Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 2/2007

01-02-2007 | Original Research Article

Functional Outcomes of Drug Treatment in Alzheimer’s Disease

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Richard A. Hansen, Gerald Gartlehner, Kathleen N. Lohr, Daniel I. Kaufer

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient functioning is an important outcome in Alzheimer’s disease, but treatment-related improvements in patient function are difficult to quantify because a number of different scales are used in its measurement.

Objective

To evaluate systematically the evidence relating to patient functioning as an outcome measure in the drug treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Data were obtained by searching MEDLINE®, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 through to December 2005 for studies assessing functional outcomes with donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine in Alzheimer’s disease. Reference lists were searched manually and pharmaceutical manufacturers were invited to submit dossiers. Trained reviewers abstracted data and assessed the internal validity (quality) of trials using predefined criteria. Standardised effect sizes (i.e. Cohen’s standardised mean difference [d]) for various functional outcome scales and pooled mean incidence and 95% CIs for adverse events were calculated and summarised qualitatively and quantitatively. Meta regression was used to explore potential heterogeneity.

Results

Overall, the standardised effect size for functional outcome measures was small (d = 0.1–0.4) among included studies. However, effect sizes consistently favoured drug treatment over placebo. For all drugs, pooled standardised effect sizes were consistent in both short (<24 weeks; d = 0.25; 95% CI 0.13, 0.37) and long trials (≥24 weeks; d = 0.29; 95% CI 0.22, 0.36). The pooled effect size was not significantly affected by parameters such as disease severity, age, gender and drug dose. Adverse events were generally limited to gastrointestinal problems, weight loss and dizziness, all of which were reported in <20% of patients on average.

