Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BioDrugs 4/2009

01-08-2009 | Review Article

Manufacturing of Biodrugs

Need for Harmonization in Regulatory Standards

Authors: Niharika Sahoo, Koel Choudhury, Dr Padmavati Manchikanti

Published in: BioDrugs | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Biodrugs (biologics) are much more complex than chemically synthesized drugs because of their structural heterogeneity and interactions within a given biologic system. The manufacturing process in the biodrug industry varies with each type of molecule and is far more elaborate and stringent due to the use of living organisms and complex substrates. Product purity and altered structural characteristics leading to potential immunogenicity have often been of concern when establishing quality and safety in the use of biodrugs. Regulatory compliance in manufacturing and commercialization of biodrugs involves quality control, quality assurance, and batch documentation. Many factors such as host cell development, cell bank establishment, cell culture, protein production, purification, analysis, formulation, storage, and handling are critical for ensuring the purity, activity, and safety of the finished product. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) for biodrugs has been developed in certain regions such as the EU, US, and Japan. Due to differences in manufacturing methods and systems, product-specific GMP guidelines are evolving. In general, there are variations in GMP guidelines between countries, which lead to difficulty for the manufacturers in conforming to different standards, thus entailing delays in the commercialization of biodrugs. There is a need to develop a unified regulatory guideline for biodrug manufacturing across various countries, which would be helpful in the marketing of products and trade. This review deals with the comparative framework and analysis of GMP regulation of biodrugs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schellekens H. Follow-on biologics: challenges of the next generation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20(4): iv31–4PubMedCrossRef Schellekens H. Follow-on biologics: challenges of the next generation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20(4): iv31–4PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
5.
go back to reference Joung J, Robertson SJ, Griffith E, et al., on behalf of the WHO Informal Consultation Group. WHO informal consultation on regulatory evaluation of therapeutic biological medicinal products, held at WHO Headquarters, Geneva, 19-20 April 2007. Biologicals 2008; 36: 269–76PubMedCrossRef Joung J, Robertson SJ, Griffith E, et al., on behalf of the WHO Informal Consultation Group. WHO informal consultation on regulatory evaluation of therapeutic biological medicinal products, held at WHO Headquarters, Geneva, 19-20 April 2007. Biologicals 2008; 36: 269–76PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Malucchi S, Bertolotto A. Clinical aspects of immunogenicity to biopharmaceuticals. In: Marco VW, Møller EH, editors. Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Vol. VIII. New York: Springer, 2008: 27–56CrossRef Malucchi S, Bertolotto A. Clinical aspects of immunogenicity to biopharmaceuticals. In: Marco VW, Møller EH, editors. Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Vol. VIII. New York: Springer, 2008: 27–56CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Hesse F, Wagner R. Developments and improvements in the manufacturing of human therapeutics with mammalian cell culture. Trends Biotechnol 2000; 18: 173–80PubMedCrossRef Hesse F, Wagner R. Developments and improvements in the manufacturing of human therapeutics with mammalian cell culture. Trends Biotechnol 2000; 18: 173–80PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schiff LJ. Review: production, characterization, and testing of banked mammalian cell substrates used to produce biological products. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2005; 41: 65–70PubMedCrossRef Schiff LJ. Review: production, characterization, and testing of banked mammalian cell substrates used to produce biological products. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2005; 41: 65–70PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference European Medicines Agency. Quality of bio technologic products: derivation and characterization of cell substrates used for production of biotechnologic/biologic products [online]. Available from URL:http://www.pharma.gally.ch/ich/q5d029495en.pdf [Accessed 2009 Jun 23] European Medicines Agency. Quality of bio technologic products: derivation and characterization of cell substrates used for production of biotechnologic/biologic products [online]. Available from URL:http://​www.​pharma.​gally.​ch/ich/q5d029495en.pdf [Accessed 2009 Jun 23]
