Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2000

01-05-2000 | Review Article

Methods for Clinical Monitoring of Cyclosporin in Transplant Patients

Authors: Randall J. Dumont, Dr Mary H. H. Ensom

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 5/2000

Login to get access

Abstract

Cyclosporin was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1980s and has since been shown to prolong survival for transplant recipients. Because cyclosporin is a narrow therapeutic index drug and there are significant consequences associated with ‘subtherapeutic’ and ‘supratherapeutic’ concentrations, cyclosporin therapy is monitored as part of routine patient follow-up. However, the optimal method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin has yet to be defined. Currently, the most common method involves monitoring pre-dose trough concentrations, but this method is less than ideal.
Other methods of monitoring cyclosporin therapy include monitoring the area under the concentration-time curve, limited sampling strategies, monitoring of single concentrations other than troughs and pharmacodynamic monitoring. Bayesian forecasting has been used successfully in clinical practice with other drugs with narrow therapeutic indices. However, few studies are available regarding Bayesian forecasting and cyclosporin. Existing studies are preliminary in nature and involve the old Sandimmun® formulation rather than the Neoral® formulation. Although these methods show promise, they have not gained widespread acceptance. This is because of their impracticality and the lack of prospective studies comparing other monitoring methods with trough concentration monitoring. Further comparative studies evaluating the impact of the specific monitoring method on definite patient outcomes are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fathman CG, Myers BD. Cyclosporine therapy for autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1693–5.PubMedCrossRef Fathman CG, Myers BD. Cyclosporine therapy for autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1693–5.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wu G, Baraldo M, Pea F, et al. Effects of different sampling strategies on predictions of blood cyclosporine concentrations in haematological patients with multidrug resistance by Bayesian and non-linear least squares methods. Pharmacol Res. 1995; 32: 355–62.PubMedCrossRef Wu G, Baraldo M, Pea F, et al. Effects of different sampling strategies on predictions of blood cyclosporine concentrations in haematological patients with multidrug resistance by Bayesian and non-linear least squares methods. Pharmacol Res. 1995; 32: 355–62.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wu G, Cossettini P, Furlanut M. Prediction of blood cyclosporine concentrations in haematological patients with multidrug resistance by one-, two-, and three-compartment models using Bayesian and non-linear least squares methods. Pharm Res. 1996; 34: 47–57.CrossRef Wu G, Cossettini P, Furlanut M. Prediction of blood cyclosporine concentrations in haematological patients with multidrug resistance by one-, two-, and three-compartment models using Bayesian and non-linear least squares methods. Pharm Res. 1996; 34: 47–57.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wu G, Furlanut M. Prediction of blood cyclosporine concentration in haematological patients with multidrug resistance by means of total, lean and different adipose factors dosing body weight using Bayesian and non-linear least squares methods. Int J Clin Pharm Res. 1996; 16: 89–97. Wu G, Furlanut M. Prediction of blood cyclosporine concentration in haematological patients with multidrug resistance by means of total, lean and different adipose factors dosing body weight using Bayesian and non-linear least squares methods. Int J Clin Pharm Res. 1996; 16: 89–97.
5.
go back to reference Wu G, Pea F, Cossettini P, et al. Effect of the number of samples on Bayesian and non-linear least-squares individualization: a study of cyclosporin treatment of haematological patients with multidrug resistance. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998; 20: 343–9.CrossRef Wu G, Pea F, Cossettini P, et al. Effect of the number of samples on Bayesian and non-linear least-squares individualization: a study of cyclosporin treatment of haematological patients with multidrug resistance. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998; 20: 343–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kahan BD, Welsh M, Rutzky LR. Challenges in cyclosporine therapy: the role of therapeutic monitoring by area under the curve monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 1995: 17: 621–4.PubMedCrossRef Kahan BD, Welsh M, Rutzky LR. Challenges in cyclosporine therapy: the role of therapeutic monitoring by area under the curve monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 1995: 17: 621–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lindholm A, Sawe J. Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of immuno-suppressants. Ther Drug Monit. 1995; 17: 570–3.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm A, Sawe J. Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of immuno-suppressants. Ther Drug Monit. 1995; 17: 570–3.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kesten S, Scavuzzo M, Chaparro C, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile and variability of cyclosporine versus Neoral in patients with cystic fibrosis after lung transplantation. Pharmacotherapy. 1998; 18: 847–50.PubMed Kesten S, Scavuzzo M, Chaparro C, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile and variability of cyclosporine versus Neoral in patients with cystic fibrosis after lung transplantation. Pharmacotherapy. 1998; 18: 847–50.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Friman S, Backman L. A new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin: pharmacokinetic and clinical features. Clin Phar-macokinet. 1996; 30: 181–93.CrossRef Friman S, Backman L. A new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin: pharmacokinetic and clinical features. Clin Phar-macokinet. 1996; 30: 181–93.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wilczek HE, Berglin E, Blohme I. The Swedish nationwide experience of converting transplant patients treated with Sandimmun to the new galenic formulation Sandimmun-Neoral. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 280–3.PubMedCrossRef Wilczek HE, Berglin E, Blohme I. The Swedish nationwide experience of converting transplant patients treated with Sandimmun to the new galenic formulation Sandimmun-Neoral. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 280–3.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zaldonis DB, Keenan RJ, Pham SM, et al. Neoral conversion in stable thoracic transplant patients leads to dose reduction. Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1158–9.PubMedCrossRef Zaldonis DB, Keenan RJ, Pham SM, et al. Neoral conversion in stable thoracic transplant patients leads to dose reduction. Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1158–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sabbatielo R, Sgrosso JL, Schiavelli R, et al. Cyclosporine Neoral monitoring and its correlation with the ‘area under the curve’. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 3378. Sabbatielo R, Sgrosso JL, Schiavelli R, et al. Cyclosporine Neoral monitoring and its correlation with the ‘area under the curve’. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 3378.
13.
go back to reference Keown P, Kahan BD, Johnston A, et al. Optimization of cyclosporine therapy with new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: report from the international Neoral TDM advisory consensus meeting (Vancouver, November 1997). Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1645–9.PubMedCrossRef Keown P, Kahan BD, Johnston A, et al. Optimization of cyclosporine therapy with new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: report from the international Neoral TDM advisory consensus meeting (Vancouver, November 1997). Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1645–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Morris RG. Target concentration strategy for cyclosporin monitoring. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997; 32: 175–9.PubMedCrossRef Morris RG. Target concentration strategy for cyclosporin monitoring. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997; 32: 175–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ensom MHH, Davis GA, Cropp CD, et al. Clinical Pharmacokinetics in the 21st century: does the evidence support definitive outcomes? Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998; 34: 265–79.PubMedCrossRef Ensom MHH, Davis GA, Cropp CD, et al. Clinical Pharmacokinetics in the 21st century: does the evidence support definitive outcomes? Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998; 34: 265–79.PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Holford NHG. The target concentration approach to clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993; 25: 495–505.PubMedCrossRef Holford NHG. The target concentration approach to clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993; 25: 495–505.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Johnston A, Holt DW. Therapeutic drug monitoring of immu-nosuppressant drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999; 47: 339–50.PubMedCrossRef Johnston A, Holt DW. Therapeutic drug monitoring of immu-nosuppressant drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999; 47: 339–50.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Grevel J, Welsh MS, Kahan BD. Cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation: area under the curve monitoring is superior to trough-level monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 1989; 11: 246–8.PubMedCrossRef Grevel J, Welsh MS, Kahan BD. Cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation: area under the curve monitoring is superior to trough-level monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 1989; 11: 246–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Grevel J, Kahan BD. Area under the curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy: the early posttransplant period. Ther Drug Monit. 1991; 13: 89–95.PubMedCrossRef Grevel J, Kahan BD. Area under the curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy: the early posttransplant period. Ther Drug Monit. 1991; 13: 89–95.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kahan BD, Kramer WG, Wideman CA, et al. Analysis of pharmacokinetic profiles in 232 renal and 87 cardiac allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 1986: 18 Suppl. 5: 115–9.PubMed Kahan BD, Kramer WG, Wideman CA, et al. Analysis of pharmacokinetic profiles in 232 renal and 87 cardiac allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 1986: 18 Suppl. 5: 115–9.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Savoldi S, Kahan BD. Relationship of cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters to clinical events in human renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1986; 18: Suppl. 5: 120–8.PubMed Savoldi S, Kahan BD. Relationship of cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters to clinical events in human renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1986; 18: Suppl. 5: 120–8.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kasiske BL, Heim-Duthoy K, Rao KV, et al. The relationship between cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters and subsequent acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1988; 46: 716–22.PubMedCrossRef Kasiske BL, Heim-Duthoy K, Rao KV, et al. The relationship between cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters and subsequent acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1988; 46: 716–22.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Grevel J, Napoli KL, Welsh MS, et al. Prediction of acute graft rejection in renal transplantation: the utility of cyclosporine blood concentrations. Pharm Res. 1991; 8: 278–81.PubMedCrossRef Grevel J, Napoli KL, Welsh MS, et al. Prediction of acute graft rejection in renal transplantation: the utility of cyclosporine blood concentrations. Pharm Res. 1991; 8: 278–81.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lindholm A, Welsh M, Rutzky L, et al. The adverse impact of high cyclosporine clearance rates on the incidences of acute rejection and graft loss. Transplantation. 1993; 55: 985–93.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm A, Welsh M, Rutzky L, et al. The adverse impact of high cyclosporine clearance rates on the incidences of acute rejection and graft loss. Transplantation. 1993; 55: 985–93.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schroeder TJ, Hariharan S, First MR. Relationship between cyclosporine bioavailability and clinical outcome in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 1994; 26: 2787–90.PubMed Schroeder TJ, Hariharan S, First MR. Relationship between cyclosporine bioavailability and clinical outcome in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 1994; 26: 2787–90.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Barone G, Chang CT, Choc MG, et al. The pharmacokinetics of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in primary renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1996; 61: 875–80.PubMedCrossRef Barone G, Chang CT, Choc MG, et al. The pharmacokinetics of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in primary renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1996; 61: 875–80.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bowles MJ, Waters JB, Lechler RI, et al. Do cyclosporin profiles provide useful information in the management of renal transplant recipients. Nephral Dial Transplant. 1996; 11: 1597–602.CrossRef Bowles MJ, Waters JB, Lechler RI, et al. Do cyclosporin profiles provide useful information in the management of renal transplant recipients. Nephral Dial Transplant. 1996; 11: 1597–602.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Johnston A, Sketris I, Marsden JT. A limited sampling strategy for the measurement of cyclosporine AUC. Transplant Proc. 1990; 22: 1345–6.PubMed Johnston A, Sketris I, Marsden JT. A limited sampling strategy for the measurement of cyclosporine AUC. Transplant Proc. 1990; 22: 1345–6.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Grevel J, Kahan BD. Abbreviated kinetic profiles in area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy. Clin Chem. 1991; 37: 1905–8.PubMed Grevel J, Kahan BD. Abbreviated kinetic profiles in area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy. Clin Chem. 1991; 37: 1905–8.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Meyer M, Bennet W, Udeajah J, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of area under the curve (AUC) cyclosporine (CS A) monitoring [abstract]. J Am Soc Nephral. 1991; 2: 808. Meyer M, Bennet W, Udeajah J, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of area under the curve (AUC) cyclosporine (CS A) monitoring [abstract]. J Am Soc Nephral. 1991; 2: 808.
32.
go back to reference Meyer MM, Munar M, Udeaja J, et al. Efficacy of area under the curve cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephral. 1993; 4: 1306–15. Meyer MM, Munar M, Udeaja J, et al. Efficacy of area under the curve cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephral. 1993; 4: 1306–15.
