Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CNS Drugs 6/2004

01-05-2004 | Adis Drug Evaluation

Mitoxantrone

A Review of its Use in Multiple Sclerosis

Authors: Lesley J. Scott, David P. Figgitt

Published in: CNS Drugs | Issue 6/2004

Login to get access

Summary

Abstract

Mitoxantrone (Novantrone®), a synthetic anthracenedione derivative, is an antineoplastic, immunomodulatory agent. Its presumed mechanism of action in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is via immunomodulatory mechanisms, although these remain to be fully elucidated.
Intravenous mitoxantrone treatment improved neurological disability and delayed progression of MS in patients with worsening relapsing-remitting (RR) [also termed progressive-relapsing (PR) MS] or secondary-progressive (SP) disease. In a pivotal randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial, mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 administered once every 3 months for 2 years provided significant improvements in neurological disability ratings, including Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Ambulatory Index (AI) and Standardised Neurological Status (SNS) scores, compared with placebo. The drug also significantly reduced the mean number of corticosteroid-treated relapses and prolonged the time to the first treated relapse, with the beneficial effects on disease progression supported by magnetic resonance imaging. Post hoc analyses suggest that the benefits associated with mitoxantrone treatment may be sustained for at least 12 months after cessation of treatment, mean changes from baseline at 36 months in EDSS, AI and SNS scores of 0.10, 0.61 and 0.19, respectively, in the mitoxantrone group versus 0.46, 1.13 and 3.38 with placebo.
Concomitant intravenous mitoxantrone 20mg plus intravenous methyl-prednisolone 1g once every month for 6 months was more effective than intravenous methylprednisolone monotherapy in preventing the development of new gadolinium-enhanced lesions in patients with very active RRMS or SPMS.
The drug was generally well tolerated in patients with MS. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity and usually resolved upon discontinuation of treatment or with appropriate pharmacotherapy. At the recommended dosage, mitoxantrone appears to have a low potential to cause cardiotoxicity.
In conclusion, intravenous mitoxantrone reduces the relapse rate and slows progression of the disease in patients with worsening RRMS, PRMS or SPMS; thus providing a new option for the management of these patients. The drug was generally well tolerated at the recommended dosage, although potential cardiotoxicity limits the total cumulative dose to 140 mg/m2. Further studies are warranted to determine which patients with worsening RRMS, PRMS or SPMS are most likely to benefit from mitoxantrone treatment and to more fully define the long-term safety and tolerability of mitoxantrone, including the use of concomitant cardioprotectants to extend the therapeutic lifespan of the drug.

Pharmacodynamic Profile

Mitoxantrone, a synthetic anthracenedione derivative, is an established cytotoxic, antineoplastic agent. Its presumed mechanism of action in multiple sclerosis (MS) is immunosuppression. In antineoplastic studies, the drug showed several immunomodulatory effects, inducing macrophage-mediated suppression of B-cell, T-helper and T-cytotoxic lymphocyte function.
Currently, the pharmacodynamic properties of mitoxantrone have not been investigated to any extent in patients with MS. In one study, 6 months’ treatment with intravenous mitoxantrone generally had no effect on the distribution of cytokine-positive peripheral blood monocyte cells in patients with MS. In an animal model of the disease, mitoxantrone suppressed the development and progression of both actively and passively induced acute experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). It appeared to be 10-20 times more effective than cyclophosphamide in the suppression of EAE. Moreover, mitoxantrone approximately doubled the mean time to onset of EAE versus control animals (279 vs 148 days after immunisation; p < 0.00005). In vitro, mitoxantrone 10 and 100 μg/L inhibited myelin degradation by leucocytes and peritoneal macrophages derived from mice with acute EAE by approximately 60% and 100%.

