Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 2/2006

01-02-2006 | Review Article

The Role of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists in Elderly Patients with Hypertension

Authors: G. Neil Thomas, Paul Chan, Professor Brian Tomlinson

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke and coronary events in elderly people and clinical trials have shown that treatment of hypertension with various drugs can result in a substantial reduction in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. The angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists are the newest class of antihypertensive agents to be used widely in clinical practice. AT1 receptor antagonists can generally be given once-daily. They are also extremely well tolerated with minimal first-dose hypotension and an incidence of adverse effects similar to that seen with placebo. Adverse event rates are significantly lower than with other classes of antihypertensive drugs including ACE inhibitors. These factors result in improved compliance and increased rates of continuance on therapy. AT1 receptor antagonists show similar efficacy in lowering blood pressure to other classes of antihypertensive agents and their antihypertensive effect is potentiated when they are given concomitantly with low-dose thiazide diuretics. AT1 receptor antagonists are eliminated predominantly by the hepatic route but most are not subject to extensive metabolism and interactions with other drugs are uncommon. This is an advantage in the elderly, who are often receiving multiple medications which increases the risk for adverse drug interactions. Dose adjustments are not usually required in the elderly unless there is plasma volume depletion. Although plasma AT1 receptor antagonist concentrations are generally higher in the elderly than in younger subjects, this pharmacokinetic difference may be balanced by decreased activation of the circulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the elderly.
Recent clinical studies in high-risk hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or in patients with diabetic nephropathy or heart failure have demonstrated that AT1 receptor antagonists can improve clinical outcomes to a similar or sometimes greater extent than other antihypertensive agents. Many of these studies have included large numbers of older patients and have confirmed the excellent tolerability profile of these drugs. Thus, AT1 receptor antagonists should be considered as a possible first-line treatment or as a component of combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria or nephropathy and as an alternative or additional treatment to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. AT1 receptor antagonists also appear to reduce the onset of new diabetes compared with some other antihypertensive drugs. The benefits in terms of organ protection have mainly been seen in studies using higher doses of particular AT1 receptor antagonists and it is not certain at present whether these results can be extrapolated to other members of the class.
As the elderly are more likely to have developed organ damage related to hypertension or to have heart failure or diabetes as concomitant conditions, AT1 receptor antagonists represent an appropriate option for many elderly patients. The main disadvantage of these drugs is the cost of the medication but this may be offset by their improved tolerability with fewer adverse reactions and thus increased compliance, resulting in better blood pressure control and fewer clinical events. Overall, AT1 receptor antagonists are well tolerated and efficacious for blood pressure-lowering when given as a single daily dose in elderly patients and have many potential benefits in high-risk hypertensive subjects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 2003; 290: 199–206PubMedCrossRef Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 2003; 290: 199–206PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–72PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–72PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Staessen JA, Gasowski J, Wang JG, et al. Risks of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis of outcome trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 865–72PubMedCrossRef Staessen JA, Gasowski J, Wang JG, et al. Risks of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis of outcome trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 865–72PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rajkumar C. Hypertension in the elderly. In: Birkenhager WH, Reid JL, Bulpitt CJ, editors. Handbook of hypertension. London: Elsevier Science, 2000: 106–14 Rajkumar C. Hypertension in the elderly. In: Birkenhager WH, Reid JL, Bulpitt CJ, editors. Handbook of hypertension. London: Elsevier Science, 2000: 106–14
5.
go back to reference Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension—European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–53CrossRef Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension—European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–53CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eastern Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease Collaborative Research Group. Blood pressure, cholesterol and stroke in eastern Asia. Lancet 1998; 352: 1801–7CrossRef Eastern Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease Collaborative Research Group. Blood pressure, cholesterol and stroke in eastern Asia. Lancet 1998; 352: 1801–7CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–13PubMedCrossRef Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–13PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–64CrossRef SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–64CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dahlof B, Lindholm LH, Hansson L, et al. Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension). Lancet 1991; 338: 1281–5PubMedCrossRef Dahlof B, Lindholm LH, Hansson L, et al. Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension). Lancet 1991; 338: 1281–5PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference MRC Working Party. Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. BMJ 1992; 304: 405–12CrossRef MRC Working Party. Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. BMJ 1992; 304: 405–12CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet 1997; 350: 757–64PubMedCrossRef Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet 1997; 350: 757–64PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wang JG, Staessen JA, Gong L, et al., for the Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative Group. Chinese trial on isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 211–20PubMedCrossRef Wang JG, Staessen JA, Gong L, et al., for the Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative Group. Chinese trial on isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 211–20PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, et al. Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity: the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study. Lancet 1999; 354: 1751–6PubMedCrossRef Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, et al. Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity: the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study. Lancet 1999; 354: 1751–6PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97CrossRef The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Guidelines Subcommittee. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society for Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–83 Guidelines Subcommittee. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society for Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–83
16.
go back to reference Turnbull F, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 362: 1527–35PubMedCrossRef Turnbull F, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 362: 1527–35PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Israili ZH, Hall WD. ACE inhibitors: differential use in elderly patients with hypertension. Drugs Aging 1995; 7: 355–71PubMedCrossRef Israili ZH, Hall WD. ACE inhibitors: differential use in elderly patients with hypertension. Drugs Aging 1995; 7: 355–71PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Svanborg A. Age-related changes in cardiac physiology. Can they be postponed or treated by drugs? Drugs Aging 1997; 10: 463–72PubMedCrossRef Svanborg A. Age-related changes in cardiac physiology. Can they be postponed or treated by drugs? Drugs Aging 1997; 10: 463–72PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bulpitt CJ, Cameron JD, Rajkumar C, et al. The effect of age on vascular compliance in man: which are the appropriate measures? J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 753–8PubMedCrossRef Bulpitt CJ, Cameron JD, Rajkumar C, et al. The effect of age on vascular compliance in man: which are the appropriate measures? J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 753–8PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Beckett NS, Connor M, Sadler JD, et al. Orthostatic fall in blood pressure in the very elderly hypertensive: results from the hypertension in the very elderly trial (HYVET) — pilot. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 839–40PubMedCrossRef Beckett NS, Connor M, Sadler JD, et al. Orthostatic fall in blood pressure in the very elderly hypertensive: results from the hypertension in the very elderly trial (HYVET) — pilot. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 839–40PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cleophas TJ, van Marum R. Age-related decline in autonomic control of blood pressure: implications for the pharmacological management of hypertension in the elderly. Drugs Aging 2003; 20: 313–9PubMedCrossRef Cleophas TJ, van Marum R. Age-related decline in autonomic control of blood pressure: implications for the pharmacological management of hypertension in the elderly. Drugs Aging 2003; 20: 313–9PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Weidmann P, De Myttenaere-Bursztein S, Maxwell MH, et al. Effect on aging on plasma renin and aldosterone in normal man. Kidney Int 1975; 8: 325–33PubMedCrossRef Weidmann P, De Myttenaere-Bursztein S, Maxwell MH, et al. Effect on aging on plasma renin and aldosterone in normal man. Kidney Int 1975; 8: 325–33PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tsunoda K, Abe K, Goto T, et al. Effect of age on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in normal subjects: simultaneous measurement of active and inactive renin, renin substrate, and aldosterone in plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986; 62: 384–9PubMedCrossRef Tsunoda K, Abe K, Goto T, et al. Effect of age on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in normal subjects: simultaneous measurement of active and inactive renin, renin substrate, and aldosterone in plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986; 62: 384–9PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Belmin J, Lévy BI, Michel J-B. Changes in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis in later life. Drugs Aging 1994; 5: 391–400PubMedCrossRef Belmin J, Lévy BI, Michel J-B. Changes in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis in later life. Drugs Aging 1994; 5: 391–400PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nakamaru M, Ogihara T, Higaki J, et al. Effect of age on active and inactive plasma renin in normal subjects and in patients with essential hypertension. J Am Geriatr Soc 1981; 29: 379–82PubMed Nakamaru M, Ogihara T, Higaki J, et al. Effect of age on active and inactive plasma renin in normal subjects and in patients with essential hypertension. J Am Geriatr Soc 1981; 29: 379–82PubMed
26.
go back to reference Takeda R, Morimoto S, Uchida K, et al. Effect of age on plasma aldosterone response to exogenous angiotensin II in normotensive subjects. Acta Endocrinol 1980; 94: 552–8PubMed Takeda R, Morimoto S, Uchida K, et al. Effect of age on plasma aldosterone response to exogenous angiotensin II in normotensive subjects. Acta Endocrinol 1980; 94: 552–8PubMed
27.
go back to reference Unger T. The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the development of cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 3A–9APubMedCrossRef Unger T. The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the development of cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 3A–9APubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schiffrin EL, Touyz RM. Multiple actions of angiotensin II in hypertension: benefits of AT1 receptor blockade. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 911–3PubMedCrossRef Schiffrin EL, Touyz RM. Multiple actions of angiotensin II in hypertension: benefits of AT1 receptor blockade. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 911–3PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference The ACE Inhibitors in Diabetic Nephropathy Trialist Group. Should all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 370–9 The ACE Inhibitors in Diabetic Nephropathy Trialist Group. Should all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 370–9
30.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, et al. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 145–53PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, et al. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 145–53PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Jafar TH, Schmid CH, Landa M, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis of patient-level data. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 73–87PubMed Jafar TH, Schmid CH, Landa M, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis of patient-level data. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 73–87PubMed
32.
go back to reference Tomlinson B, Young RP, Chan JCN, et al. Pharmacoepidemiology of ACE inhibitor-induced cough. Drug Safety 1997; 16: 150–1PubMedCrossRef Tomlinson B, Young RP, Chan JCN, et al. Pharmacoepidemiology of ACE inhibitor-induced cough. Drug Safety 1997; 16: 150–1PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lacourciere Y. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan in patients aged > or = 65 years with mild to moderate hypertension. Clin Ther 2000; 22: 1213–24PubMedCrossRef Lacourciere Y. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan in patients aged > or = 65 years with mild to moderate hypertension. Clin Ther 2000; 22: 1213–24PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, et al. Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan In The Elderly Study, ELITE). Lancet 1997; 349: 747–52PubMedCrossRef Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, et al. Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan In The Elderly Study, ELITE). Lancet 1997; 349: 747–52PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference McInnes GT, O’Kane KP, Istad H, et al. Comparison of the AT1-receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil, and the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, in fixed combination with low dose hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14: 263–9PubMedCrossRef McInnes GT, O’Kane KP, Istad H, et al. Comparison of the AT1-receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil, and the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, in fixed combination with low dose hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14: 263–9PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Juillerat L, Nussberger J, Menard J, et al. Determinants of angiotensin II generation during converting enzyme inhibition. Hypertension 1990; 16: 564–72PubMedCrossRef Juillerat L, Nussberger J, Menard J, et al. Determinants of angiotensin II generation during converting enzyme inhibition. Hypertension 1990; 16: 564–72PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hollenberg NK. AT(l)-receptor blockade and the kidney: importance of non-ACE pathways in health and disease. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16Suppl. 3: S59–63PubMedCrossRef Hollenberg NK. AT(l)-receptor blockade and the kidney: importance of non-ACE pathways in health and disease. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16Suppl. 3: S59–63PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hollenberg NK, Fisher ND, Price DA. Pathways for angiotensin II generation in intact human tissue: evidence from comparative pharmacological interruption of the renin system. Hypertension 1998; 32: 387–92PubMedCrossRef Hollenberg NK, Fisher ND, Price DA. Pathways for angiotensin II generation in intact human tissue: evidence from comparative pharmacological interruption of the renin system. Hypertension 1998; 32: 387–92PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Pitt B, Poole-Wilson P, Segal R, et al. Effects of losartan versus captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of patients in the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study — ELITE II. J Card Fail 1999; 5: 146–54PubMedCrossRef Pitt B, Poole-Wilson P, Segal R, et al. Effects of losartan versus captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of patients in the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study — ELITE II. J Card Fail 1999; 5: 146–54PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kaschina E, Unger T. Angiotensin AT1/AT2 receptors: regulation, signalling and function. Blood Press 2003; 12: 70–88PubMedCrossRef Kaschina E, Unger T. Angiotensin AT1/AT2 receptors: regulation, signalling and function. Blood Press 2003; 12: 70–88PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Matsubara H. Pathophysiological role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in cardiovascular and renal diseases. Circ Res 1998; 83: 1182–91PubMedCrossRef Matsubara H. Pathophysiological role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in cardiovascular and renal diseases. Circ Res 1998; 83: 1182–91PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Johren O, Dendorfer A, Dominiak P. Cardiovascular and renal function of angiotensin II type-2 receptors. Cardiovasc Res 2004; 62: 460–7PubMedCrossRef Johren O, Dendorfer A, Dominiak P. Cardiovascular and renal function of angiotensin II type-2 receptors. Cardiovasc Res 2004; 62: 460–7PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Henrion D, Kubis N, Levy BI. Physiological and pathophysiological functions of the AT(2) subtype receptor of angiotensin II: from large arteries to the microcirculation. Hypertension 2001; 38: 1150–7PubMedCrossRef Henrion D, Kubis N, Levy BI. Physiological and pathophysiological functions of the AT(2) subtype receptor of angiotensin II: from large arteries to the microcirculation. Hypertension 2001; 38: 1150–7PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Schneider MD, Lorell BH. AT(2), judgment day: which angiotensin receptor is the culprit in cardiac hypertrophy? Circulation 2001; 104: 247–8PubMedCrossRef Schneider MD, Lorell BH. AT(2), judgment day: which angiotensin receptor is the culprit in cardiac hypertrophy? Circulation 2001; 104: 247–8PubMedCrossRef
45.
46.
