Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Leading Article

Role of Modelling and Simulation

A European Regulatory Perspective

Authors: Dr Siv Jönsson, Anja Henningsson, Monica Edholm, Tomas Salmonson

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Modelling and simulation (M&S) of clinical data, e.g. pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical endpoints, is a useful approach for more efficient interpretation of collected data and for extrapolation of knowledge to the entire target population. This type of documentation is included in the majority of marketing authorization applications for new medicinal products. This article summarizes the current status of regulatory review with respect to the role of M&S in Europe from the perspective of the Swedish Medical Products Agency.
At present, regulatory bodies in Europe encourage the application of the M&S approach during drug development. However, there is a lack of consensus and transparent guidance documents. The main regulatory usage is in the evaluation of dose choices in sub-populations and as support for the dosing regimen in general. The regulatory review of conestat alfa illustrates how the dose recommendation was revised during the approval procedure based on M&S information. A survey of marketing authorization applications for new medicinal products approved in 2010 revealed that the use of the information gained from M&S documentation varies with respect to both regulatory review and the applicants’ presentation of the data in the submitted dossier.
Increased utilization and broadened application of M&S is anticipated in pharmaceutical development, where one area of focus is medicines for paediatric patients. Accordingly, the regulatory agencies will need to increase their capability to assess and utilize this type of information, and an interactive process among regulatory agencies is warranted to provide more unified regulatory assessment and guidance. Moreover, applicants are encouraged to expand on the usage of exposure-response models to map the systemic exposure range that yields safe and efficacious treatment and to improve the presentation of the gained knowledge in summary documents of the marketing authorization applications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997 Mar; 61(3): 275–91PubMedCrossRef Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997 Mar; 61(3): 275–91PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Breimer DD, Danhof M. Relevance of the application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling concepts in drug development: the ‘wooden shoe’ paradigm. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 Apr; 32(4): 259–67PubMedCrossRef Breimer DD, Danhof M. Relevance of the application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling concepts in drug development: the ‘wooden shoe’ paradigm. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 Apr; 32(4): 259–67PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Minto C, Schnider T. Expanding clinical applications of population pharma-codynamic modelling. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998 Oct; 46(4): 321–33PubMedCrossRef Minto C, Schnider T. Expanding clinical applications of population pharma-codynamic modelling. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998 Oct; 46(4): 321–33PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Derendorf H, Meibohm B. Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives. Pharm Res 1999 Feb; 16(2): 176–85PubMedCrossRef Derendorf H, Meibohm B. Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives. Pharm Res 1999 Feb; 16(2): 176–85PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Balant LP, Gex-Fabry M. Modelling during drug development. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000 Jul; 50(1): 13–26PubMedCrossRef Balant LP, Gex-Fabry M. Modelling during drug development. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000 Jul; 50(1): 13–26PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Holford NH, Kimko HC, Monteleone JP, et al. Simulation of clinical trials. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000; 40: 209–34PubMedCrossRef Holford NH, Kimko HC, Monteleone JP, et al. Simulation of clinical trials. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000; 40: 209–34PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Sheiner LB, Steimer J-L. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000; 40: 67–95PubMedCrossRef Sheiner LB, Steimer J-L. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000; 40: 67–95PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aarons L, Karlsson MO, Mentre F, et al. Role of modelling and simulation in phase I drug development. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001 May; 13(2): 115–22PubMedCrossRef Aarons L, Karlsson MO, Mentre F, et al. Role of modelling and simulation in phase I drug development. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001 May; 13(2): 115–22PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Meibohm B, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in drug product development. J Pharm Sci 2001 Jan; 91(1): 18–31CrossRef Meibohm B, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in drug product development. J Pharm Sci 2001 Jan; 91(1): 18–31CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stanski DR, Rowland M, Sheiner LB. Getting the dose right: report from the Tenth European Federation of Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS) Conference on Optimizing Drug Development. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2005 Apr; 32(2): 199–211PubMedCrossRef Stanski DR, Rowland M, Sheiner LB. Getting the dose right: report from the Tenth European Federation of Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS) Conference on Optimizing Drug Development. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2005 Apr; 32(2): 199–211PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chaikin P, Rhodes GR, Bruno R, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in drug development: an industrial perspective. J Clin Pharmacol 2000 Dec; 40(12 Pt 2): 1428–38PubMed Chaikin P, Rhodes GR, Bruno R, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in drug development: an industrial perspective. J Clin Pharmacol 2000 Dec; 40(12 Pt 2): 1428–38PubMed
13.