Conclusions

Standardised estimates of effect size across diverse functional outcome measures for drug treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease were small and the data reflect only a modest trend favouring active treatment over placebo. However, given the current lack of other effective treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, this trend supports the clinical benefits of these treatments with regard to this important health outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366(9503): 2112–7PubMedCrossRef Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366(9503): 2112–7PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Birks J, Grimley Evans J, Iakovidou V, et al. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4): CD001191 Birks J, Grimley Evans J, Iakovidou V, et al. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4): CD001191
3.
go back to reference Olin J, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001747 Olin J, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001747
4.
go back to reference Birks JS, Harvey R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001190 Birks JS, Harvey R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001190
5.
go back to reference Qizilbash N, Whitehead A, Higgins J, et al. Cholinesterase inhibition for Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis of the tacrine trials. Dementia Trialists’ Collaboration. JAMA 1998; 280(20): 1777–82PubMedCrossRef Qizilbash N, Whitehead A, Higgins J, et al. Cholinesterase inhibition for Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis of the tacrine trials. Dementia Trialists’ Collaboration. JAMA 1998; 280(20): 1777–82PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Areosa SA, Sherriff F. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD003154 Areosa SA, Sherriff F. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD003154
7.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: NICE, 2005 National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: NICE, 2005
8.
go back to reference Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt HP, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2005; 331(7512): 321–7PubMedCrossRef Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt HP, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2005; 331(7512): 321–7PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Berger G, Bernhardt T, Weimer E, et al. Longitudinal study on the relationship between symptomatology of dementia and levels of subjective burden and depression among family caregivers in memory clinic patients. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005; 18(3): 119–28PubMedCrossRef Berger G, Bernhardt T, Weimer E, et al. Longitudinal study on the relationship between symptomatology of dementia and levels of subjective burden and depression among family caregivers in memory clinic patients. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005; 18(3): 119–28PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fox DM. Evidence of evidence-based health policy: the politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Jan–Feb; 24(1): 114–22CrossRef Fox DM. Evidence of evidence-based health policy: the politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Jan–Feb; 24(1): 114–22CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20 (3 Suppl.): 21–35PubMedCrossRef Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20 (3 Suppl.): 21–35PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001 NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001
13.
go back to reference Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ, 2001CrossRef Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ, 2001CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum, 1988 Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum, 1988
15.
go back to reference Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications, 1981 Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications, 1981
16.
go back to reference Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997; 315(7121): 1533–7PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997; 315(7121): 1533–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 Nov; 12(3): 189–98PubMedCrossRef Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 Nov; 12(3): 189–98PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50(4): 1088–101PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50(4): 1088–101PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315(7109): 629–34PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315(7109): 629–34PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53(11): 1119–29PubMedCrossRef Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53(11): 1119–29PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bullock R, Touchon J, Bergman H, et al. Rivastigmine and donepezil treatment in moderate to moderately-severe Alzheimer’s disease over a 2-year period. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(8): 1317–27PubMedCrossRef Bullock R, Touchon J, Bergman H, et al. Rivastigmine and donepezil treatment in moderate to moderately-severe Alzheimer’s disease over a 2-year period. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(8): 1317–27PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jones RW, Soininen H, Hager K, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week study comparing the effects of donepezil and galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19(1): 58–67PubMedCrossRef Jones RW, Soininen H, Hager K, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week study comparing the effects of donepezil and galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19(1): 58–67PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wilcock G, Howe I, Coles H, et al. A long-term comparison of galantamine and donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging 2003; 20(10): 777–89PubMedCrossRef Wilcock G, Howe I, Coles H, et al. A long-term comparison of galantamine and donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging 2003; 20(10): 777–89PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wilkinson DG, Passmore AP, Bullock R, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week, comparative study of donepezil and rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56(6): 441–6PubMed Wilkinson DG, Passmore AP, Bullock R, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week, comparative study of donepezil and rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56(6): 441–6PubMed
25.
go back to reference Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, et al. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9427): 2105–15PubMedCrossRef Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, et al. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9427): 2105–15PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J, et al. The effects of donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10(3): 237–44PubMedCrossRef Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J, et al. The effects of donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10(3): 237–44PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mohs RC, Doody RS, Morris JC, et al. A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 481–8PubMedCrossRef Mohs RC, Doody RS, Morris JC, et al. A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 481–8PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, et al. A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2001; 57(4): 613–20PubMedCrossRef Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, et al. A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2001; 57(4): 613–20PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Homma A, Takeda M, Imai Y, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000; 11(6): 299–313PubMedCrossRef Homma A, Takeda M, Imai Y, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000; 11(6): 299–313PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT. The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: results of a US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Donepezil Study Group. Dementia 1996; 7(6): 293–303PubMed Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT. The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: results of a US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Donepezil Study Group. Dementia 1996; 7(6): 293–303PubMed
31.
go back to reference Rogers SL, Doody RS, Mohs RC, et al. Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(9): 1021–31PubMedCrossRef Rogers SL, Doody RS, Mohs RC, et al. Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(9): 1021–31PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al. A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50(1): 136–45PubMedCrossRef Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al. A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50(1): 136–45PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tariot PN, Cummings JL, Katz IR, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease in the nursing home setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49(12): 1590–9PubMedCrossRef Tariot PN, Cummings JL, Katz IR, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease in the nursing home setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49(12): 1590–9PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 489–95PubMedCrossRef Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 489–95PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Wessel T, et al. Galantamine in AD: a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2261–8PubMedCrossRef Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Wessel T, et al. Galantamine in AD: a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2261–8PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rockwood K, Mintzer J, Truyen L, et al. Effects of a flexible galantamine dose in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71(5): 589–95PubMedCrossRef Rockwood K, Mintzer J, Truyen L, et al. Effects of a flexible galantamine dose in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71(5): 589–95PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Tariot PN, Solomon PR, Morris JC, et al. A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD. The Galantamine USA-10 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2269–76PubMedCrossRef Tariot PN, Solomon PR, Morris JC, et al. A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD. The Galantamine USA-10 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2269–76PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Wilcock GK, Lilienfeld S, Gaens E. Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Galantamine International-1 Study Group. BMJ 2000; 321(7274): 1445–9PubMedCrossRef Wilcock GK, Lilienfeld S, Gaens E. Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Galantamine International-1 Study Group. BMJ 2000; 321(7274): 1445–9PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Wilkinson D, Murray J. Galantamine: a randomized, double-blind, dose comparison in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16(9): 852–7PubMedCrossRef Wilkinson D, Murray J. Galantamine: a randomized, double-blind, dose comparison in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16(9): 852–7PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Agid Y, Dubois B, Anand R, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1998; 59(12): 837–45CrossRef Agid Y, Dubois B, Anand R, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1998; 59(12): 837–45CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Corey-Bloom JR, Anand JV, Veach J, et al. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ENA 713 (rivastigmine tartrate), a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65 Corey-Bloom JR, Anand JV, Veach J, et al. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ENA 713 (rivastigmine tartrate), a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65
42.
go back to reference Rosier M, Anand R, Cicin-Sain A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318(7184): 633–8 Rosier M, Anand R, Cicin-Sain A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318(7184): 633–8
43.
go back to reference Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(14): 1333–41PubMedCrossRef Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(14): 1333–41PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Tariot PN, Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, et al. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291(3): 317–24PubMedCrossRef Tariot PN, Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, et al. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291(3): 317–24PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Brodaty H, Corey-Bloom J, Potocnik FC, et al. Galantamine prolonged-release formulation in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005; 20(2–3): 120–32PubMedCrossRef Brodaty H, Corey-Bloom J, Potocnik FC, et al. Galantamine prolonged-release formulation in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005; 20(2–3): 120–32PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Morganroth J, Graham S, Hartman R, et al. Electrocardiograph-ic effects of rivastigmine. J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 42(5): 558–68PubMedCrossRef Morganroth J, Graham S, Hartman R, et al. Electrocardiograph-ic effects of rivastigmine. J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 42(5): 558–68PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Dunn NR, Pearce GL, Shakir SA. Adverse effects associated with the use of donepezil in general practice in England. J Psychopharmacol 2000; 14(4): 406–8PubMedCrossRef Dunn NR, Pearce GL, Shakir SA. Adverse effects associated with the use of donepezil in general practice in England. J Psychopharmacol 2000; 14(4): 406–8PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Grimley Evans J, Wilcock G, Birks J. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of AD. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 351–69CrossRef Grimley Evans J, Wilcock G, Birks J. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of AD. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 351–69CrossRef
49.
go back to reference The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Medicinal products in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: EMEA, 1997 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.eu.int [Accessed 2006 Sep 5] The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Medicinal products in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: EMEA, 1997 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​emea.​eu.​int [Accessed 2006 Sep 5]
50.
go back to reference Food and Drug Administration. Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting, July 7, 1989. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, 1989 Food and Drug Administration. Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting, July 7, 1989. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, 1989
51.
go back to reference Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, et al. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31(1): 115–23PubMedCrossRef Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, et al. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31(1): 115–23PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Functional Outcomes of Drug Treatment in Alzheimer’s Disease
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Richard A. Hansen
Gerald Gartlehner
Kathleen N. Lohr
Daniel I. Kaufer
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200724020-00007

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Drugs & Aging 2/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine