Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2002

01-10-2002 | Original Research Article

Psychomotor Effects of Mexazolam vs Placebo in Healthy Volunteers

Authors: Dr Pedro Silveira, Manuel Vaz-da-Silva, Ana Dolgner, Luis Almeida

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 10/2002

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Mexazolam is an oxazolo-benzodiazepine demonstrating chemical similarities to oxazolam and cloxazolam. This trial aimed to assess the effect of mexazolam on psychomotor performance.

Design

The study was a double-blind, single-dose, randomised, two-way crossover, placebo-controlled trial.

Study participants

33 healthy male and female adult volunteers.

Main outcome measures

Psychomotor performance was evaluated through the Leeds Psychomotor Test Battery [critical flicker fusion (CFF) threshold and choice reaction time with its three components (recognition reaction time — RRT, motor reaction time — MRT, and total reaction time — TRT)] and, in an exploratory way, a car-driving simulation (CDS). After performing a baseline test set, each volunteer received, in a randomised fashion, either a single oral dose of mexazolam 1mg or placebo and, 3 hours later, the test set was repeated. After a washout of at least 10 days, the procedures were repeated in a crossover way. Tolerability was assessed through the reporting of adverse events.

Results

A total of 33 healthy subjects were enrolled. In the Leeds Psychomotor Test Battery, no statistically significant differences were found between post-versus pre-placebo results, post-versus pre-mexazolam results, and placebo versus mexazolam results (post-administration: CFF: p = 0.480, RRT: p = 0.195, MRT: p = 0.470, TRT: p = 0.169). In the CDS, there were no statistical differences between placebo and mexazolam scores [pre-administration: total time score (TTS): p = 0.519, best lap time (BLT): p = 0.499; post-administration: TTS: p = 0.940, RRT: p = 0.995]. There was a statistically significant improvement between post- and pre-placebo scores (TTS: p = 0.032, BLT: p = 0.023) and between post- and pre-mexazolam scores (TTS: p = 0.016, BLT: p = 0.030), indicating a learning effect induced by the repetition of the tests. A total of three volunteers reported a total of three adverse events: somnolence, which occurred following mexazolam administration, and headache and flu-like syndrome, which occurred after placebo administration.

Conclusions

Mexazolam does not have psychomotor performance-impairing effects at therapeutic doses. Reduced effects on psychomotor performance in anxious patients may lead to better compliance and to specific indications for this benzodiazepine.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matsushima T. Clinical trials of CS-386. Shinryo to Shinyaku 1979; 16: 71–5 Matsushima T. Clinical trials of CS-386. Shinryo to Shinyaku 1979; 16: 71–5
2.
go back to reference Lader MH. Limitations on the use of benzodiazepines in anxiety and insomnia: are they justified? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1999; 9Suppl. 6: S399–405PubMedCrossRef Lader MH. Limitations on the use of benzodiazepines in anxiety and insomnia: are they justified? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1999; 9Suppl. 6: S399–405PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hindmarch I, Haller J, Sherwood N, et al. Comparison of five anxiolytic benzodiazepines on measures of psychomotor performance and sleep. Neuropsychobiology 1991; 24: 84–9CrossRef Hindmarch I, Haller J, Sherwood N, et al. Comparison of five anxiolytic benzodiazepines on measures of psychomotor performance and sleep. Neuropsychobiology 1991; 24: 84–9CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vieira-Coelho MA, Garrett J. Mexazolam in anxiety disorders: results of a multicenter trial. Adv Ther 1997; 14: 125–33 Vieira-Coelho MA, Garrett J. Mexazolam in anxiety disorders: results of a multicenter trial. Adv Ther 1997; 14: 125–33
5.
go back to reference Kobayashi S. Pharmacology of CS-386. Tokyo: Central Research Laboratories, Sankyo Co Ltd, 1981 Kobayashi S. Pharmacology of CS-386. Tokyo: Central Research Laboratories, Sankyo Co Ltd, 1981
6.
go back to reference Hindmarch I. Instrumental assessment of psychomotor functions and the effects of psychotropic drugs. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994; 89Suppl. 380: 49–52CrossRef Hindmarch I. Instrumental assessment of psychomotor functions and the effects of psychotropic drugs. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994; 89Suppl. 380: 49–52CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hindmarch I. A 1, 4-Benzodiazepine, temazepam (K 3917), its effect on some psychological parameters of sleep and behaviour. Arzneimittel Forschung 1975; 25: 1836–9PubMed Hindmarch I. A 1, 4-Benzodiazepine, temazepam (K 3917), its effect on some psychological parameters of sleep and behaviour. Arzneimittel Forschung 1975; 25: 1836–9PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hindmarch I. Critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF): the effects of psychotropic compounds. Pharmacopsychiatry 1982; 15Suppl. 1: 44–8CrossRef Hindmarch I. Critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF): the effects of psychotropic compounds. Pharmacopsychiatry 1982; 15Suppl. 1: 44–8CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Katsunuma H, Shimoto Y, Senba K, et al. Clinical trials of the anti-anxiety drug CS-386 (mexazolam) in the field of geriatrics. Geriatr Med 1981; 19: 126–34 Katsunuma H, Shimoto Y, Senba K, et al. Clinical trials of the anti-anxiety drug CS-386 (mexazolam) in the field of geriatrics. Geriatr Med 1981; 19: 126–34
10.
go back to reference Ohara K, Suzuki Y, Kawaguchi K, et al. Clinical evaluation of mexazolam in neuroses. Jpn J Clin Exp Med 1987; 64: 263–6 Ohara K, Suzuki Y, Kawaguchi K, et al. Clinical evaluation of mexazolam in neuroses. Jpn J Clin Exp Med 1987; 64: 263–6
11.
go back to reference Vaz-Serra A, Firmino H. Estudo clinico com dupla ocultacao comparando mexazolam com bromazepam. (Comparison of mexazolam and bromazepam: a double-blind clinical study). Psiquiatria Clinica 1993; 14: 77–84 Vaz-Serra A, Firmino H. Estudo clinico com dupla ocultacao comparando mexazolam com bromazepam. (Comparison of mexazolam and bromazepam: a double-blind clinical study). Psiquiatria Clinica 1993; 14: 77–84
12.
go back to reference Hindmarch I. Antidepressant drugs and performance. Br J Clin Pract 1982; 19 Suppl: 73–7 Hindmarch I. Antidepressant drugs and performance. Br J Clin Pract 1982; 19 Suppl: 73–7
13.
go back to reference Volz H-P, Sturm Y. Antidepressant drugs and psychomotor performance. Neuropsychobiology 1995; 31: 146–55PubMedCrossRef Volz H-P, Sturm Y. Antidepressant drugs and psychomotor performance. Neuropsychobiology 1995; 31: 146–55PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vaz-Serra A, Figueira, ML. Mexazolam and alprazolam in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder: a double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Clin Drug Invest 2001; 21: 257–63CrossRef Vaz-Serra A, Figueira, ML. Mexazolam and alprazolam in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder: a double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Clin Drug Invest 2001; 21: 257–63CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hindmarch I. Cognition and anxiety: the cognitive effects of anti-anxiety medication. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1998; 98Suppl. 393: 89–94CrossRef Hindmarch I. Cognition and anxiety: the cognitive effects of anti-anxiety medication. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1998; 98Suppl. 393: 89–94CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ito H, Kaizawa S, Miura S, et al. Comparison of mexazolam and diazepam in the treatment of neurosis: a double-blind controlled study. Clin Eval 1981; 9: 319–54 Ito H, Kaizawa S, Miura S, et al. Comparison of mexazolam and diazepam in the treatment of neurosis: a double-blind controlled study. Clin Eval 1981; 9: 319–54
17.
go back to reference Willumeit HP, Ott H, Neubert W. Simulated car driving as a useful technique for the determination of residual effects and alcohol interaction after short- and long-acting benzodiazepines. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1984; Suppl. 1: 182-92 Willumeit HP, Ott H, Neubert W. Simulated car driving as a useful technique for the determination of residual effects and alcohol interaction after short- and long-acting benzodiazepines. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1984; Suppl. 1: 182-92
18.
go back to reference Cox DJ, Quillian WC, Thorndike FP, et al. Evaluating driving performance of outsubjects with Alzheimer disease. J Am Board Fam Pract 1998; 11: 264–71PubMed Cox DJ, Quillian WC, Thorndike FP, et al. Evaluating driving performance of outsubjects with Alzheimer disease. J Am Board Fam Pract 1998; 11: 264–71PubMed
19.
go back to reference Barkly RA, Murphy KR, Kwasnik D. Motor vehicle driving competencies and risks in teens and young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 1089–95 Barkly RA, Murphy KR, Kwasnik D. Motor vehicle driving competencies and risks in teens and young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 1089–95
20.
go back to reference Gianutsos R, Campbell A, Beattie B A, et al. The driving advisement system: a computer-augmented quasi-simulation of the cognitive prerequisites for resumption of driving after brain injury. Assist Technol 1992; 4: 70–86PubMedCrossRef Gianutsos R, Campbell A, Beattie B A, et al. The driving advisement system: a computer-augmented quasi-simulation of the cognitive prerequisites for resumption of driving after brain injury. Assist Technol 1992; 4: 70–86PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hindmarch I. The psychopharmacological approach: effects of psychotropic drugs on car driving. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1988; 3: 73–9PubMedCrossRef Hindmarch I. The psychopharmacological approach: effects of psychotropic drugs on car driving. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1988; 3: 73–9PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sherwood N. Effects of cigarette smoking on performance in a simulated driving task. Neuropsychobiology 1995; 32: 161–5PubMedCrossRef Sherwood N. Effects of cigarette smoking on performance in a simulated driving task. Neuropsychobiology 1995; 32: 161–5PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Psychomotor Effects of Mexazolam vs Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
Authors
Dr Pedro Silveira
Manuel Vaz-da-Silva
Ana Dolgner
Luis Almeida
Publication date
01-10-2002
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 10/2002
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200222100-00004

Other articles of this Issue 10/2002

Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2002 Go to the issue