go back to reference Reigner BG, Williams PE, Patel IH, et al. An evaluation of the integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in clinical drug development: experience within Hoffmann La Roche. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 Aug; 33(2): 142–52PubMedCrossRef Reigner BG, Williams PE, Patel IH, et al. An evaluation of the integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in clinical drug development: experience within Hoffmann La Roche. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 Aug; 33(2): 142–52PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gieschke R, Steimer JL. Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2000 Jan–Mar; 25(1): 49–58PubMedCrossRef Gieschke R, Steimer JL. Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2000 Jan–Mar; 25(1): 49–58PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Olson SC, Bockbrader H, Boyd RA, et al. Impact of population pharma-cokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000 May; 38(5): 449–59PubMedCrossRef Olson SC, Bockbrader H, Boyd RA, et al. Impact of population pharma-cokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000 May; 38(5): 449–59PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Blesch KS, Gieschke R, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: the capecitabine experience. Invest New Drugs 2003 May; 21(2): 195–223PubMedCrossRef Blesch KS, Gieschke R, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: the capecitabine experience. Invest New Drugs 2003 May; 21(2): 195–223PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Veyrat-Follet C, Bruno R, Olivares R, et al. Clinical trial simulation of docetaxel in patients with cancer as a tool for dosage optimization. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000 Dec; 68(6): 677–87PubMedCrossRef Veyrat-Follet C, Bruno R, Olivares R, et al. Clinical trial simulation of docetaxel in patients with cancer as a tool for dosage optimization. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000 Dec; 68(6): 677–87PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lockwood P, Ewy W, Hermann D, et al. Application of clinical trial simulation to compare proof-of-concept study designs for drugs with a slow onset of effect: an example in Alzheimer’s disease. Pharm Res 2006 Sep; 23(9): 2050–9PubMedCrossRef Lockwood P, Ewy W, Hermann D, et al. Application of clinical trial simulation to compare proof-of-concept study designs for drugs with a slow onset of effect: an example in Alzheimer’s disease. Pharm Res 2006 Sep; 23(9): 2050–9PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Miller R, Ewy W, Corrigan BW, et al. How modeling and simulation have enhanced decision making in new drug development. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2005 Apr; 32(2): 185–97PubMedCrossRef Miller R, Ewy W, Corrigan BW, et al. How modeling and simulation have enhanced decision making in new drug development. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2005 Apr; 32(2): 185–97PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chien JY, Friedrich S, Heathman MA, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: role of modeling and simulation. AAPS J 2005 Oct 7; 7(3): E544–59PubMedCrossRef Chien JY, Friedrich S, Heathman MA, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: role of modeling and simulation. AAPS J 2005 Oct 7; 7(3): E544–59PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhang L, Sinha V, Forgue ST, et al. Model-based drug development: the road to quantitative pharmacology. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2006 Jun; 33(3): 369–93PubMedCrossRef Zhang L, Sinha V, Forgue ST, et al. Model-based drug development: the road to quantitative pharmacology. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2006 Jun; 33(3): 369–93PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lalonde RL, Kowalski KG, Hutmacher MM, et al. Model-based drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Jul; 82(1): 21–32PubMedCrossRef Lalonde RL, Kowalski KG, Hutmacher MM, et al. Model-based drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Jul; 82(1): 21–32PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Grasela TH, Dement CW, Kolterman OG, et al. Pharmacometrics and the transition to model-based development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Aug; 82(2): 137–42PubMedCrossRef Grasela TH, Dement CW, Kolterman OG, et al. Pharmacometrics and the transition to model-based development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Aug; 82(2): 137–42PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stone JA, Banfield C, Pfister M, et al. Model-based drug development survey finds pharmacometrics impacting decision making in the pharmaceutical industry. J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl.): 20S–30SPubMedCrossRef Stone JA, Banfield C, Pfister M, et al. Model-based drug development survey finds pharmacometrics impacting decision making in the pharmaceutical industry. J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl.): 20S–30SPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lesko LJ. Paving the critical path: how can clinical pharmacology help achieve the vision? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Feb; 81(2): 170–7PubMedCrossRef Lesko LJ. Paving the critical path: how can clinical pharmacology help achieve the vision? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Feb; 81(2): 170–7PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Edholm M, Gil Berglund E, Salmonson T. Regulatory aspects of pharmacokinetic profiling in special populations: a European perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008 Nov; 47(11): 693–701PubMedCrossRef Edholm M, Gil Berglund E, Salmonson T. Regulatory aspects of pharmacokinetic profiling in special populations: a European perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008 Nov; 47(11): 693–701PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Manolis E, Herold R. Pharmacometrics for regulatory decision making: status and perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011 Oct 1; 50(10): 625–6PubMedCrossRef Manolis E, Herold R. Pharmacometrics for regulatory decision making: status and perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011 Oct 1; 50(10): 625–6PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Jönsson S, Henningsson A, Edholm E, et al. Contribution of modeling and simulation studies in the regulatory review: a European regulatory perspective. In: Kimko HHC, Peck CC, editors. Clinical trial simulations: applications and trends. New York: Springer, 2011: 15–36CrossRef Jönsson S, Henningsson A, Edholm E, et al. Contribution of modeling and simulation studies in the regulatory review: a European regulatory perspective. In: Kimko HHC, Peck CC, editors. Clinical trial simulations: applications and trends. New York: Springer, 2011: 15–36CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Manolis E, Osman TE, Herold R, et al. Role of modeling and simulation in pediatric investigation plans. Paediatr Anaesth 2011 Mar; 21(3): 214–21PubMedCrossRef Manolis E, Osman TE, Herold R, et al. Role of modeling and simulation in pediatric investigation plans. Paediatr Anaesth 2011 Mar; 21(3): 214–21PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Manolis E, Pons G. Proposals for model-based paediatric medicinal development within the current European Union regulatory framework. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009 Oct; 68(4): 493–501PubMedCrossRef Manolis E, Pons G. Proposals for model-based paediatric medicinal development within the current European Union regulatory framework. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009 Oct; 68(4): 493–501PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Zhao P, Zhang L, Grillo JA, et al. Applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation during regulatory review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011 Feb; 89(2): 259–67PubMedCrossRef Zhao P, Zhang L, Grillo JA, et al. Applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation during regulatory review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011 Feb; 89(2): 259–67PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Gobburo JVS. Pharmacometrics 2020. J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl.): 151S–157SCrossRef Gobburo JVS. Pharmacometrics 2020. J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl.): 151S–157SCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Wetherington JD, Pfister M, Banfield C, et al. Model-based drug development: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for broad application of pharmacometrics in drug development. J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl.): 31S–46SPubMedCrossRef Wetherington JD, Pfister M, Banfield C, et al. Model-based drug development: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for broad application of pharmacometrics in drug development. J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl.): 31S–46SPubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Karlsson KE, Grahnén A, Karlsson MO, et al. Randomized exposure-controlled trials; impact of randomization and analysis strategies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007 Sep; 64(3): 266–77PubMedCrossRef Karlsson KE, Grahnén A, Karlsson MO, et al. Randomized exposure-controlled trials; impact of randomization and analysis strategies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007 Sep; 64(3): 266–77PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Role of Modelling and Simulation
A European Regulatory Perspective
Authors
Dr Siv Jönsson
Anja Henningsson
Monica Edholm
Tomas Salmonson
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11596650-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2/2012 Go to the issue