Pharmacokinetic Profile

Currently, there are no published pharmacokinetic data for intravenous mitoxantrone in patients with MS, paediatric patients or in those with renal impairment. All studies, to date, have been in patients with cancer receiving a single, approximately 30-minute intravenous infusion of mitoxantrone 5-14 mg/m2. The drug exhibits triexponential pharmacokinetics, with a rapid initial distribution (α) phase, an intermediate distribution (β) phase and a much slower elimination (γ) phase. The mean half-life of the α phase appears to be 6–12 minutes and that of the β phase 1.1–3.1 hours. Mitoxantrone has a high affinity for tissue, with a volume of distribution of up to 2248 L/m2. Mitoxantrone persists for prolonged periods in tissues and was detectable in autopsy tissue from patients who last received the drug up to 272 days before death. At concentrations of 10–10 000 ng/ mL, the drug was 70–80% bound to plasma proteins in dogs.
Elimination of mitoxantrone occurs predominantly through biliary excretion and may be impaired in patients with hepatic dysfunction or third space abnormalities (e.g. ascites). The mean terminal elimination half-life of mitoxantrone ranged from 23 hours to 215 hours. Renal clearance accounts for ≈10% of the total clearance of the drug. Total clearance of mitoxantrone ranged from 13 to 34.2 L/h/ m2 and renal clearance from 0.9 to 2.7 L/h/m2. The drug appears to have a low potential for interaction with other concomitantly administered agents.

Therapeutic Efficacy

Intravenous mitoxantrone (infusion of ≥5 minutes), either as monotherapy or in combination with intravenous methylprednisolone, delayed the progression of the disease in patients with secondary-progressive (SP) or worsening relapsing-remitting (RR) MS (the latter is also termed progressive-relapsing MS) in comparative, randomised, multicentre trials.
In a double-blind, monotherapy trial (Mitoxantrone In Multiple Sclerosis [MIMS] trial), mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 (n = 60) once every 3 months for 2 years significantly improved neurological disability relative to placebo (n = 64), as assessed by changes in mean Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, mean Ambulatory Index (AI) score and mean Standardised Neurological Status (SNS) score. The drug also significantly reduced the mean number of corticosteroid-treated relapses per patient and prolonged the time to the first treated relapse. A Wei-Lachin multivariate analysis of these five efficacy variables indicated that the global difference between the two treatment groups was 0.30 (p < 0.0001).
Mitroxantrone was also more effective than placebo according to secondary endpoints in this study, with fewer mitoxantrone recipients experiencing a relapse, a deterioration of ≥1 EDSS point or a confirmed deterioration in EDSS score over a 3-month period. Mitoxantrone recipients also showed less deterioration in quality-of-life ratings and had fewer hospital admissions, whereas more placebo recipients had new gadolinium-enhanced lesions at study end (the latter parameter was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] in a subgroup of 110 patients, including 40 patients who received an exploratory 5 mg/m2 dose). Furthermore, post hoc analyses indicated that the beneficial effects of mitoxantrone treatment on EDSS, SNS and AI scores were sustained for at least 12 months after cessation of treatment, with mean changes from baseline at 36 months in EDSS, AI and SNS scores of 0.10, 0.61 and 0.19, respectively, in the mitoxantrone group versus 0.46, 1.13 and 3.38 with placebo.
Preliminary data from a cost-minimisation analysis based on results from the MIMS trial indicated that approximately half of the cost of mitoxantrone was offset by cost savings in other areas associated with the treatment of MS (direct and indirect major costs), with a total annual incremental cost for mitoxantrone of $1661 per patient.
Combination therapy once-monthly with intravenous mitoxantrone 20mg plus intravenous methylprednisolone 1g was more effective than intravenous methyl-prednisolone 1g once every month in preventing the development of gadolinium-enhanced lesions in patients with very active RRMS or SPMS (double-blind assessment using MRI scans). After 6 months, significantly more combination therapy recipients had no new gadolinium-enhanced lesions (90.5% vs 31.3% with monotherapy; p < 0.001) [primary endpoint]. There were also significant reductions in both the mean number of new enhancing lesions and the total number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions in patients receiving combination therapy versus methylprednisolone monotherapy.

Tolerability

Mitoxantrone was generally well tolerated in patients with MS. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring significantly more frequently with mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2 once every 3 months for 2 years) than placebo were nausea, alopecia, menstrual disorders, urinary tract infection, amenorrhoea, leucopenia and elevated γ-glutamyltranspeptidase levels. Adverse events were usually mild to moderate in severity and generally resolved with discontinuation of treatment or when treated with appropriate pharmacotherapy. Eight percent of patients discontinued treatment in the mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 group due to an adverse event versus 3% of placebo recipients. The incidence of drug-related acute myelogenous leukaemia was very low (0.12%) in a cohort of 802 patients with MS receiving mitoxantrone.
Evidence suggests that the risk of cardiotoxicity is low in patients with MS. After 1 year of monotherapy, 3.4% of mitoxantrone recipients had a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to ≤50% compared with 0% of placebo recipients; at the end of the second year, respective incidences were 1.9% and 2.9% (total cumulative dose of mitoxantrone per patient was 96 mg/m2 after 2 years’ treatment).

