Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 9/2007

01-09-2007 | Original Research Article

Preferences of Community Pharmacists for Extended Roles in Primary Care

A Survey and Discrete Choice Experiment

Authors: Professor Anthony Scott, Christine Bond, Jackie Inch, Aileen Grant

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Major changes in the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists across the world are occurring. A new Scottish Community Pharmacy contract was introduced in April 2006, following the introduction of a similar contract in England in 2005. This contract encourages greater involvement in medicines management and other clinical cognitive roles, whilst retaining a supply function.
Objective: To use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to examine the strength of preference of community pharmacists for existing and potential new roles, prior to the introduction of the new contract.
Study design: The DCE was a component of a larger questionnaire, which assessed demography, workload, attitudes to, and satisfaction with, proposed new roles, and current levels of activity. Attributes and levels for the DCE were based on the recent policy document for Scotland, The Right Medicine, and informed consensus, respectively. Scenarios were organised into pairs, and pharmacists were asked “Which job would you prefer?” The questionnaire was mailed to all pharmacists working in the community setting in Scotland (n = 1621), as identified from a telephone survey. The questionnaire was totally anonymous, and two reminders were sent.
Results: There was an overall response rate of 56.4% (914/1621). Community pharmacists preferred to work in an extended pharmacy team, to have strong integration with secondary care, and to provide a minor illness advice service. In 2003, they would forgo an annual income of £3443, £2183 and £2798, respectively to achieve this. However, overall, the pharmacists preferred more income to less. Repeat dispensing, chronic disease management, offering health promotion services, and the number of prescriptions dispensed per month were not significant predictors of job choice.
Conclusion: Community pharmacists placed the highest value on organisational aspects of their work, and having a first contact primary care role. Although total income was important, there were indications that they would be prepared to forgo income to attain their preferred job.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scottish Executive. The right medicine: a strategy for pharmaceutical care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, 2001 Scottish Executive. The right medicine: a strategy for pharmaceutical care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, 2001
2.
go back to reference Department of Health. Pharmacy in the future: a vision for pharmacy in the new NHS. London: Department of Health, 2000 Department of Health. Pharmacy in the future: a vision for pharmacy in the new NHS. London: Department of Health, 2000
3.
go back to reference Welsh Assembly Government. Remedies for success: a strategy for pharmacy in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government, 2002 Welsh Assembly Government. Remedies for success: a strategy for pharmacy in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government, 2002
4.
go back to reference Bond CM, Laing A, McKee L, et al. Evolution and change in community pharmacy. Aberdeen: Community Pharmacy Research Consortium, 2003 Bond CM, Laing A, McKee L, et al. Evolution and change in community pharmacy. Aberdeen: Community Pharmacy Research Consortium, 2003
5.
go back to reference Hassell K. Contemporary workforce patterns and historical trends: the pharmacy labour market over the last forty years. Pharm J 2002; 269 (7213): 291–296 Hassell K. Contemporary workforce patterns and historical trends: the pharmacy labour market over the last forty years. Pharm J 2002; 269 (7213): 291–296
6.
go back to reference Bond C, Scott A, Inch J, et al. Examining alternatives for the remuneration of community pharmacy: report to Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council Research Trust. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, 2003 Bond C, Scott A, Inch J, et al. Examining alternatives for the remuneration of community pharmacy: report to Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council Research Trust. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, 2003
7.
go back to reference Inch J, Bond C, Lee A, et al. Scottish community pharmacists’ current involvement in and attitudes towards’ extended service’ provision: a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract 2005; 13: 289–301CrossRef Inch J, Bond C, Lee A, et al. Scottish community pharmacists’ current involvement in and attitudes towards’ extended service’ provision: a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract 2005; 13: 289–301CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ryan M, Farrar S. Eliciting preferences for health care using conjoint analysis. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530–1533PubMedCrossRef Ryan M, Farrar S. Eliciting preferences for health care using conjoint analysis. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530–1533PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: moving forward. In: Scott A, Maynard A, Elliott R. Advances in health economics. Wiley: Chichester, 2002 Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: moving forward. In: Scott A, Maynard A, Elliott R. Advances in health economics. Wiley: Chichester, 2002
10.
go back to reference Scott A. Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J Health Econ 2001: 20; 329–347PubMedCrossRef Scott A. Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J Health Econ 2001: 20; 329–347PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zwerina K, Huber J, Kuhfeld W. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Durham (NC): Duke University, 1996 Zwerina K, Huber J, Kuhfeld W. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Durham (NC): Duke University, 1996
12.
go back to reference Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ 2003; 12: 281–294PubMedCrossRef Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ 2003; 12: 281–294PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Inch J, Bond C, Lee A, et al. Scottish Community Pharmacists’ current involvement in and attitudes towards’ extended service’ provision: a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract 2005; 13: 289–301CrossRef Inch J, Bond C, Lee A, et al. Scottish Community Pharmacists’ current involvement in and attitudes towards’ extended service’ provision: a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract 2005; 13: 289–301CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rosen S. The theory of equalising differences. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R, editors. Handbook of labour economics. Vol I. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1986: 641–692CrossRef Rosen S. The theory of equalising differences. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R, editors. Handbook of labour economics. Vol I. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1986: 641–692CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Briggs AH, Gray AM. Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluations of health care interventions. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3 (2): 1–134PubMed Briggs AH, Gray AM. Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluations of health care interventions. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3 (2): 1–134PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ratcliffe J. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit willingness to pay: proceed with caution? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 270–290PubMedCrossRef Ratcliffe J. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit willingness to pay: proceed with caution? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 270–290PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Skjoldborg US, Gyrd-Hansen D. Conjoint analysis: the cost variable. An Achilles’ heel? Health Econ 2003; 12: 479–492CrossRef Skjoldborg US, Gyrd-Hansen D. Conjoint analysis: the cost variable. An Achilles’ heel? Health Econ 2003; 12: 479–492CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 901–907CrossRef Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 901–907CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: a response to Ryan and Santos Silva. Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 919–924CrossRef Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: a response to Ryan and Santos Silva. Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 919–924CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ryan M. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 909–912CrossRef Ryan M. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 909–912CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Santos Silva JMC. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (2). Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 913–918CrossRef Santos Silva JMC. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (2). Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 913–918CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Scott A. Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health care. J Econom Psyc 2002; 23: 383–398CrossRef Scott A. Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health care. J Econom Psyc 2002; 23: 383–398CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lloyd AJ. Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate? Health Econ 2003; 12: 393–402PubMedCrossRef Lloyd AJ. Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate? Health Econ 2003; 12: 393–402PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preferences of Community Pharmacists for Extended Roles in Primary Care
A Survey and Discrete Choice Experiment
Authors
Professor Anthony Scott
Christine Bond
Jackie Inch
Aileen Grant
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200725090-00006

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

PharmacoEconomics 9/2007 Go to the issue

Correspondence

The Authors’ Reply