Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs 11/2012

01-07-2012 | Review Article

Ceftaroline Fosamil in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Authors: Dr Thomas P. Lodise, PharmD, Donald E. Low

Published in: Drugs | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Ceftaroline fosamil is a cephalosporin antibacterial approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). After intravenous administration, ceftaroline fosamil is rapidly converted to its bioactive metabolite, ceftaroline. Ceftaroline has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including contemporary resistant Gram-positive phenotypes, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Because of its unique spectrum of activity, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) designated ceftaroline as a member of a new subclass of β-lactam antimicrobials, cephalosporins with anti-MRSA activity.
The activity of ceftaroline against S. aureus extends to heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate, vancomycin-intermediate, vancomycin-resistant and daptomycin-nonsusceptible isolates. Ceftaroline has low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for all tested species of streptococci, and has potent activity against S. pneumoniae isolates with varying degrees of penicillin resistance. The activity of ceftaroline is limited against Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium and against anaerobes such as Bacteroides fragilis. The in vitro activity of ceftaroline includes many Gram-negative pathogens, but does not extend to bacteria that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases, class B metallo-β-lactamases or AmpC cephalosporinases, or to most nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli.
Ceftaroline fosamil has been studied for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in phase III randomized, double-blind, international, multicentre noninferiority clinical trials. Two identical trials (CANVAS 1 and CANVAS 2) compared the efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil with that of vancomycin plus aztreonam in 1378 adults with cSSSI. Results demonstrated that ceftaroline was noninferior to vancomycin plus aztreonam, with 91.6% in the ceftaroline fosamil group (pooled analysis) achieving clinical response compared with 92.7% in the vancomycin plus aztreonam group (difference −1.1%, 95% CI −4.2, 2.0). An additional analysis evaluated clinical cure in a subgroup of patients who met the FDA guidance definition of ABSSSI at treatment day 3. Clinical response, defined as cessation of lesion spread and absence of fever, was 74.0% in the ceftaroline fosamil group compared with 66.2% in the vancomycin plus aztreonam group (treatment difference 7.8%, 95% CI 1.3, 14.0).
Clinical efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil in 1240 hospitalized adults with CAP was compared with that of ceftriaxone in two additional phase III trials (FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2). Of note, because ceftriaxone does not have activity against MRSA, patients with confirmed or suspected MRSA CAP were excluded from the FOCUS trials. Results demonstrated that ceftaroline was noninferior to ceftriaxone, with 84.3% in the ceftaroline fosamil group achieving clinical cure compared with 77.7% in the ceftriaxone group (difference 6.7%, 95% CI 1.6, 11.8). An additional analysis of the trials was conducted in patients with moderate to severe CAP and at least one proven typical bacterial pathogen at baseline (i.e. CABP). Day 4 clinical response rates were 69.5% for ceftaroline and 59.4% for ceftriaxone (difference 10.1%, 95% CI −0.6, 20.6).
In the phase III trials, adverse event rates were similar between groups. Overall, ceftaroline is well tolerated, which is consistent with the good safety and tolerability profile of the cephalosporin class.
In summary, ceftaroline fosamil is a broad-spectrum parenteral cephalosporin with excellent in vitro activity against resistant Gram-positive pathogens, including MRSA, as well as many common Gram-negative organisms. It is a welcome treatment option for ABSSSI and CABP.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement (M100-S20). Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2010 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement (M100-S20). Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2010
2.