47.
go back to reference Levy BI. Can angiotensin II type 2 receptors have deleterious effects in cardiovascular disease? Implications for therapeutic blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Circulation 2004; 109: 8–13PubMedCrossRef Levy BI. Can angiotensin II type 2 receptors have deleterious effects in cardiovascular disease? Implications for therapeutic blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Circulation 2004; 109: 8–13PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Israili ZH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14: S73–86PubMedCrossRef Israili ZH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14: S73–86PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Unger T. Pharmacology of AT1-receptor blockers. Blood Press 2001; 10Suppl. 3: 5–10CrossRef Unger T. Pharmacology of AT1-receptor blockers. Blood Press 2001; 10Suppl. 3: 5–10CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Lip GY, Beevers DG. More evidence on blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cardiovascular disease and the long-term treatment of hypertension: data from recent clinical trials (CHARM, EUROPA, ValHEFT, HOPE-TOO and SYST-EUR2). J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 747–50PubMedCrossRef Lip GY, Beevers DG. More evidence on blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cardiovascular disease and the long-term treatment of hypertension: data from recent clinical trials (CHARM, EUROPA, ValHEFT, HOPE-TOO and SYST-EUR2). J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 747–50PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Dickson TZ, Zagrobelny J, Lin CC, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and antihypertensive efficacy of losartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with renal impairment. J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 43: 591–603PubMed Dickson TZ, Zagrobelny J, Lin CC, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and antihypertensive efficacy of losartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with renal impairment. J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 43: 591–603PubMed
52.
go back to reference Mallion JM, Carretta R, Trenkwalder P, et al. Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is effective in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by valsartan monotherapy. Blood Press 2003; 12Suppl. 1: 36–43CrossRef Mallion JM, Carretta R, Trenkwalder P, et al. Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is effective in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by valsartan monotherapy. Blood Press 2003; 12Suppl. 1: 36–43CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Wing LM, Arnolda LF, Upton J, et al. Candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in isolated systolic hypertension. Blood Press 2003; 12: 246–54PubMedCrossRef Wing LM, Arnolda LF, Upton J, et al. Candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in isolated systolic hypertension. Blood Press 2003; 12: 246–54PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Cody RJ. Physiological changes due to age. Implications for drug therapy of congestive heart failure. Drugs Aging 1993; 3: 320–34PubMedCrossRef Cody RJ. Physiological changes due to age. Implications for drug therapy of congestive heart failure. Drugs Aging 1993; 3: 320–34PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Fu A, Sreekumaran Nair K. Age effect on fibrinogen and albumin synthesis in humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 275: E1023–30PubMed Fu A, Sreekumaran Nair K. Age effect on fibrinogen and albumin synthesis in humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 275: E1023–30PubMed
56.
go back to reference Israili ZH, Dayton PG. Human alpha-1-glycoprotein and its interactions with drugs. Drug Metab Rev 2001; 33: 161–235PubMedCrossRef Israili ZH, Dayton PG. Human alpha-1-glycoprotein and its interactions with drugs. Drug Metab Rev 2001; 33: 161–235PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Mangoni AA. Cardiovascular drug therapy in elderly patients: specific age-related pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and therapeutic considerations. Drugs Aging 2005; 22: 913–41PubMedCrossRef Mangoni AA. Cardiovascular drug therapy in elderly patients: specific age-related pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and therapeutic considerations. Drugs Aging 2005; 22: 913–41PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Gillis JC, Markham A. Irbesartan: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in the management of hypertension. Drugs 1997; 54: 885–902PubMedCrossRef Gillis JC, Markham A. Irbesartan: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in the management of hypertension. Drugs 1997; 54: 885–902PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Markham A, Goa KL. Valsartan: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension. Drugs 1997; 54: 299–311PubMedCrossRef Markham A, Goa KL. Valsartan: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension. Drugs 1997; 54: 299–311PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Markham A, Spencer CM, Jarvis B. Irbesartan: an updated review of its use in cardiovascular disorders. Drugs 2000; 59: 1187–206PubMedCrossRef Markham A, Spencer CM, Jarvis B. Irbesartan: an updated review of its use in cardiovascular disorders. Drugs 2000; 59: 1187–206PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Plosker GL, Foster RH. Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs 2000; 60: 177–201PubMedCrossRef Plosker GL, Foster RH. Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs 2000; 60: 177–201PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Simpson KL, McClellan KJ. Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients. Drugs Aging 2000; 16: 227–50PubMedCrossRef Simpson KL, McClellan KJ. Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients. Drugs Aging 2000; 16: 227–50PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Sharpe M, Jarvis B, Goa KL. Telmisartan: a review of its use in hypertension. Drugs 2001; 61: 1501–29PubMedCrossRef Sharpe M, Jarvis B, Goa KL. Telmisartan: a review of its use in hypertension. Drugs 2001; 61: 1501–29PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Bottorff MB, Tenero DM. Pharmacokinetics of eprosartan in healthy subjects, patients with hypertension and special populations. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19: 73S–8SPubMedCrossRef Bottorff MB, Tenero DM. Pharmacokinetics of eprosartan in healthy subjects, patients with hypertension and special populations. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19: 73S–8SPubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Marino MR, Langenbacher KM, Raymond RH, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 347–56PubMed Marino MR, Langenbacher KM, Raymond RH, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 347–56PubMed
70.
go back to reference Tenero D, Martin D, Chapelsky M, et al. Effect of hepatic disease on the pharmacokinetics and plasma protein binding of eprosartan. Pharmacotherapy 1998; 18: 42–50PubMed Tenero D, Martin D, Chapelsky M, et al. Effect of hepatic disease on the pharmacokinetics and plasma protein binding of eprosartan. Pharmacotherapy 1998; 18: 42–50PubMed
71.
go back to reference Stangier J, Su CA, Schondorfer G, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous and oral telmisartan 20mg and 120mg in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 40: 1355–64PubMed Stangier J, Su CA, Schondorfer G, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous and oral telmisartan 20mg and 120mg in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 40: 1355–64PubMed
72.
go back to reference Thurmann PA. Valsartan: a novel angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2000; 1: 337–50PubMedCrossRef Thurmann PA. Valsartan: a novel angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2000; 1: 337–50PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Gleiter CH, Morike KE. Clinical pharmacokinetics of candesartan. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41: 7–17PubMedCrossRef Gleiter CH, Morike KE. Clinical pharmacokinetics of candesartan. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41: 7–17PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Waldmeier F, Flesch G, Muller P, et al. Pharmacokinetics, disposition and biotransformation of [14C]-radiolabelled valsartan in healthy male volunteers after a single oral dose. Xenobiotica 1997; 27: 59–71PubMedCrossRef Waldmeier F, Flesch G, Muller P, et al. Pharmacokinetics, disposition and biotransformation of [14C]-radiolabelled valsartan in healthy male volunteers after a single oral dose. Xenobiotica 1997; 27: 59–71PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Chung O, Unger T. Pharmacology of angiotensin receptors and AT1 receptor blockers. Basic Res Cardiol 1998; 93Suppl. 2: 15–23PubMedCrossRef Chung O, Unger T. Pharmacology of angiotensin receptors and AT1 receptor blockers. Basic Res Cardiol 1998; 93Suppl. 2: 15–23PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Yasar UMD, Forslund-Bergengren CMD, Tybring GP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of losartan and its metabolite E-3174 in relation to the CYP2C9 genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 71: 89–98PubMedCrossRef Yasar UMD, Forslund-Bergengren CMD, Tybring GP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of losartan and its metabolite E-3174 in relation to the CYP2C9 genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 71: 89–98PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Hallberg P, Karlsson J, Kurland L, et al. The CYP2C9 genotype predicts the blood pressure response to irbesartan: results from the Swedish Irbesartan Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Investigation vs Atenolol (SILVHIA) trial. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 2089–93PubMedCrossRef Hallberg P, Karlsson J, Kurland L, et al. The CYP2C9 genotype predicts the blood pressure response to irbesartan: results from the Swedish Irbesartan Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Investigation vs Atenolol (SILVHIA) trial. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 2089–93PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Uchida S, Watanabe H, Nishio S, et al. Altered pharmacokinetics and excessive hypotensive effect of candesartan in a patient with the CYP2C91/3 genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003; 74: 505–8PubMedCrossRef Uchida S, Watanabe H, Nishio S, et al. Altered pharmacokinetics and excessive hypotensive effect of candesartan in a patient with the CYP2C91/3 genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003; 74: 505–8PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Miners JO, McKinnon RA, Mackenzie PI. Genetic polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and their functional significance. Toxicology 2002; 181–182: 453–6PubMedCrossRef Miners JO, McKinnon RA, Mackenzie PI. Genetic polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and their functional significance. Toxicology 2002; 181–182: 453–6PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Mallion JM, Siche JP, Lacourciere Y. ABPM comparison of the antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 657–64PubMedCrossRef Mallion JM, Siche JP, Lacourciere Y. ABPM comparison of the antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 657–64PubMedCrossRef
81.