Dosage and Administration

In the US, an approximately 5–15 minute intravenous infusion of mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 once every 3 months is recommended for the treatment of patients with worsening RRMS, progressive-relapsing MS or SPMS (maximum lifetime cumulative dose of 140 mg/m2). Subcutaneous, intramuscular, intrathecal and intraarterial administration of the drug are contraindicated.
Prior to commencing treatment with mitoxantrone, patients should have their LVEF determined, with treatment not recommended in those with a LVEF of <50% or in those who show a clinically significant reduction in LVEF during treatment. Cardiotoxicity monitoring is also recommended in all patients showing signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure, and prior to and following each subsequent dose once patients have received a cumulative dose of 100 mg/m2. Before each course of treatment, patients should have a complete blood count and liver function tests, with the drug not recommended in those with a neutrophil count of <1500 cells/mm3 or in those with hepatic impairment. Pregnant women should not be treated with mitoxantrone.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maurer M, Rieckmann P. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: what is the potential for combination therapy? Biodrugs 2000; 13(3): 149–58PubMedCrossRef Maurer M, Rieckmann P. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: what is the potential for combination therapy? Biodrugs 2000; 13(3): 149–58PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Flachenecker P, Rieckmann P. Early intervention in multiple sclerosis: better outcomes for patients and society? Drugs 2003; 63(15): 1525–33PubMedCrossRef Flachenecker P, Rieckmann P. Early intervention in multiple sclerosis: better outcomes for patients and society? Drugs 2003; 63(15): 1525–33PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Corboy JR, Goodin DS, Frohman EM. Disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2003 Jan; 5(1): 35–54PubMedCrossRef Corboy JR, Goodin DS, Frohman EM. Disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2003 Jan; 5(1): 35–54PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rice GPA. Treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: current recommendations and future prospects. Biodrugs 1999; 12(4): 267–77PubMedCrossRef Rice GPA. Treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: current recommendations and future prospects. Biodrugs 1999; 12(4): 267–77PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rudick RA, Cohen JA, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. Management of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1997; 337(22): 1604–11PubMedCrossRef Rudick RA, Cohen JA, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. Management of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1997; 337(22): 1604–11PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brod SA, Lindsey W, Wolinsky JS. Multiple sclerosis: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment [published erratum appears in Am Fam Physician 1997; 55(2): 448]. Am Fam Physician 1996; 54(4): 1301–11PubMed Brod SA, Lindsey W, Wolinsky JS. Multiple sclerosis: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment [published erratum appears in Am Fam Physician 1997; 55(2): 448]. Am Fam Physician 1996; 54(4): 1301–11PubMed
8.
go back to reference Poser CM, Paty DW, Schienberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983; 13(3): 227–31PubMedCrossRef Poser CM, Paty DW, Schienberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983; 13(3): 227–31PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 46(4): 907–11 Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 46(4): 907–11
10.
11.
go back to reference Weinstock-Guttman B, Jacobs LD. What is new in the treatment of multiple sclerosis? Drugs 2000; 59(3): 401–10PubMedCrossRef Weinstock-Guttman B, Jacobs LD. What is new in the treatment of multiple sclerosis? Drugs 2000; 59(3): 401–10PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khan O, Zabad R, Caon C, et al. Comparative assessment of immunomodulating therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2002; 16(8): 563–78PubMedCrossRef Khan O, Zabad R, Caon C, et al. Comparative assessment of immunomodulating therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2002; 16(8): 563–78PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kilpatrick TJ, Soilu-Haenninen M. New treatments in multiple sclerosis. Aust N Z J Med 1999; 29(6): 801–10PubMedCrossRef Kilpatrick TJ, Soilu-Haenninen M. New treatments in multiple sclerosis. Aust N Z J Med 1999; 29(6): 801–10PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schluep M, Bogousslavsky J. Emerging treatments in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 1997; 38(3): 216–21PubMedCrossRef Schluep M, Bogousslavsky J. Emerging treatments in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 