33.
go back to reference Serino F, Citterio F, Pozzetto, et al. Abbreviated three-point kinetic profile in the 12-hour area under the curve for pharmacokinetic monitoring of cyclosporine. Transplant Proc. 1994; 26: 2807–8.PubMed Serino F, Citterio F, Pozzetto, et al. Abbreviated three-point kinetic profile in the 12-hour area under the curve for pharmacokinetic monitoring of cyclosporine. Transplant Proc. 1994; 26: 2807–8.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Foradori AC, Martinez L, Elberg A, et al. Preliminary pharmacokinetic evaluation of a new galenical formulation of oral cyclosporine A: Neoral TM. Transplant Proc. 1995; 27: 1813–4.PubMed Foradori AC, Martinez L, Elberg A, et al. Preliminary pharmacokinetic evaluation of a new galenical formulation of oral cyclosporine A: Neoral TM. Transplant Proc. 1995; 27: 1813–4.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Johnston A, Kovarik JM, Mueller EA, et al. Predicting patients’ exposure to cyclosporin. Transpl Int. 1996; 9: S305–7.PubMedCrossRef Johnston A, Kovarik JM, Mueller EA, et al. Predicting patients’ exposure to cyclosporin. Transpl Int. 1996; 9: S305–7.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Serafinowicz A, Gaciong Z, Baczkowska T, et al. Limited sampling strategy to estimate exposure to cyclosporine A in renal allograft recipients treated with Sandimmun-Neoral. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 3138–9.PubMed Serafinowicz A, Gaciong Z, Baczkowska T, et al. Limited sampling strategy to estimate exposure to cyclosporine A in renal allograft recipients treated with Sandimmun-Neoral. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 3138–9.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Amante J, Kahan BD. Abbreviated area-under-the-curve strategy for monitoring cyclosporine microemulsion therapy in immediate posttransplant period. Clin Chem. 1996; 42: 1294–6.PubMed Amante J, Kahan BD. Abbreviated area-under-the-curve strategy for monitoring cyclosporine microemulsion therapy in immediate posttransplant period. Clin Chem. 1996; 42: 1294–6.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Keown P, Landsberg D, Halloran P, et al. A randomized, prospective multicenter pharmacoepidemiologic study of cyclosporine microemulsion in stable renal graft recipients. Transplantation. 1996; 42: 1744–52.CrossRef Keown P, Landsberg D, Halloran P, et al. A randomized, prospective multicenter pharmacoepidemiologic study of cyclosporine microemulsion in stable renal graft recipients. Transplantation. 1996; 42: 1744–52.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cooney GF, Lum BL, Meligeni JA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in pediatric liver transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 2270–2.PubMed Cooney GF, Lum BL, Meligeni JA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in pediatric liver transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 2270–2.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Gaspari F, Anedda MF, Signorini O, et al. Prediction of cyclosporine area under the curve using a three-point sampling strategy after Neoral administration. J Am Soc Nephral. 1997; 8: 647–52. Gaspari F, Anedda MF, Signorini O, et al. Prediction of cyclosporine area under the curve using a three-point sampling strategy after Neoral administration. J Am Soc Nephral. 1997; 8: 647–52.
41.
go back to reference Primmett DRN, Levine M, Kovarik JM, et al. Cyclosporine monitoring in patients with renal transplants: two- or three-point methods that estimate area under the curve are superior to trough levels in predicting drug exposure. Ther Drug Monit. 1998; 20: 276–83.PubMedCrossRef Primmett DRN, Levine M, Kovarik JM, et al. Cyclosporine monitoring in patients with renal transplants: two- or three-point methods that estimate area under the curve are superior to trough levels in predicting drug exposure. Ther Drug Monit. 1998; 20: 276–83.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B, Brannan P, et al. A limited sampling strategy for the estimation of eight-hour Neoral areas under the curve in renal transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 1998; 20: 401–7.PubMedCrossRef Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B, Brannan P, et al. A limited sampling strategy for the estimation of eight-hour Neoral areas under the curve in renal transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 1998; 20: 401–7.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lemire J, Capparelli D, MacDonald D, et al. Estimated area-under-the curve monitoring of Neoral in a stable pediatric renal transplant population: one-year experience. Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1983–4.PubMedCrossRef Lemire J, Capparelli D, MacDonald D, et al. Estimated area-under-the curve monitoring of Neoral in a stable pediatric renal transplant population: one-year experience. Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1983–4.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Marsh CL. Abbreviated pharmacokinetic profiles in area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy in de novo renal transplant patients treated with Sandimmune or Neoral. Ther Drug Monit. 1999; 21: 27–34.PubMedCrossRef Marsh CL. Abbreviated pharmacokinetic profiles in area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy in de novo renal transplant patients treated with Sandimmune or Neoral. Ther Drug Monit. 1999; 21: 27–34.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Gaspari F, Perico N, Signorini O, et al. Abbreviated kinetic profiles in area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy. Kidney Int. 1998; 54: 2146–50.PubMedCrossRef Gaspari F, Perico N, Signorini O, et al. Abbreviated kinetic profiles in area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy. Kidney Int. 1998; 54: 2146–50.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Gaspari F, Ruggenenti P, Torre L, et al. Failure to predict cyclosporine area under the curve using a limited sampling strategy. Kidney Int. 1993; 44: 436–9.PubMedCrossRef Gaspari F, Ruggenenti P, Torre L, et al. Failure to predict cyclosporine area under the curve using a limited sampling strategy. Kidney Int. 1993; 44: 436–9.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981; 9: 503–12.PubMed Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981; 9: 503–12.PubMed
48.
go back to reference Cantarovich F, Bizollon C, Cantarovich D, et al. Cyclosporine plasma levels six hours after oral administration. A useful tool for monitoring therapy. Transplantation. 1988; 45: 389–94. Cantarovich F, Bizollon C, Cantarovich D, et al. Cyclosporine plasma levels six hours after oral administration. A useful tool for monitoring therapy. Transplantation. 1988; 45: 389–94.
49.
go back to reference Cantarovich M, Besner JG, Fitchett DH, et al. Efficacy and side-effects of cyclosporine dose monitoring with levels 6 h after the morning dose in heart transplant patients. Clin Transplant. 1997; 11: 399–405.PubMed Cantarovich M, Besner JG, Fitchett DH, et al. Efficacy and side-effects of cyclosporine dose monitoring with levels 6 h after the morning dose in heart transplant patients. Clin Transplant. 1997; 11: 399–405.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Rial MC, Frias S, Argento J, et al. Convenience of level of cyclosporine-Neoral at time 3 to determine the area under curve in renal transplant. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 292–3.PubMedCrossRef Rial MC, Frias S, Argento J, et al. Convenience of level of cyclosporine-Neoral at time 3 to determine the area under curve in renal transplant. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 292–3.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Cantarovich M, Barkun J, Besner JG, et al. Cyclosporine peak levels provide a better correlation with the area-under-the-curve than trough levels in liver transplant patients treated with Neoral. Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1462–3.PubMedCrossRef Cantarovich M, Barkun J, Besner JG, et al. Cyclosporine peak levels provide a better correlation with the area-under-the-curve than trough levels in liver transplant patients treated with Neoral. Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1462–3.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Cantarovich M, Besner JG, Barkun JS, et al. Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy. Clin Transplant. 1998; 12: 243–9.PubMed Cantarovich M, Besner JG, Barkun JS, et al. Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy. Clin Transplant. 1998; 12: 243–9.PubMed
53.
go back to reference Cantarovich M, Barkun JS, Tchervenkov JI, et al. Comparison of Neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine trough levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients. Transplantation. 1998; 66: 1621–7.PubMedCrossRef Cantarovich M, Barkun JS, Tchervenkov JI, et al. Comparison of Neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine trough levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients. Transplantation. 1998; 66: 1621–7.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Trull A, Steel L, Sharpies L, et al. Randomized, trough blood cyclosporine concentration-controlled trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of Sandimmune and Neoral in de novo lung transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit. 1999; 21: 17–26.PubMedCrossRef Trull A, Steel L, Sharpies L, et al. Randomized, trough blood cyclosporine concentration-controlled trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of Sandimmune and Neoral in de novo lung transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit. 1999; 21: 17–26.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Bryson SM, Al-Lanqawi Y, Kelman AW, et al. Comparison of a Bayesian forecasting technique with a new method for estimating phenytoin dose requirements. Ther Drug Monit. 1988; 10: 80–4.PubMed Bryson SM, Al-Lanqawi Y, Kelman AW, et al. Comparison of a Bayesian forecasting technique with a new method for estimating phenytoin dose requirements. Ther Drug Monit. 1988; 10: 80–4.PubMed
56.
go back to reference Privitera MD, Homan RW, Ludden TM, et al. Clinical utility of a Bayesian dosing program for phenytoin. Ther Drug Monit. 1989; 11: 285–94.PubMedCrossRef Privitera MD, Homan RW, Ludden TM, et al. Clinical utility of a Bayesian dosing program for phenytoin. Ther Drug Monit. 1989; 11: 285–94.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Erdman SM, Rodvold KA, Pryka RD. An updated comparison of drug dosing methods part II: theophylline. Clin Phar-macokinet. 1991; 20: 280–92.CrossRef Erdman SM, Rodvold KA, Pryka RD. An updated comparison of drug dosing methods part II: theophylline. Clin Phar-macokinet. 1991; 20: 280–92.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Erdman SM, Rodvold KA, Pryka RD. An updated comparison of drug dosing methods part III: aminoglycoside antibiotics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991; 20: 374–88.PubMedCrossRef Erdman SM, Rodvold KA, Pryka RD. An updated comparison of drug dosing methods part III: aminoglycoside antibiotics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991; 20: 374–88.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Pryka RD, Rodvold KA, Erdman SM. An updated comparison of drug dosing methods part IV: vancomycin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991; 20: 463–76.PubMedCrossRef Pryka RD, Rodvold KA, Erdman SM. An updated comparison of drug dosing methods part IV: vancomycin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991; 20: 463–76.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Wu G, Furlanut M. Prediction of serum vancomycin concentrations using one-, two-, and three-compartment models with implemented population pharmacokinetic parameters and with the Bayesian method. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998; 50: 851–6.PubMedCrossRef Wu G, Furlanut M. Prediction of serum vancomycin concentrations using one-, two-, and three-compartment models with implemented population pharmacokinetic parameters and with the Bayesian method. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998; 50: 851–6.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Lee C, Coleman RW, Mungall DR. Effect of using warfarin plasma concentrations in Bayesian forecasting of prothrom-bin-time response. Clin Pharm. 1987; 6: 406–12.PubMed Lee C, Coleman RW, Mungall DR. Effect of using warfarin plasma concentrations in Bayesian forecasting of prothrom-bin-time response. Clin Pharm. 1987; 6: 406–12.PubMed
62.
go back to reference Boyle DA, Ludden TM, Carter BL, et al. Evaluation of a Bayesian regression program for predicting warfarin response. Ther Drug Monit. 1989; 11: 276–84.PubMedCrossRef Boyle DA, Ludden TM, Carter BL, et al. Evaluation of a Bayesian regression program for predicting warfarin response. Ther Drug Monit. 1989; 11: 276–84.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Svec JM, Coleman RW, Mungall DR, et al. Bayesian pharma-cokinetic/pharmacodynamic forecasting of Prothrombin response to warfarin therapy: preliminary evaluation. Ther Drug Monit. 1985; 7: 174–80.PubMedCrossRef Svec JM, Coleman RW, Mungall DR, et al. Bayesian pharma-cokinetic/pharmacodynamic forecasting of Prothrombin response to warfarin therapy: preliminary evaluation. Ther Drug Monit. 1985; 7: 174–80.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Vozeh S, Uematsu T, Hauf GF, et al. Performance of Bayesian feedback to forecast lidocaine serum concentration: evaluation of the prediction error and the prediction interval. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1985; 13: 203–12.PubMed Vozeh S, Uematsu T, Hauf GF, et al. Performance of Bayesian feedback to forecast lidocaine serum concentration: evaluation of the prediction error and the prediction interval. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1985; 13: 203–12.PubMed
65.
go back to reference Williams PJ, Browne JL, Patel RA. Bayesian forecasting of serum lithium concentrations- comparison with traditional methods. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989; 17: 45–52.PubMedCrossRef Williams PJ, Browne JL, Patel RA. Bayesian forecasting of serum lithium concentrations- comparison with traditional methods. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989; 17: 45–52.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Thomson AH, Whiting B. Bayesian parameter estimation and population pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992; 20: 447–67.CrossRef Thomson AH, Whiting B. Bayesian parameter estimation and population pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992; 20: 447–67.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Schumacher GE, Barr JT. Bayesian approaches in pharmacokinetic decision making. Clin Pharm. 1984; 3: 525–30.PubMed Schumacher GE, Barr JT. Bayesian approaches in pharmacokinetic decision making. Clin Pharm. 1984; 3: 525–30.PubMed
68.
go back to reference Sheiner LB, Beal S, Rosenberg B, et al. Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979; 26: 294–305.PubMed Sheiner LB, Beal S, Rosenberg B, et al. Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979; 26: 294–305.PubMed
69.
go back to reference Buffington DE, Lampasona V, Chandler MHH. Computers in pharmacokinetics. Choosing software for clinical decision making. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993; 25: 205–16. Buffington DE, Lampasona V, Chandler MHH. Computers in pharmacokinetics. Choosing software for clinical decision making. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993; 25: 205–16.
