Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 7/2007

01-07-2007 | Conference Paper

Innovations for the Future of Pharmacovigilance

Author: Dr June S. Almenoff

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 7/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Post-marketing pharmacovigilance involves the review and management of safety information from many sources. Among these sources, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems are among the most challenging and resource-intensive to manage. Traditionally, efforts to monitor spontaneous adverse event reporting systems have focused on review of individual case reports. The science of pharmacovigilance could be enhanced with the availability of systems-based tools that facilitate analysis of aggregate data for purposes of signal detection, signal evaluation and knowledge management.
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) recently implemented Online Signal Management (OSM) as a data-driven framework for managing the pharmacovigilance of marketed products. This pioneering work builds upon the strong history GSK has of innovation in this area. OSM is a software application co-developed by GSK and Lincoln Technologies that integrates traditional pharmacovigilance methods with modern quantitative statistical methods and data visualisation tools. OSM enables the rapid identification of trends from the individual adverse event reports received by GSK. OSM also provides knowledge-management tools to ensure the successful tracking of emerging safety issues. GSK has developed standard procedures and ‘best practices’ around the use of OSM to ensure the systematic evaluation of complex safety datasets.
In summary, the implementation of OSM provides new tools and efficient processes to advance the science of pharmacovigilance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Almenoff J, Tonning JM, Gould AL, et al. Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmaco-vigilance. Drug Saf 2005; 28(11): 981–1007PubMedCrossRef Almenoff J, Tonning JM, Gould AL, et al. Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmaco-vigilance. Drug Saf 2005; 28(11): 981–1007PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Almenoff J, LaCroix K, Yuen N, et al. Comparative performance of two quantitative signal detection methods: implications for use in a pharmacovigilance department. Drug Saf 2006; 29(10): 875–87PubMedCrossRef Almenoff J, LaCroix K, Yuen N, et al. Comparative performance of two quantitative signal detection methods: implications for use in a pharmacovigilance department. Drug Saf 2006; 29(10): 875–87PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brewster W, Gibbs T, LaCroix K, et al. Evolving paradigms in pharmacovigilance. Curr Drug Saf 2006; 1(2): 127–34PubMedCrossRef Brewster W, Gibbs T, LaCroix K, et al. Evolving paradigms in pharmacovigilance. Curr Drug Saf 2006; 1(2): 127–34PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Innovations for the Future of Pharmacovigilance
Author
Dr June S. Almenoff
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200730070-00013

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Drug Safety 7/2007 Go to the issue

Conference Paper

Signal Detection