1997; 38(3): 216–21PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Waubant EL, Goodkin DE. Assessing efficacy in clinical trials of treatments for multiple sclerosis: issues and controversy. CNS Drugs 1996; 6(6): 462–73CrossRef Waubant EL, Goodkin DE. Assessing efficacy in clinical trials of treatments for multiple sclerosis: issues and controversy. CNS Drugs 1996; 6(6): 462–73CrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Faulds D, Balfour JA, Chrisp P, et al. Mitoxantrone: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs 1991; 41(3): 400–49PubMedCrossRef Faulds D, Balfour JA, Chrisp P, et al. Mitoxantrone: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs 1991; 41(3): 400–49PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Mitoxantrone: a review of its pharmacological properties and use in acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia. Drugs Aging 1996; 9(2): 122–47PubMedCrossRef Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Mitoxantrone: a review of its pharmacological properties and use in acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia. Drugs Aging 1996; 9(2): 122–47PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ehninger G, Schuler U, Proksch B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of mitoxantrone: a review. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18(5): 365–80PubMedCrossRef Ehninger G, Schuler U, Proksch B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of mitoxantrone: a review. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18(5): 365–80PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wiseman LR, Spencer CM. Mitoxantrone: a review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer. Drugs Aging 1997; 10(6): 473–85PubMedCrossRef Wiseman LR, Spencer CM. Mitoxantrone: a review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer. Drugs Aging 1997; 10(6): 473–85PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Khoury SJ, Bharanidharan P, Bourcier K, et al. Immunologic effects of mitoxantrone in patients with multiple sclerosis [abstract no. S33.002]. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 3: A245–6 Khoury SJ, Bharanidharan P, Bourcier K, et al. Immunologic effects of mitoxantrone in patients with multiple sclerosis [abstract no. S33.002]. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 3: A245–6
22.
go back to reference Fidler JM, DeJoy SQ, Gibbons Jr JJ. Selective immunomodulation by the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone 1. Suppression of B lymphocyte function. J Immunol 1986; 137(2): 727–32PubMed Fidler JM, DeJoy SQ, Gibbons Jr JJ. Selective immunomodulation by the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone 1. Suppression of B lymphocyte function. J Immunol 1986; 137(2): 727–32PubMed
23.
go back to reference Fidler JM, DeJoy SQ, Smith III FR, et al. Selective immunomodulation by the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone. II. Nonspecific adherent suppressor cells derived from mitoxantrone-treated mice. J Immunol 1986; 136(8): 2747–54 Fidler JM, DeJoy SQ, Smith III FR, et al. Selective immunomodulation by the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone. II. Nonspecific adherent suppressor cells derived from mitoxantrone-treated mice. J Immunol 1986; 136(8): 2747–54
24.
go back to reference Wang BS, Lumanglas AL, Silva J, et al. Inhibition of the induction of alloreactivity with mitoxantrone. Int J Immunopharmacol 1986; 8(8): 967–73PubMedCrossRef Wang BS, Lumanglas AL, Silva J, et al. Inhibition of the induction of alloreactivity with mitoxantrone. Int J Immunopharmacol 1986; 8(8): 967–73PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Levine S, Gherson J. Morphologic effects of mitoxantrone and a related anthracenedione on lymphoid tissues. Int J Immunopharmacol 1986; 8(8): 999–1007PubMedCrossRef Levine S, Gherson J. Morphologic effects of mitoxantrone and a related anthracenedione on lymphoid tissues. Int J Immunopharmacol 1986; 8(8): 999–1007PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Watson CM, Davison AN, Baker D, et al. Suppression of demyelination by mitoxantrone. Int J Immunopharmacol 1991; 13(7): 923–30PubMedCrossRef Watson CM, Davison AN, Baker D, et al. Suppression of demyelination by mitoxantrone. Int J Immunopharmacol 1991; 13(7): 923–30PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sloboda AE, Oronsky AL, Kerwar SS. Studies of the effects of mitoxantrone on adjuvant induced arthritis in rats. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1986; 40(2): 236–43PubMedCrossRef Sloboda AE, Oronsky AL, Kerwar SS. Studies of the effects of mitoxantrone on adjuvant induced arthritis in rats. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1986; 40(2): 236–43PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Baker D, O’Neill JK, Davison AN, et al. Control of immunemediated disease of the central nervous system requires the use of a neuroactive agent — elucidation by the action of mitoxantrone. Clin Exp Immunol 1992; 90(1): 124–8PubMedCrossRef Baker D, O’Neill JK, Davison AN, et al. Control of immunemediated disease of the central nervous system requires the use of a neuroactive agent — elucidation by the action of mitoxantrone. Clin Exp Immunol 1992; 90(1): 124–8PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lublin FD, Lavasa M, Viti C, et al. Suppression of acute and relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis with mitoxantrone. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1987; 45(1): 122–8PubMedCrossRef Lublin FD, Lavasa M, Viti C, et al. Suppression of acute and relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis with mitoxantrone. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1987; 45(1): 122–8PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ridge SC, Sloboda AE, McReynolds RA, et al. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by mitoxantrone. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1985; 35(1): 35–42PubMedCrossRef Ridge SC, Sloboda AE, McReynolds RA, et al. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by mitoxantrone. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1985; 35(1): 35–42PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Levine S, Saltzman A. Regional suppression, therapy after onset and prevention of relapses in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by mitoxantrone. J Neuroimmunol 1986; 13(2): 175–81PubMedCrossRef Levine S, Saltzman A. Regional suppression, therapy after onset and prevention of relapses in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by mitoxantrone. J Neuroimmunol 1986; 13(2): 175–81PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mustafa M, Diener P, Sun J-B, et al. Immunopharmacologic modulation of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: low dose cyclosporin-A treatment causes disease relapse and increased systemic T and B cell-mediated myelin-directed autoimmunity. Scand J Immunol 1993; 38(6): 499–507PubMedCrossRef Mustafa M, Diener P, Sun J-B, et al. Immunopharmacologic modulation of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: low dose cyclosporin-A treatment causes disease relapse and increased systemic T and B cell-mediated myelin-directed autoimmunity. Scand J Immunol 1993; 38(6): 499–507PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lublin FD, Maurer PH, Berry RG, et al. Delayed, relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in mice. J Immunol 1981; 126(3): 819–22PubMed Lublin FD, Maurer PH, Berry RG, et al. Delayed, relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in mice. J Immunol 1981; 126(3): 819–22PubMed
34.
go back to reference Lublin FD. Relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: an autoimmune model of multiple sclerosis. Springer Semin Immunopathol 1985; 8(3): 197–208PubMedCrossRef Lublin FD. Relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: an autoimmune model of multiple sclerosis. Springer Semin Immunopathol 1985; 8(3): 197–208PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Schleyer E, Kamischke A, Kaufmann CC, et al. New aspects on the pharmacokinetics of mitoxantrone and its two major metabolites. Leukemia 1994; 8(3): 435–40PubMed Schleyer E, Kamischke A, Kaufmann CC, et al. New aspects on the pharmacokinetics of mitoxantrone and its two major metabolites. Leukemia 1994; 8(3): 435–40PubMed
37.
go back to reference Ehninger G, Proksch B, Heinzel G, et al. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of mitoxantrone in man. Invest New Drugs 1985; 3(2): 109–16PubMedCrossRef Ehninger G, Proksch B, Heinzel G, et al. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of mitoxantrone in man. Invest New Drugs 1985; 3(2): 109–16PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Smyth JF, Macpherson JS, Warrington PS, et al. The clinical pharmacology of mitoxantrone. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1986; 17(2): 149–52PubMedCrossRef Smyth JF, Macpherson JS, Warrington PS, et al. The clinical pharmacology of mitoxantrone. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1986; 17(2): 149–52PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Alberts DS, Peng Y-M, Leigh S, et al. Disposition of mitoxantrone in cancer patients. Cancer Res 1985; 45(4): 1879–84PubMed Alberts DS, Peng Y-M, Leigh S, et al. Disposition of mitoxantrone in cancer patients. Cancer Res 1985; 45(4): 1879–84PubMed
40.
go back to reference Lu K, Savaraj N, Loo TL. Pharmacological disposition of 1,4-dihydoxy-5-8-bis[[2[(2-hydroxyethal)amino]ethyl] amino]-9,10-anthracenedione dihydrochloride in the dog. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1984; 13(1): 63–6PubMedCrossRef Lu K, Savaraj N, Loo TL. Pharmacological disposition of 1,4-dihydoxy-5-8-bis[[2[(2-hydroxyethal)amino]ethyl] amino]-9,10-anthracenedione dihydrochloride in the dog. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1984; 13(1): 63–6PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Stewart DJ, Green RM, Mikhael NZ, et al. Human autopsy tissue concentrations of mitoxantrone. Cancer Treat Rep 1986; 70(11): 1255–61PubMed Stewart DJ, Green RM, Mikhael NZ, et al. Human autopsy tissue concentrations of mitoxantrone. Cancer Treat Rep 1986; 70(11): 1255–61PubMed