70.
go back to reference Kahan BD, Kramer WG, Williams C, et al. Application of Bayesian forecasting to predict appropriate cyclosporine dosing regimens for renal allograft patients. Transplant Proc 1986 Dec; 6: 200–3. Kahan BD, Kramer WG, Williams C, et al. Application of Bayesian forecasting to predict appropriate cyclosporine dosing regimens for renal allograft patients. Transplant Proc 1986 Dec; 6: 200–3.
71.
go back to reference Serre-Debeauvais F, Iliadis A, Tranchand B, et al. Bayesian estimation of cyclosporine clearance in bone marrow graft. Ther Drug Monit. 1990; 12: 16–22.PubMedCrossRef Serre-Debeauvais F, Iliadis A, Tranchand B, et al. Bayesian estimation of cyclosporine clearance in bone marrow graft. Ther Drug Monit. 1990; 12: 16–22.PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Anderson JE, Munday AS, Kelman AW, et al. Evaluation of a Bayesian approach to the pharmacokinetic interpretation of cyclosporin concentrations in renal allograft recipients. Ther Drug Monit. 1994; 16: 160–5.PubMedCrossRef Anderson JE, Munday AS, Kelman AW, et al. Evaluation of a Bayesian approach to the pharmacokinetic interpretation of cyclosporin concentrations in renal allograft recipients. Ther Drug Monit. 1994; 16: 160–5.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Niven AA, Grevel J, AI-Banna M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin in the early post-operative period following renal transplantation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 26: 626–7. Niven AA, Grevel J, AI-Banna M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin in the early post-operative period following renal transplantation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 26: 626–7.
74.
go back to reference Akhlaghi F, McLachlan AJ, Keogh AM, et al. Effect of sim-vastatin on cyclosporine unbound fraction and apparent blood clearance in heart transplant recipients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997; 44: 537–42.PubMedCrossRef Akhlaghi F, McLachlan AJ, Keogh AM, et al. Effect of sim-vastatin on cyclosporine unbound fraction and apparent blood clearance in heart transplant recipients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997; 44: 537–42.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Charpiat B, Falconi I, Breant V, et al. A population pharmacokinetic model of cyclosporine in the early postoperative phase in patients with liver transplants, and its predictive performance with Bayesian fitting. Ther Drug Monit. 1998; 20: 158–64.PubMedCrossRef Charpiat B, Falconi I, Breant V, et al. A population pharmacokinetic model of cyclosporine in the early postoperative phase in patients with liver transplants, and its predictive performance with Bayesian fitting. Ther Drug Monit. 1998; 20: 158–64.PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Michalets EL. Update: clinically significant cytochrome P-450 drug interactions. Pharmacotherapy. 1998; 18: 84–112.PubMed Michalets EL. Update: clinically significant cytochrome P-450 drug interactions. Pharmacotherapy. 1998; 18: 84–112.PubMed
77.
go back to reference Rogers AJ, Yoshimura N, Kerman RH, et al. Immunopharmaco-dynamic evaluation of cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1984; 38: 657–64.PubMedCrossRef Rogers AJ, Yoshimura N, Kerman RH, et al. Immunopharmaco-dynamic evaluation of cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1984; 38: 657–64.PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Kerman RH, van Buren CT, Payne W, et al. Monitoring of T-cell subsets and immune events in renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1983; 15: 1170–2. Kerman RH, van Buren CT, Payne W, et al. Monitoring of T-cell subsets and immune events in renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1983; 15: 1170–2.
79.
go back to reference Reichenspurner H, Ertel W, Hammer C, et al. Immunologic monitoring of heart transplant patients under cyclosporine immunosuppression. Transplant Proc. 1984; 16: 1251–4.PubMed Reichenspurner H, Ertel W, Hammer C, et al. Immunologic monitoring of heart transplant patients under cyclosporine immunosuppression. Transplant Proc. 1984; 16: 1251–4.PubMed
80.
go back to reference Hammer C, Reichenspurner H, Ertel W, et al. Cytological and immunologic monitoring of cyclosporine-treated human heart recipients. J Heart Transplant. 1984; 3: 228–32. Hammer C, Reichenspurner H, Ertel W, et al. Cytological and immunologic monitoring of cyclosporine-treated human heart recipients. J Heart Transplant. 1984; 3: 228–32.
81.
go back to reference Ertel W, Reichenspurner H, Hammer C, et al. Cytoimmunologic monitoring: a method to reduce biopsy frequency after cardiac transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1985; 17: 204–6. Ertel W, Reichenspurner H, Hammer C, et al. Cytoimmunologic monitoring: a method to reduce biopsy frequency after cardiac transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1985; 17: 204–6.
82.
go back to reference Ertel W, Reichenspurner H, Lersch C, et al. Cytoimmunological monitoring in acute rejection and viral, bacterial or fungal infection following transplantation. J Heart Transplant. 1985; 4: 390–4.PubMed Ertel W, Reichenspurner H, Lersch C, et al. Cytoimmunological monitoring in acute rejection and viral, bacterial or fungal infection following transplantation. J Heart Transplant. 1985; 4: 390–4.PubMed
83.
go back to reference Shen SY, Weir MR, Kosenko A, et al. Reevaluation of T cell subset monitoring in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1985; 40: 620–3.PubMedCrossRef Shen SY, Weir MR, Kosenko A, et al. Reevaluation of T cell subset monitoring in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1985; 40: 620–3.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Mohanakumar T, Hoshinaga K, Wood NL, et al. Enumeration of transferrin receptor expressing lymphocytes as a potential marker for rejection in human cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1986; 42: 691–4.PubMedCrossRef Mohanakumar T, Hoshinaga K, Wood NL, et al. Enumeration of transferrin receptor expressing lymphocytes as a potential marker for rejection in human cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1986; 42: 691–4.PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Fieguth HG, Haverich A, Schaefers HJ, et al. Cytoimmunological monitoring for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac rejection. Transplant Proc. 1987; 19: 2541–2.PubMed Fieguth HG, Haverich A, Schaefers HJ, et al. Cytoimmunological monitoring for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac rejection. Transplant Proc. 1987; 19: 2541–2.PubMed
86.
go back to reference Klanke D, Hammer C, Dirschedl P, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of cytoimmunological monitoring in correlation with endomyocardial biopsies in heart transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 1987; 19: 3781–3.PubMed Klanke D, Hammer C, Dirschedl P, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of cytoimmunological monitoring in correlation with endomyocardial biopsies in heart transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 1987; 19: 3781–3.PubMed
87.
go back to reference Kotylo PK, McCloskey DW, Moriarty A, et al. Immunologic monitoring of the cardiac transplant patient. Chest. 1988; 94: 834–6.PubMedCrossRef Kotylo PK, McCloskey DW, Moriarty A, et al. Immunologic monitoring of the cardiac transplant patient. Chest. 1988; 94: 834–6.PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference Hoshinaga K, Mohanakumar T, Pascoe EA, et al. Expression of transferrin receptors on lymphocytes: its correlation with T-helper/T-suppressor cytotoxic ratio and rejection in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Transplant. 1988; 7: 198–204.PubMed Hoshinaga K, Mohanakumar T, Pascoe EA, et al. Expression of transferrin receptors on lymphocytes: its correlation with T-helper/T-suppressor cytotoxic ratio and rejection in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Transplant. 1988; 7: 198–204.PubMed
89.
go back to reference Hanson CA, Boiling SF, Stoolman LM, et al. Cytoimmunologic monitoring and heart transplantation. J Heart Transplant. 1988; 7: 424–9.PubMed Hanson CA, Boiling SF, Stoolman LM, et al. Cytoimmunologic monitoring and heart transplantation. J Heart Transplant. 1988; 7: 424–9.PubMed
90.
go back to reference Mooney ML, Carlson P, Szentpetery S, et al. A prospective study of the clinical utility of lymphocyte monitoring in the cardiac transplant recipient. Transplantation. 1990; 50: 951–4.PubMedCrossRef Mooney ML, Carlson P, Szentpetery S, et al. A prospective study of the clinical utility of lymphocyte monitoring in the cardiac transplant recipient. Transplantation. 1990; 50: 951–4.PubMedCrossRef
91.
go back to reference Huber C, Fuchs D, Hausen A, et al. Pteridines as a new marker to detect human T cells activated by allogeneic or modified self major histocompatibility complex (MHC) determinants. J Immunol. 1983; 130: 1047–50.PubMed Huber C, Fuchs D, Hausen A, et al. Pteridines as a new marker to detect human T cells activated by allogeneic or modified self major histocompatibility complex (MHC) determinants. J Immunol. 1983; 130: 1047–50.PubMed
92.
go back to reference Niederwieser D, Huber C, Gratwohl A, et al. Neopterin as a new biochemical marker in the clinical monitoring of bone marrow transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1984; 38: 497–500.PubMedCrossRef Niederwieser D, Huber C, Gratwohl A, et al. Neopterin as a new biochemical marker in the clinical monitoring of bone marrow transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1984; 38: 497–500.PubMedCrossRef
93.
go back to reference Giraud P, Tafani JAM, Calot M, et al. Serum neopterin radio-immunoassay for kidney transplant monitoring: relationship with renal function and acute allograft rejection. Transplant Proc. 1985; 17: 2518–20. Giraud P, Tafani JAM, Calot M, et al. Serum neopterin radio-immunoassay for kidney transplant monitoring: relationship with renal function and acute allograft rejection. Transplant Proc. 1985; 17: 2518–20.
94.
go back to reference Magalini SC, Sambo A, Agnes S, et al. Monitoring of kidney allograft rejection with urinary neopterin. Transplant Proc. 1986; 18: 1063–6. Magalini SC, Sambo A, Agnes S, et al. Monitoring of kidney allograft rejection with urinary neopterin. Transplant Proc. 1986; 18: 1063–6.
95.
go back to reference Woloszczuk W, Schwarz M, Havel M, et al. Neopterin and in-terferon gamma serum levels in patients with heart and kidney transplants. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1986; 24: 729–34.PubMed Woloszczuk W, Schwarz M, Havel M, et al. Neopterin and in-terferon gamma serum levels in patients with heart and kidney transplants. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1986; 24: 729–34.PubMed
96.
go back to reference Woloszczuk W, Troppmair J, Leiter E, et al. Relationship of interferon-gamma and neopterin levels during stimulation with alloantigens in vivo and in vitro. Transplantation. 1986; 41: 716–9.PubMedCrossRef Woloszczuk W, Troppmair J, Leiter E, et al. Relationship of interferon-gamma and neopterin levels during stimulation with alloantigens in vivo and in vitro. Transplantation. 1986; 41: 716–9.PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Schafer AJ, Daniel V, Dreikorn K, et al. Assessment of plasma neopterin in clinical kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1986; 41: 454–9.PubMedCrossRef Schafer AJ, Daniel V, Dreikorn K, et al. Assessment of plasma neopterin in clinical kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1986; 41: 454–9.PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Backman L, Ringden O, Bjorkhem I. Monitoring of serum neopterin levels in renal transplant recipients: increased values during impaired renal function and cytomegalovirus infection. Nephron. 1987; 46: 319–22.PubMedCrossRef Backman L, Ringden O, Bjorkhem I. Monitoring of serum neopterin levels in renal transplant recipients: increased values during impaired renal function and cytomegalovirus infection. Nephron. 1987; 46: 319–22.PubMedCrossRef
99.
go back to reference Aulitzky WE, Tilg H, Niederwieser D, et al. Comparison of serum neopterin levels and urinary neopterin excretion in renal allograft recipients. Clin Nephral. 1988; 29: 248–52. Aulitzky WE, Tilg H, Niederwieser D, et al. Comparison of serum neopterin levels and urinary neopterin excretion in renal allograft recipients. Clin Nephral. 1988; 29: 248–52.
100.
go back to reference Tilg H, Vogel W, Aulitzky WE, et al. Neopterin excretion after liver transplantation and its value in differential diagnosis of complications. Transplantation. 1989; 48: 594–9.PubMed Tilg H, Vogel W, Aulitzky WE, et al. Neopterin excretion after liver transplantation and its value in differential diagnosis of complications. Transplantation. 1989; 48: 594–9.PubMed
101.
go back to reference Muller TF, Vogl M, Neumann MC, et al. Noninvasive monitoring using serum amyloid A and serum neopterin in cardiac transplantation. Clin Chim Acta. 1998; 276: 63–74.PubMedCrossRef Muller TF, Vogl M, Neumann MC, et al. Noninvasive monitoring using serum amyloid A and serum neopterin in cardiac transplantation. Clin Chim Acta. 1998; 276: 63–74.PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Van Oers MHJ, van Der Heyden AAPAM, Aarden LA. Inter-leukin 6 (IL-6) in serum and urine of renal transplant recipients. Clin Exp Immunol. 1988; 71: 314–9.PubMed Van Oers MHJ, van Der Heyden AAPAM, Aarden LA. Inter-leukin 6 (IL-6) in serum and urine of renal transplant recipients. Clin Exp Immunol. 1988; 71: 314–9.PubMed
103.