11.
go back to reference Griffin TJ, Seth G, Xie H, et al. Advancing mammalian cell culture engineering using genome-scale technologies. Trends Biotechnol 2007; 25(9): 401–8PubMedCrossRef Griffin TJ, Seth G, Xie H, et al. Advancing mammalian cell culture engineering using genome-scale technologies. Trends Biotechnol 2007; 25(9): 401–8PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sharma B. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: part 3. Impact of manufacturing changes. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25: 325–31PubMedCrossRef Sharma B. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: part 3. Impact of manufacturing changes. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25: 325–31PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eaton LC. Host cell contaminant protein assay development for recombinant biopharmaceuticals. J Chromatogr 1995; 705: 105–14CrossRef Eaton LC. Host cell contaminant protein assay development for recombinant biopharmaceuticals. J Chromatogr 1995; 705: 105–14CrossRef
16.
18.
go back to reference Riggin A, Luu VT, Lobdell JK, et al. A non-isotopic probe-hybridization assay for residual DNA in biopharmaceuticals. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1997; 16: 561–72PubMedCrossRef Riggin A, Luu VT, Lobdell JK, et al. A non-isotopic probe-hybridization assay for residual DNA in biopharmaceuticals. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1997; 16: 561–72PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goldsmith D, Kuhlmann M, Covic A. Through the looking glass: the protein science of biosimilars. Clin Exp Nephrol 2007; 11: 191–5PubMedCrossRef Goldsmith D, Kuhlmann M, Covic A. Through the looking glass: the protein science of biosimilars. Clin Exp Nephrol 2007; 11: 191–5PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sharma B. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: part 1. Impact of product handling. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25: 310–7PubMedCrossRef Sharma B. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: part 1. Impact of product handling. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25: 310–7PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Andya JD, Hsu CC, Shire SJ. Mechanisms of aggregate formation and carbohydrate excipient stabilization of lyophilized humanized monoclonal antibody formulations. AAPS PharmSci 2003; 5(2): E10PubMedCrossRef Andya JD, Hsu CC, Shire SJ. Mechanisms of aggregate formation and carbohydrate excipient stabilization of lyophilized humanized monoclonal antibody formulations. AAPS PharmSci 2003; 5(2): E10PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gregory R, Edwards S, Yateman NA. Demonstration of insulin transformation products in insulin vials by high-performance liquid chromatography. Diabetes Care 1991; 14(1): 42–8PubMedCrossRef Gregory R, Edwards S, Yateman NA. Demonstration of insulin transformation products in insulin vials by high-performance liquid chromatography. Diabetes Care 1991; 14(1): 42–8PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Akers MJ. Special challenges in production of biopharmaceutical dosage forms. Bioprocess Int 2006; 4(11): 36–43 Akers MJ. Special challenges in production of biopharmaceutical dosage forms. Bioprocess Int 2006; 4(11): 36–43
24.
go back to reference Crommelin D, Storm G, Verrijk R, et al. Shifting paradigm, biopharmaceuticals vs low molecular weight drugs. Int J Pharm 2003; 266: 3–16PubMedCrossRef Crommelin D, Storm G, Verrijk R, et al. Shifting paradigm, biopharmaceuticals vs low molecular weight drugs. Int J Pharm 2003; 266: 3–16PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schellekens H. The first biosimilar epoetin: but how similar is it? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 174–8PubMedCrossRef Schellekens H. The first biosimilar epoetin: but how similar is it? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 174–8PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kromminga A, Deray G. Case study: immunogenicity of rhEPO. In: Marco VW, Møller EH, editors. Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Vol. VIII. New York: Springer, 2008: 113–26CrossRef Kromminga A, Deray G. Case study: immunogenicity of rhEPO. In: Marco VW, Møller EH, editors. Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Vol. VIII. New York: Springer, 2008: 113–26CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sharma B. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: part 2. Impact of container closure. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25: 318–24PubMedCrossRef Sharma B. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: part 2. Impact of container closure. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25: 318–24PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tucker J, Yakatan S, Yakatan S. Biogenerics 2007: how far have we come? J Comm Biotechnol 2008; 14: 56–64CrossRef Tucker J, Yakatan S, Yakatan S. Biogenerics 2007: how far have we come? J Comm Biotechnol 2008; 14: 56–64CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Muller KM, Gempler MR, Scheiwe M, et al. Quality assurance for biopharmaceuticals: an overview of regulations, methods and problems. Pharm Acta Helv 1996; 71: 421–38CrossRef Muller KM, Gempler MR, Scheiwe M, et al. Quality assurance for biopharmaceuticals: an overview of regulations, methods and problems. Pharm Acta Helv 1996; 71: 421–38CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Doblhoff-Dier O, Bliem R. Quality control and assurance from the development to the production of biopharmaceuticals. Trends Biotechnol 1999; 17: 266–70PubMedCrossRef Doblhoff-Dier O, Bliem R. Quality control and assurance from the development to the production of biopharmaceuticals. Trends Biotechnol 1999; 17: 266–70PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Annex 3: guidelines for assuring the quality of pharmaceutical and biological products prepared by recombinant DNA technology. In: WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: forty-first report [WHO technical report series no. 814]. Geneva: WHO, 1991: 59-70 [online]. Available from URL:http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_814.pdf[Accessed 2009 Jun 17] WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Annex 3: guidelines for assuring the quality of pharmaceutical and biological products prepared by recombinant DNA technology. In: WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: forty-first report [WHO technical report series no. 814]. Geneva: WHO, 1991: 59-70 [online]. Available from URL:http://​whqlibdoc.​who.​int/​trs/​WHO_​TRS_​814.​pdf[Accessed 2009 Jun 17]
55.
go back to reference Steel MP, Roessler BJ. Compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices for facilities engaged in vector production, cell isolation, and genetic manipulations. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1999; 10: 295–7PubMedCrossRef Steel MP, Roessler BJ. Compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices for facilities engaged in vector production, cell isolation, and genetic manipulations. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1999; 10: 295–7PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference WHO. WHO informal consultation on international nonproprietary names (INN): policy for biosimilar products. Geneva, 4-5 September 2006 [INN working document 07.211; online] Available from URL: www.who.int/entity/medicines/services/inn/BiosimilarsINN_Report.pdf [Accessed 2009 Jun 16] WHO. WHO informal consultation on international nonproprietary names (INN): policy for biosimilar products. Geneva, 4-5 September 2006 [INN working document 07.211; online] Available from URL: www.who.int/entity/medicines/services/inn/BiosimilarsINN_Report.pdf [Accessed 2009 Jun 16]
65.
go back to reference Lubiniecki AS. Impact of ICH guidelines on phases of development of biotechnology products. In: Bernard A, Griffiths B, Noe W, editors. Animal cell technology: products from cells, cells as product. Dordrecht: Springer, 1999: 489–93 Lubiniecki AS. Impact of ICH guidelines on phases of development of biotechnology products. In: Bernard A, Griffiths B, Noe W, editors. Animal cell technology: products from cells, cells as product. Dordrecht: Springer, 1999: 489–93
66.
go back to reference Lubiniecki AS. Potential influence of international harmonization of pharmaceutical regulations on biopharmaceutical development. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1997; 8: 350–6PubMedCrossRef Lubiniecki AS. Potential influence of international harmonization of pharmaceutical regulations on biopharmaceutical development. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1997; 8: 350–6PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference The International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) [online]. Available from URL:http://www.ich.org[Accessed 2009 Jul 7] The International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) [online]. Available from URL:http://​www.​ich.​org[Accessed 2009 Jul 7]
Metadata
Title
Manufacturing of Biodrugs
Need for Harmonization in Regulatory Standards
Authors
Niharika Sahoo
Koel Choudhury
Dr Padmavati Manchikanti
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
BioDrugs / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1173-8804
Electronic ISSN: 1179-190X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11317110-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

BioDrugs 4/2009 Go to the issue