Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 4/2004

01-12-2004 | Article

Burning a hole in the budget

Tobacco spending and its crowd-out of other goods

Authors: Dr Susan H. Busch, Mireia Jofre-Bonet, Tracy A. Falba, Jody L. Sindelar

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 4/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Smoking is an expensive habit. Smoking households spend, on average, more than $US1000 annually on cigarettes. When a family member quits, in addition to the former smoker’s improved long-term health, families benefit because savings from reduced cigarette expenditures can be allocated to other goods. For households in which some members continue to smoke, smoking expenditures crowd-out other purchases, which may affect other household members, as well as the smoker. We empirically analyse how expenditures on tobacco crowd-out consumption of other goods, estimating the patterns of substitution and complementarity between tobacco products and other categories of household expenditure. We use the Consumer Expenditure Survey data for the years 1995–2001, which we complement with regional price data and state cigarette prices. We estimate a consumer demand system that includes several main expenditure categories (cigarettes, food, alcohol, housing, apparel, transportation, medical care) and controls for socioeconomic variables and other sources of observable heterogeneity. Descriptive data indicate that, comparing smokers to nonsmokers, smokers spend less on housing. Results from the demand system indicate that as the price of cigarettes rises, households increase the quantity of food purchased, and, in some samples, reduce the quantity of apparel and housing purchased.
Footnotes
1
1Representative items in the expenditure categories include food (food at home, food away from home), housing (rent, mortgage interest, property taxes, maintenance and repairs, utilities, household operations, house furnishings), apparel (men’s, boys’, women’s and girls’ apparel; footwear; other apparel services), transportation (vehicle purchases [both new and used], gas, motor oil, vehicle finance charges, insurance, repairs, vehicle rentals) and healthcare (health insurance, medical supplies, medical services, prescription drugs). For further specific classifications, see US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.[13]
 
2
2Low income is defined as less than 200% of the US federal poverty line.
 
3
3In work currently in progress, we are exploiting the longitudinality of the dataset and controlling for the correlation of the error terms over time.
 
4
4Note that given the formula for the elasticities, we can obtain their variances (and statistical level of significance) as a linear combination of the variances of the estimated coefficients.
 
