Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2010

01-10-2010 | Original Research Article

Safety and Tolerability of Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension 0.6% in the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis

Data from Six Clinical and Phase I Safety Studies

Authors: Dr Timothy L. Comstock, Michael R. Paterno, Heleen H. DeCory, Dale W. Usner

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 10/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Besifloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone, specifically a chlorofluoroquinolone, with potent broad-spectrum bactericidal activity for the topical treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
Objective: The objective of this report was to provide a comprehensive assessment of the safety and tolerability of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% across clinical and phase I safety studies.
Methods: Data were drawn from two phase I safety studies in healthy adults, an open-label, phase II pharmacokinetic study of patients with bacterial conjunctivitis and from integrated data from three randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, safety and efficacy studies of patients with bacterial conjunctivitis (two were vehicle controlled and one was active controlled with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5%, as base). Safety assessments included changes in visual acuity, ocular assessments with ophthalmoscopy and biomicroscopy, and assessment of adverse events (AEs).
Results: Safety data for besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% were available for 1350 patients, including 1192 patients (1810 eyes) in the integrated analysis. Systemic exposure following topical administration of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% was negligible. No changes were seen in corneal endothelial cell density. In the integrated safety analysis of the three safety and efficacy studies, the most commonly reported ocular AEs in study eyes receiving besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% were blurred vision (2.1 %), eye pain (1.8%), eye irritation (1.4%), nonspecific conjunctivitis (1.2%) and eye pruritus (1.1%). Blurred vision, eye irritation and nonspecific conjunctivitis occurred in significantly fewer besifloxacin-treated patients than in vehicle-treated patients (p≤0.05). Headache (1.8%) was the most frequently reported non-ocular AE. Most AEs were mild in severity and there were no treatment-related serious AEs. Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% did not significantly affect visual acuity, biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy compared with vehicle or moxifloxacin.
Conclusion: The results from this comprehensive data set of 1350 patients demonstrate that besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% has a favourable safety profile and is well tolerated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Diamant JI, Hwang DG. Therapy for bacterial conjunctivitis. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 1999; 12(1): 15–20CrossRef Diamant JI, Hwang DG. Therapy for bacterial conjunctivitis. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 1999; 12(1): 15–20CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sheikh A, Hurwitz B. Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 19(2):CD001211 Sheikh A, Hurwitz B. Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 19(2):CD001211
3.
go back to reference Høvding G. Acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2008; 86(1): 5–17 Høvding G. Acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2008; 86(1): 5–17
4.
go back to reference Cavuoto K, Zutshi D, Karp CL, et al. Update on bacterial conjunctivitis in South Florida. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(1): 51–6PubMedCrossRef Cavuoto K, Zutshi D, Karp CL, et al. Update on bacterial conjunctivitis in South Florida. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(1): 51–6PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ward KH, Lepage J-F, Driot J-Y. Nonclinical pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of BOL-303224-A, a novel fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent for topical ophthalmic use. J Ocular Phamacol Ther 2007; 23(3): 243–56CrossRef Ward KH, Lepage J-F, Driot J-Y. Nonclinical pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of BOL-303224-A, a novel fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent for topical ophthalmic use. J Ocular Phamacol Ther 2007; 23(3): 243–56CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cambau E, Matrat S, Pan X-S, et al. Target specificity of the new fluoroquinolone besifloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63(3): 443–50PubMedCrossRef Cambau E, Matrat S, Pan X-S, et al. Target specificity of the new fluoroquinolone besifloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63(3): 443–50PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Haas W, Pillar CM, Zurenko GE, et al. Besifloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53(8): 3552–60PubMedCrossRef Haas W, Pillar CM, Zurenko GE, et al. Besifloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53(8): 3552–60PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haas W, Zurenko GE, Lee J, et al. Activity of besifloxacin and comparators against ciprofloxacin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis ocular isolates from 2005–2008. Poster presented at the 3rd Congress of the Federation of European Microbiologists; 2009 Jun 28–Jul 2; Gothenberg Haas W, Zurenko GE, Lee J, et al. Activity of besifloxacin and comparators against ciprofloxacin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis ocular isolates from 2005–2008. Poster presented at the 3rd Congress of the Federation of European Microbiologists; 2009 Jun 28–Jul 2; Gothenberg
9.
go back to reference Haas W, Pillar CM, Hesje CK, et al. Bactericidal activity of besifloxacin against staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65(7): 1441–7PubMedCrossRef Haas W, Pillar CM, Hesje CK, et al. Bactericidal activity of besifloxacin against staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65(7): 1441–7PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Besivance [package insert]. Tampa (FL): Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 2009 Besivance [package insert]. Tampa (FL): Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 2009
11.
go back to reference Friedlander MH, Protzko E. Clinical development of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite, a topical azalide anti-infective for ocular surface therapy. Clin Ophthalmol 2007; 1(1): 3–10 Friedlander MH, Protzko E. Clinical development of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite, a topical azalide anti-infective for ocular surface therapy. Clin Ophthalmol 2007; 1(1): 3–10
12.
