Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 6/2011

01-11-2011 | Original Research Article

An application of a proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries

The case of Côte d’Ivoire

Authors: Vakaramoko Diaby, MSc, CRA, Jean Lachaine

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The General Mutual Benefit Fund for Civil Servants and State Employees of Côte d’Ivoire (MUGEFCI; Mutuelle Générale des Fonctionnaires et Agents de l’État de Côte d’Ivoire) is a health mutual fund providing coverage (medical consultations, laboratory tests and treatment) for its enrolees (government officials and agents). This organization aims to improve its current drug reimbursement process because of budgetary constraints. One method of achieving this is to implement a formulary-listing framework specifically developed for low-income countries.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of developing a new formulary for the MUGEFCI in Côte d’Ivoire, by implementing a formulary-listing framework specifically designed for under-researched settings.

Methods

The application of this formulary-listing framework (based on multi-criteria decision analysis [MCDA]) consisted of four steps. First, relevant formulary-listing criteria and their levels of variation were identified and weighted according to their importance in the decision making around drug reimbursement. Second, a set of priority treatments to be assessed was determined. Once the treatments eligible for reimbursement were determined, scores were assigned to these treatments according to their performance on the formulary-listing criteria levels. Finally, a composite league table (weighted matrix) was constructed to rank the set of treatments by priority order of reimbursement.
A budget-impact analysis (BIA) was also conducted to appraise the economic implications of the new composite drugs league table. The extent to which the new priority list of reimbursable drugs was affordable for the MUGEFCI was then measured.

Results

Policy makers in Côte d’Ivoire considered severity of disease and cost effectiveness of treatment to be the most significant criteria for priority reimbursement of drugs. This translated into a general preference for antimalarials, treatments for asthma and antibacterials for urinary tract infection. Moreover, the results of the BIA suggest that the new priority list of reimbursable drugs would be affordable if the real economic impact of drugs per member is less than $US66. Over this threshold, the MUGEFCI would have to select reimbursable drugs according to their rank in the priority list and their respective budget impact per patient (cost per patient). This selection would start from the first treatment, going down the list until the $US66 per patient is exhausted.

Conclusion

It was possible to use MCDA to simultaneously consider different decision criteria for drug reimbursement in Côte d’Ivoire; therefore, it is feasible to use MCDA to establish a formulary for low-income countries. The application of this method is a step towards transparency in policy making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Diaby V, Dié Kakou H, Lachaine J. Eliciting preferences for reimbursed drugs selection criteria in Cote d’Ivoire. Patient 2011; 4(2): 125–31PubMedCrossRef Diaby V, Dié Kakou H, Lachaine J. Eliciting preferences for reimbursed drugs selection criteria in Cote d’Ivoire. Patient 2011; 4(2): 125–31PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006; 4: 14PubMedCrossRef Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006; 4: 14PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference McDaniel Jr C, Gates R. Marketing research essentials. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2005 McDaniel Jr C, Gates R. Marketing research essentials. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2005
6.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(8): 661–77PubMedCrossRef Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(8): 661–77PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Diaby V, Lachaine J. A proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries: incorporating key features from established drug benefit plans. Pharm Med 2011; 25(2): 71–82CrossRef Diaby V, Lachaine J. A proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries: incorporating key features from established drug benefit plans. Pharm Med 2011; 25(2): 71–82CrossRef
8.
go back to reference James C, Carrin G, Savedoff W, et al. Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries. Health Care Anal 2005 Mar; 13(1): 33–51PubMedCrossRef James C, Carrin G, Savedoff W, et al. Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries. Health Care Anal 2005 Mar; 13(1): 33–51PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rapport de revue des pratiques de prescription de 2008 — Mutuelle générale des fonctionnaires et agents de l’État de Côte d’Ivoire. Abidjan: MUGEFCI, 2008. (Data on file) Rapport de revue des pratiques de prescription de 2008 — Mutuelle générale des fonctionnaires et agents de l’État de Côte d’Ivoire. Abidjan: MUGEFCI, 2008. (Data on file)
12.
go back to reference Omonuwa S, Omonuva S. Malaria recurrence caused by Plasmodium falciparum. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002; 15(2): 159–60PubMed Omonuwa S, Omonuva S. Malaria recurrence caused by Plasmodium falciparum. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002; 15(2): 159–60PubMed
13.
go back to reference Observatoire pour les motifs de prescriptions à la MUGEFCI en 2008. Abidjan: MUGEFCI, 2008. (Data on file) Observatoire pour les motifs de prescriptions à la MUGEFCI en 2008. Abidjan: MUGEFCI, 2008. (Data on file)
16.
go back to reference Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Res Alloc 2006 Aug 21; 4: 14CrossRef Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Res Alloc 2006 Aug 21; 4: 14CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005
19.
go back to reference Wilson EC, Rees J, Fordham RJ. Developing a prioritization framework in an English Primary Care Trust. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006 Feb 17; 4: 3PubMedCrossRef Wilson EC, Rees J, Fordham RJ. Developing a prioritization framework in an English Primary Care Trust. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006 Feb 17; 4: 3PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Baltussen R, ten Asbroek G, Koolman X, et al. A rational approach to priority setting: should a lung health program be implemented in Nepal? Health Policy Plan 2007; 22(3): 178–85PubMedCrossRef Baltussen R, ten Asbroek G, Koolman X, et al. A rational approach to priority setting: should a lung health program be implemented in Nepal? Health Policy Plan 2007; 22(3): 178–85PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Jehu-Appiah C, Baltussen R, Acquah C, et al. Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multi-criteria decision analysis. Value Health 2008 Dec; 11(7): 1081–7PubMedCrossRef Jehu-Appiah C, Baltussen R, Acquah C, et al. Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multi-criteria decision analysis. Value Health 2008 Dec; 11(7): 1081–7PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference González-Pier E, Gutiérez-Delgado C, Stevens G, et al. Priority setting for health interventions in Mexico’s system of social protection in health. Lancet 2006 Nov; 368(9547): 1608–18PubMedCrossRef González-Pier E, Gutiérez-Delgado C, Stevens G, et al. Priority setting for health interventions in Mexico’s system of social protection in health. Lancet 2006 Nov; 368(9547): 1608–18PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An application of a proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries
The case of Côte d’Ivoire
Authors
Vakaramoko Diaby, MSc, CRA
Jean Lachaine
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11595220-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 6/2011 Go to the issue

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement