Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Original Research Article

Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Metabolic Pathway of Gemcitabine During Intravenous and Intra-arterial Delivery in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Authors: Ali I. Shamseddine, Mohammad J. Khalifeh, Fadi H. Mourad, Aref A. Chehal, Aghiad Al-Kutoubi, Jaber Abbas, Mohammad Z. Habbal, Lida A. Malaeb, Dr Anwar B. Bikhazi

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: To study the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome of gemcitabine (2′-2′-difluoro-deoxcytidine [dFdC]) during intra-arterial versus intravenous delivery in locally advanced and regionally metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Patients and methods: Seven patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer received escalating intra-arterial doses of gemcitabine ranging from 800 to 1400 mg/m2, after selective embolisation of all pancreatic blood supply, except for the tumour-feeding arteries. Four patients received intravenous gemcitabine (control). Venous blood samples at different time intervals were taken throughout 270 minutes for pharmacokinetic analyses of gemcitabine and its inactive metabolite 2′-2′-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU).
Results: Pharmacokinetic data revealed differences in plasma concentrations between intra-arterial and intravenous delivery routes. The plasma concentration-time curve of gemcitabine during and after cessation of intra-arterial pancreatic target administration through the proximal splenic artery showed a profile with an area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 270 minutes (intra-arterial 29.0 + 0.4 vs intravenous 331.0 + 2.7 ng · min/mL; p < 0.0001) and peak plasma concentration (intra-arterial 1.1 + 0.2 vs intravenous 7.6 + 2.0 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) significantly lower than that for the corresponding systemic intravenous route. A plot of In (% of dose) versus time showed a bi-compartmentalised metabolic model for intravenous administration of gemcitabine, one indicating rapid conversion of gemcitabine to dFdU, and another at a significantly lower affinity resulting in no conversion. Hence, this could be the main reason why dFdU was not detected in the systemic circulation during pancreatic intra-arterial target delivery. Furthermore, during intravenous administration a pseudo first-order rate constant (≈0.20 min-1) for in vivo conversion of gemcitabine to dFdU was estimated, indicating a rapid cellular deamination which was not shown in the intra-arterial route. Clinically, one patient had a partial response and six patients had a stable disease after intra-arterial administration of gemcitabine. The median time to disease progression was 4 months and the median overall survival was 5 months. One patient survived for 26 months. No grade III or IV toxicity was documented.
Conclusion: Intra-arterial administration of gemcitabine has a major advantage related to reduced toxicity as increasing the dose through this administration route will eventually result in pancreatic cellular drug target delivery prior to systemic availability. Despite the low number of patients recruited, the clinical results are encouraging and this approach should be tested in a randomised study.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Burris III HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvement in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2403–13PubMed Burris III HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvement in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2403–13PubMed
4.
go back to reference Plunkett W, Huang P, Xu YZ, et al. Gemcitabine: metabolism, mechanisms of action and self-potentiation. Semin Oncol 1995; 22: 3–10PubMed Plunkett W, Huang P, Xu YZ, et al. Gemcitabine: metabolism, mechanisms of action and self-potentiation. Semin Oncol 1995; 22: 3–10PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kiani A, Köhne CH, Franz T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in a patient with end-stage renal disease: effective clearance of its main metabolite by standard hemodialysis treatment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2003; 51: 266–70PubMed Kiani A, Köhne CH, Franz T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in a patient with end-stage renal disease: effective clearance of its main metabolite by standard hemodialysis treatment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2003; 51: 266–70PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bergman AM, Pinedo HM, Peters GJ. Determinants of resistance to 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine). Drug Resist Updat 2002; 5: 19–33PubMedCrossRef Bergman AM, Pinedo HM, Peters GJ. Determinants of resistance to 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine). Drug Resist Updat 2002; 5: 19–33PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Heinemann V, Xu YZ, Chubb S, et al. Cellular elimination of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine 5’-triphosphate: a mechanism of self-potentiation. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 533–9PubMed Heinemann V, Xu YZ, Chubb S, et al. Cellular elimination of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine 5’-triphosphate: a mechanism of self-potentiation. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 533–9PubMed
8.