go back to reference Zhanel GG, Sniezek G, Schweizer F, et al. Ceftaroline: a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Drugs 2009; 69: 809–31PubMedCrossRef Zhanel GG, Sniezek G, Schweizer F, et al. Ceftaroline: a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Drugs 2009; 69: 809–31PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Villegas-Estrada A, Lee M, Hesek D, et al. Co-opting the cell wall in fighting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: potent inhibition of PBP 2a by two anti-MRSA β-lactam antibiotics. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130: 9212–3PubMedCrossRef Villegas-Estrada A, Lee M, Hesek D, et al. Co-opting the cell wall in fighting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: potent inhibition of PBP 2a by two anti-MRSA β-lactam antibiotics. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130: 9212–3PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kosowska-Shick K, McGhee PL, Appelbaum PC. Affinity of ceftaroline and other β-lactams for penicillin-binding proteins from Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 1670–7PubMedCrossRef Kosowska-Shick K, McGhee PL, Appelbaum PC. Affinity of ceftaroline and other β-lactams for penicillin-binding proteins from Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 1670–7PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moisan H, Pruneau M, Malouin F. Binding of ceftaroline to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 713–6PubMedCrossRef Moisan H, Pruneau M, Malouin F. Binding of ceftaroline to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 713–6PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, et al. Activity of ceftaroline and epidemiologic trends in Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from 43 medical centers in the United States in 2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 4154–60PubMedCrossRef Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, et al. Activity of ceftaroline and epidemiologic trends in Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from 43 medical centers in the United States in 2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 4154–60PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sader HS, Moet G, Jones RN. In vitro activity of ceftaroline tested against recent clinical isolates from the United States (USA) [abstract no. 894]. 47th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2009 Oct 29–Nov 1; Philadelphia (PA) Sader HS, Moet G, Jones RN. In vitro activity of ceftaroline tested against recent clinical isolates from the United States (USA) [abstract no. 894]. 47th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2009 Oct 29–Nov 1; Philadelphia (PA)
8.
go back to reference Saravolatz L, Pawlak J, Johnson L. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against community-associated methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-intermediate, vancomycin-resistant, and daptomycin-nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 3027–30PubMedCrossRef Saravolatz L, Pawlak J, Johnson L. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against community-associated methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-intermediate, vancomycin-resistant, and daptomycin-nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 3027–30PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Flamm RK, Sader HS, Farrell DJ, et al. Summary of ceftaroline activity against pathogens in the United States, 2010: report from the Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) Surveillance Program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 293–4CrossRef Flamm RK, Sader HS, Farrell DJ, et al. Summary of ceftaroline activity against pathogens in the United States, 2010: report from the Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) Surveillance Program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 293–4CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Castanheira M, Jones RN, Sader HS. In vitro activity of ceftaroline tested against leading gram-positive and gram-negative European bacterial pathogens collected in 2009 [abstract no. 1876]. 20th Annual European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; 2010 Apr 10–13; Vienna Castanheira M, Jones RN, Sader HS. In vitro activity of ceftaroline tested against leading gram-positive and gram-negative European bacterial pathogens collected in 2009 [abstract no. 1876]. 20th Annual European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; 2010 Apr 10–13; Vienna
11.
go back to reference Karlowsky JA, Adam HJ, DeCorby MR, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals in 2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 2837–46PubMedCrossRef Karlowsky JA, Adam HJ, DeCorby MR, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals in 2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 2837–46PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference TEFLARO® (ceftaroline fosamil) [prescribing information]. St. Louis (MO): Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2012 TEFLARO® (ceftaroline fosamil) [prescribing information]. St. Louis (MO): Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2012
13.
go back to reference Brown SD, Traczewski MM. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a new cephalosporin, ceftaroline, and determination of quality control ranges for MIC testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 1271–4PubMedCrossRef Brown SD, Traczewski MM. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a new cephalosporin, ceftaroline, and determination of quality control ranges for MIC testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 1271–4PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ge Y, Biek D, Talbot GH, et al. In vitro profiling of ceftaroline against a collection of recent bacterial clinical isolates from across the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 3398–407PubMedCrossRef Ge Y, Biek D, Talbot GH, et al. In vitro profiling of ceftaroline against a collection of recent bacterial clinical isolates from across the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 3398–407PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jacobs MR, Good CE, Windau AR, et al. Activity of ceftaroline against recent emerging serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 2716–9PubMedCrossRef Jacobs MR, Good CE, Windau AR, et al. Activity of ceftaroline against recent emerging serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 2716–9PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McGee L, Biek D, Ge Y, et al. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline against cephalosporin-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 552–6PubMedCrossRef McGee L, Biek D, Ge Y, et al. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline against cephalosporin-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 552–6PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morrissey I, Ge Y, Janes R. Activity of the new cephalosporin ceftaroline against bacteraemia isolates from patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33: 515–9PubMedCrossRef Morrissey I, Ge Y, Janes R. Activity of the new cephalosporin ceftaroline against bacteraemia isolates from patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33: 515–9PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patel SN, Pillai DR, Pong-Porter S, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and cethromycin against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected from across Canada between 2003 and 2008 [letter]. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 64: 659–60PubMedCrossRef Patel SN, Pillai DR, Pong-Porter S, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and cethromycin against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected from across Canada between 2003 and 2008 [letter]. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 64: 659–60PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mushtaq S, Warner M, Ge Y, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M, T-91825) against bacteria with defined resistance mechanisms and phenotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 300–11PubMedCrossRef Mushtaq S, Warner M, Ge Y, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M, T-91825) against bacteria with defined resistance mechanisms and phenotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 300–11PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Citron DM, Tyrrell KL, Merriam CV, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against 623 diverse strains of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 1627–32PubMedCrossRef Citron DM, Tyrrell KL, Merriam CV, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against 623 diverse strains of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 1627–32PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Snydman DR, Jacobus NV, McDermott LA. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against a broad spectrum of recent clinical anaerobic isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 421–5PubMedCrossRef Snydman DR, Jacobus NV, McDermott LA. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against a broad spectrum of recent clinical anaerobic isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 421–5PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schaadt RD, Sweeney DA, Biek D, et al. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of ceftaroline in combination with other antibacterial agents [abstract no. E-279]. 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2007 Sep 17–21; Chicago (IL) Schaadt RD, Sweeney DA, Biek D, et al. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of ceftaroline in combination with other antibacterial agents [abstract no. E-279]. 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2007 Sep 17–21; Chicago (IL)
23.
go back to reference Vidaillac C, Leonard SN, Rybak MJ. In vitro evaluation of ceftaroline alone and in combination with tobramycin against hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35: 527–30PubMedCrossRef Vidaillac C, Leonard SN, Rybak MJ. In vitro evaluation of ceftaroline alone and in combination with tobramycin against hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35: 527–30PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vidaillac C, Leonard SN, Sader HS, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline alone and in combination against clinical isolates of resistant gram-negative pathogens, including β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 2360–6PubMedCrossRef Vidaillac C, Leonard SN, Sader HS, et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline alone and in combination against clinical isolates of resistant gram-negative pathogens, including β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 2360–6PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Odds FC. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 52(1): 1PubMedCrossRef Odds FC. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 52(1): 1PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Clark C, McGhee P, Appelbaum PC, et al. Multistep resistance development studies of ceftaroline in gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 2344–51PubMedCrossRef Clark C, McGhee P, Appelbaum PC, et al. Multistep resistance development studies of ceftaroline in gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 2344–51PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hinshaw RR, Schaadt RD, Murray B, et al. Spontaneous mutation frequency and serial passage resistance development studies with ceftaroline (CPT) [abstract no. C1-185]. 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy/46th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2008 Oct 25–28; Washington, DC Hinshaw RR, Schaadt RD, Murray B, et al. Spontaneous mutation frequency and serial passage resistance development studies with ceftaroline (CPT) [abstract no. C1-185]. 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy/46th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2008 Oct 25–28; Washington, DC
28.
go back to reference Pankuch GA, Appelbaum PC. Postantibiotic effect of ceftaroline against gram-positive organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 4537–9PubMed Pankuch GA, Appelbaum PC. Postantibiotic effect of ceftaroline against gram-positive organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 4537–9PubMed
29.
go back to reference Keel RA, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. Efficacy of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline administered at 600 milligrams every 12 hours against phenotypically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 4028–32PubMedCrossRef Keel RA, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. Efficacy of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline administered at 600 milligrams every 12 hours against phenotypically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 4028–32PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Steed M, Vidaillac C, Rybak MJ. Evaluation of ceftaroline activity versus daptomycin (DAP) against DAP-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3522–6PubMedCrossRef Steed M, Vidaillac C, Rybak MJ. Evaluation of ceftaroline activity versus daptomycin (DAP) against DAP-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3522–6PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vidaillac C, Leonard SN, Rybak MJ. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus in a hollow fiber model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 4712–7PubMedCrossRef Vidaillac C, Leonard SN, Rybak MJ. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus in a hollow fiber model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 4712–7PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Zhanel GG, Rossnagel E, Nichol et al. Ceftaroline pharmacodynamic activity versus community-associated and healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus using an in vitro model. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 1301–5PubMedCrossRef Zhanel GG, Rossnagel E, Nichol et al. Ceftaroline pharmacodynamic activity versus community-associated and healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus using an in vitro model. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 1301–5PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Housman ST, Keel RA, Crandon JL, et al. Efficacy of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline against phenotypically diverse Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 2576–80PubMedCrossRef Housman ST, Keel RA, Crandon JL, et al. Efficacy of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline against phenotypically diverse Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 2576–80PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Jacqueline C, Caillon J, Le Mabecque V, et al. In vivo efficacy of ceftaroline (PPI-0903), a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, compared with linezolid and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit endocarditis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 3397–400PubMedCrossRef Jacqueline C, Caillon J, Le Mabecque V, et al. In vivo efficacy of ceftaroline (PPI-0903), a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, compared with linezolid and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit endocarditis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 3397–400PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jacqueline C, Amador G, Batard E, et al. Comparison of ceftaroline fosamil, daptomycin and tigecycline in an experimental rabbit endocarditis model caused by methicillin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 863–6PubMedCrossRef Jacqueline C, Amador G, Batard E, et al. Comparison of ceftaroline fosamil, daptomycin and tigecycline in an experimental rabbit endocarditis model caused by methicillin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 863–6PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jacqueline C, Caillon J, Le Mabecque V, et al. In vivo activity of a novel anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cephalosporin, ceftaroline, against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis strains in a rabbit endocarditis model: a comparative study with line-zolid and vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 5300–2PubMedCrossRef Jacqueline C, Caillon J, Le Mabecque V, et al. In vivo activity of a novel anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cephalosporin, ceftaroline, against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis strains in a rabbit endocarditis model: a comparative study with line-zolid and vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 5300–2PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Jacqueline C, Amador G, Caillon J, et al. Efficacy of the new cephalosporin ceftaroline in the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acute osteomyelitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 1749–52PubMedCrossRef Jacqueline C, Amador G, Caillon J, et al. Efficacy of the new cephalosporin ceftaroline in the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acute osteomyelitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 1749–52PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Croisier-Bertin D, Piroth L, Charles PE, et al. Ceftaroline versus ceftriaxone in a highly penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia rabbit model using simulated human dosing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3557–63PubMedCrossRef Croisier-Bertin D, Piroth L, Charles PE, et al. Ceftaroline versus ceftriaxone in a highly penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia rabbit model using simulated human dosing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3557–63PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cottagnoud P, Acosta F, Biek D, et al. Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil against penicillin-sensitive and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in an experimental rabbit meningitis model [abstract no. B-702]. 50th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2010 Sep 12–15; Boston (MA) Cottagnoud P, Acosta F, Biek D, et al. Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil against penicillin-sensitive and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in an experimental rabbit meningitis model [abstract no. B-702]. 50th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2010 Sep 12–15; Boston (MA)
40.
go back to reference Cottagnoud P, Stucki A, Acosta F, et al. Ceftaroline fosamil is superior to cefepime against a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain in an experimental rabbit meningitis model [abstract no. 1569]. 20th Annual European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; 2010 Apr 10–13; Vienna Cottagnoud P, Stucki A, Acosta F, et al. Ceftaroline fosamil is superior to cefepime against a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain in an experimental rabbit meningitis model [abstract no. 1569]. 20th Annual European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; 2010 Apr 10–13; Vienna
41.
