Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2004

01-04-2004 | Original Research Article

Pharmacokinetics and Subjective Effects of Sublingual Buprenorphine, Alone or in Combination with Naloxone

Lack of Dose Proportionality

Authors: Debra S. Harris, John E. Mendelson, Emil T. Lin, Robert A. Upton, Dr Reese T. Jones

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective: Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone combinations are effective pharmacotherapies for opioid dependence, but doses are considerably greater than analgesic doses. Because dose-related buprenorphine opioid agonist effects may plateau at higher doses, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of expected therapeutic doses.
Design: The first experiment examined a range of sublingual buprenorphine solution doses with an ascending dose design (n = 12). The second experiment examined a range of doses of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets along with one dose of buprenorphine alone tablets with a balanced crossover design (n = 8).
Participants: Twenty nondependent, opioid-experienced volunteers.
Methods: Subjects in the solution experiment received sublingual buprenorphine solution in single ascending doses of 4, 8, 16 and 32mg. Subjects in the tablet experiment received sublingual tablets combining buprenorphine 4, 8 and 16mg with naloxone at a 4: 1 ratio or buprenorphine 16mg alone, given as single doses. Plasma buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects were measured for 48–72 hours after administration.
Results: Buprenorphine concentrations increased with dose, but not proportionally. Dose-adjusted areas under the concentration-time curve for buprenorphine 32mg solution, buprenorphine 16mg tablet and buprenorphine/naloxone 16/4mg tablet were only 54 ± 16%, 70 ± 25% and 72 ± 17%, respectively, of that of the 4mg dose of sublingual solution or tablet. No differences were found between dose strengths for most subjective and physiological effects. Pupil constriction at 48 hours after administration of solution did, however, increase with dose. Subjects reported greater intoxication with the 32mg solution dose, even though acceptability of the 4mg dose was greatest. Naloxone did not change the bioavailability or effects of the buprenorphine 16mg tablet.
Conclusion: Less than dose-proportional increases in plasma buprenorphine concentrations may contribute to the observed plateau for most pharmacodynamic effects as the dose is increased.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strain EC, Stitzer ML, Liebson IA, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid-dependence: self-reports, urinalysis, and Addiction Severity Index. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 16: 59–67CrossRef Strain EC, Stitzer ML, Liebson IA, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid-dependence: self-reports, urinalysis, and Addiction Severity Index. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 16: 59–67CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Johnson RE, Chutuape MA, Strain EC, et al. A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1290–7PubMedCrossRef Johnson RE, Chutuape MA, Strain EC, et al. A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1290–7PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schottenfeld RS, Pakes JR, Oliveto A, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance for concurrent opioid dependence and cocaine abuse. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54: 713–20PubMedCrossRef Schottenfeld RS, Pakes JR, Oliveto A, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance for concurrent opioid dependence and cocaine abuse. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54: 713–20PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ling W, Charuvastra C, Collins JF, et al. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment of opiate dependence: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Addiction 1998; 93: 475–86PubMedCrossRef Ling W, Charuvastra C, Collins JF, et al. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment of opiate dependence: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Addiction 1998; 93: 475–86PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brewster D, Humphrey MJ, McLeavy MA. The systemic bioavailability of buprenorphine by various routes of administration. J Pharm Pharmacol 1981; 33: 500–6PubMedCrossRef Brewster D, Humphrey MJ, McLeavy MA. The systemic bioavailability of buprenorphine by various routes of administration. J Pharm Pharmacol 1981; 33: 500–6PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Iribarne C, Picart D, Dreano Y, et al. Involvement of cytochrome P450 3A4 in N-dealkylation of buprenorphine in human liver microsomes. Life Sci 1997; 60: 1953–64PubMedCrossRef Iribarne C, Picart D, Dreano Y, et al. Involvement of cytochrome P450 3A4 in N-dealkylation of buprenorphine in human liver microsomes. Life Sci 1997; 60: 1953–64PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Walsh SL, Preston KL, Stitzer ML, et al. Clinical pharmacology of buprenorphine: ceiling effects at high doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 55: 569–80PubMedCrossRef Walsh SL, Preston KL, Stitzer ML, et al. Clinical pharmacology of buprenorphine: ceiling effects at high doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 55: 569–80PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Walsh SL, Preston KL, Bigelow GE, et al. Acute administration of buprenorphine in humans: partial agonist and blockade effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995; 274: 361–72PubMed Walsh SL, Preston KL, Bigelow GE, et al. Acute administration of buprenorphine in humans: partial agonist and blockade effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995; 274: 361–72PubMed
9.
go back to reference Preston KL, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA. Effects of sublingually given naloxone in opioid-dependent human volunteers. Drug Alcohol Depend 1990; 25: 27–34PubMedCrossRef Preston KL, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA. Effects of sublingually given naloxone in opioid-dependent human volunteers. Drug Alcohol Depend 1990; 25: 27–34PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mendelson J, Jones RT, Welm S, et al. Buprenorphine and naloxone combinations: the effects of three dose ratios in morphine-stabilized, opiate-dependent volunteers. Psychopharmacology 1999; 141: 37–46PubMedCrossRef Mendelson J, Jones RT, Welm S, et al. Buprenorphine and naloxone combinations: the effects of three dose ratios in morphine-stabilized, opiate-dependent volunteers. Psychopharmacology 1999; 141: 37–46PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harris DS, Jones RT, Welm S, et al. Buprenorphine and naloxone co-administration in opiate-dependent patients stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 61: 85–94PubMedCrossRef Harris DS, Jones RT, Welm S, et al. Buprenorphine and naloxone co-administration in opiate-dependent patients stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 61: 85–94PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Strain EC, Stoller K, Walsh SL, et al. Effects of buprenorphine versus buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in non-dependent opioid abusers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000; 148: 374–83CrossRef Strain EC, Stoller K, Walsh SL, et al. Effects of buprenorphine versus buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in non-dependent opioid abusers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000; 148: 374–83CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stoller KB, Bigelow GE, Walsh SL, et al. Effects of buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid-dependent humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001; 154: 230–42CrossRef Stoller KB, Bigelow GE, Walsh SL, et al. Effects of buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid-dependent humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001; 154: 230–42CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weinberg DS, Inturrisi CE, Reidenberg B, et al. Sublingual absorption of selected opioid analgesics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 44: 335–42PubMedCrossRef Weinberg DS, Inturrisi CE, Reidenberg B, et al. Sublingual absorption of selected opioid analgesics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 44: 335–42PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bullingham RES, McQuay HJ, Porter EJB, et al. Sublingual buprenorphine used postoperatively: ten-hour plasma drug concentration analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 13: 665–73PubMedCrossRef Bullingham RES, McQuay HJ, Porter EJB, et al. Sublingual buprenorphine used postoperatively: ten-hour plasma drug concentration analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 13: 665–73PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mendelson J, Upton RA, Everhart ET, et al. Bioavailability of sublingual buprenorphine. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 31–7PubMedCrossRef Mendelson J, Upton RA, Everhart ET, et al. Bioavailability of sublingual buprenorphine. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 31–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kuhlman Jr JJ, Lalani S, Magluilo Jr J, et al. Human pharmacokinetics of intravenous, sublingual, and buccal buprenorphine. J Anal Toxicol 1996; 20: 369–78PubMed Kuhlman Jr JJ, Lalani S, Magluilo Jr J, et al. Human pharmacokinetics of intravenous, sublingual, and buccal buprenorphine. J Anal Toxicol 1996; 20: 369–78PubMed
18.
go back to reference Hsieh Y, Shi R, Evangelista D, et al. Simultaneous determination of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone in human urine by LC/MS/MS [abstract]. Pharm Res 1997; 14(11 Suppl.): 738 Hsieh Y, Shi R, Evangelista D, et al. Simultaneous determination of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone in human urine by LC/MS/MS [abstract]. Pharm Res 1997; 14(11 Suppl.): 738
19.
go back to reference Bickel WK, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE, et al. A clinical trial of buprenorphine: comparison with methadone in the detoxification of heroin addicts. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 43: 72–8PubMedCrossRef Bickel WK, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE, et al. A clinical trial of buprenorphine: comparison with methadone in the detoxification of heroin addicts. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 43: 72–8PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jones RT, Mendelson J, Upton R, Relative bioavailability of oral and sublingual buprenorphine and naloxone tablets (study 97-1): final report. March 3, 2000. San Francisco (CA): University of California, 2000 Jones RT, Mendelson J, Upton R, Relative bioavailability of oral and sublingual buprenorphine and naloxone tablets (study 97-1): final report. March 3, 2000. San Francisco (CA): University of California, 2000
21.
go back to reference Kuhlman Jr JJ, Magluilo Jr J, Cone E, et al. Simultaneous assay of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine by negative chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 1996; 20: 229–35PubMed Kuhlman Jr JJ, Magluilo Jr J, Cone E, et al. Simultaneous assay of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine by negative chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 1996; 20: 229–35PubMed
22.
go back to reference Cone EJ, Dickerson SL, Darwin WD, et al. Elevated drug saliva levels suggest a ‘depot-like’ effect in subjects treated with sublingual buprenorphine [abstract]. NIDA Res Monogr 1991; 105: 569 Cone EJ, Dickerson SL, Darwin WD, et al. Elevated drug saliva levels suggest a ‘depot-like’ effect in subjects treated with sublingual buprenorphine [abstract]. NIDA Res Monogr 1991; 105: 569
23.
go back to reference Ohtani M, Kotaki H, Uchino K, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of enterohepatic circulation of buprenorphine and its active metabolite, norbuprenorphine, in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 1994; 22: 2–7PubMed Ohtani M, Kotaki H, Uchino K, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of enterohepatic circulation of buprenorphine and its active metabolite, norbuprenorphine, in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 1994; 22: 2–7PubMed
24.
go back to reference Tracqui A, Kintz P, Ludes B. Buprenorphine-related deaths among drug addicts in France: a report on 20 fatalities. J Anal Toxicol 1998; 22: 430–4PubMed Tracqui A, Kintz P, Ludes B. Buprenorphine-related deaths among drug addicts in France: a report on 20 fatalities. J Anal Toxicol 1998; 22: 430–4PubMed
25.
go back to reference Nath RP, Upton RA, Everhart ET, et al. Buprenorphine pharmacokinetics: relative bioavailability of sublingual tablet and liquid formulations. Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39: 619–23CrossRef Nath RP, Upton RA, Everhart ET, et al. Buprenorphine pharmacokinetics: relative bioavailability of sublingual tablet and liquid formulations. Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39: 619–23CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schuh KJ, Johanson CE. Pharmacokinetic comparison of the buprenorphine sublingual liquid and tablet. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 56: 55–60PubMedCrossRef Schuh KJ, Johanson CE. Pharmacokinetic comparison of the buprenorphine sublingual liquid and tablet. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 56: 55–60PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Umbricht A, Huestis MA, Cone EJ, et al. Safety of buprenorphine: ceiling for cardiorespiratory effects at high IV doses [abstract]. NIDA Res Monogr 1999; 179: 225 Umbricht A, Huestis MA, Cone EJ, et al. Safety of buprenorphine: ceiling for cardiorespiratory effects at high IV doses [abstract]. NIDA Res Monogr 1999; 179: 225
28.
go back to reference Boas RA, Villiger JW. Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine: the significance of receptor binding. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 192–6PubMedCrossRef Boas RA, Villiger JW. Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine: the significance of receptor binding. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 192–6PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
go back to reference Dum JE, Herz A. In vivo receptor binding of the opiate partial agonist, buprenorphine, correlated with its agonistic and antagonistic actions. Br J Pharmacol 1981; 74: 627–33PubMedCrossRef Dum JE, Herz A. In vivo receptor binding of the opiate partial agonist, buprenorphine, correlated with its agonistic and antagonistic actions. Br J Pharmacol 1981; 74: 627–33PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetics and Subjective Effects of Sublingual Buprenorphine, Alone or in Combination with Naloxone
Lack of Dose Proportionality
Authors
Debra S. Harris
John E. Mendelson
Emil T. Lin
Robert A. Upton
Dr Reese T. Jones
Publication date
01-04-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200443050-00005

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2004 Go to the issue

Current Opinion

Single-Isomer Drugs