go back to reference Goldberg JA, Kerr DJ, Willmott N, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of locoregional 5 fluorouracil (5FU) in advanced colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 186–9PubMedCrossRef Goldberg JA, Kerr DJ, Willmott N, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of locoregional 5 fluorouracil (5FU) in advanced colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 186–9PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aigner KR, Gailhofer S, Kopp S. Regional versus systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 1125–9PubMed Aigner KR, Gailhofer S, Kopp S. Regional versus systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 1125–9PubMed
10.
go back to reference Homma H, Doi T, Mezawa S, et al. A novel arterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma after vascular supply distribution via superselective embolization. Cancer 2000; 89: 303–13PubMedCrossRef Homma H, Doi T, Mezawa S, et al. A novel arterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma after vascular supply distribution via superselective embolization. Cancer 2000; 89: 303–13PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Laufer M, Ramalingam S, Schoenberg MP, et al. Intravesical gemcitabine therapy for superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 697–703PubMedCrossRef Laufer M, Ramalingam S, Schoenberg MP, et al. Intravesical gemcitabine therapy for superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 697–703PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weissmann A, Ludwig H. Intra-arterial gemcitabine for treatment of inoperably pancreatic and cholangio carcinoma [abstract no. 1170]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol; 1999; 18: 305 Weissmann A, Ludwig H. Intra-arterial gemcitabine for treatment of inoperably pancreatic and cholangio carcinoma [abstract no. 1170]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol; 1999; 18: 305
13.
go back to reference Spagnuolo P, Roversi R, Rossi G, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine as locoregional treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer [abstract no. 1153]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol; 1999; 18: 300a Spagnuolo P, Roversi R, Rossi G, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine as locoregional treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer [abstract no. 1153]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol; 1999; 18: 300a
14.
go back to reference Clemente CD. Clemente anatomy: a regional atlas of the human body. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1997: 151 Clemente CD. Clemente anatomy: a regional atlas of the human body. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1997: 151
15.
go back to reference Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA, et al. Phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 491–8PubMed Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA, et al. Phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 491–8PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rowland M, Tozer T. Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. 2nd ed. Beckenham: Lea & Febiger, 1989: 380, 459 Rowland M, Tozer T. Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. 2nd ed. Beckenham: Lea & Febiger, 1989: 380, 459
17.
go back to reference Wagner JG. Biopharmaceutics and relevant pharmacokinetics. 1st ed. Hamilton (IL): Drug Intelligence Publications, 1971: 294 Wagner JG. Biopharmaceutics and relevant pharmacokinetics. 1st ed. Hamilton (IL): Drug Intelligence Publications, 1971: 294
18.
go back to reference Collins JM. Pharmacologic rationale for regional drug delivery. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 498–504PubMed Collins JM. Pharmacologic rationale for regional drug delivery. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 498–504PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ensminger WD. Intra-arterial therapy. In: Perry MC, editors. The chemotherapy source book. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001: 164–74 Ensminger WD. Intra-arterial therapy. In: Perry MC, editors. The chemotherapy source book. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001: 164–74
20.
go back to reference Theodors A, Bukowski RM, Hewlett JS, et al. Intermittent regional infusion of chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: phase I and II pilot study. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 555–8PubMed Theodors A, Bukowski RM, Hewlett JS, et al. Intermittent regional infusion of chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: phase I and II pilot study. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 555–8PubMed
21.
go back to reference Smith L, Gazet J. Intraarterial chemotherapy for patients with inoperable carcinoma of the pancreas. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1980; 62: 208–12 Smith L, Gazet J. Intraarterial chemotherapy for patients with inoperable carcinoma of the pancreas. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1980; 62: 208–12
22.
go back to reference Malayeri R, Wein W, Zielinski C. Effective intrahepatic administration of gemcitabine after failure of doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer [letter]. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33(14): 2435PubMedCrossRef Malayeri R, Wein W, Zielinski C. Effective intrahepatic administration of gemcitabine after failure of doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer [letter]. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33(14): 2435PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Metabolic Pathway of Gemcitabine During Intravenous and Intra-arterial Delivery in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients
Authors
Ali I. Shamseddine
Mohammad J. Khalifeh
Fadi H. Mourad
Aref A. Chehal
Aghiad Al-Kutoubi
Jaber Abbas
Mohammad Z. Habbal
Lida A. Malaeb
Dr Anwar B. Bikhazi
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200544090-00005

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 9/2005 Go to the issue

Review Article

Microdialysis