go back to reference Mehlhorn AJ, Brown DA. Safety concerns with fluoro-quinolones. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41(11): 1859–66PubMedCrossRef Mehlhorn AJ, Brown DA. Safety concerns with fluoro-quinolones. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41(11): 1859–66PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gross RD, Hoffman RO, Lindsay RN. A comparison of ciprofloxacin and tobramycin in bacterial conjunctivitis in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1997; 36(8): 435–44CrossRef Gross RD, Hoffman RO, Lindsay RN. A comparison of ciprofloxacin and tobramycin in bacterial conjunctivitis in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1997; 36(8): 435–44CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gwon A, for the Ofloxacin Study Group II. Ofloxacin vs tobramycin for the treatment of external ocular infection. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110(9): 1234–7PubMedCrossRef Gwon A, for the Ofloxacin Study Group II. Ofloxacin vs tobramycin for the treatment of external ocular infection. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110(9): 1234–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gwon A, for the Ofloxacin Study Group. Topical ofloxacin compared with gentamicin in the treatment of external ocular infection. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76(12): 714–8PubMedCrossRef Gwon A, for the Ofloxacin Study Group. Topical ofloxacin compared with gentamicin in the treatment of external ocular infection. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76(12): 714–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hwang DG, Schanzlin DJ, Rotberg MH, et al., and the Levofloxacin Bacterial Conjunctivitis Placebo-controlled Study Group. A phase III, placebo controlled clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(8): 1004–9PubMedCrossRef Hwang DG, Schanzlin DJ, Rotberg MH, et al., and the Levofloxacin Bacterial Conjunctivitis Placebo-controlled Study Group. A phase III, placebo controlled clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(8): 1004–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lichtenstein SJ, Rinehart M, and the Levofloxacin Bacterial Conjunctivitis Study Group. Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in pediatric patients. J AAPOS 2003; 7(5): 317–24PubMedCrossRef Lichtenstein SJ, Rinehart M, and the Levofloxacin Bacterial Conjunctivitis Study Group. Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in pediatric patients. J AAPOS 2003; 7(5): 317–24PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roberts C. Comparison of the ocular comfort of ofloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution and lubricant eye drops. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2002; 41(3): 151–4CrossRef Roberts C. Comparison of the ocular comfort of ofloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution and lubricant eye drops. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2002; 41(3): 151–4CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schwab IR, Friedlaender M, McCulley J, et al., for the Levofloxacin Bacterial Conjunctivitis Active Control Study Group. A phase III clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution versus 0.3% ofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(3): 457–65PubMedCrossRef Schwab IR, Friedlaender M, McCulley J, et al., for the Levofloxacin Bacterial Conjunctivitis Active Control Study Group. A phase III clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution versus 0.3% ofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(3): 457–65PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Silver LH, Woodside AM, Montgomery DB. Clinical safety of moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% (Vigamox®) in pediatric and nonpediatric patients with bacterial conjunctivitis. Surv Ophthalmol 2005; 50(1 Suppl.): S55–63PubMedCrossRef Silver LH, Woodside AM, Montgomery DB. Clinical safety of moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% (Vigamox®) in pediatric and nonpediatric patients with bacterial conjunctivitis. Surv Ophthalmol 2005; 50(1 Suppl.): S55–63PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yee RW, Tepedino M, Bernstein P, et al., for the Gatifloxacin BID/QID Study Group. A randomized, investigator-masked clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin 0.3% administered BID versus QID for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(3): 425–31PubMedCrossRef Yee RW, Tepedino M, Bernstein P, et al., for the Gatifloxacin BID/QID Study Group. A randomized, investigator-masked clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin 0.3% administered BID versus QID for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(3): 425–31PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Karpecki P, DePaolis M, Hunter JA, et al. Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in patients with bacterial conjunctivitis: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, 5-day efficacy and safety study. Clin Ther 2009; 31(3): 514–26PubMedCrossRef Karpecki P, DePaolis M, Hunter JA, et al. Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in patients with bacterial conjunctivitis: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, 5-day efficacy and safety study. Clin Ther 2009; 31(3): 514–26PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tepedino ME, Heller WH, Usner DW, et al. Phase III efficacy and safety study of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25(5): 1159–69PubMedCrossRef Tepedino ME, Heller WH, Usner DW, et al. Phase III efficacy and safety study of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25(5): 1159–69PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference McDonald MB, Protzko EE, Brunner LS, et al. Efficacy and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% compared with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% for treating bacterial conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 2009; 116(9): 1615–23PubMedCrossRef McDonald MB, Protzko EE, Brunner LS, et al. Efficacy and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% compared with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% for treating bacterial conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 2009; 116(9): 1615–23PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Proksch JW, Granvil CP, Siou-Mermet R, et al. Ocular pharmacokinetics of besifloxacin following topical administration to rabbits, monkeys, and humans. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009; 25(4): 335–44PubMedCrossRef Proksch JW, Granvil CP, Siou-Mermet R, et al. Ocular pharmacokinetics of besifloxacin following topical administration to rabbits, monkeys, and humans. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009; 25(4): 335–44PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zymar [package insert]. Irvine (CA): Allergan, Inc., 2004 Zymar [package insert]. Irvine (CA): Allergan, Inc., 2004
28.
go back to reference Vigamox [package insert]. Fort Worth (TX): Alcon Laboratories, Inc., 2008 Vigamox [package insert]. Fort Worth (TX): Alcon Laboratories, Inc., 2008
29.
go back to reference Baudouin C. Detrimental effect of preservatives in eye drops: implications for the treatment of glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica 2008; 86(7): 716–26PubMedCrossRef Baudouin C. Detrimental effect of preservatives in eye drops: implications for the treatment of glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica 2008; 86(7): 716–26PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Safety and Tolerability of Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension 0.6% in the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis
Data from Six Clinical and Phase I Safety Studies
Authors
Dr Timothy L. Comstock
Michael R. Paterno
Heleen H. DeCory
Dale W. Usner
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 10/2010
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11536720-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 10/2010

Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2010 Go to the issue