Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Original Research Article

Onset of Action of Formoterol versus Salmeterol via Dry Powder Inhalers in Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

Authors: Prof. Mario Cazzola, Pierluigi Paggiaro, Paolo Palange, Leif Bjermer, Pilar Ausin, Lars-Goran Carlsson, Jan Ekelund, Jan Lotvall

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Bronchodilator therapy is central to the symptomatic management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and treatment with short-acting bronchodilators is recommended in patients with mild COPD.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the onset of effect of single-dose formoterol 9 μg versus single-dose salmeterol 50 μg in patients with moderate COPD.
Methods: In this multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-way single-dose crossover study, patients ≥40 years of age with moderate COPD were randomized to single-dose formoterol 9 μg via Turbuhaler® plus placebo via Diskus®, single-dose salmeterol 50 μg via Diskus® plus placebo via Turbuhaler® or placebo via Turbuhaler® and Diskus® (washout period 2–7 days). Terbutaline 0.5 mg/actuation via Turbuhaler® was used as reliever medication throughout. The primary endpoint was forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 5 minutes post-dose. Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients achieving ≥12% increase in FEV1 at 5 minutes post-dose.
Results: 109 patients were randomized, and 108 completed the study. The increase in FEV1 5 minutes post-dose versus pre-dose was 7.2% for formoterol, 4.1% for salmeterol and 0.7% for placebo, and significantly greater for formoterol versus salmeterol (ratio of treatment effects: 1.030; 95% CI 1.008, 1.052; p = 0.009), for formoterol versus placebo (1.064, 95% CI 1.041, 1.087; p < 0.001) and for salmeterol versus placebo (1.033, 95% CI 1.011, 1.056; p = 0.003). The proportions of patients with ≥12% increase in FEV1 5 minutes post-dose were 23.1%, 9.2% and 6.4% for formoterol, salmeterol and placebo, respectively; this was statistically significantly larger after formoterol than salmeterol (p = 0.008) or placebo (p < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusion: In COPD patients, formoterol 9 μg has an onset of bronchodilatory effect that is more rapid than salmeterol 50 μg based on FEV1 at 5 minutes post-dose.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2008 [online]. Available from http://www.goldcopd.org/ [Accessed 2011 Nov 9] Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2008 [online]. Available from http://​www.​goldcopd.​org/​ [Accessed 2011 Nov 9]
2.
go back to reference Partridge MR, Karlsson N, Small IR. Patient insight into the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the morning: an internet survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25: 2043–8PubMedCrossRef Partridge MR, Karlsson N, Small IR. Patient insight into the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the morning: an internet survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25: 2043–8PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Partridge MR, Schuermann W, Beckman O, et al. Effect on lung function and morning activities of budesonide/ formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2009; 3: 1–11PubMedCrossRef Partridge MR, Schuermann W, Beckman O, et al. Effect on lung function and morning activities of budesonide/ formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2009; 3: 1–11PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Partridge MR, Miravitlles M, Ståhl E, et al. Development and validation of the Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning questionnaire and the Global Chest Symptoms Questionnaire in COPD. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 96–104PubMedCrossRef Partridge MR, Miravitlles M, Ståhl E, et al. Development and validation of the Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning questionnaire and the Global Chest Symptoms Questionnaire in COPD. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 96–104PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cazzola M, Santangelo G, Piccolo A, et al. Effect of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pulm Pharmacol 1994; 7: 103–7PubMedCrossRef Cazzola M, Santangelo G, Piccolo A, et al. Effect of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pulm Pharmacol 1994; 7: 103–7PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cazzola M, Santus P, Di Marco F, et al. Onset of action of formoterol/budesonide in single inhaler vs. formoterol in patients with COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2004; 17: 121–5PubMedCrossRef Cazzola M, Santus P, Di Marco F, et al. Onset of action of formoterol/budesonide in single inhaler vs. formoterol in patients with COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2004; 17: 121–5PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Celik G, Kayacan O, Beder S, et al. Formoterol and salmeterol in partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crossover, placebo-controlled comparison of onset and duration of action. Respiration 1999; 66: 434–9PubMedCrossRef Celik G, Kayacan O, Beder S, et al. Formoterol and salmeterol in partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crossover, placebo-controlled comparison of onset and duration of action. Respiration 1999; 66: 434–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cote C, Pearle JL, Sharafkhaneh A, et al. Faster onset of action of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter, randomized study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2009; 22: 44–9PubMedCrossRef Cote C, Pearle JL, Sharafkhaneh A, et al. Faster onset of action of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter, randomized study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2009; 22: 44–9PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kottakis J, Cioppa GD, Creemers J, et al. Faster onset of bronchodilation with formoterol than with salmeterol in patients with stable, moderate to severe COPD: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Can Respir J 2002; 9: 107–15PubMed Kottakis J, Cioppa GD, Creemers J, et al. Faster onset of bronchodilation with formoterol than with salmeterol in patients with stable, moderate to severe COPD: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Can Respir J 2002; 9: 107–15PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lindberg A, Szalai Z, Pullerits T, et al. Fast onset of effect of budesonide/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and reversible airway obstruction. Respirology 2007; 12: 732–9PubMedCrossRef Lindberg A, Szalai Z, Pullerits T, et al. Fast onset of effect of budesonide/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and reversible airway obstruction. Respirology 2007; 12: 732–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Richter K, Stenglein S, Mücke M, et al. Onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Respiration 2006; 73: 414–9PubMedCrossRef Richter K, Stenglein S, Mücke M, et al. Onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Respiration 2006; 73: 414–9PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Benhamou D, Cuvelier A, Muir JF, et al. Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk). Respir Med 2001; 95: 817–21PubMedCrossRef Benhamou D, Cuvelier A, Muir JF, et al. Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk). Respir Med 2001; 95: 817–21PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cazzola M, Di Perna F, D'Amato M, et al. Formoterol Turbuhaler for as-needed therapy in patients with mild acute exacerbations of COPD. Respir Med 2001; 95: 917–21PubMedCrossRef Cazzola M, Di Perna F, D'Amato M, et al. Formoterol Turbuhaler for as-needed therapy in patients with mild acute exacerbations of COPD. Respir Med 2001; 95: 917–21PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bouros D, Kottakis J, Le Gros V, et al. Effects of formoterol and salmeterol on resting inspiratory capacity in COPD patients with poor FEV(1) reversibility. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 581–6PubMedCrossRef Bouros D, Kottakis J, Le Gros V, et al. Effects of formoterol and salmeterol on resting inspiratory capacity in COPD patients with poor FEV(1) reversibility. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 581–6PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Politiek MJ, Boorsma M, Aalbers R. Comparison of formoterol, salbutamol and salmeterol in methacholine induced severe bronchoconstriction. Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 988–92PubMedCrossRef Politiek MJ, Boorsma M, Aalbers R. Comparison of formoterol, salbutamol and salmeterol in methacholine induced severe bronchoconstriction. Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 988–92PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Palmqvist M, Persson G, Lazer L, et al. Inhaled dry-powder formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients: onset of action, duration of effect and potency. Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 2484–9PubMedCrossRef Palmqvist M, Persson G, Lazer L, et al. Inhaled dry-powder formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients: onset of action, duration of effect and potency. Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 2484–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cazzola M, MacNee W, Martinez FJ, et al. Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 416–69PubMedCrossRef Cazzola M, MacNee W, Martinez FJ, et al. Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 416–69PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Goldstein RS, Min ST, et al. Spirometry and dyspnea in patients with COPD: when small differences mean little. Chest 1996; 109: 1163–8PubMedCrossRef Redelmeier DA, Goldstein RS, Min ST, et al. Spirometry and dyspnea in patients with COPD: when small differences mean little. Chest 1996; 109: 1163–8PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Make BJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: developing comprehensive management. Respir Care 2003; 48: 1225–34PubMed Make BJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: developing comprehensive management. Respir Care 2003; 48: 1225–34PubMed
20.
go back to reference Turner J, Wright E, Mendella L, et al. Predictors of patient adherence to long-term home nebulizer therapy for COPD. The IPPB Study Group. Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing. Chest 1995; 108: 394–400PubMedCrossRef Turner J, Wright E, Mendella L, et al. Predictors of patient adherence to long-term home nebulizer therapy for COPD. The IPPB Study Group. Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing. Chest 1995; 108: 394–400PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cerveri I, Pellegrino R, Dore R, et al. Mechanisms for isolated volume response to a bronchodilator in patients with COPD. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88: 1989–95PubMed Cerveri I, Pellegrino R, Dore R, et al. Mechanisms for isolated volume response to a bronchodilator in patients with COPD. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88: 1989–95PubMed
22.
go back to reference Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes E, et al. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993; 16(Suppl. 16): 5–40 Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes E, et al. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993; 16(Suppl. 16): 5–40
23.
go back to reference Sovani MP, Whale CI, Tattersfield AE. A benefit-risk assessment of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in the management of obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Saf 2004; 27: 689–715PubMedCrossRef Sovani MP, Whale CI, Tattersfield AE. A benefit-risk assessment of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in the management of obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Saf 2004; 27: 689–715PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Campbell M, Eliraz A, Johansson G, et al. Formoterol for maintenance and as-needed treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2005; 99: 1511–20PubMedCrossRef Campbell M, Eliraz A, Johansson G, et al. Formoterol for maintenance and as-needed treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2005; 99: 1511–20PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cazzola M, Grella E, Matera MG, et al. Onset of action following formoterol Turbuhaler and salbutamol pMDI in reversible chronic airway obstruction. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002; 15: 97–102PubMedCrossRef Cazzola M, Grella E, Matera MG, et al. Onset of action following formoterol Turbuhaler and salbutamol pMDI in reversible chronic airway obstruction. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002; 15: 97–102PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Onset of Action of Formoterol versus Salmeterol via Dry Powder Inhalers in Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover Study
Authors
Prof. Mario Cazzola
Pierluigi Paggiaro
Paolo Palange
Leif Bjermer
Pilar Ausin
Lars-Goran Carlsson
Jan Ekelund
Jan Lotvall
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11630880-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Clinical Drug Investigation 3/2012 Go to the issue