42.
go back to reference Savaraj N, Lu K, Manuel V, et al. Pharmacology of mitoxantrone in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1982; 8(1): 113–7PubMedCrossRef Savaraj N, Lu K, Manuel V, et al. Pharmacology of mitoxantrone in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1982; 8(1): 113–7PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Chiccarelli FS, Morrison JA, Cosulich DB, et al. Identification of human urinary mitoxantrone metabolites. Cancer Res 1986; 46(9): 4858–61PubMed Chiccarelli FS, Morrison JA, Cosulich DB, et al. Identification of human urinary mitoxantrone metabolites. Cancer Res 1986; 46(9): 4858–61PubMed
44.
go back to reference Hartung H-P, Gonsette R, Konig N, et al. Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet 2002; 360(9350): 2018–25PubMedCrossRef Hartung H-P, Gonsette R, Konig N, et al. Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet 2002; 360(9350): 2018–25PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Edan G, Miller D, Clanet M, et al. Therapeutic effect of mitoxantrone combined with methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis: a randomised multicentre study of active disease using MRI and clinical criteria [see comments]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62(2): 112–8PubMedCrossRef Edan G, Miller D, Clanet M, et al. Therapeutic effect of mitoxantrone combined with methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis: a randomised multicentre study of active disease using MRI and clinical criteria [see comments]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62(2): 112–8PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Bastianello S, Pozzilli C, Dandrea F, et al. A controlled trial of mitoxantrone in multiple sclerosis: serial MRI evaluation at one year. Can J Neurol Sci 1994; 21(3): 266–70PubMed Bastianello S, Pozzilli C, Dandrea F, et al. A controlled trial of mitoxantrone in multiple sclerosis: serial MRI evaluation at one year. Can J Neurol Sci 1994; 21(3): 266–70PubMed
47.
go back to reference De Castro S, Cartoni D, Millefiorini E, et al. Noninvasive assessment of mitoxantrone cardiotoxicity in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 35(6): 627–32PubMed De Castro S, Cartoni D, Millefiorini E, et al. Noninvasive assessment of mitoxantrone cardiotoxicity in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 35(6): 627–32PubMed
48.
go back to reference Millefiorini E, Gasperini C, Pozzilli C, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of mitoxantrone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 24-month clinical and MRI outcome. J Neurol 1997; 244(3): 153–9PubMedCrossRef Millefiorini E, Gasperini C, Pozzilli C, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of mitoxantrone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 24-month clinical and MRI outcome. J Neurol 1997; 244(3): 153–9PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Mauch E, Kornhuber HH, Krapf H, et al. Treatment of multiple sclerosis with mitoxantrone. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 242(2–3): 96–102PubMedCrossRef Mauch E, Kornhuber HH, Krapf H, et al. Treatment of multiple sclerosis with mitoxantrone. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 242(2–3): 96–102PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Noseworthy JH, Hopkins MB, Vandervoort MK, et al. An open-trial evaluation of mitoxantrone in the treatment of progressive MS. Neurology 1993; 43(7): 1401–6PubMedCrossRef Noseworthy JH, Hopkins MB, Vandervoort MK, et al. An open-trial evaluation of mitoxantrone in the treatment of progressive MS. Neurology 1993; 43(7): 1401–6PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Krapf H, Mauch E, Fetzer U, et al. Serial gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with mitoxantrone. Neuroradiology 1995; 37(2): 113–9PubMedCrossRef Krapf H, Mauch E, Fetzer U, et al. Serial gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with mitoxantrone. Neuroradiology 1995; 37(2): 113–9PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Malone M, Lomaestro B. Outcomes assessment of drug treatment in multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 9(3): 198–210PubMedCrossRef Malone M, Lomaestro B. Outcomes assessment of drug treatment in multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 9(3): 198–210PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Polman CH, Hartung H-P. The treatment of multiple sclerosis: current and future. Curr Opin Neurol 1995; 8(3): 200–9PubMedCrossRef Polman CH, Hartung H-P. The treatment of multiple sclerosis: current and future. Curr Opin Neurol 1995; 8(3): 200–9PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Filippi M, Horsfield MA, Ader HJ, et al. Guidelines for using quantitative measures of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1998; 43(4): 499–506PubMedCrossRef Filippi M, Horsfield MA, Ader HJ, et al. Guidelines for using quantitative measures of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1998; 43(4): 499–506PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Arnold DL, Matthews PM. MRI in the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 4 (8 Suppl. 