go back to reference Andes D, Craig WA. Pharmacodynamics of a new cephalosporin, PPI-0903 99), active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in murine thigh and lung infection models: identification of an in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1376–83PubMedCrossRef Andes D, Craig WA. Pharmacodynamics of a new cephalosporin, PPI-0903 99), active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in murine thigh and lung infection models: identification of an in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1376–83PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Jones RN, Fritsche TR, Ge Y, et al. Evaluation of PPI-0903M (T91825), a novel cephalosporin: bactericidal activity, effects of modifying in vitro testing parameters and optimization of disc diffusion tests. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 1047–52PubMedCrossRef Jones RN, Fritsche TR, Ge Y, et al. Evaluation of PPI-0903M (T91825), a novel cephalosporin: bactericidal activity, effects of modifying in vitro testing parameters and optimization of disc diffusion tests. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 1047–52PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1–12PubMedCrossRef Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1–12PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Ishikawa T, Matsunaga N, Tawada H, et al. TAK-99, a novel N-phosphono type prodrug of anti-MRSA cephalosporin T-91825: synthesis, physicochemical and pharmacological properties. Bioorg Med Chem 2003; 11: 2427–37PubMedCrossRef Ishikawa T, Matsunaga N, Tawada H, et al. TAK-99, a novel N-phosphono type prodrug of anti-MRSA cephalosporin T-91825: synthesis, physicochemical and pharmacological properties. Bioorg Med Chem 2003; 11: 2427–37PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Ge Y, Redman R, Floren L, et al. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M) in healthy subjects receiving multiple-dose intravenous (IV) infusions [abstract no. A-1937]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA) Ge Y, Redman R, Floren L, et al. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M) in healthy subjects receiving multiple-dose intravenous (IV) infusions [abstract no. A-1937]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA)
46.
go back to reference Steed ME, Rybak MJ. Ceftaroline: a new cephalosporin with activity against resistant gram-positive pathogens. Pharmacotherapy 2010; 30: 375–89PubMedCrossRef Steed ME, Rybak MJ. Ceftaroline: a new cephalosporin with activity against resistant gram-positive pathogens. Pharmacotherapy 2010; 30: 375–89PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Ge Y, Hubbel A. In vitro evaluation of plasma protein binding and metabolic stability of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M) [abstract no. A-1935]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA) Ge Y, Hubbel A. In vitro evaluation of plasma protein binding and metabolic stability of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M) [abstract no. A-1935]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA)
48.
go back to reference Ge Y, Redman R, Floren L, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftaroline (PPI-0903) in healthy subjects [abstract no. A-1936]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA) Ge Y, Redman R, Floren L, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftaroline (PPI-0903) in healthy subjects [abstract no. A-1936]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA)
49.
go back to reference Van Wart SA, Reynolds DK, Khariton T, et al. Impact of concomitant medication use on the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections or community-acquired pneumonia [abstract no. A2-548]. 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2011 Sep 17–20; Chicago (IL) Van Wart SA, Reynolds DK, Khariton T, et al. Impact of concomitant medication use on the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections or community-acquired pneumonia [abstract no. A2-548]. 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2011 Sep 17–20; Chicago (IL)
50.
go back to reference Ge Y, Thye D, Liao S, et al. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftaroline (PPI-0903) in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment (RI) [abstract no. A-1039]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA) Ge Y, Thye D, Liao S, et al. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftaroline (PPI-0903) in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment (RI) [abstract no. A-1039]. 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2006 Sep 27–30; San Francisco (CA)
51.
go back to reference Riccobene T, Fang E, Thye D. An open-label pharmacokinetic (PK), safety, and tolerability study of single intravenous (IV) doses of ceftaroline (CPT) in subjects with normal renal function or severe renal impairment [abstract no. A1-003]. 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2009 Sep 12–15; San Francisco (CA) Riccobene T, Fang E, Thye D. An open-label pharmacokinetic (PK), safety, and tolerability study of single intravenous (IV) doses of ceftaroline (CPT) in subjects with normal renal function or severe renal impairment [abstract no. A1-003]. 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2009 Sep 12–15; San Francisco (CA)
52.
go back to reference Riccobene T, Jakate A, Rank D, et al. An open-label, pharmacokinetic, safety and tolerability study of singledose intravenous ceftaroline in subjects with end-stage renal disease on intermittent haemodialysis [abstract no. P1455]. 19th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID); 2009 May 16–19; Helsinki Riccobene T, Jakate A, Rank D, et al. An open-label, pharmacokinetic, safety and tolerability study of singledose intravenous ceftaroline in subjects with end-stage renal disease on intermittent haemodialysis [abstract no. P1455]. 19th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID); 2009 May 16–19; Helsinki
53.