go back to reference White WB, Anwar YA, Mansoor GA, et al. Evaluation of the 24-hour blood pressure effects of eprosartan in patients with systemic hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14: 1248–55PubMedCrossRef White WB, Anwar YA, Mansoor GA, et al. Evaluation of the 24-hour blood pressure effects of eprosartan in patients with systemic hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14: 1248–55PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Sioufi A, Marfil F, Jaouen A, et al. The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of valsartan. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1998; 19: 237–44PubMedCrossRef Sioufi A, Marfil F, Jaouen A, et al. The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of valsartan. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1998; 19: 237–44PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Hubner R, Hogemann AM, Sunzel M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of candesartan after single and repeated doses of candesartan cilexetil in young and elderly healthy volunteers. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11: S19–25PubMed Hubner R, Hogemann AM, Sunzel M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of candesartan after single and repeated doses of candesartan cilexetil in young and elderly healthy volunteers. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11: S19–25PubMed
84.
go back to reference Tenero DM, Martin DE, Miller AK, et al. Effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of eprosartan. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 267–70PubMedCrossRef Tenero DM, Martin DE, Miller AK, et al. Effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of eprosartan. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 267–70PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Vachharajani NN, Shyu WC, Smith RA, et al. The effects of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of irbesartan. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 611–3PubMedCrossRef Vachharajani NN, Shyu WC, Smith RA, et al. The effects of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of irbesartan. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 611–3PubMedCrossRef
86.
go back to reference von Bergmann K, Laeis P, Puchler K, et al. Olmesartan medoxomil: influence of age, renal and hepatic function on the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil. J Hypertens Suppl 2001; 19Suppl. 1: S33–40 von Bergmann K, Laeis P, Puchler K, et al. Olmesartan medoxomil: influence of age, renal and hepatic function on the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil. J Hypertens Suppl 2001; 19Suppl. 1: S33–40
87.
go back to reference Brousil JA, Burke JM. Olmesartan medoxomil: an angiotensin II-receptor blocker. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 1041–55PubMedCrossRef Brousil JA, Burke JM. Olmesartan medoxomil: an angiotensin II-receptor blocker. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 1041–55PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference Schepke M, Werner E, Biecker E, et al. Hemodynamic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 389–95PubMedCrossRef Schepke M, Werner E, Biecker E, et al. Hemodynamic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 389–95PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Weir MR. Are drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system effective and safe in patients with renal insufficiency? Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 195S–203SPubMedCrossRef Weir MR. Are drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system effective and safe in patients with renal insufficiency? Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 195S–203SPubMedCrossRef
90.
go back to reference Belz GG, Butzer R, Kober S, et al. Time course and extent of angiotensin II antagonism after irbesartan, losartan, and valsartan in humans assessed by angiotensin II dose response and radioligand receptor assay. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66: 367–73PubMedCrossRef Belz GG, Butzer R, Kober S, et al. Time course and extent of angiotensin II antagonism after irbesartan, losartan, and valsartan in humans assessed by angiotensin II dose response and radioligand receptor assay. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66: 367–73PubMedCrossRef
91.
go back to reference Mclnnes GT. Clinical advantage of valsartan. Cardiology 1999; 91Suppl. 1: 14–8CrossRef Mclnnes GT. Clinical advantage of valsartan. Cardiology 1999; 91Suppl. 1: 14–8CrossRef
92.
go back to reference Burrell LM, Johnston CI. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists: potential in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. Drugs Aging 1997; 10: 421–34PubMedCrossRef Burrell LM, Johnston CI. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists: potential in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. Drugs Aging 1997; 10: 421–34PubMedCrossRef
93.
go back to reference Mclnnes GT, O’Kane KP, Jonker J, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil in an elderly hypertensive population. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11Suppl. 2: S75–80 Mclnnes GT, O’Kane KP, Jonker J, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil in an elderly hypertensive population. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11Suppl. 2: S75–80
94.
go back to reference Okereke CE, Messerli FH. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockers in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2001; 10: 42–9PubMedCrossRef Okereke CE, Messerli FH. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockers in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2001; 10: 42–9PubMedCrossRef
95.
go back to reference Brunner HR, Laeis P. Clinical efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil. J Hypertens Suppl 2003; 21Suppl. 2: S43–6PubMed Brunner HR, Laeis P. Clinical efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil. J Hypertens Suppl 2003; 21Suppl. 2: S43–6PubMed
96.
go back to reference Chrysant SG. Fixed combination therapy of hypertension: focus on valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination (Diovan®/HCT). Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2003; 1: 335–43PubMedCrossRef Chrysant SG. Fixed combination therapy of hypertension: focus on valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination (Diovan®/HCT). Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2003; 1: 335–43PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Bohm M, Sachse A. Safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Drug Saf 2002; 25: 599–611PubMedCrossRef Bohm M, Sachse A. Safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Drug Saf 2002; 25: 599–611PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Kulbertus H. Kinzalkomb, a fixed telmisartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination for the treatment of hypertension [in French]. Rev Med Liege 2003; 58: 580–4PubMed Kulbertus H. Kinzalkomb, a fixed telmisartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination for the treatment of hypertension [in French]. Rev Med Liege 2003; 58: 580–4PubMed
99.
go back to reference Lacourciere Y, Gil-Extremera B, Mueller O, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus HCTZ compared with losartan plus HCTZ in patients with essential hypertension. Int J Clin Pract 2003; 57: 273–9PubMed Lacourciere Y, Gil-Extremera B, Mueller O, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus HCTZ compared with losartan plus HCTZ in patients with essential hypertension. Int J Clin Pract 2003; 57: 273–9PubMed
100.
