Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 3/2006

01-03-2006 | Review Article

Camptothecin and Podophyllotoxin Derivatives

Inhibitors of Topoisomerase I and II — Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity Profile

Authors: Dr Jörg T Hartmann, Hans-Peter Lipp

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Camptothecins represent an established class of effective agents that selectively target topoisomerase I by trapping the catalytic intermediate of the topoisomerase I-DNA reaction, the cleavage complex. The water-soluble salt camptothecin-sodium — introduced in early trials in the 1960s — was highly toxic in animals, whereas the semisynthetic derivatives irinotecan and topotecan did not cause haemorrhagic cystitis because of their higher physicochemical stability and solubility at lower pH values. Myelosuppression, neutropenia and, to a lesser extent, thrombocytopenia are dose-limiting toxic effects of topotecan. In contrast to the structurally-related topotecan, irinotecan is a prodrug which has to be converted to SN-38, its active form. SN-38 is inactivated by conjugation, thus patients with Gilbert’s syndrome and other forms of genetic glucuronidation deficiency are at an increased risk of irinotecan-induced adverse effects, such as neutropenia and diarrhoea.
The cytotoxic mechanism of podophyllotoxin is the inhibition of topoisomerase II. Common adverse effects of etoposide include dose-limiting myelosuppression. Hypersensitivity reactions are more common with etoposide and teniposide than with etoposide phosphate because the formulations of the former contain sensitising solubilisers. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occur in 65% and 80%, respectively, of patients after administration of conventional doses of teniposide. Anorexia, vomiting and diarrhoea are generally of mild severity after administration of conventional doses of topoisomerase II inhibitors. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies have revealed substantial interindividual variabilities regarding the area under the concentration-time curve values and steady-state concentrations for all drugs reviewed in this article. Irinotecan, etoposide and teniposide are degraded via complex metabolic pathways. In contrast, topotecan primarily undergoes renal excretion. Regarding etoposide and teniposide, the extent of catechol formation over time during drug metabolism may be associated with a higher risk for secondary malignancies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malonne H, Atassi G. DNA topoisomerase targeting drugs: mechanisms of action and perspectives. Anticancer Drugs 1997; 8: 811–22PubMedCrossRef Malonne H, Atassi G. DNA topoisomerase targeting drugs: mechanisms of action and perspectives. Anticancer Drugs 1997; 8: 811–22PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Potmesil M. Camptothecins: from bench research to hospital wards. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 1431–9PubMed Potmesil M. Camptothecins: from bench research to hospital wards. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 1431–9PubMed
3.
go back to reference Iyer L, Ratain MJ. Clinical pharmacology of camptothecins. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 42Suppl.: S31–43PubMedCrossRef Iyer L, Ratain MJ. Clinical pharmacology of camptothecins. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 42Suppl.: S31–43PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG. Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 641–61PubMed Garcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG. Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 641–61PubMed
6.
go back to reference Husain I, Mohler JL, Seigler HF, et al. Elevation of topoisomerase I messenger RNA, protein, and catalytic activity in human tumors: demonstration of tumor-type specificity and implications for cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 539–46PubMed Husain I, Mohler JL, Seigler HF, et al. Elevation of topoisomerase I messenger RNA, protein, and catalytic activity in human tumors: demonstration of tumor-type specificity and implications for cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 539–46PubMed
7.
go back to reference Burris HA, Rothenberg ML, Kuhn JG, et al. Clinical trials with the topoisomerase I inhibitors. Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 663–9PubMed Burris HA, Rothenberg ML, Kuhn JG, et al. Clinical trials with the topoisomerase I inhibitors. Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 663–9PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gupta E, Mick R, Ramirez J, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1502–10PubMed Gupta E, Mick R, Ramirez J, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1502–10PubMed
9.