go back to reference Riccobene T, Jakate A, Rank D, et al. Open-label pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability study of single intravenous doses of ceftaroline in healthy elderly and healthy young adult subjects [abstract no. 3-161]. 44th Annual Midyear Meeting of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP); 2009 Dec 6–10; Las Vegas (NV) Riccobene T, Jakate A, Rank D, et al. Open-label pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability study of single intravenous doses of ceftaroline in healthy elderly and healthy young adult subjects [abstract no. 3-161]. 44th Annual Midyear Meeting of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP); 2009 Dec 6–10; Las Vegas (NV)
54.
go back to reference Cerexa, Inc. Study of blood levels of ceftaroline fosamil in children who are receiving antibiotic therapy in the hospital [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01298843]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov [Accessed 2012 Jun 22] Cerexa, Inc. Study of blood levels of ceftaroline fosamil in children who are receiving antibiotic therapy in the hospital [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01298843]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​clinicaltrials.​gov [Accessed 2012 Jun 22]
55.
go back to reference Bhavnani SM, Van Wart SA, Rubino CM, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis to evaluate susceptibility test interpretive criteria for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus [abstract no. A2-553]. 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2011 Sep 17–20; Chicago (IL) Bhavnani SM, Van Wart SA, Rubino CM, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis to evaluate susceptibility test interpretive criteria for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus [abstract no. A2-553]. 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2011 Sep 17–20; Chicago (IL)
56.
go back to reference Van Wart SA, Forrest A, Khariton T, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ceftaroline in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infection or community-acquired pneumonia [abstract no. A2-547]. 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2011 Sep 17–20; Chicago (IL) Van Wart SA, Forrest A, Khariton T, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ceftaroline in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infection or community-acquired pneumonia [abstract no. A2-547]. 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2011 Sep 17–20; Chicago (IL)
57.
go back to reference Drusano GL. Pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline fosamil for complicated skin and skin structure infection: rationale for improved anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv33–9PubMedCrossRef Drusano GL. Pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline fosamil for complicated skin and skin structure infection: rationale for improved anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv33–9PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Corey GR, Wilcox MH, Talbot GH, et al., on behalf of the CANVAS 1 investigators. CANVAS 1: the first phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv41–51PubMedCrossRef Corey GR, Wilcox MH, Talbot GH, et al., on behalf of the CANVAS 1 investigators. CANVAS 1: the first phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv41–51PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Wilcox MH, Corey GR, Talbot GH, et al., on behalf of the CANVAS 2 investigators. CANVAS 2: the second phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv53–65PubMedCrossRef Wilcox MH, Corey GR, Talbot GH, et al., on behalf of the CANVAS 2 investigators. CANVAS 2: the second phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv53–65PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Corey GR, Wilcox M, Talbot GH, et al. Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51: 641–50PubMedCrossRef Corey GR, Wilcox M, Talbot GH, et al. Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51: 641–50PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Noel GJ, Strauss RS, Amsler K, et al. Results of a double-blind, randomized trial of ceftobiprole treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 37–44PubMedCrossRef Noel GJ, Strauss RS, Amsler K, et al. Results of a double-blind, randomized trial of ceftobiprole treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 37–44PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Stryjewski ME, Graham DR, Wilson SE, et al., Assessment of Telavancin in Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections Study. Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive organisms. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1683–93PubMedCrossRef Stryjewski ME, Graham DR, Wilson SE, et al., Assessment of Telavancin in Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections Study. Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive organisms. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1683–93PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Snodgrass WR, Anderson T. Prontosil in the treatment of erysipelas, a controlled series of 312 cases. Br Med J 1937; 2: 101–4PubMedCrossRef Snodgrass WR, Anderson T. Prontosil in the treatment of erysipelas, a controlled series of 312 cases. Br Med J 1937; 2: 101–4PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Snodgrass WR, Anderson T. Sulphanilamide in the treatment of erysipelas, a controlled series of 270 cases. Br Med J 1937; 2: 1156–9PubMedCrossRef Snodgrass WR, Anderson T. Sulphanilamide in the treatment of erysipelas, a controlled series of 270 cases. Br Med J 1937; 2: 1156–9PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Friedland HD, O’Neal T, Biek D, et al. CANVAS 1 and 2: analysis of clinical response at day 3 in two phase 3 trials of ceftaroline fosamil vs vancomycin plus aztreonam in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 2231–6PubMedCrossRef Friedland HD, O’Neal T, Biek D, et al. CANVAS 1 and 2: analysis of clinical response at day 3 in two phase 3 trials of ceftaroline fosamil vs vancomycin plus aztreonam in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 2231–6PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al., on behalf of the FOCUS 1 investigators. FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 Suppl. 3: iii19–32PubMedCrossRef File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al., on behalf of the FOCUS 1 investigators. FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 Suppl. 3: iii19–32PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Low DE, File TM Jr, Eckburg PB, et al., on behalf of the FOCUS 2 investigators. FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 Suppl. 3: iii33–44PubMedCrossRef Low DE, File TM Jr, Eckburg PB, et al., on behalf of the FOCUS 2 investigators. FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 Suppl. 3: iii33–44PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al. Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, double-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia [published erratum appears in Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 967]. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51: 1395–405PubMedCrossRef File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al. Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, double-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia [published erratum appears in Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 967]. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51: 1395–405PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 243–50PubMedCrossRef Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 243–50PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Drehobl MA, De Salvo MC, Lewis DE, et al. Single-dose azithromycin microspheres vs clarithromycin extended release for the treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Chest 2005; 128: 2230–7PubMedCrossRef Drehobl MA, De Salvo MC, Lewis DE, et al. Single-dose azithromycin microspheres vs clarithromycin extended release for the treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Chest 2005; 128: 2230–7PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Gotfried MH, Dattani D, Riffer E, et al. A controlled, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release tablets and levofloxacin tablets in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 736–51PubMedCrossRef Gotfried MH, Dattani D, Riffer E, et al. A controlled, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release tablets and levofloxacin tablets in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 736–51PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Tanaseanu C, Bergallo C, Teglia et al.,308 Study Group; 313 Study Group. Integrated results of 2 phase 3 studies comparing tigecycline and levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 61: 329–38PubMedCrossRef Tanaseanu C, Bergallo C, Teglia et al.,308 Study Group; 313 Study Group. Integrated results of 2 phase 3 studies comparing tigecycline and levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 61: 329–38PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Eckburg PB, Friedland HD, Llorens L, et al. Day 4 clinical response of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin Pract. Epub 2012 Jun 13 Eckburg PB, Friedland HD, Llorens L, et al. Day 4 clinical response of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin Pract. Epub 2012 Jun 13
77.
go back to reference Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44 Suppl.: S27–72PubMedCrossRef Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44 Suppl.: S27–72PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Corrado ML. Integrated safety summary of CANVAS 1 and 2 trials: phase III, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. J Anti-microb Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv67–71CrossRef Corrado ML. Integrated safety summary of CANVAS 1 and 2 trials: phase III, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. J Anti-microb Chemother 2010; 65 Suppl. 4: iv67–71CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Rank DR, Friedland HD, Laudano JB. Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 Suppl. 3: iii53–9PubMedCrossRef Rank DR, Friedland HD, Laudano JB. Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 Suppl. 3: iii53–9PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Rank DR, Baculik T, Eckburg P, et al. Integrated safety analysis of CANVAS and FOCUS studies: randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 studies of ceftaroline (CPT) fosamil versus comparators in complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) [abstract no. P1531]. 21st Annual European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases/27th International Congress on Chemotherapy; 2011 May 7–10; Milan Rank DR, Baculik T, Eckburg P, et al. Integrated safety analysis of CANVAS and FOCUS studies: randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 studies of ceftaroline (CPT) fosamil versus comparators in complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) [abstract no. P1531]. 21st Annual European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases/27th International Congress on Chemotherapy; 2011 May 7–10; Milan
81.
go back to reference Panagiotidis G, Bäckström T, Asker-Hagelberg C et al. Effect of ceftaroline on normal human intestinal microflora. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 1811–4PubMedCrossRef Panagiotidis G, Bäckström T, Asker-Hagelberg C et al. Effect of ceftaroline on normal human intestinal microflora. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 1811–4PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ceftaroline Fosamil in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Authors
Dr Thomas P. Lodise, PharmD
Donald E. Low
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11635660-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Drugs 11/2012 Go to the issue

Adis Drug Evaluation

Docetaxel

Adis Drug Profile

Vismodegib