go back to reference Yoshimura N, Oka T, Kahan BD. Sequential determinations of serum interleukin 6 levels as an immunodiagnostic tool to differentiate rejection from nephrotoxicity in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1991; 51: 172–6.PubMedCrossRef Yoshimura N, Oka T, Kahan BD. Sequential determinations of serum interleukin 6 levels as an immunodiagnostic tool to differentiate rejection from nephrotoxicity in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1991; 51: 172–6.PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference McKenna RM, Rush DN, Bakkestad-Legare P, et al. Interleukin 2, Interferon, and lymphotoxin in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1988; 45: 76–81.PubMedCrossRef McKenna RM, Rush DN, Bakkestad-Legare P, et al. Interleukin 2, Interferon, and lymphotoxin in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1988; 45: 76–81.PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference Kahan BD, Pellis NR, Leinikki P, et al. Pharmacodynamic assays of the immunosuppressive action of cyclosporine therapy in transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 1987; 19: 1695–8.PubMed Kahan BD, Pellis NR, Leinikki P, et al. Pharmacodynamic assays of the immunosuppressive action of cyclosporine therapy in transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 1987; 19: 1695–8.PubMed
106.
go back to reference Georgi BA, Dempsey RA, Corry RJ. Interleukin-2 assay in serum and urine as a means of monitoring pancreatic allograft rejection. Transplant Proc. 1989; 21: 2784–5.PubMed Georgi BA, Dempsey RA, Corry RJ. Interleukin-2 assay in serum and urine as a means of monitoring pancreatic allograft rejection. Transplant Proc. 1989; 21: 2784–5.PubMed
107.
go back to reference Vie H, Bonneville M, Cariou R, et al. Interleukin 2 production by peripheral blood lymphocytes in allograft recipients during acute rejection episodes. Kidney Int. 1985; 28: 553–7.PubMedCrossRef Vie H, Bonneville M, Cariou R, et al. Interleukin 2 production by peripheral blood lymphocytes in allograft recipients during acute rejection episodes. Kidney Int. 1985; 28: 553–7.PubMedCrossRef
108.
go back to reference Dupont E, Huygen K, Schandene L, et al. Influence of in vivo immunosuppressive drugs on production of lymphokynes. Transplantation. 1985; 39: 143–7.PubMedCrossRef Dupont E, Huygen K, Schandene L, et al. Influence of in vivo immunosuppressive drugs on production of lymphokynes. Transplantation. 1985; 39: 143–7.PubMedCrossRef
109.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Giles GR, Ramsden CW. Natural killer-cell activity, interferon-alpha2 production, and interleukin-2 production in cyclosporine-treated and conventionally immunosuppressed human allograft recipients. J Clin Immunol. 1986; 6: 373–80.PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Giles GR, Ramsden CW. Natural killer-cell activity, interferon-alpha2 production, and interleukin-2 production in cyclosporine-treated and conventionally immunosuppressed human allograft recipients. J Clin Immunol. 1986; 6: 373–80.PubMedCrossRef
110.
go back to reference Cornaby A, Simpson M, Vann Rice R, et al. Interleukin 2 levels and urine cytology distinguish between cyclosporine toxicity and rejection in renal and liver allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1988; 20: 827–30.PubMed Cornaby A, Simpson M, Vann Rice R, et al. Interleukin 2 levels and urine cytology distinguish between cyclosporine toxicity and rejection in renal and liver allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1988; 20: 827–30.PubMed
111.
go back to reference Yoshimura N, Kahan BD. Pharmacodynamic assessment of the in vivo cyclosporine effect on interleukin-2 production by lymphocytes in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1985; 40: 661–6.PubMedCrossRef Yoshimura N, Kahan BD. Pharmacodynamic assessment of the in vivo cyclosporine effect on interleukin-2 production by lymphocytes in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1985; 40: 661–6.PubMedCrossRef
112.
go back to reference Cornaby A, Simpson MA, Vann Rice RA, et al. Interleukin-2 production in plasma and urine, plasma interleukin-2 receptor levels, and urine cytology as a means of monitoring renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1988; 20: 108–10. Cornaby A, Simpson MA, Vann Rice RA, et al. Interleukin-2 production in plasma and urine, plasma interleukin-2 receptor levels, and urine cytology as a means of monitoring renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1988; 20: 108–10.
113.
go back to reference Simpson MA, Madras PN, Cornaby AT, et al. Sequential determinations of urinary cytology and plasma and urinary lymphokines in the management of renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1989; 47: 218–23.PubMedCrossRef Simpson MA, Madras PN, Cornaby AT, et al. Sequential determinations of urinary cytology and plasma and urinary lymphokines in the management of renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1989; 47: 218–23.PubMedCrossRef
114.
go back to reference Colvin RB, Fuller TC, MacKeen L, et al. Plasma interleukin 2 receptor levels in renal allograft recipients. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1987; 43: 273–6.PubMedCrossRef Colvin RB, Fuller TC, MacKeen L, et al. Plasma interleukin 2 receptor levels in renal allograft recipients. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1987; 43: 273–6.PubMedCrossRef
115.
go back to reference Stolc V, Krause JR. Interleukin-2 receptor levels are increased in blood of heart transplant patients during infections. Diagn Clin Immunol. 1987; 5: 171–4.PubMed Stolc V, Krause JR. Interleukin-2 receptor levels are increased in blood of heart transplant patients during infections. Diagn Clin Immunol. 1987; 5: 171–4.PubMed
116.
go back to reference Adams DH, Wang L, Hubscher SG, et al. Soluble interleukin-2 receptors in serum and bile of liver transplant recipients. Lancet. 1989; 1: 469–71.PubMedCrossRef Adams DH, Wang L, Hubscher SG, et al. Soluble interleukin-2 receptors in serum and bile of liver transplant recipients. Lancet. 1989; 1: 469–71.PubMedCrossRef
117.
go back to reference De Maria R, Zuccelli GC, Masini S, et al. Nonspecific increase of interleukin-2 receptor serum levels during immune events in heart transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1989; 21: 440–1.PubMed De Maria R, Zuccelli GC, Masini S, et al. Nonspecific increase of interleukin-2 receptor serum levels during immune events in heart transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1989; 21: 440–1.PubMed
118.
go back to reference Smith AY, Citterio F, Welsh M, et al. Interleukin-2 receptor as an immunodiagnostic tool to differentiate rejection from nephrotoxicity. Transplant Proc. 1989; 21: 1462–4.PubMed Smith AY, Citterio F, Welsh M, et al. Interleukin-2 receptor as an immunodiagnostic tool to differentiate rejection from nephrotoxicity. Transplant Proc. 1989; 21: 1462–4.PubMed
119.
go back to reference Perkins JD, Nelson DL, Rakela J, et al. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor level as an indicator of liver allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1989; 47: 77–81.PubMedCrossRef Perkins JD, Nelson DL, Rakela J, et al. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor level as an indicator of liver allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1989; 47: 77–81.PubMedCrossRef
120.
go back to reference Perkins JD, Munn SR, Barr D, et al. Evidence that soluble interleukin-2 receptor level may determine the optimal time for cytoscopically-directed biopsy in pancreaticoduodenal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1990; 49: 363–6.PubMedCrossRef Perkins JD, Munn SR, Barr D, et al. Evidence that soluble interleukin-2 receptor level may determine the optimal time for cytoscopically-directed biopsy in pancreaticoduodenal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1990; 49: 363–6.PubMedCrossRef
121.
go back to reference McNally CM, Luckhurst E, Penny R. Cell free serum interleukin-2 receptor levels after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991; 10: 769–74.PubMed McNally CM, Luckhurst E, Penny R. Cell free serum interleukin-2 receptor levels after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991; 10: 769–74.PubMed
122.
go back to reference Plaza JJ, Blum G, Ortiz L, et al. Usefulness of serum interleukin 2 receptor levels in renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1992; 24: 63–4.PubMed Plaza JJ, Blum G, Ortiz L, et al. Usefulness of serum interleukin 2 receptor levels in renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 1992; 24: 63–4.PubMed
123.
go back to reference Pai SY, Fruman DA, Leong T, et al. Inhibition of calcineurin Phosphatase activity in adult bone marrow transplant patients treated with cyclosporine A. Blood. 1994; 84: 3974–9.PubMed Pai SY, Fruman DA, Leong T, et al. Inhibition of calcineurin Phosphatase activity in adult bone marrow transplant patients treated with cyclosporine A. Blood. 1994; 84: 3974–9.PubMed
124.
go back to reference Batiuk TD, Pazderka F, Halloran PF. Cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients have only partial inhibition of calcineurin Phosphatase activity. Transplant Proc. 1995; 27: 840–1.PubMed Batiuk TD, Pazderka F, Halloran PF. Cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients have only partial inhibition of calcineurin Phosphatase activity. Transplant Proc. 1995; 27: 840–1.PubMed
125.
go back to reference Batiuk TD, Pazderka F, Halloran PF. Calcineurin activity is only partially inhibited in leukocytes of cyclosporine-treated patients. Transplantation. 1995; 59: 1400–4.PubMedCrossRef Batiuk TD, Pazderka F, Halloran PF. Calcineurin activity is only partially inhibited in leukocytes of cyclosporine-treated patients. Transplantation. 1995; 59: 1400–4.PubMedCrossRef
126.
go back to reference Quien RM, Kaiser BA, Dunn SP, et al. Calcineurin activity in children with renal transplants receiving cyclosporine. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 1486–9.PubMedCrossRef Quien RM, Kaiser BA, Dunn SP, et al. Calcineurin activity in children with renal transplants receiving cyclosporine. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 1486–9.PubMedCrossRef
127.
go back to reference Sommer BG, Sing DE, Henry ML, et al. Serum cyclosporine kinetic profile. Transplantation. 1988; 45: 86–90.PubMedCrossRef Sommer BG, Sing DE, Henry ML, et al. Serum cyclosporine kinetic profile. Transplantation. 1988; 45: 86–90.PubMedCrossRef
128.
go back to reference Lindholm A, Kahan BD. Influence of cyclosporine pharmaco-kinetics, trough concentrations, and AUC monitoring on outcome after kidney transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993; 54: 205–18.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm A, Kahan BD. Influence of cyclosporine pharmaco-kinetics, trough concentrations, and AUC monitoring on outcome after kidney transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993; 54: 205–18.PubMedCrossRef
129.
go back to reference Filler G, Mai I, Filler S, et al. Abbreviated AUCs on Neoral — the search continues! Pediatr Nephral 1999; 13: 98–102.CrossRef Filler G, Mai I, Filler S, et al. Abbreviated AUCs on Neoral — the search continues! Pediatr Nephral 1999; 13: 98–102.CrossRef
130.
go back to reference Tsunoda SM, Aweeka FT. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize immunosuppressive therapy. Clin Phar-macokinet. 1996; 30: 107–40.CrossRef Tsunoda SM, Aweeka FT. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize immunosuppressive therapy. Clin Phar-macokinet. 1996; 30: 107–40.CrossRef
131.
go back to reference Sanathanan LP, Peck CC. The randomized concentration-controlled trial: an evaluation of its sample size efficiency. Control Clin Trial. 1991; 12: 780–94.CrossRef Sanathanan LP, Peck CC. The randomized concentration-controlled trial: an evaluation of its sample size efficiency. Control Clin Trial. 1991; 12: 780–94.CrossRef
132.
go back to reference Endrenyl L, Zha J. Comparative efficiencies of randomized concentration- and dose-controlled clinical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994; 56: 331–8.CrossRef Endrenyl L, Zha J. Comparative efficiencies of randomized concentration- and dose-controlled clinical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994; 56: 331–8.CrossRef
133.
go back to reference Holford N, Black P, Couch R, et al. Theophylline target concentration in severe airways obstruction - 10 or 20 mg/L? A randomized concentration-controlled trial. Clin Pharmaco-kinet. 1993; 25: 495–505.CrossRef Holford N, Black P, Couch R, et al. Theophylline target concentration in severe airways obstruction - 10 or 20 mg/L? A randomized concentration-controlled trial. Clin Pharmaco-kinet. 1993; 25: 495–505.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Methods for Clinical Monitoring of Cyclosporin in Transplant Patients
Authors
Randall J. Dumont
Dr Mary H. H. Ensom
Publication date
01-05-2000
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 5/2000
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200038050-00004

Other articles of this Issue 5/2000

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2000 Go to the issue