4): S23–31PubMedCrossRef Arnold DL, Matthews PM. MRI in the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 4 (8 Suppl. 4): S23–31PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Wanke LA, Durgin TL, Goodkin D, et al. Estimated resource use and cost of mitoxantrone in patients with progressive-relapsing and secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis: results from MIMS trial [abstract no. P02.029]. Neurology 2001; 56Suppl. 3: A100 Wanke LA, Durgin TL, Goodkin D, et al. Estimated resource use and cost of mitoxantrone in patients with progressive-relapsing and secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis: results from MIMS trial [abstract no. P02.029]. Neurology 2001; 56Suppl. 3: A100
57.
go back to reference Brassat D, Recher C, Waubant E, et al. Therapy-related acute myeloblastic leukemia after mitoxantrone treatment in a patient with MS. Neurology 2002 Sep 24; 59(6): 954–5PubMedCrossRef Brassat D, Recher C, Waubant E, et al. Therapy-related acute myeloblastic leukemia after mitoxantrone treatment in a patient with MS. Neurology 2002 Sep 24; 59(6): 954–5PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Heesen C, Bruegmann M, Gbdamosi J, et al. Therapy-related acute myelogenous leukaemia (t-AML) in a patient with multiple sclerosis treated with mitoxantrone [letter]. Mult Scler 2003 Mar; 9(2): 213–4PubMedCrossRef Heesen C, Bruegmann M, Gbdamosi J, et al. Therapy-related acute myelogenous leukaemia (t-AML) in a patient with multiple sclerosis treated with mitoxantrone [letter]. Mult Scler 2003 Mar; 9(2): 213–4PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Cattaneo C, Almici C, Borlenghi E, et al. A case of acute promyelocytic leukaemia following mitoxantrone treatment of multiple sclerosis. Leukemia 2003 May; 17(5): 985–6PubMedCrossRef Cattaneo C, Almici C, Borlenghi E, et al. A case of acute promyelocytic leukaemia following mitoxantrone treatment of multiple sclerosis. Leukemia 2003 May; 17(5): 985–6PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Crossley RJ. Clinical safety and tolerance of mitoxantrone. Semin Oncol 1984; 11(3 Suppl. 1): 54–8PubMed Crossley RJ. Clinical safety and tolerance of mitoxantrone. Semin Oncol 1984; 11(3 Suppl. 1): 54–8PubMed
61.
go back to reference Edan G, Brassat D, Clanet M, et al. Safety profile of mitoxantrone in a cohort of 802 multiple sclerosis patients [abstract no. S23.005]. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 3: A168 Edan G, Brassat D, Clanet M, et al. Safety profile of mitoxantrone in a cohort of 802 multiple sclerosis patients [abstract no. S23.005]. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 3: A168
62.
go back to reference Ghalie RG, Edan G, Laurent M, et al. Cardiac adverse effects associated with mitoxantrone (Novantrone) therapy in patients with MS. Neurology 2002 Sep 24; 59: 909–13PubMedCrossRef Ghalie RG, Edan G, Laurent M, et al. Cardiac adverse effects associated with mitoxantrone (Novantrone) therapy in patients with MS. Neurology 2002 Sep 24; 59: 909–13PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Avasarala JR, Cross AH, Clifford DB, et al. Rapid onset mitoxantrone-induced cardiotoxicity in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003 Feb; 9(1): 59–62PubMedCrossRef Avasarala JR, Cross AH, Clifford DB, et al. Rapid onset mitoxantrone-induced cardiotoxicity in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003 Feb; 9(1): 59–62PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Mikol DD, Bernitsas E. Safety and tolerability of mitoxantrone plus dexrazoxane therapy in multiple sclerosis patients [abstract no. P06.084]. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 3: A459–60 Mikol DD, Bernitsas E. Safety and tolerability of mitoxantrone plus dexrazoxane therapy in multiple sclerosis patients [abstract no. P06.084]. Neurology 2002; 58Suppl. 3: A459–60
65.
