Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CNS Drugs 3/2007

01-03-2007 | Current Opinion

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and Drug Treatment for Alzheimer’s Disease

Author: Dr Steve Iliffe

Published in: CNS Drugs | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recently issued guidance that restricts the use of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in the National Health Service. This stance contains lessons for designers of trials, drug regulators, health economists and those developing clinical guidelines for dementia care. The debates that took place around and within NICE were about identifying the benefits of these medicines and the beneficiaries, clarifying the costs of the medication and whom bears them, the methods of weighing benefit against cost, and the consequences of using different approaches to cost-benefit analysis. This article discusses each of these themes and outlines the changes in research and clinical practice and policy making that might flow from NICE’S decisions on medication use. Outcome measures that capture changes in dementia syndromes need further development. Cost-benefit analysis needs refinement with better tools than quality-adjusted life-years, and the policy implications of restricting treatments in a progressive neurodegenerative disorder need more careful consideration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maidment I, Fox C, Livingston G, et al. Drug treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: the way forward. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 6–8PubMedCrossRef Maidment I, Fox C, Livingston G, et al. Drug treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: the way forward. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 6–8PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schneider L. The post-modern world of Alzheimer’s disease trials: how much is an ADAS-cog point worth in central London? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 9–13PubMedCrossRef Schneider L. The post-modern world of Alzheimer’s disease trials: how much is an ADAS-cog point worth in central London? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 9–13PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1 year randomised placebo-controlled study in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57: 489–95PubMedCrossRef Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1 year randomised placebo-controlled study in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57: 489–95PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mohs R, Doody R, Morris J, et al. A 1 year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57: 481–8PubMedCrossRef Mohs R, Doody R, Morris J, et al. A 1 year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57: 481–8PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Raskind M, Peskingd E, Wessel T, et al. Galantamine in AD: a 6 month randomised placebo-controlled trial with a 6 month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54: 2261–8 Raskind M, Peskingd E, Wessel T, et al. Galantamine in AD: a 6 month randomised placebo-controlled trial with a 6 month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54: 2261–8
7.
go back to reference Schneider L, Anand R, Farlow M. Systematic review of the efficacy of rivastigmine for patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65 Schneider L, Anand R, Farlow M. Systematic review of the efficacy of rivastigmine for patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65
8.
go back to reference Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. New Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1333–41PubMedCrossRef Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. New Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1333–41PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gureje O, Oguyinni A, Kola L. The profile and impact of probable dementia in a sub-Saharan African community: results from the Ibadan Study of Aging. J Psychosom Res 2006; 61: 327–33PubMedCrossRef Gureje O, Oguyinni A, Kola L. The profile and impact of probable dementia in a sub-Saharan African community: results from the Ibadan Study of Aging. J Psychosom Res 2006; 61: 327–33PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rockwood K. The measuring, meaning and importance of ADL as an outcome. Presentation to the International Psychiatric Association Consensus Conference; 2006 Oct 31–Nov 1; Canterbury Rockwood K. The measuring, meaning and importance of ADL as an outcome. Presentation to the International Psychiatric Association Consensus Conference; 2006 Oct 31–Nov 1; Canterbury
12.
go back to reference Rockwood K. Size of the treatment effect on cognition of cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 677–85PubMedCrossRef Rockwood K. Size of the treatment effect on cognition of cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 677–85PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chiu H, Zhang H. Dementia research in China. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry 2000; 15: 947–53CrossRef Chiu H, Zhang H. Dementia research in China. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry 2000; 15: 947–53CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rabins PV. Measuring quality of life in dementia: purposes, goals, challenges and progress. Presentation to the International Psychiatric Association Consensus Conference; 2006 Oct 31–Nov 1; Canterbury Rabins PV. Measuring quality of life in dementia: purposes, goals, challenges and progress. Presentation to the International Psychiatric Association Consensus Conference; 2006 Oct 31–Nov 1; Canterbury
15.
