Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 1/2002

01-10-2002 | Original Research Article

Economic Evaluation of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Canada

Authors: Douglas Coyle, Andrew J. Palmer, Robert Tam

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Special Issue 1/2002

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction: Recently published clinical trial results have demonstrated that, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, treatment with pioglitazone hydrochloride as a first-line therapy can lead to significant improvements in glycosylated haemoglobin, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Given the results of these trials, we assessed the cost effectiveness of the use of pioglitazone as a first-line therapy in Canada.
Methods: A Markov model was used to determine the health outcomes and economic impact for patients with type 2 diabetes, from the perspective of a provincial ministry of health. The model incorporated six complications of diabetes: hypoglycaemia, acutemyocardial infarction, stroke, lower extremity amputation, nephropathy, and retinopathy. Transition probabilities and costs were taken from published literature. Analysis compared treatment strategies with different first-line therapies: pioglitazone, glibenclamide (glyburide), metformin, and diet and exercise.
Results: Compared with other strategies, a pioglitazone-based strategy was estimated to reduce the cumulative incidence of severe clinical events and long-term complications by between 23 and 36% and to increase discounted life expectancy by between 0.13 and 0.35 life-years. The discounted incremental cost per life-year gained of a first-line pioglitazone-based strategy was 54 000 Canadian dollars ($Can) compared with metformin, $Can42 000 compared with glibenclamide and $Can27 000 compared with diet and exercise.
Conclusions: When compared with other currently funded chronic therapy, these results demonstrate that a treatment strategy employing pioglitazone as a first-line therapy may be cost effective for certain patient strata.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aronoff S, Rosenblatt S, Braithwaite S, et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study. The Pioglitazone 001 Study Group. Diabetes Care 2000; 23 (11): 1605–11PubMedCrossRef Aronoff S, Rosenblatt S, Braithwaite S, et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study. The Pioglitazone 001 Study Group. Diabetes Care 2000; 23 (11): 1605–11PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pinaire J, Robertson K, Zagar A, et al. Favourable impact of pioglitazone on lipid profile independent of baseline triglyceride in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Presented at the Endocrine Society Meeting; 2001 Jun; Denver (CO) Pinaire J, Robertson K, Zagar A, et al. Favourable impact of pioglitazone on lipid profile independent of baseline triglyceride in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Presented at the Endocrine Society Meeting; 2001 Jun; Denver (CO)
3.
go back to reference Einhorn D, Rendell M, Rosenzweig J, et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized placebo-controlled study. The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group. Clin Ther 2000; 22 (12): 1395–409PubMedCrossRef Einhorn D, Rendell M, Rosenzweig J, et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized placebo-controlled study. The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group. Clin Ther 2000; 22 (12): 1395–409PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kipnes MS, Krosnick A, Rendell MS, et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Med 2001; 111: 10–7PubMedCrossRef Kipnes MS, Krosnick A, Rendell MS, et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Med 2001; 111: 10–7PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Anderson RN. United States life tables, 1998. National vital statistics reports; Vol. 48, no. 18. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2001 Anderson RN. United States life tables, 1998. National vital statistics reports; Vol. 48, no. 18. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2001
6.
go back to reference Palmer AJ, Weiss C, Sendi PP, et al. The cost-effectiveness of different management strategies for type I diabetes: a Swiss perspective. Diabetologia 2000; 43: 13–26PubMedCrossRef Palmer AJ, Weiss C, Sendi PP, et al. The cost-effectiveness of different management strategies for type I diabetes: a Swiss perspective. Diabetologia 2000; 43: 13–26PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Palmer AJ, Sendi PP, Spinas GA. Applying some UK Prospective Diabetes Study results to Switzerland: the cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control with metformin versus conventional control in overweight patients with type-2 diabetes. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 2000; 130 (27–28): 1034–40PubMed Palmer AJ, Sendi PP, Spinas GA. Applying some UK Prospective Diabetes Study results to Switzerland: the cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control with metformin versus conventional control in overweight patients with type-2 diabetes. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 2000; 130 (27–28): 1034–40PubMed
9.
go back to reference Actos Prescibing Information. Eli Lilly Canada, 2000 Actos Prescibing Information. Eli Lilly Canada, 2000
10.
go back to reference Matthews DR, Cull CA, Stratton IM, et al. UKPDS 26: Sulphonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over six years. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Diabet Med 1998; 15 (4): 297–303PubMedCrossRef Matthews DR, Cull CA, Stratton IM, et al. UKPDS 26: Sulphonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over six years. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Diabet Med 1998; 15 (4): 297–303PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chun B, Coyle D, Berthelot JM, et al. Estimating the cost of coronary heart disease in Manitoba. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Joint Annual Meeting. 1997 Mar; Chicago (IL) Chun B, Coyle D, Berthelot JM, et al. Estimating the cost of coronary heart disease in Manitoba. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Joint Annual Meeting. 1997 Mar; Chicago (IL)
12.
go back to reference Smurawsksa LT, Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF. Cost of acute stroke care in Toronto, Canada. Stroke 1994; 25: 1628–31CrossRef Smurawsksa LT, Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF. Cost of acute stroke care in Toronto, Canada. Stroke 1994; 25: 1628–31CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rivière M, Wang S, Leclerc C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in Canada. CMAJ 1997; 156: 991–7PubMed Rivière M, Wang S, Leclerc C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in Canada. CMAJ 1997; 156: 991–7PubMed