5
5For example, when we estimated the model including the selection bias correction terms, the own price elasticity of tobacco in the full sample was −0.977, compared with −0.986 when we did not include them.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Congressional Budget Office. Federal taxation of tobacco, alcoholic beverages, and motor fuels. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1990 Congressional Budget Office. Federal taxation of tobacco, alcoholic beverages, and motor fuels. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1990
2.
go back to reference Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of health economics. Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2000: 1539–627CrossRef Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of health economics. Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2000: 1539–627CrossRef
3.
go back to reference From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Response to increases in cigarette prices by race/ethnicity, income, and age groups — United States, 1976–1993. JAMA 1998; 280(23): 1979–80CrossRef From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Response to increases in cigarette prices by race/ethnicity, income, and age groups — United States, 1976–1993. JAMA 1998; 280(23): 1979–80CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Remler DK. Poor smokers, poor quitters, and cigarette tax regressivity. Am J Public Health 2004 Feb; 94(2): 225PubMedCrossRef Remler DK. Poor smokers, poor quitters, and cigarette tax regressivity. Am J Public Health 2004 Feb; 94(2): 225PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barrow L, McGranahan L. The earned income credit and durable goods purchases. Evanston (IL): The Joint Center for Poverty Research Conference on the Earned Income Tax Credit, 1999 Barrow L, McGranahan L. The earned income credit and durable goods purchases. Evanston (IL): The Joint Center for Poverty Research Conference on the Earned Income Tax Credit, 1999
6.
go back to reference Souleies NS. The response of household consumption to income tax refunds. Am Econ Rev 1999; 89(4): 947–58CrossRef Souleies NS. The response of household consumption to income tax refunds. Am Econ Rev 1999; 89(4): 947–58CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Deaton AS, Muellbauer J. An almost ideal demand system. Am Econ Rev 1980; 70(3): 312–26 Deaton AS, Muellbauer J. An almost ideal demand system. Am Econ Rev 1980; 70(3): 312–26
8.
go back to reference Deaton A, Muellbauer J. Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1980CrossRef Deaton A, Muellbauer J. Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1980CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hunt-McCool J, Kiker BF, Ng YC. Estimates of the demand for medical care under different functional forms. J Appl Econom 1994; 9(2): 201–18CrossRef Hunt-McCool J, Kiker BF, Ng YC. Estimates of the demand for medical care under different functional forms. J Appl Econom 1994; 9(2): 201–18CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jones AM. A systems approach to the demand for alcohol and tobacco. Bull Econ Res 1989 Apr; 41(2): 85–105CrossRef Jones AM. A systems approach to the demand for alcohol and tobacco. Bull Econ Res 1989 Apr; 41(2): 85–105CrossRef
11.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Tobacco and poverty: a vicious circle. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004 World Health Organization. Tobacco and poverty: a vicious circle. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004
12.
go back to reference Mackay J, Eriksen M. The tobacco atlas. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002: 22–3, 30-1 Mackay J, Eriksen M. The tobacco atlas. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002: 22–3, 30-1
13.
go back to reference US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2002: interview survey and detailed expenditure files [computer file; ICPSR03949-v1]. Ann Arbor (MI): Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005 Mar 25 US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2002: interview survey and detailed expenditure files [computer file; ICPSR03949-v1]. Ann Arbor (MI): Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005 Mar 25
14.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, prevalence data (1995–2002) [online]. Available from URL: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/ [Accessed 2005 Mar 31] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, prevalence data (1995–2002) [online]. Available from URL: http://​apps.​nccd.​cdc.​gov/​brfss/​ [Accessed 2005 Mar 31]
15.
go back to reference Bien TH, Bürge R. Smoking and drinking: a review of the literature. Int J Addict 1990; 25(12): 1429–31PubMed Bien TH, Bürge R. Smoking and drinking: a review of the literature. Int J Addict 1990; 25(12): 1429–31PubMed
16.
go back to reference Evans WN, Farrelly MC. The compensating behavior of smokers: taxes, tar and nicotine. Rand J Econ 1998; 29(3): 578–95PubMedCrossRef Evans WN, Farrelly MC. The compensating behavior of smokers: taxes, tar and nicotine. Rand J Econ 1998; 29(3): 578–95PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK. Human drug self administration in a medium of exchange. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1995; 3: 349–57CrossRef DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK. Human drug self administration in a medium of exchange. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1995; 3: 349–57CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ohsfeldt RL, Boyle RG, Capilouto EI. Tobacco taxes, smoking restrictions, and tobacco use. In: Chaloupka FJ, Grossman M, Bickel WK, et al., editors. The economic analysis of substance use and abuse: an integration of econometric and behavioral economic research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999 Ohsfeldt RL, Boyle RG, Capilouto EI. Tobacco taxes, smoking restrictions, and tobacco use. In: Chaloupka FJ, Grossman M, Bickel WK, et al., editors. The economic analysis of substance use and abuse: an integration of econometric and behavioral economic research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999
19.
go back to reference Klesges RC, Meyers AW, Klesges LM, et al. Smoking, body weight, and their effects on smoking behavior: a comprehensive review of the literature. Psychol Bull 1989; 106(2): 204–30PubMedCrossRef Klesges RC, Meyers AW, Klesges LM, et al. Smoking, body weight, and their effects on smoking behavior: a comprehensive review of the literature. Psychol Bull 1989; 106(2): 204–30PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Burning a hole in the budget
Tobacco spending and its crowd-out of other goods
Authors
Dr Susan H. Busch
Mireia Jofre-Bonet
Tracy A. Falba
Jody L. Sindelar
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 4/2004
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00148365-200403040-00009

Other articles of this Issue 4/2004

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 4/2004 Go to the issue

EditorialNotes

Guest Editorial