go back to reference Lacourciere Y, Neutel JM, Schumacher H. Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5mg and 80/12.5mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials. Clin Ther 2005; 27: 1795–805PubMedCrossRef Lacourciere Y, Neutel JM, Schumacher H. Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5mg and 80/12.5mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials. Clin Ther 2005; 27: 1795–805PubMedCrossRef
101.
go back to reference Lorell BH, Carabello BA. Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis. Circulation 2000; 102: 470–9PubMedCrossRef Lorell BH, Carabello BA. Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis. Circulation 2000; 102: 470–9PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Verdecchia P, Carini G, Circo A, et al. Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1829–35PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Carini G, Circo A, et al. Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1829–35PubMedCrossRef
103.
go back to reference Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Reboldi G, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy as an independent predictor of acute cerebrovascular events in essential hypertension. Circulation 2001; 104: 2039–44PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Reboldi G, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy as an independent predictor of acute cerebrovascular events in essential hypertension. Circulation 2001; 104: 2039–44PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference Vakili BA, Okin PM, Devereux RB. Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 334–41PubMedCrossRef Vakili BA, Okin PM, Devereux RB. Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 334–41PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD, et al. Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors. The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 7–13PubMed Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD, et al. Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors. The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 7–13PubMed
106.
go back to reference Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Circulation 1998; 97: 48–54PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Circulation 1998; 97: 48–54PubMedCrossRef
107.
go back to reference Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Borgioni C, et al. Changes in cardiovascular risk by reduction of left ventricular mass in hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 895–9PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Borgioni C, et al. Changes in cardiovascular risk by reduction of left ventricular mass in hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 895–9PubMedCrossRef
108.
go back to reference Lorell BH. Role of angiotensin AT1, and AT2 receptors in cardiac hypertrophy and disease. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 48H–52HPubMedCrossRef Lorell BH. Role of angiotensin AT1, and AT2 receptors in cardiac hypertrophy and disease. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 48H–52HPubMedCrossRef
109.
go back to reference Kim S, Iwao H. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of angiotensin II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases. Pharmacol Rev 2000; 52: 11–34PubMed Kim S, Iwao H. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of angiotensin II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases. Pharmacol Rev 2000; 52: 11–34PubMed
110.
go back to reference Schmieder RE, Martus P, Klingbeil A. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind studies. JAMA 1996; 275: 1507–13PubMedCrossRef Schmieder RE, Martus P, Klingbeil A. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind studies. JAMA 1996; 275: 1507–13PubMedCrossRef
111.
go back to reference Klingbeil AU, Schneider M, Martus P, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Am J Med 2003; 115: 41–6PubMedCrossRef Klingbeil AU, Schneider M, Martus P, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Am J Med 2003; 115: 41–6PubMedCrossRef
112.
go back to reference Mancia G, Zanchetti A, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy: SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation. Circulation 1997; 95: 1464–70PubMedCrossRef Mancia G, Zanchetti A, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy: SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation. Circulation 1997; 95: 1464–70PubMedCrossRef
113.
go back to reference Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 995–1003PubMedCrossRef Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 995–1003PubMedCrossRef
114.
go back to reference Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2022–31PubMedCrossRef Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2022–31PubMedCrossRef
115.
go back to reference Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1893–906PubMedCrossRef Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1893–906PubMedCrossRef
116.
go back to reference Mclnnes GT. Angiotensin II antagonism in clinical practice: experience with valsartan. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1999; 33Suppl. 1: S29–32CrossRef Mclnnes GT. Angiotensin II antagonism in clinical practice: experience with valsartan. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1999; 33Suppl. 1: S29–32CrossRef
117.
go back to reference Pool JL, Guthrie RM, Littlejohn 3rd TW, et al. Dose-related antihypertensive effects of irbesartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 462–70PubMedCrossRef Pool JL, Guthrie RM, Littlejohn 3rd TW, et al. Dose-related antihypertensive effects of irbesartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 462–70PubMedCrossRef
118.
go back to reference Hedner T, Oparil S, Rasmussen K, et al. A comparison of the angiotensin II antagonists valsartan and losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 414–7PubMedCrossRef Hedner T, Oparil S, Rasmussen K, et al. A comparison of the angiotensin II antagonists valsartan and losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 414–7PubMedCrossRef
119.
go back to reference Man in’t Veld AJ. Clinical overview of irbesartan: expanding the therapeutic window in hypertension. J Hypertens 1997; 15 Suppl.: S27–33 Man in’t Veld AJ. Clinical overview of irbesartan: expanding the therapeutic window in hypertension. J Hypertens 1997; 15 Suppl.: S27–33
120.
go back to reference Chan JCN, Critchley JAJH, Tomlinson B, et al. Antihypertensive and antialbuminuric effects of losartan potassium and felodipine in Chinese elderly hypertensive patients with or without non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Nephrol 1997; 17: 72–80PubMedCrossRef Chan JCN, Critchley JAJH, Tomlinson B, et al. Antihypertensive and antialbuminuric effects of losartan potassium and felodipine in Chinese elderly hypertensive patients with or without non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Nephrol 1997; 17: 72–80PubMedCrossRef
121.
go back to reference Argenziano L, Trimarco B. Effect of eprosartan and enalapril in the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: subgroup analysis of a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre study. Eprosartan Multinational Study Group. Curr Med Res Opin 1999; 15: 9–14PubMedCrossRef Argenziano L, Trimarco B. Effect of eprosartan and enalapril in the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: subgroup analysis of a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre study. Eprosartan Multinational Study Group. Curr Med Res Opin 1999; 15: 9–14PubMedCrossRef
122.
go back to reference Conlin PR, Elkins M, Liss C, et al. A study of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide vs nifedipine GITS in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12: 693–9PubMedCrossRef Conlin PR, Elkins M, Liss C, et al. A study of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide vs nifedipine GITS in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12: 693–9PubMedCrossRef
123.
go back to reference Conlin PR, Spence JD, Williams B, et al. Angiotensin II antagonists for hypertension: are there differences in efficacy? Am J Hypertens 2000; 13: 418–26PubMedCrossRef Conlin PR, Spence JD, Williams B, et al. Angiotensin II antagonists for hypertension: are there differences in efficacy? Am J Hypertens 2000; 13: 418–26PubMedCrossRef
124.
go back to reference Conlin PR. Angiotensin II antagonists in the treatment of hypertension: more similarities than differences. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2000; 2: 253–7 Conlin PR. Angiotensin II antagonists in the treatment of hypertension: more similarities than differences. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2000; 2: 253–7
125.
go back to reference Critchley JAJH, Gilchrist N, Ikeda L, et al. A randomized, double-masked comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of combination therapy with losartan and hydrochlorothiazide versus captopril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly and younger patients. Curr Ther Res 1996; 57: 392–407CrossRef Critchley JAJH, Gilchrist N, Ikeda L, et al. A randomized, double-masked comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of combination therapy with losartan and hydrochlorothiazide versus captopril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly and younger patients. Curr Ther Res 1996; 57: 392–407CrossRef
126.
go back to reference Giles TD, Bakris GL, Smith DH, et al. Defining the antihypertensive properties of the angiotensin receptor blocker telmisartan by a practice-based clinical trial. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 460–6PubMedCrossRef Giles TD, Bakris GL, Smith DH, et al. Defining the antihypertensive properties of the angiotensin receptor blocker telmisartan by a practice-based clinical trial. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 460–6PubMedCrossRef
127.
go back to reference Roden DM, Brown NJ. Preprescription genotyping: not yet ready for prime time, but getting there. Circulation 2001; 103: 1608–10PubMedCrossRef Roden DM, Brown NJ. Preprescription genotyping: not yet ready for prime time, but getting there. Circulation 2001; 103: 1608–10PubMedCrossRef
128.
go back to reference Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004; 364: 1684–9PubMedCrossRef Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004; 364: 1684–9PubMedCrossRef
129.
go back to reference Messerli FH, Grossman E, Fournier A. Losartan vs atenolol in prevention of stroke and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2003; 289: 700–1PubMedCrossRef Messerli FH, Grossman E, Fournier A. Losartan vs atenolol in prevention of stroke and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2003; 289: 700–1PubMedCrossRef
130.
go back to reference Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 1004–10PubMedCrossRef Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 1004–10PubMedCrossRef
131.
go back to reference Julius S, Alderman MH, Beevers G, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction in hypertensive black patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1047–55PubMedCrossRef Julius S, Alderman MH, Beevers G, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction in hypertensive black patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1047–55PubMedCrossRef
132.
go back to reference Devereux RB, Lyle PA. Losartan for the treatment of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2004; 5: 2311–20PubMedCrossRef Devereux RB, Lyle PA. Losartan for the treatment of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2004; 5: 2311–20PubMedCrossRef
133.
go back to reference Lithell H, Hansson L, Skoog I, et al. The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 875–86PubMedCrossRef Lithell H, Hansson L, Skoog I, et al. The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 875–86PubMedCrossRef
134.
go back to reference Kjeldsen SE, Dahlof B, Devereux RB, et al. Effects of losartan on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: a Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) substudy. JAMA 2002; 288: 1491–8PubMedCrossRef Kjeldsen SE, Dahlof B, Devereux RB, et al. Effects of losartan on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: a Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) substudy. JAMA 2002; 288: 1491–8PubMedCrossRef
135.
go back to reference Papademetriou V, Farsang C, Elmfeldt D, et al. Stroke prevention with the angiotensin II type 1-receptor blocker candesartan in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1175–80PubMed Papademetriou V, Farsang C, Elmfeldt D, et al. Stroke prevention with the angiotensin II type 1-receptor blocker candesartan in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1175–80PubMed
136.
go back to reference Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 851–60PubMedCrossRef Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 851–60PubMedCrossRef
137.
go back to reference Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861–9PubMedCrossRef Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861–9PubMedCrossRef
138.
go back to reference Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Cardiovascular prevention and blood pressure reduction: a quantitative overview updated until 1 March 2003. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1055–76PubMedCrossRef Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Cardiovascular prevention and blood pressure reduction: a quantitative overview updated until 1 March 2003. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1055–76PubMedCrossRef
139.
go back to reference Berl T, Hunsicker LG, Lewis JB, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 542–9PubMed Berl T, Hunsicker LG, Lewis JB, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 542–9PubMed
140.
go back to reference Lindholm LH, Persson M, Alaupovic P, et al. Metabolic outcome during 1 year in newly detected hypertensives: results of the Antihypertensive Treatment and Lipid Profile in a North of Sweden Efficacy Evaluation (ALPINE study). J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1563–74PubMedCrossRef Lindholm LH, Persson M, Alaupovic P, et al. Metabolic outcome during 1 year in newly detected hypertensives: results of the Antihypertensive Treatment and Lipid Profile in a North of Sweden Efficacy Evaluation (ALPINE study). J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1563–74PubMedCrossRef
141.
go back to reference Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, et al. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. Lancet 2003; 362: 759–66PubMedCrossRef Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, et al. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. Lancet 2003; 362: 759–66PubMedCrossRef
142.
go back to reference Weber MA, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Blood pressure dependent and independent effects of antihypertensive treatment on clinical events in the VALUE Trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2049–51PubMedCrossRef Weber MA, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Blood pressure dependent and independent effects of antihypertensive treatment on clinical events in the VALUE Trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2049–51PubMedCrossRef
143.
144.
go back to reference Williams B. Recent hypertension trials: implications and controversies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 813–27PubMedCrossRef Williams B. Recent hypertension trials: implications and controversies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 813–27PubMedCrossRef
145.
go back to reference Schrader J, Luders S, Kulschewski A, et al. Morbidity and mortality after stroke, eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES). Stroke 2005; 36: 1218–26PubMedCrossRef Schrader J, Luders S, Kulschewski A, et al. Morbidity and mortality after stroke, eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES). Stroke 2005; 36: 1218–26PubMedCrossRef
146.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS38). BMJ 1998; 317: 703–13CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS38). BMJ 1998; 317: 703–13CrossRef
147.
go back to reference Jover B, Demeilliers B. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist versus angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor in experimental renal diseases. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2000; 14: 541–8PubMedCrossRef Jover B, Demeilliers B. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist versus angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor in experimental renal diseases. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2000; 14: 541–8PubMedCrossRef
148.
go back to reference Ravid M, Savin H, Jutrin I, et al. Long-term stabilizing effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on plasma creatinine and on proteinuria in normotensive type II diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 577–81PubMed Ravid M, Savin H, Jutrin I, et al. Long-term stabilizing effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on plasma creatinine and on proteinuria in normotensive type II diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 577–81PubMed
149.
go back to reference Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, et al. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 870–8PubMedCrossRef Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, et al. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 870–8PubMedCrossRef
150.
go back to reference Viberti G, Wheeldon NM. Microalbuminuria reduction with valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a blood pressure-independent effect. Circulation 2002; 106: 672–8PubMedCrossRef Viberti G, Wheeldon NM. Microalbuminuria reduction with valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a blood pressure-independent effect. Circulation 2002; 106: 672–8PubMedCrossRef
151.
go back to reference Gerstein HC. Diabetes and the HOPE study: implications for macrovascular and microvascular disease. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2001: 8–12 Gerstein HC. Diabetes and the HOPE study: implications for macrovascular and microvascular disease. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2001: 8–12
152.
go back to reference Adler AI, Stevens RJ, Manley SE, et al. Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64). Kidney Int 2003; 63: 225–32PubMedCrossRef Adler AI, Stevens RJ, Manley SE, et al. Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64). Kidney Int 2003; 63: 225–32PubMedCrossRef
153.
go back to reference Donnelly R, Yeung JM, Manning G. Microalbuminuria: a common, independent cardiovascular risk factor, especially but not exclusively in type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens Suppl 2003; 21Suppl. 1: S7–12PubMed Donnelly R, Yeung JM, Manning G. Microalbuminuria: a common, independent cardiovascular risk factor, especially but not exclusively in type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens Suppl 2003; 21Suppl. 1: S7–12PubMed
154.
go back to reference Strippoli GF, Craig M, Deeks JJ, et al. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists on mortality and renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy: systematic review. BMJ 2004; 329: 828PubMedCrossRef Strippoli GF, Craig M, Deeks JJ, et al. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists on mortality and renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy: systematic review. BMJ 2004; 329: 828PubMedCrossRef
155.
go back to reference Verma S, Strauss M. Angiotensin receptor blockers and myocardial infarction. BMJ 2004; 329: 1248–9PubMedCrossRef Verma S, Strauss M. Angiotensin receptor blockers and myocardial infarction. BMJ 2004; 329: 1248–9PubMedCrossRef
156.
go back to reference Epstein BJ, Gums JG. Angiotensin receptor blockers versus ACE inhibitors: prevention of death and myocardial infarction in high-risk populations. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 470–80PubMedCrossRef Epstein BJ, Gums JG. Angiotensin receptor blockers versus ACE inhibitors: prevention of death and myocardial infarction in high-risk populations. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 470–80PubMedCrossRef
157.
go back to reference McDonald MA, Simpson SH, Ezekowitz JA, et al. Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: systematic review. BMJ 2005; 331: 873PubMedCrossRef McDonald MA, Simpson SH, Ezekowitz JA, et al. Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: systematic review. BMJ 2005; 331: 873PubMedCrossRef
158.
go back to reference Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Gattobigio R, et al. Do angiotensin II receptor blockers increase the risk of myocardial infarction? Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2381–6PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Gattobigio R, et al. Do angiotensin II receptor blockers increase the risk of myocardial infarction? Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2381–6PubMedCrossRef
159.
go back to reference Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention. Hypertension 2005; 46(2): 386–92PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention. Hypertension 2005; 46(2): 386–92PubMedCrossRef
160.
go back to reference Teo K, Yusuf S, Sleight P, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of 2 large, simple, randomized trials evaluating telmisartan, ramipril, and their combination in high-risk patients: the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial/Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease (ONTARGET/TRANSCEND) trials. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 52–61PubMedCrossRef Teo K, Yusuf S, Sleight P, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of 2 large, simple, randomized trials evaluating telmisartan, ramipril, and their combination in high-risk patients: the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial/Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease (ONTARGET/TRANSCEND) trials. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 52–61PubMedCrossRef
161.
go back to reference Barnett AH, Bain SC, Bouter P, et al. Angiotensin-receptor blockade versus converting-enzyme inhibition in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1952–61PubMedCrossRef Barnett AH, Bain SC, Bouter P, et al. Angiotensin-receptor blockade versus converting-enzyme inhibition in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1952–61PubMedCrossRef
162.
go back to reference Lacourciere Y, Belanger A, Godin C, et al. Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 762–9PubMedCrossRef Lacourciere Y, Belanger A, Godin C, et al. Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 762–9PubMedCrossRef
163.
go back to reference Mogensen CE, Neldam S, Tikkanen I, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the Candesartan and Lisinopril Microalbuminuria (CALM) study. BMJ 2000; 321: 1440–4PubMedCrossRef Mogensen CE, Neldam S, Tikkanen I, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the Candesartan and Lisinopril Microalbuminuria (CALM) study. BMJ 2000; 321: 1440–4PubMedCrossRef
164.
go back to reference Nakao N, Yoshimura A, Morita H, et al. Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in non-diabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 117–24PubMedCrossRef Nakao N, Yoshimura A, Morita H, et al. Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in non-diabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 117–24PubMedCrossRef
165.
go back to reference Taal MW, Brenner BM. Combination ACEI and ARB therapy: additional benefit in renoprotection? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2002; 11: 377–81PubMedCrossRef Taal MW, Brenner BM. Combination ACEI and ARB therapy: additional benefit in renoprotection? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2002; 11: 377–81PubMedCrossRef
166.
go back to reference Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 611–6PubMedCrossRef Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 611–6PubMedCrossRef
167.
go back to reference Vermes E, Ducharme A, Bourassa MG, et al. Enalapril reduces the incidence of diabetes in patients with chronic heart failure: insight from the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation 2003; 107: 1291–6PubMedCrossRef Vermes E, Ducharme A, Bourassa MG, et al. Enalapril reduces the incidence of diabetes in patients with chronic heart failure: insight from the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation 2003; 107: 1291–6PubMedCrossRef
168.
go back to reference Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. Risk of new-onset diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1879–86PubMedCrossRef Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. Risk of new-onset diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1879–86PubMedCrossRef
169.
go back to reference Mason JM, Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, et al. The diabetogenic potential of thiazide-type diuretic and beta-blocker combinations in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1777–81PubMedCrossRef Mason JM, Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, et al. The diabetogenic potential of thiazide-type diuretic and beta-blocker combinations in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1777–81PubMedCrossRef
170.
go back to reference Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, et al. Adverse prognostic significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension 2004; 43: 963–9PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, et al. Adverse prognostic significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension 2004; 43: 963–9PubMedCrossRef
171.
go back to reference Francis GS, Cohn JN, Johnson G, et al. Plasma norepinephrine, plasma renin activity and congestive heart failure: relations to survival and the effects of therapy in V-HeFT II. Circulation 1993; 87Suppl. VI: 40–8 Francis GS, Cohn JN, Johnson G, et al. Plasma norepinephrine, plasma renin activity and congestive heart failure: relations to survival and the effects of therapy in V-HeFT II. Circulation 1993; 87Suppl. VI: 40–8
172.
go back to reference Riegger GAJ, Bouzo H, Petr P, et al. Improvement in exercise tolerance and symptoms of congestive heart failure during treatment with candesartan cilexetil. Circulation 1999; 1000: 2224–30CrossRef Riegger GAJ, Bouzo H, Petr P, et al. Improvement in exercise tolerance and symptoms of congestive heart failure during treatment with candesartan cilexetil. Circulation 1999; 1000: 2224–30CrossRef
173.
go back to reference McKelvie RS, Yusuf S, Pericak D, et al. Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. Circulation 1999; 100: 1056–64PubMedCrossRef McKelvie RS, Yusuf S, Pericak D, et al. Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. Circulation 1999; 100: 1056–64PubMedCrossRef
174.
go back to reference Maggioni AP, Anand I, Gottlieb SO, et al. Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1414–21PubMedCrossRef Maggioni AP, Anand I, Gottlieb SO, et al. Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1414–21PubMedCrossRef
175.
go back to reference Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-con-verting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 772–6PubMedCrossRef Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-con-verting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 772–6PubMedCrossRef
176.
go back to reference Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R, et al. Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial — the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II. Lancet 2000; 355: 1582–7PubMedCrossRef Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R, et al. Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial — the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II. Lancet 2000; 355: 1582–7PubMedCrossRef
177.
go back to reference Jong P, Demers C, McKelvie RS, et al. Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 463–70PubMedCrossRef Jong P, Demers C, McKelvie RS, et al. Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 463–70PubMedCrossRef
178.
go back to reference Cohn JN, Tognoni G, for the Val-HeFT Investigators. Effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan on morbidity and mortality in heart failure: the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). Circulation 2000: 102 Cohn JN, Tognoni G, for the Val-HeFT Investigators. Effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan on morbidity and mortality in heart failure: the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). Circulation 2000: 102
179.
go back to reference McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 767–71PubMedCrossRef McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 767–71PubMedCrossRef
180.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 777–81PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 777–81PubMedCrossRef
181.