go back to reference Loos WJ, Gelderblom HJ, Verweij J, et al. Gender-dependent pharmacokinetics of topotecan in adult patients. Anticancer Drugs 2000; 11: 673–80PubMedCrossRef Loos WJ, Gelderblom HJ, Verweij J, et al. Gender-dependent pharmacokinetics of topotecan in adult patients. Anticancer Drugs 2000; 11: 673–80PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Herben VM, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Beijnen JH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of topotecan. Clin Pharmacokinet 1996; 31: 85–102PubMedCrossRef Herben VM, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Beijnen JH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of topotecan. Clin Pharmacokinet 1996; 31: 85–102PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Levy T, Inbar M, Menczer J, et al. Phase II study of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 686–90PubMedCrossRef Levy T, Inbar M, Menczer J, et al. Phase II study of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 686–90PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Herben VM, Schoemaker E, Rosing H, et al. Urinary and fecal excretion of topotecan in patients with malignant solid tumours. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2002; 50: 59–64PubMedCrossRef Herben VM, Schoemaker E, Rosing H, et al. Urinary and fecal excretion of topotecan in patients with malignant solid tumours. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2002; 50: 59–64PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Loos WJ, Gelderblom H, Verweij J, et al. Red blood cells: a neglected compartment in topotecan pharmacokinetic analysis. Anticancer Drugs 2003; 14: 227–32PubMedCrossRef Loos WJ, Gelderblom H, Verweij J, et al. Red blood cells: a neglected compartment in topotecan pharmacokinetic analysis. Anticancer Drugs 2003; 14: 227–32PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference O’Reilly S. Topotecan: what dose, what schedule, what route? Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 3–5PubMed O’Reilly S. Topotecan: what dose, what schedule, what route? Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 3–5PubMed
15.
go back to reference O’Reilly S, Rowinsky EK, Slichenmyer W, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 3062–73PubMed O’Reilly S, Rowinsky EK, Slichenmyer W, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 3062–73PubMed
16.
go back to reference Montazeri A, Culine S, Laguerre B, et al. Individual adaptive dosing of topotecan in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 394–9PubMed Montazeri A, Culine S, Laguerre B, et al. Individual adaptive dosing of topotecan in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 394–9PubMed
17.
go back to reference Herrington JD, Figueroa JA, Kirstein MN, et al. Effect of hemodialysis on topotecan disposition in a patient with severe renal dysfunction. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001; 47: 89–93PubMedCrossRef Herrington JD, Figueroa JA, Kirstein MN, et al. Effect of hemodialysis on topotecan disposition in a patient with severe renal dysfunction. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001; 47: 89–93PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dennis MJ, Beijnen JH, Grochow LB, et al. An overview of the clinical pharmacology of topotecan. Semin Oncol 1997; 24: S5–18PubMed Dennis MJ, Beijnen JH, Grochow LB, et al. An overview of the clinical pharmacology of topotecan. Semin Oncol 1997; 24: S5–18PubMed
19.
go back to reference Blaney SM, Heideman R, Berg S, et al. Phase I clinical trial of intrathecal topotecan in patients with neoplastic meningitis. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 143–7PubMedCrossRef Blaney SM, Heideman R, Berg S, et al. Phase I clinical trial of intrathecal topotecan in patients with neoplastic meningitis. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 143–7PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Blaney SM, Cole DE, Godwin K, et al. Intrathecal administration of topotecan in nonhuman primates. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 36: 121–4PubMedCrossRef Blaney SM, Cole DE, Godwin K, et al. Intrathecal administration of topotecan in nonhuman primates. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 36: 121–4PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kollmannsberger C, Mross K, Jakob A, et al. Topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. Pharmacology and clinical experience. Oncology 1999; 56: 1–12PubMedCrossRef Kollmannsberger C, Mross K, Jakob A, et al. Topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. Pharmacology and clinical experience. Oncology 1999; 56: 1–12PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Kaufmann SH, Baker SD, et al. Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 3074–84PubMed Rowinsky EK, Kaufmann SH, Baker SD, et al. Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 3074–84PubMed
23.
go back to reference Breidenbach M, Rein DT, Schondorf T, et al. Hematological side-effect profiles of individualized chemotherapy regimen for recurrent ovarian cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2003; 14: 341–6PubMedCrossRef Breidenbach M, Rein DT, Schondorf T, et al. Hematological side-effect profiles of individualized chemotherapy regimen for recurrent ovarian cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2003; 14: 341–6PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Saltz L, Sirott M, Young C, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacology study of topotecan given daily for 5 consecutive days to patients with advanced solid tumors, with attempt at dose intensification using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1499–507PubMedCrossRef Saltz L, Sirott M, Young C, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacology study of topotecan given daily for 5 consecutive days to patients with advanced solid tumors, with attempt at dose intensification using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1499–507PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Sartorius SE, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1224–35PubMed Rowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Sartorius SE, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1224–35PubMed
26.
go back to reference von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Pujol JL, et al. Phase II comparator study of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with chemosensitive small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1743–9 von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Pujol JL, et al. Phase II comparator study of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with chemosensitive small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1743–9
27.
go back to reference Creemers GJ, Gerrits CJ, Eckardt JR, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral topotecan administered twice daily for 21 days to adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1087–93PubMed Creemers GJ, Gerrits CJ, Eckardt JR, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral topotecan administered twice daily for 21 days to adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1087–93PubMed
28.
go back to reference Gore M, Oza A, Rustin G, et al. A randomised trial of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 57–63PubMedCrossRef Gore M, Oza A, Rustin G, et al. A randomised trial of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 57–63PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Saigi E, Salut A, Campos JM, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every 2 weeks as treatment for patients with colorectal cancer resistant to previous treatment with 5-fluorouracil-based therapies: comparison of two different dose schedules (250 and 200 mg/m2) according to toxicity prognostic factors. Anticancer Drugs 2004; 15: 835–41PubMedCrossRef Saigi E, Salut A, Campos JM, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every 2 weeks as treatment for patients with colorectal cancer resistant to previous treatment with 5-fluorouracil-based therapies: comparison of two different dose schedules (250 and 200 mg/m2) according to toxicity prognostic factors. Anticancer Drugs 2004; 15: 835–41PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hofheinz R, Hartung G, Samel S, et al. Adding weekly irinotecan to high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (HD-5-FU/FA) after failure for first-line HD-5-FU/FA in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13: 999–1004PubMedCrossRef Hofheinz R, Hartung G, Samel S, et al. Adding weekly irinotecan to high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (HD-5-FU/FA) after failure for first-line HD-5-FU/FA in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13: 999–1004PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sanghani SP, Quinney SK, Fredenburg TB, et al. Hydrolysis of irinotecan and its oxidative metabolites, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxycamptothecin and 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-amino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin, by human carboxylesterases CES1A1, CES2, and a newly expressed carboxylesterase isoenzyme, CES3. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32: 505–11PubMedCrossRef Sanghani SP, Quinney SK, Fredenburg TB, et al. Hydrolysis of irinotecan and its oxidative metabolites, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxycamptothecin and 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-amino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin, by human carboxylesterases CES1A1, CES2, and a newly expressed carboxylesterase isoenzyme, CES3. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32: 505–11PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Cersosimo RJ. Irinotecan: a new antineoplastic agent for the management of colorectal cancer. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32: 1324–33PubMedCrossRef Cersosimo RJ. Irinotecan: a new antineoplastic agent for the management of colorectal cancer. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32: 1324–33PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Carlini LE, Meropol NJ, Bever J, et al. UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms predict response and toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine/irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 1226–36PubMed Carlini LE, Meropol NJ, Bever J, et al. UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms predict response and toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine/irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 1226–36PubMed
34.
go back to reference Iyer L, King CD, Whitington PF, et al. Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11): role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 847–54PubMedCrossRef Iyer L, King CD, Whitington PF, et al. Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11): role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 847–54PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kraemer D, Scheurlen M. Gilbert disease and type I and II Crigler-Najjar syndrome due to mutations in the same UGT1A1 gene locus [in German]. Med Klin (Munich) 2002; 97: 528–32CrossRef Kraemer D, Scheurlen M. Gilbert disease and type I and II Crigler-Najjar syndrome due to mutations in the same UGT1A1 gene locus [in German]. Med Klin (Munich) 2002; 97: 528–32CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Innocenti F, Undevia SD, Iyer L, et al. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is a predictor of neutropenia in irinotecan chemotherapy [abstract 495]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 124 Innocenti F, Undevia SD, Iyer L, et al. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is a predictor of neutropenia in irinotecan chemotherapy [abstract 495]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 124
37.
go back to reference Ando Y, Saka H, Asai G, et al. UGT1A1 genotypes and glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 845–7PubMedCrossRef Ando Y, Saka H, Asai G, et al. UGT1A1 genotypes and glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 845–7PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Innocenti F, Iyer L, Ratain MJ. Pharmacogenetics of anticancer agents: lessons from amonafide and irinotecan. Drug Metab Dispos 2001; 29: 596–600PubMed Innocenti F, Iyer L, Ratain MJ. Pharmacogenetics of anticancer agents: lessons from amonafide and irinotecan. Drug Metab Dispos 2001; 29: 596–600PubMed
39.
go back to reference Crews KR, Stewart CF, Jones-Wallace D, et al. Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 2202–9PubMed Crews KR, Stewart CF, Jones-Wallace D, et al. Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 2202–9PubMed
40.
go back to reference Murry DJ, Cherrick I, Salama V, et al. Influence of phenytoin on the disposition of irinotecan: a case report. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002; 24: 130–3PubMedCrossRef Murry DJ, Cherrick I, Salama V, et al. Influence of phenytoin on the disposition of irinotecan: a case report. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002; 24: 130–3PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Sanghani SP, Quinney SK, Fredenburg TB, et al. Hydrolysis of irinotecan and its oxidative metabolites, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-carbonyloxycamptothecin, by human carboxylesterases CES1A1, CES2, and a newly expressed carboxylesterase isoenzyme, CES3. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32: 505–11PubMedCrossRef Sanghani SP, Quinney SK, Fredenburg TB, et al. Hydrolysis of irinotecan and its oxidative metabolites, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-carbonyloxycamptothecin, by human carboxylesterases CES1A1, CES2, and a newly expressed carboxylesterase isoenzyme, CES3. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32: 505–11PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Yamamoto W, Verweij J, de Bruijn P, et al. Active transepithelial transport of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolites by human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Anticancer Drugs 2001; 12: 419–32PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto W, Verweij J, de Bruijn P, et al. Active transepithelial transport of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolites by human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Anticancer Drugs 2001; 12: 419–32PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Chester JD, Joel SP, Cheeseman SL, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan plus oral ciclosporin in patients with fuorouracil-refractory metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1125–32PubMedCrossRef Chester JD, Joel SP, Cheeseman SL, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan plus oral ciclosporin in patients with fuorouracil-refractory metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1125–32PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Takasuna K, Hagiwara T, Hirohashi M, et al. Inhibition of intestinal microflora beta-glucuronidase modifies the distribution of the active metabolite of the antitumor agent, irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 42: 280–6PubMedCrossRef Takasuna K, Hagiwara T, Hirohashi M, et al. Inhibition of intestinal microflora beta-glucuronidase modifies the distribution of the active metabolite of the antitumor agent, irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 42: 280–6PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Abigerges D, Chabot CG, Armand J-P, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic studies of the camptothecin analog irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 210–21PubMed Abigerges D, Chabot CG, Armand J-P, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic studies of the camptothecin analog irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 210–21PubMed
46.
go back to reference Alimonti A, Satta F, Pavese I, et al. Prevention of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-induced diarrhoea by oral administration of neomycin plus bacitracin in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 805–6PubMedCrossRef Alimonti A, Satta F, Pavese I, et al. Prevention of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-induced diarrhoea by oral administration of neomycin plus bacitracin in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 805–6PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Lokiec F, Canal P, Gay C, et al. Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in human blood, bile, and urine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 36: 79–82PubMedCrossRef Lokiec F, Canal P, Gay C, et al. Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in human blood, bile, and urine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 36: 79–82PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ratain MJ. Insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 3393–4PubMed Ratain MJ. Insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 3393–4PubMed
49.
go back to reference Santos A, Zanetta S, Cresteil T, et al. Metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11) by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in humans. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 2012–20PubMed Santos A, Zanetta S, Cresteil T, et al. Metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11) by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in humans. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 2012–20PubMed
50.
go back to reference Mathijssen RH, Verweij J, de Bruijn P, et al. Effects of St. John’s wort on irinotecan metabolism. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1247–9PubMedCrossRef Mathijssen RH, Verweij J, de Bruijn P, et al. Effects of St. John’s wort on irinotecan metabolism. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1247–9PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Sai K, Kaniwa N, Ozawa S, et al. A new metabolite of irinotecan in which formation is mediated by human hepatic cytochrome P-450 3A4. Drug Metab Dispos 2001; 29: 1505–13PubMed Sai K, Kaniwa N, Ozawa S, et al. A new metabolite of irinotecan in which formation is mediated by human hepatic cytochrome P-450 3A4. Drug Metab Dispos 2001; 29: 1505–13PubMed
52.
go back to reference Slatter JG, Schaaf LJ, Sams JP, et al. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of irinotecan (CPT-11) following I.V. infusion of [(14)C]CPT-11 in cancer patients. Drug Metab Dispos 2000; 28: 423–33PubMed Slatter JG, Schaaf LJ, Sams JP, et al. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of irinotecan (CPT-11) following I.V. infusion of [(14)C]CPT-11 in cancer patients. Drug Metab Dispos 2000; 28: 423–33PubMed
53.
go back to reference Sparreboom A, de Jonge MJ, de Bruijn P, et al. Irinotecan (CPT-11) metabolism and disposition in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4: 2747–54PubMed Sparreboom A, de Jonge MJ, de Bruijn P, et al. Irinotecan (CPT-11) metabolism and disposition in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4: 2747–54PubMed
54.
go back to reference Van Groeningen CJ, van der Vijgh WJ, Baars JJ, et al. Altered pharmacokinetics and metabolism of CPT-11 in liver dysfunction: a need for guidelines. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 1342–6PubMed Van Groeningen CJ, van der Vijgh WJ, Baars JJ, et al. Altered pharmacokinetics and metabolism of CPT-11 in liver dysfunction: a need for guidelines. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 1342–6PubMed
55.
go back to reference Venook AP, Enders KC, Fleming G, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction or with prior pelvic radiation: CALGB 9863. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 1783–90PubMedCrossRef Venook AP, Enders KC, Fleming G, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction or with prior pelvic radiation: CALGB 9863. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 1783–90PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Ong SY, Clarke SJ, Bishop J, et al. Toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) and hepato-renal dysfunction. Anticancer Drugs 2001; 12: 619–25PubMedCrossRef Ong SY, Clarke SJ, Bishop J, et al. Toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) and hepato-renal dysfunction. Anticancer Drugs 2001; 12: 619–25PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Raymond E, Boige V, Faivre S, et al. Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4303–12PubMedCrossRef Raymond E, Boige V, Faivre S, et al. Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4303–12PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Gandia D, Abigerges D, Armand JP, et al. CPT-11-induced cholinergic effects in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 196–7PubMed Gandia D, Abigerges D, Armand JP, et al. CPT-11-induced cholinergic effects in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 196–7PubMed
59.
go back to reference Saliba F, Hagipantelli R, Misset JL, et al. Pathophysiology and therapy of irinotecan-induced delayed-onset diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective assessment. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2745–51PubMed Saliba F, Hagipantelli R, Misset JL, et al. Pathophysiology and therapy of irinotecan-induced delayed-onset diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective assessment. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2745–51PubMed
60.
go back to reference Dodds HM, Bishop JF, Rivory LP. More about: irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome induced by coadministration of oxaliplatin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 91–2PubMedCrossRef Dodds HM, Bishop JF, Rivory LP. More about: irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome induced by coadministration of oxaliplatin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 91–2PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Wasserman E, Cuvier C, Lokiec F, et al. Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1751–9PubMed Wasserman E, Cuvier C, Lokiec F, et al. Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1751–9PubMed
62.
go back to reference Xu Y, Villalona-Calero MA. Irinotecan: mechanisms of tumor resistance and novel strategies for modulating its activity. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 1841–51PubMedCrossRef Xu Y, Villalona-Calero MA. Irinotecan: mechanisms of tumor resistance and novel strategies for modulating its activity. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 1841–51PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Castellanos C, Aldaz A, Zufia L, et al. Biliary index accurately predict the severity of irinotecan (CPT-11) induced delayed diarrhea in colo-rectal cancer patients [abstract 648]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 162 Castellanos C, Aldaz A, Zufia L, et al. Biliary index accurately predict the severity of irinotecan (CPT-11) induced delayed diarrhea in colo-rectal cancer patients [abstract 648]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 162
64.
go back to reference Fittkau M, Voigt W, Holzhausen HJ, et al. Saccharic acid 1.4-lactone protects against CPT-11-induced mucosa damage in rats. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004; 130: 388–94PubMedCrossRef Fittkau M, Voigt W, Holzhausen HJ, et al. Saccharic acid 1.4-lactone protects against CPT-11-induced mucosa damage in rats. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004; 130: 388–94PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Kehrer DF, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, et al. Modulation of irinotecan-induced diarrhea by cotreatment with neomycin in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 1136–41PubMed Kehrer DF, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, et al. Modulation of irinotecan-induced diarrhea by cotreatment with neomycin in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 1136–41PubMed
66.
go back to reference Hennebelle I, Terret C, Chatelut E, et al. Characterization of CPT-11 converting carboxylesterase activity in colon tumor and normal tissues: comparison with p-nitro-phenylacetate converting carboxylesterase activity. Anticancer Drugs 2000; 11: 465–70PubMedCrossRef Hennebelle I, Terret C, Chatelut E, et al. Characterization of CPT-11 converting carboxylesterase activity in colon tumor and normal tissues: comparison with p-nitro-phenylacetate converting carboxylesterase activity. Anticancer Drugs 2000; 11: 465–70PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Takeda Y, Kobayashi K, Akiyama Y, et al. Prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation in cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2001; 92: 269–75PubMedCrossRef Takeda Y, Kobayashi K, Akiyama Y, et al. Prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation in cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2001; 92: 269–75PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Ikegami T, Ha L, Arimori K, et al. Intestinal alkalization as a possible preventive mechanism in irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 179–87PubMed Ikegami T, Ha L, Arimori K, et al. Intestinal alkalization as a possible preventive mechanism in irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 179–87PubMed
69.
go back to reference Prado D. A multinational comparison of racecadotril and loperamide in the treatment of acute watery diarrhoea in adults. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37(6): 656–62PubMedCrossRef Prado D. A multinational comparison of racecadotril and loperamide in the treatment of acute watery diarrhoea in adults. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37(6): 656–62PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Ukropec J, Pro B, Lozano R, et al. Refractory CPT-11 induced diarrhea in cancer patients: resolution with octreotide, four case studies [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21: 2904 Ukropec J, Pro B, Lozano R, et al. Refractory CPT-11 induced diarrhea in cancer patients: resolution with octreotide, four case studies [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21: 2904
71.
go back to reference Benson AB, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, et al. Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2918–26PubMedCrossRef Benson AB, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, et al. Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2918–26PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Barbounis V, Koumakis G, Vassilomanolakis M, et al. Control of irinotecan-induced diarrhea by octreotide after loperamide failure. Support Care Cancer 2001; 9: 258–60PubMedCrossRef Barbounis V, Koumakis G, Vassilomanolakis M, et al. Control of irinotecan-induced diarrhea by octreotide after loperamide failure. Support Care Cancer 2001; 9: 258–60PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Schwab M, Klotz U. Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40: 723–51PubMedCrossRef Schwab M, Klotz U. Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40: 723–51PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Lenfers BH, Loeffler TM, Droege CM, et al. Substantial activity of budesonide in patients with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil induced diarrhea and failure of loperamide treatment. Ann Oncol 1999; 10(10): 1251–3PubMedCrossRef Lenfers BH, Loeffler TM, Droege CM, et al. Substantial activity of budesonide in patients with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil induced diarrhea and failure of loperamide treatment. Ann Oncol 1999; 10(10): 1251–3PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Karthaus M, Ballo H, Steinmetz T, et al. Budesonide for prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized phase-III-study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) [abstract 2935]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 730 Karthaus M, Ballo H, Steinmetz T, et al. Budesonide for prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized phase-III-study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) [abstract 2935]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 730
76.