go back to reference Reisberg B, Schneider L, Doody R, et al. Clinical global measures of dementia: position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11Suppl. 3: 8–18PubMed Reisberg B, Schneider L, Doody R, et al. Clinical global measures of dementia: position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11Suppl. 3: 8–18PubMed
16.
go back to reference Brodaty H. Meaning and measurement of caregiver outcomes. Presentation to the International Psychiatric Association Consensus Conference; 2006 Oct 31–Nov 1; Canterbury Brodaty H. Meaning and measurement of caregiver outcomes. Presentation to the International Psychiatric Association Consensus Conference; 2006 Oct 31–Nov 1; Canterbury
17.
go back to reference Brodaty H, Green A, Low LF. Family caregivers for people with dementia: carer burden and stress. In: Burns A, O’Brien J, Ames D, editors. Dementia. London: Hodder Arnold, 2005 Brodaty H, Green A, Low LF. Family caregivers for people with dementia: carer burden and stress. In: Burns A, O’Brien J, Ames D, editors. Dementia. London: Hodder Arnold, 2005
19.
go back to reference Lobo A, Launer LJ, Fratiglioni L, et al. Prevalence of dementia and major subtypes in Europe: a collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic Diseases in the Elderly Research Group. Neurology 2000; 54(11 Suppl. 5): S4–9PubMed Lobo A, Launer LJ, Fratiglioni L, et al. Prevalence of dementia and major subtypes in Europe: a collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic Diseases in the Elderly Research Group. Neurology 2000; 54(11 Suppl. 5): S4–9PubMed
20.
go back to reference Gray A, Fenn P. Alzheimer’s disease: the burden of the illness in England. Health Trends 1993; 25: 31–7PubMed Gray A, Fenn P. Alzheimer’s disease: the burden of the illness in England. Health Trends 1993; 25: 31–7PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wimo A, Ljunggren G, Winblad B. Costs of dementia and dementia care: a review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997; 12: 841–56PubMedCrossRef Wimo A, Ljunggren G, Winblad B. Costs of dementia and dementia care: a review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997; 12: 841–56PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bosanquet N, May J, Johnson N. Alzheimer’s disease in the United Kingdom: burden of disease and future care. London: Imperial College, 1998 Bosanquet N, May J, Johnson N. Alzheimer’s disease in the United Kingdom: burden of disease and future care. London: Imperial College, 1998
23.
go back to reference Evans R, McGrail K, Morgan S, et al. Apocalypse no: population aging and the future of health care systems. Can J Aging 2001; 20Suppl. 1: 160–91CrossRef Evans R, McGrail K, Morgan S, et al. Apocalypse no: population aging and the future of health care systems. Can J Aging 2001; 20Suppl. 1: 160–91CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banerjee S, et al. Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9(10): 1–93 Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banerjee S, et al. Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9(10): 1–93
25.
26.
go back to reference The Royal College of Psychiatrists. Appeal from the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the British Geriatrics Society regarding the NICE Final Appraisal Document: donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [online]. Available from URL: http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/PDF/AlzletterNice0606.pdf [Accessed 2007 Jan 16] The Royal College of Psychiatrists. Appeal from the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the British Geriatrics Society regarding the NICE Final Appraisal Document: donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​rcpsych.​ac.​uk/​PDF/​AlzletterNice060​6.​pdf [Accessed 2007 Jan 16]
27.
go back to reference Wimo A, Winblad B. Pharmacoeconomic outcomes. In: Rock-wood K, Gauthier S, editors. Trial designs and outcomes in dementia therapeutic research. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2006: 250–8 Wimo A, Winblad B. Pharmacoeconomic outcomes. In: Rock-wood K, Gauthier S, editors. Trial designs and outcomes in dementia therapeutic research. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2006: 250–8
28.
go back to reference Boyer F, Novella JL, Morrone I, et al. Agreement between dementia patient report and proxy reports using the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry 2004; 19: 1026–34CrossRef Boyer F, Novella JL, Morrone I, et al. Agreement between dementia patient report and proxy reports using the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry 2004; 19: 1026–34CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Coucill W, Bryan S, Bentham P, et al. EQ-5D in patients with dementia: an investigation of inter-rater agreement. Med Care 2001; 39: 760–71PubMedCrossRef Coucill W, Bryan S, Bentham P, et al. EQ-5D in patients with dementia: an investigation of inter-rater agreement. Med Care 2001; 39: 760–71PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Iliffe S, Manthorpe J. Drugs: consider the probable side effects. J Dementia Care 2005; 13(2): 33–5 Iliffe S, Manthorpe J. Drugs: consider the probable side effects. J Dementia Care 2005; 13(2): 33–5
Metadata
Title
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and Drug Treatment for Alzheimer’s Disease
Author
Dr Steve Iliffe
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
CNS Drugs / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 1172-7047
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1934
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200721030-00001

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

CNS Drugs 3/2007 Go to the issue