go back to reference Dickstein K, Kjekshus J. Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan. Lancet 2002; 360: 752–60PubMedCrossRef Dickstein K, Kjekshus J. Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan. Lancet 2002; 360: 752–60PubMedCrossRef
182.
go back to reference Garg R, Yusuf S. Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure: Collaborative Group on ACE Inhibitor Trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 1450–6PubMedCrossRef Garg R, Yusuf S. Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure: Collaborative Group on ACE Inhibitor Trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 1450–6PubMedCrossRef
183.
go back to reference Cohn JN, Tognoni G. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1667–75PubMedCrossRef Cohn JN, Tognoni G. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1667–75PubMedCrossRef
184.
go back to reference Hall J, Marbury T, Gray J, et al. Long term safety, tolerability and efficacy of valsartan: results from one and two year trials. J Clin Res 1998; 1: 147–59 Hall J, Marbury T, Gray J, et al. Long term safety, tolerability and efficacy of valsartan: results from one and two year trials. J Clin Res 1998; 1: 147–59
185.
go back to reference Chan P, Tomlinson B, Huang TY, et al. Double-blind comparison of losartan, lisinopril, and metolazone in elderly hypertensive patients with previous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 253–7PubMed Chan P, Tomlinson B, Huang TY, et al. Double-blind comparison of losartan, lisinopril, and metolazone in elderly hypertensive patients with previous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 253–7PubMed
186.
go back to reference Siragy HM, Carey RM. Protective role of the angiotensin AT2 receptor in a renal wrap hypertension model. Hypertension 1999; 33: 1237–42PubMedCrossRef Siragy HM, Carey RM. Protective role of the angiotensin AT2 receptor in a renal wrap hypertension model. Hypertension 1999; 33: 1237–42PubMedCrossRef
187.
go back to reference Aronow WS. The ELITE Study. What are its implications for the drug treatment of heart failure? Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study. Drugs Aging 1998; 12: 423–8PubMedCrossRef Aronow WS. The ELITE Study. What are its implications for the drug treatment of heart failure? Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study. Drugs Aging 1998; 12: 423–8PubMedCrossRef
188.
go back to reference Puig JG, Mateos F, Buno A, et al. Effect of eprosartan and losartan on uric acid metabolism in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1033–9PubMedCrossRef Puig JG, Mateos F, Buno A, et al. Effect of eprosartan and losartan on uric acid metabolism in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1033–9PubMedCrossRef
189.
go back to reference Csajka C, Buclin T, Brunner HR, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 31: 1–29CrossRef Csajka C, Buclin T, Brunner HR, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 31: 1–29CrossRef
190.
go back to reference Calvino J, Lens XM, Romero R, et al. Long-term anti-protein-uric effect of losartan in renal transplant recipients treated for hypertension. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 82–6PubMedCrossRef Calvino J, Lens XM, Romero R, et al. Long-term anti-protein-uric effect of losartan in renal transplant recipients treated for hypertension. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 82–6PubMedCrossRef
191.
go back to reference Ducloux D, Saint-Hillier Y, Chalopin JM. Effect of losartan on haemoglobin concentration in renal transplant recipients — a retrospective analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12: 2683–6PubMedCrossRef Ducloux D, Saint-Hillier Y, Chalopin JM. Effect of losartan on haemoglobin concentration in renal transplant recipients — a retrospective analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12: 2683–6PubMedCrossRef
192.
go back to reference el-Agroudy AE, Hassan NA, Foda MA, et al. Effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker on plasma levels of TGF-beta 1 and interstitial fibrosis in hypertensive kidney transplant patients. Am J Nephrol 2003; 23: 300–6PubMedCrossRef el-Agroudy AE, Hassan NA, Foda MA, et al. Effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker on plasma levels of TGF-beta 1 and interstitial fibrosis in hypertensive kidney transplant patients. Am J Nephrol 2003; 23: 300–6PubMedCrossRef
193.
go back to reference Tepel M, van der Giet M, Zidek W. Efficacy and tolerability of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in dialysis patients using AN69 dialysis membranes. Kidney Blood Press Res 2001; 24: 71–4PubMedCrossRef Tepel M, van der Giet M, Zidek W. Efficacy and tolerability of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in dialysis patients using AN69 dialysis membranes. Kidney Blood Press Res 2001; 24: 71–4PubMedCrossRef
194.
go back to reference Kon V, Fogo A, Ichikawa I. Bradykinin causes selective efferent arteriolar dilation during angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition. Kidney Int 1993; 44: 545–50PubMedCrossRef Kon V, Fogo A, Ichikawa I. Bradykinin causes selective efferent arteriolar dilation during angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition. Kidney Int 1993; 44: 545–50PubMedCrossRef
195.
go back to reference Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, et al. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy: the Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1456–62PubMedCrossRef Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, et al. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy: the Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1456–62PubMedCrossRef
196.
go back to reference Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, et al. Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency: the Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 939–45PubMedCrossRef Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, et al. Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency: the Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 939–45PubMedCrossRef
197.
go back to reference The GISEN Group. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy. Lancet 1997; 349: 1857–63CrossRef The GISEN Group. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy. Lancet 1997; 349: 1857–63CrossRef
198.
go back to reference Ahmed A, Kiefe CI, Allman RM, et al. Survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in older heart failure patients with perceived contraindications. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1659–66PubMedCrossRef Ahmed A, Kiefe CI, Allman RM, et al. Survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in older heart failure patients with perceived contraindications. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1659–66PubMedCrossRef
199.
go back to reference Routledge HC, Townend JN. ACE inhibition in aortic stenosis: dangerous medicine or golden opportunity? J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 659–67PubMedCrossRef Routledge HC, Townend JN. ACE inhibition in aortic stenosis: dangerous medicine or golden opportunity? J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 659–67PubMedCrossRef
200.
go back to reference Taavitsainen P, Kiukaanniemi K, Pelkonen O. In vitro inhibition screening of human hepatic P450 enzymes by five angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 135–40PubMedCrossRef Taavitsainen P, Kiukaanniemi K, Pelkonen O. In vitro inhibition screening of human hepatic P450 enzymes by five angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 135–40PubMedCrossRef
201.
go back to reference Marino MR, Vachharajani NN. Drug interactions with irbesartan. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40: 605–14PubMedCrossRef Marino MR, Vachharajani NN. Drug interactions with irbesartan. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40: 605–14PubMedCrossRef
202.
go back to reference Maillard MP, Wurzner G, Nussberger J, et al. Comparative angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy volunteers: the importance of dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 71: 68–76PubMedCrossRef Maillard MP, Wurzner G, Nussberger J, et al. Comparative angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy volunteers: the importance of dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 71: 68–76PubMedCrossRef
203.
go back to reference Elliott HL, Mclnnes GT. Special management needs of the elderly hypertensive patient. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2002; 3Suppl. 1: S25–31PubMedCrossRef Elliott HL, Mclnnes GT. Special management needs of the elderly hypertensive patient. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2002; 3Suppl. 1: S25–31PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Role of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists in Elderly Patients with Hypertension
Authors
G. Neil Thomas
Paul Chan
Professor Brian Tomlinson
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200623020-00004

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Drugs & Aging 2/2006 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine