Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 15/2002

01-12-2002 | Original Research Article

Monitoring and Assessing the Safety of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

A West Midlands Experience

Authors: Dr Paresh Jobanputra, Fiona Maggs, Dawn Homer, Jessica Bevan

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 15/2002

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Serious adverse events may occur from the use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. We describe preliminary data from a regional surveillance scheme. Our aims were to identify a broad range of potential adverse events, to identify deficiencies in care and examine the management of common events in order to improve care.
Methods: Adverse events were sought by regular postcards to clinicians in the West Midlands region of the UK. Each reported case was carefully described and the opinions of at least three peer-reviewers were sought on cause-effect relationships, the potential for prevention and the appropriateness of management.
Results: Forty-four serious adverse events associated with DMARD use were reported between December 1999 and October 2001. Events included eight patients with malignancies, two with pancytopenia taking methotrexate, three with septic arthritis, and two with septicaemias. Fifteen cases have been peer-reviewed in detail, so far. At least two reviewers thought that eight events were related to DMARD use and that two were preventable. Agreement between pairs of reviewers was fair or moderate (weighted kappa 0.23–0.5).
Discussion: We have successfully implemented a regional system for identifying potential drug-related serious adverse events. A diverse range of potential drug-related events has been seen. Early analyses have highlighted the difficulties of determining cause-effect relationships between a drug and an event.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Jobanputra P, Hunter M, Clark D, et al. An audit of methotrexate and folic acid for rheumatoid arthritis: experience from a teaching centre. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34: 971–5PubMedCrossRef Jobanputra P, Hunter M, Clark D, et al. An audit of methotrexate and folic acid for rheumatoid arthritis: experience from a teaching centre. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34: 971–5PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines. Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 328–46 American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines. Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 328–46
4.
go back to reference Comer M, Scott DL, Doyle DV, et al. Are slow-acting antirheumatic drugs monitored too often? An audit of current clinical practice. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34: 966–70PubMedCrossRef Comer M, Scott DL, Doyle DV, et al. Are slow-acting antirheumatic drugs monitored too often? An audit of current clinical practice. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34: 966–70PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. JAMA 1995; 274: 29–34PubMedCrossRef Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. JAMA 1995; 274: 29–34PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Andrew LB, Stocking C, Krizek T, et al. An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care. Lancet 1997; 349: 309–13CrossRef Andrew LB, Stocking C, Krizek T, et al. An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care. Lancet 1997; 349: 309–13CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA 2001; 286: 415–20PubMedCrossRef Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA 2001; 286: 415–20PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2000; 356: 1255–9PubMedCrossRef Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2000; 356: 1255–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Figueiras A, Tato F, Fontaiñas J, et al. Influence of physicians attitudes on reporting adverse drug events: a case-control study. Med Care 1999; 37: 809–14PubMedCrossRef Figueiras A, Tato F, Fontaiñas J, et al. Influence of physicians attitudes on reporting adverse drug events: a case-control study. Med Care 1999; 37: 809–14PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Eland IA, Belton KJ, van Grootheest AC, et al. Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 623–7PubMedCrossRef Eland IA, Belton KJ, van Grootheest AC, et al. Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 623–7PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brewer T, Colditz GA. Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs. JAMA 1999; 281: 824–9PubMedCrossRef Brewer T, Colditz GA. Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs. JAMA 1999; 281: 824–9PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1994 Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1994
19.
go back to reference Li Wan Po A, Kendall MJ. Causality assessment of adverse events. Drug Saf 2001; 24: 793–9CrossRef Li Wan Po A, Kendall MJ. Causality assessment of adverse events. Drug Saf 2001; 24: 793–9CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hutchinson TA, Flegel KM, HoPingKong H, et al. Reasons for disagreement in the standardized assessment of suspected adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharm Ther 1983; 34: 421–6CrossRef Hutchinson TA, Flegel KM, HoPingKong H, et al. Reasons for disagreement in the standardized assessment of suspected adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharm Ther 1983; 34: 421–6CrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30: 239–45PubMedCrossRef Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30: 239–45PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drugs events. JAMA 1995; 274: 35–43PubMedCrossRef Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drugs events. JAMA 1995; 274: 35–43PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Monitoring and Assessing the Safety of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
A West Midlands Experience
Authors
Dr Paresh Jobanputra
Fiona Maggs
Dawn Homer
Jessica Bevan
Publication date
01-12-2002
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 15/2002
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225150-00004

Other articles of this Issue 15/2002

Drug Safety 15/2002 Go to the issue