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley, 2005: 767–89
4.
go back to reference Potter LS. Oral contraceptive compliance and its role in the effectiveness of the method. In: Cramer JA, Spilker B, editors. Compliance in medical practice and clinical trials. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 195–207 Potter LS. Oral contraceptive compliance and its role in the effectiveness of the method. In: Cramer JA, Spilker B, editors. Compliance in medical practice and clinical trials. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 195–207
5.
go back to reference Guillebaud J. Any questions. BMJ 1993; 307: 617 Guillebaud J. Any questions. BMJ 1993; 307: 617
6.
go back to reference “What to do if you miss pills”? In: Physicians’ desk reference. 59th ed. Montvale (NJ): Medical Economics Co.: 2541 “What to do if you miss pills”? In: Physicians’ desk reference. 59th ed. Montvale (NJ): Medical Economics Co.: 2541
7.
go back to reference Ten great public health achievements US, 1900–99: family planning. MMWR 1999; 48: 1073-80 Ten great public health achievements US, 1900–99: family planning. MMWR 1999; 48: 1073-80
8.
go back to reference Urquhart J. The odds of the three nons when an aptly prescribed medicine isn’t working: noncompliance, nonabsorption, non-response. Brit J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 54: 212–20CrossRef Urquhart J. The odds of the three nons when an aptly prescribed medicine isn’t working: noncompliance, nonabsorption, non-response. Brit J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 54: 212–20CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Urquhart J. Controlled drug delivery: pharmacologic and therapeutic aspects. J Internal Med 2000; 248: 357–76PubMedCrossRef Urquhart J. Controlled drug delivery: pharmacologic and therapeutic aspects. J Internal Med 2000; 248: 357–76PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vrijens B, Gross R, Urquhart J. The odds that clinically unrecognized poor or partial adherence confuses population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 96: 225–7PubMedCrossRef Vrijens B, Gross R, Urquhart J. The odds that clinically unrecognized poor or partial adherence confuses population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 96: 225–7PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vrijens B, Comte L, Tousset E, et al. Once-daily versus twice-daily regimens: which is best for HIV-infected patients [abstract no. 3; poster no. 1.3]. 6th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy. 2005 Apr 28–30. Quebec City (QC) Vrijens B, Comte L, Tousset E, et al. Once-daily versus twice-daily regimens: which is best for HIV-infected patients [abstract no. 3; poster no. 1.3]. 6th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy. 2005 Apr 28–30. Quebec City (QC)
12.
go back to reference Levy G. A pharmacokinetic perspective on medicament non-compliance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54: 242–4PubMedCrossRef Levy G. A pharmacokinetic perspective on medicament non-compliance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54: 242–4PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kruse W, Rampmaier J, Ullrich G, et al. Patterns of drug compliance with medication to be taken once and twice daily assessed by continuous electronic monitoring in primary care. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 32: 452–7PubMed Kruse W, Rampmaier J, Ullrich G, et al. Patterns of drug compliance with medication to be taken once and twice daily assessed by continuous electronic monitoring in primary care. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 32: 452–7PubMed
Metadata
Title
‘Hedged’ Prescribing for Partially Compliant Patients
How Accurate Are Available Scaling Methods?
Authors
John Urquhart
Bernard Vrijens
Publication date
01-01-2006
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200645010-00008

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 1/2006 Go to the issue

Original Research Article

Compliance-Guided Therapy