14.
go back to reference Jacobs P, Bachynsky J. An Alberta standard cost list for health economics evaluations. Institute for Pharmacoeconomics, 1997. Working paper: 97–5 Jacobs P, Bachynsky J. An Alberta standard cost list for health economics evaluations. Institute for Pharmacoeconomics, 1997. Working paper: 97–5
15.
go back to reference Alberta Physician Fee Schedule. Edmonton: Alberta Health and Wellness, 1999 Alberta Physician Fee Schedule. Edmonton: Alberta Health and Wellness, 1999
16.
go back to reference Tan MH, MacLean DR. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in Canada. Clin Invest Med 1995; 18 (4): 240–6PubMed Tan MH, MacLean DR. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in Canada. Clin Invest Med 1995; 18 (4): 240–6PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ontario Case Costing Project (OCCP). Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1999 Ontario Case Costing Project (OCCP). Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1999
18.
go back to reference Johansen K. Efficacy of metformin in the treatment of NIDDM. Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 33–7PubMedCrossRef Johansen K. Efficacy of metformin in the treatment of NIDDM. Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 33–7PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hermann LS, Schersten B, Per-Olof B, et al. Therapeutic comparison of metformin and sulphonylurea, alone and in various combinations. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 1100–9PubMedCrossRef Hermann LS, Schersten B, Per-Olof B, et al. Therapeutic comparison of metformin and sulphonylurea, alone and in various combinations. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 1100–9PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization. Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ 1992; 146 (4): 473–81PubMed Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization. Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ 1992; 146 (4): 473–81PubMed
21.
go back to reference Churchill DN, Lemon DC, Torrance GW. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis to hospital hemodialysis. Med Decis Making 1984; 4: 489–500CrossRef Churchill DN, Lemon DC, Torrance GW. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis to hospital hemodialysis. Med Decis Making 1984; 4: 489–500CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Goel V, Deber RB, Detsky AS. Nonionic contrast media: economic analysis and health policy development. CMAJ 1989; 140: 389–95PubMed Goel V, Deber RB, Detsky AS. Nonionic contrast media: economic analysis and health policy development. CMAJ 1989; 140: 389–95PubMed
23.
go back to reference Naylor CD, Baigrie RS, Goldman BS, et al. Assessment of priority for coronary revascularization procedures. Lancet 1990; 335: 1070–3PubMedCrossRef Naylor CD, Baigrie RS, Goldman BS, et al. Assessment of priority for coronary revascularization procedures. Lancet 1990; 335: 1070–3PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Oliver A, Pritchard C. Economic evaluations relating to diabetes: a descriptive review and their compliance with guidance. Value Health 2000; 3: s7–14CrossRef Oliver A, Pritchard C. Economic evaluations relating to diabetes: a descriptive review and their compliance with guidance. Value Health 2000; 3: s7–14CrossRef
25.
go back to reference MacKeigan LD. A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 14 (6): 709–10PubMedCrossRef MacKeigan LD. A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 14 (6): 709–10PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hood S, Annemans L, Rutten-van Molken M. A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13 (3): 317–26PubMedCrossRef Hood S, Annemans L, Rutten-van Molken M. A short term cost-effectiveness model for oral antidiabetic medicines in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13 (3): 317–26PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Caro JJ, Klittich WS, Raggio G, et al. Economic assessment of troglitazone as an adjunct to sulfonylurea therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther 2000; 22 (1): 116–27PubMedCrossRef Caro JJ, Klittich WS, Raggio G, et al. Economic assessment of troglitazone as an adjunct to sulfonylurea therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther 2000; 22 (1): 116–27PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Campbell IW. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of type 2 diabetes. Value Health 2000; 3: s3–6CrossRef Campbell IW. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of type 2 diabetes. Value Health 2000; 3: s3–6CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Holmes J, McGill S, Kind P, et al. Health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes (T2ARDIS-2). Value Health 2000; 3: s47–51CrossRef Holmes J, McGill S, Kind P, et al. Health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes (T2ARDIS-2). Value Health 2000; 3: s47–51CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Eastman RC, Javitt JC, Herman WH, et al. Model of complications of NIDDM. I. Model construction and assumptions. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 725–34PubMedCrossRef Eastman RC, Javitt JC, Herman WH, et al. Model of complications of NIDDM. I. Model construction and assumptions. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 725–34PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Brown JB, Russell A, Chan W, et al. The global diabetes model: user friendly version 3.0. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 50 Suppl. 3: S15–46PubMedCrossRef Brown JB, Russell A, Chan W, et al. The global diabetes model: user friendly version 3.0. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 50 Suppl. 3: S15–46PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brown JB, Palmer AJ, Bisgaard P, et al. The Mt. Hood challenge: cross-testing two diabetes simulation models. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 50 Suppl. 3: S57–64PubMedCrossRef Brown JB, Palmer AJ, Bisgaard P, et al. The Mt. Hood challenge: cross-testing two diabetes simulation models. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 50 Suppl. 3: S57–64PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Economic Evaluation of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Canada
Authors
Douglas Coyle
Andrew J. Palmer
Robert Tam
Publication date
01-10-2002
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue Special Issue 1/2002
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220001-00004

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2002

PharmacoEconomics 1/2002 Go to the issue