go back to reference van Oosten BW, Truyen L, Barkhof F, et al. Choosing drug therapy for multiple sclerosis: an update. Drugs 1998; 56(4): 555–69PubMedCrossRef van Oosten BW, Truyen L, Barkhof F, et al. Choosing drug therapy for multiple sclerosis: an update. Drugs 1998; 56(4): 555–69PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Rudick R. Contemporary immunomodulatory therapy for multiple sclerosis. J Neuro-Opthalmol 2001; 21(4): 284–91CrossRef Rudick R. Contemporary immunomodulatory therapy for multiple sclerosis. J Neuro-Opthalmol 2001; 21(4): 284–91CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Frohman E, Phillips T, Kokel PA-C, et al. Disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: strategies for optimizing management. Neurologist 2002; 8(4): 227–36PubMedCrossRef Frohman E, Phillips T, Kokel PA-C, et al. Disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: strategies for optimizing management. Neurologist 2002; 8(4): 227–36PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Cohen JA. Multiple sclerosis: the importance of early recognition and treatment. Cleveland Clin J Med 2001; 68(2): 157–71 Fox RJ, Cohen JA. Multiple sclerosis: the importance of early recognition and treatment. Cleveland Clin J Med 2001; 68(2): 157–71
69.
go back to reference Becker CC, Gidal BE, Fleming JO. Immunotherapy in multiple sclerosis, part 2. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1995; 52(19): 2105–20PubMed Becker CC, Gidal BE, Fleming JO. Immunotherapy in multiple sclerosis, part 2. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1995; 52(19): 2105–20PubMed
70.
go back to reference Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Garmany GP, et al. Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines [published erratum appears in Neurology 2002; 59(3): 480]. Neurology 2002; 58(2): 169–78PubMedCrossRef Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Garmany GP, et al. Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines [published erratum appears in Neurology 2002; 59(3): 480]. Neurology 2002; 58(2): 169–78PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Calabresi P. Considerations in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2002; 58(8 Suppl. 4): S10–22PubMedCrossRef Calabresi P. Considerations in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2002; 58(8 Suppl. 4): S10–22PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Lea AP, Goa KL. Copolymer-1: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in multiple sclerosis. Clin Immunother 1996; 6(4): 319–31CrossRef Lea AP, Goa KL. Copolymer-1: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in multiple sclerosis. Clin Immunother 1996; 6(4): 319–31CrossRef
74.
go back to reference Simpson D, Noble S, Perry C. Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2002; 16(12): 825–50PubMedCrossRef Simpson D, Noble S, Perry C. Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2002; 16(12): 825–50PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Wagstaff AJ, Goa KL. Recombinant interferon-β-1a: a review of its therapeutic efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Biodrugs 1998; 10(6): 471–94PubMedCrossRef Wagstaff AJ, Goa KL. Recombinant interferon-β-1a: a review of its therapeutic efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Biodrugs 1998; 10(6): 471–94PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Holliday SM, Benfield P. Interferon-β-1a: a review of its pharmacological and therapeutic potential in multiple sclerosis. Biodrugs 1997; 8(4): 317–30PubMedCrossRef Holliday SM, Benfield P. Interferon-β-1a: a review of its pharmacological and therapeutic potential in multiple sclerosis. Biodrugs 1997; 8(4): 317–30PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Ziemssen T, Neuhaus O, Hohlfeld R. Risk-benefit assessment of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Drug Saf 2001; 24(13): 979–90PubMedCrossRef Ziemssen T, Neuhaus O, Hohlfeld R. Risk-benefit assessment of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Drug Saf 2001; 24(13): 979–90PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Weilbach FX, Gold R. Disease modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: what is on the horizon? CNS Drugs 1999; 11(2): 133–57CrossRef Weilbach FX, Gold R. Disease modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: what is on the horizon? CNS Drugs 1999; 11(2): 133–57CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Goodin DS, Arnason BG, Coyle PK, et al. The use of mitoxantrone (Novantrone) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2003; 61(10): 1332–8PubMedCrossRef Goodin DS, Arnason BG, Coyle PK, et al. The use of mitoxantrone (Novantrone) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2003; 61(10): 1332–8PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Bashir K, Whitaker JN. Current immunotherapy for demyelinating disease. Arch Neurol 2002; 59(5): 726–31PubMedCrossRef Bashir K, Whitaker JN. Current immunotherapy for demyelinating disease. Arch Neurol 2002; 59(5): 726–31PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mitoxantrone
A Review of its Use in Multiple Sclerosis
Authors
Lesley J. Scott
David P. Figgitt
Publication date
01-05-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
CNS Drugs / Issue 6/2004
Print ISSN: 1172-7047
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1934
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200418060-00010

Other articles of this Issue 6/2004

CNS Drugs 6/2004 Go to the issue

Therapy In Practice

Depersonalisation Disorder