Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 5/2000

01-05-2000 | Clinical Use

Additional Efficacy of Milligram-Equivalent Doses of Atorvastatin over Simvastatin

Authors: Dr Marjel van Dam, Dick C. G. Basart, Charles Janus, Rolf Zwertbroek, Han A. M. Spierenburg, Hans A. Werner, A. C. Bredero, Peter J. Lansberg, Carla J. Jonker, Mieke D. Trip, Martin H. Prins, John J. P. Kastelein

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 5/2000

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives: This single-blind, multicentre study in a large cohort of hypercholesterolaemic patients with or without coronary heart disease (CHD) was designed to evaluate the additional low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)— lowering effect of atorvastatin over milligram-equivalent doses of simvastatin.
Methods: 378 patients treated with either simvastatin 20 or 40mg, with baseline LDL-C values >2.6 mmol/L, were randomised to four groups: patients on 20mg simvastatin were randomised to either simvastatin 20mg (n = 129) or atorvastatin 20mg (n = 124), and patients on 40mg simvastatin were randomised to simvastatin 40mg (n = 64) or atorvastatin 40mg (n = 61). The investigator was blinded for study medication during the 8-week treatment phase, the patient was not. Lipid profiles were measured at screening, randomisation and at study completion. The primary efficacy parameter was the relative change in LDL-C level within and between groups. Statistical significance was assessed with analysis of variance.
Results: No major differences in baseline patient characteristics were found with regard to demographic variables, vital signs, cardiovascular risk factors, concomitant medication or lipid profiles. The mean (±SD) relative decreases of LDL-C from baseline were: 14.0 ± 14.1% for atorvastatin 20mg (n = 107) versus 3.3 ± 14.1% for simvastatin 20mg (n = 108) [p = 0.0001], and 14.7 ± 15.2% for atorvastatin 40mg (n = 55) versus 2.9 ± 12.7% for simvastatin 40mg (n = 54) [p = 0.0001]. The relative change of LDL-C from baseline in the overall atorvastatin group (n = 162) versus the overall simvastatin group (n = 162) was 14.2 ± 14.4% versus 3.2 ± 13.6% (p = 0.0001). This involved an additional decrease of 11% in the atorvastatin versus the simvastatin group. The percentage of high risk patients according to the European Atherosclerosis Society/National Cholesterol Education Program (EAS/NCEP) who initially did not meet these goals but reached them at week 8, was 48/34% (for atorvastatin 20mg) versus 20/14% (for simvastatin 20mg) [p = 0.005 and p = 0.007, respectively], and 58/18% (for atorvastatin 40mg) versus 24/10% (for simvastatin 40mg) [p = 0.005 and not significant, respectively].
Conclusion: Our results indicated that patients with hypercholesterolaemia on simvastatin 20 or 40mg who are switched to a milligram-equivalent dose of atorvastatin, will reach significantly lower LDL-C values within 8 weeks of treatment, with a greater percentage of high risk patients reaching their EAS or NCEP targets.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adult treatment panel II. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. JAMA 1993; 269(23): 3015–23CrossRef Adult treatment panel II. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. JAMA 1993; 269(23): 3015–23CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Adult treatment panel II. High blood cholesterol. Circulation 1994; 89(3): 1329–445 Adult treatment panel II. High blood cholesterol. Circulation 1994; 89(3): 1329–445
3.
go back to reference Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1301–7PubMedCrossRef Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1301–7PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994; 44: 1383–9 Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994; 44: 1383–9
5.
go back to reference Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1001–9PubMedCrossRef Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1001–9PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lea AP, McTavish D. Atorvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of hyperlipidaemias. Drugs 1997; 53(5): 828–47PubMedCrossRef Lea AP, McTavish D. Atorvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of hyperlipidaemias. Drugs 1997; 53(5): 828–47PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bakker-Arkema RG, Davidson MH, Goldstein RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA 1996; 275: 128–33PubMedCrossRef Bakker-Arkema RG, Davidson MH, Goldstein RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA 1996; 275: 128–33PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nawrocki JW, Weiss SR, Davidson MH, et al. Reduction of LDL cholesterol by 25% to 60% in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia by atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995 May; 15: 678–82PubMedCrossRef Nawrocki JW, Weiss SR, Davidson MH, et al. Reduction of LDL cholesterol by 25% to 60% in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia by atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995 May; 15: 678–82PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heinonen TM, Stein E, Weiss SR, et al. The lipid-lowering effects of atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor: results of a double-masked study. Clin Ther 1996; 18(5): 853–63PubMedCrossRef Heinonen TM, Stein E, Weiss SR, et al. The lipid-lowering effects of atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor: results of a double-masked study. Clin Ther 1996; 18(5): 853–63PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bertolini S, Bittolo Bon G, Campbell LM, et al. Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 1997; 130: 191–7PubMedCrossRef Bertolini S, Bittolo Bon G, Campbell LM, et al. Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 1997; 130: 191–7PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Davidson MH, Stein EA, Dujovne CA, et al. The efficacy and six-week tolerability of simvastatin 80 and 160 mg/day. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 38–42PubMedCrossRef Davidson MH, Stein EA, Dujovne CA, et al. The efficacy and six-week tolerability of simvastatin 80 and 160 mg/day. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 38–42PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jonsson B, Johannesson M, Kjekshus J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering. Results from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Eur Heart J 1996; 17(7): 1001–7PubMedCrossRef Jonsson B, Johannesson M, Kjekshus J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering. Results from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Eur Heart J 1996; 17(7): 1001–7PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dart A, Jerums G, Nicholson G, et al. A multicentric, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 39–44PubMedCrossRef Dart A, Jerums G, Nicholson G, et al. A multicentric, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 39–44PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jones PH, Kafonek S, Laurora I, et al. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study). Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 582–7PubMedCrossRef Jones PH, Kafonek S, Laurora I, et al. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study). Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 582–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18: 499–502PubMed Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18: 499–502PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gonzalez Estrada M, Rodriguea Ferrer CR, Asterlou IR, et al. Use of serum cholesterol/triglycerides ratio to discern for which individuals the Friedewald formula can be used confidently. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 1673–5 Gonzalez Estrada M, Rodriguea Ferrer CR, Asterlou IR, et al. Use of serum cholesterol/triglycerides ratio to discern for which individuals the Friedewald formula can be used confidently. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 1673–5
17.
go back to reference Siedel J, Hagele ED, Ziegenhorn J, et al. Reagent for the enzymatic determination in serum total cholesterol in serum total cholesterol with improved lipolytic efficiency. Clin Chem 1983; 29: 1075–80PubMed Siedel J, Hagele ED, Ziegenhorn J, et al. Reagent for the enzymatic determination in serum total cholesterol in serum total cholesterol with improved lipolytic efficiency. Clin Chem 1983; 29: 1075–80PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ellerbe P, Myers GL, Cooper GR, et al. A comparison of results for cholesterol in human serum obtained by the reference method and by the definitive method of the national reference system for cholesterol. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 370–5PubMed Ellerbe P, Myers GL, Cooper GR, et al. A comparison of results for cholesterol in human serum obtained by the reference method and by the definitive method of the national reference system for cholesterol. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 370–5PubMed
19.
go back to reference Cole TG. Glycerol blanking in triglyceride assays: is it necessary. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 1267–8PubMed Cole TG. Glycerol blanking in triglyceride assays: is it necessary. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 1267–8PubMed
20.
go back to reference Klotzsch SG, McNamara JR. Triglyceride measurements: a review of methods and interferences. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 1605–13PubMed Klotzsch SG, McNamara JR. Triglyceride measurements: a review of methods and interferences. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 1605–13PubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Steele BW, Koehler DF, Azar MM, et al. Enzymatic determination of cholesterol in high density lipoprotein fractions prepared by a precipitation technique. Clin Chem 1976; 22: 98–101PubMed Steele BW, Koehler DF, Azar MM, et al. Enzymatic determination of cholesterol in high density lipoprotein fractions prepared by a precipitation technique. Clin Chem 1976; 22: 98–101PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lopez-Virella MF, et al. Cholesterol determination in high density lipoproteins separated by three different methods. Clin Chem 1977; 23: 882–4 Lopez-Virella MF, et al. Cholesterol determination in high density lipoproteins separated by three different methods. Clin Chem 1977; 23: 882–4
24.
go back to reference Grundy SM, Balady GJ, Criqui MH, et al. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: guidance from Framingham. A statement for healthcare professionals from the AHA Task Force on Risk Reduction. Circulation 1998; 97: 1876–87PubMedCrossRef Grundy SM, Balady GJ, Criqui MH, et al. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: guidance from Framingham. A statement for healthcare professionals from the AHA Task Force on Risk Reduction. Circulation 1998; 97: 1876–87PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pearson TA, McBride PE, Houston-Miller N, et al. Task Force 8: organization of preventive cardiology service. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1039–47PubMedCrossRef Pearson TA, McBride PE, Houston-Miller N, et al. Task Force 8: organization of preventive cardiology service. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1039–47PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Williams RR, Schumacher MC, Barlow GK, et al. Documented need for more effective diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia according to data from 502 heterozygotes in Utah. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 18D–24DPubMedCrossRef Williams RR, Schumacher MC, Barlow GK, et al. Documented need for more effective diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia according to data from 502 heterozygotes in Utah. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 18D–24DPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference McBride P, Schrott HG, Plane MB, et al. Primary care practice adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines for patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1238–44PubMedCrossRef McBride P, Schrott HG, Plane MB, et al. Primary care practice adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines for patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1238–44PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sacks FM, Moyé LA, Davis BR, et al. Relationship between plasma LDL concentrations during treatment with pravastatin and recurrent coronary events in the cholesterol and recurrent events trials. Circulation 1998; 81: 578–81 Sacks FM, Moyé LA, Davis BR, et al. Relationship between plasma LDL concentrations during treatment with pravastatin and recurrent coronary events in the cholesterol and recurrent events trials. Circulation 1998; 81: 578–81
29.
go back to reference Pedersen TR, Olsson AG, Faergeman O, et al. Lipoprotein changes and reduction in the incidence of major coronary heart disease in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Circulation 1998; 97: 1453–60PubMedCrossRef Pedersen TR, Olsson AG, Faergeman O, et al. Lipoprotein changes and reduction in the incidence of major coronary heart disease in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Circulation 1998; 97: 1453–60PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference The Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes is saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass graft. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 153–62CrossRef The Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes is saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass graft. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 153–62CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Additional Efficacy of Milligram-Equivalent Doses of Atorvastatin over Simvastatin
Authors
Dr Marjel van Dam
Dick C. G. Basart
Charles Janus
Rolf Zwertbroek
Han A. M. Spierenburg
Hans A. Werner
A. C. Bredero
Peter J. Lansberg
Carla J. Jonker
Mieke D. Trip
Martin H. Prins
John J. P. Kastelein
Publication date
01-05-2000
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 5/2000
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200019050-00002

Other articles of this Issue 5/2000

Clinical Drug Investigation 5/2000 Go to the issue