go back to reference Sharma R, Tobin P. Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, and diarrhoea. Lancet Oncol 2005; 9: 93–102CrossRef Sharma R, Tobin P. Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, and diarrhoea. Lancet Oncol 2005; 9: 93–102CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Michael M, Brittain M, Nagai J, et al. Phase II study of activated charcoal to prevent irinotecan-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4410–7PubMedCrossRef Michael M, Brittain M, Nagai J, et al. Phase II study of activated charcoal to prevent irinotecan-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4410–7PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Mansky PJ, Straus SE. St John’s Wort: more implications for cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1187–8PubMedCrossRef Mansky PJ, Straus SE. St John’s Wort: more implications for cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1187–8PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Dumez H, et al. Altered irinotecan metabolism in a patient receiving phenytoin. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13: 139–40PubMedCrossRef Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Dumez H, et al. Altered irinotecan metabolism in a patient receiving phenytoin. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13: 139–40PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Kehrer DF, Mathijssen RH, Verweij J, et al. Modulation of irinotecan metabolism by ketoconazole. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3122–9PubMedCrossRef Kehrer DF, Mathijssen RH, Verweij J, et al. Modulation of irinotecan metabolism by ketoconazole. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3122–9PubMedCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Minami H, Fujii H, Igarashi T, et al. Phase I and pharmacological study of a new camptothecin derivative, exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f), infused over 30 minutes every three weeks. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 3056–64PubMed Minami H, Fujii H, Igarashi T, et al. Phase I and pharmacological study of a new camptothecin derivative, exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f), infused over 30 minutes every three weeks. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 3056–64PubMed
82.
go back to reference Mitsui I, Kumazawa E, Hirota Y, et al. A new water-soluble camptothecin derivative, DX-8951f, exhibits potent antitumor activity against human tumors in vitro and in vivo. Jpn J Cancer Res 1995; 86: 776–82PubMedCrossRef Mitsui I, Kumazawa E, Hirota Y, et al. A new water-soluble camptothecin derivative, DX-8951f, exhibits potent antitumor activity against human tumors in vitro and in vivo. Jpn J Cancer Res 1995; 86: 776–82PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Kajimura T. DX-8951f: single intravenous dose toxicity study in dogs. In house study report (8951 J-TOXO 19). Tokyo, Japan: Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd; 1996 Kajimura T. DX-8951f: single intravenous dose toxicity study in dogs. In house study report (8951 J-TOXO 19). Tokyo, Japan: Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd; 1996
84.
go back to reference Braybrooke JP, Boven E, Bates NP, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f), using a weekly 30-minute intravenous infusion, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 913–21PubMedCrossRef Braybrooke JP, Boven E, Bates NP, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f), using a weekly 30-minute intravenous infusion, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 913–21PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Johnson TR, Geyer CE, et al. DX-8951f, a hexacyclic camptothecin analog, on a daily-times-five schedule: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3151–63PubMed Rowinsky EK, Johnson TR, Geyer CE, et al. DX-8951f, a hexacyclic camptothecin analog, on a daily-times-five schedule: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3151–63PubMed
86.
go back to reference Jung LL, Ramanathan RK, Egorin MJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic studies of 9-nitrocamptothecin on intermittent and continuous schedules of administration in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2004; 54: 487–96PubMedCrossRef Jung LL, Ramanathan RK, Egorin MJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic studies of 9-nitrocamptothecin on intermittent and continuous schedules of administration in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2004; 54: 487–96PubMedCrossRef
87.
go back to reference Bailly C. Homocamptothecins: potent topoisomerase I inhibitors and promising anticancer drugs. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 45: 91–108PubMedCrossRef Bailly C. Homocamptothecins: potent topoisomerase I inhibitors and promising anticancer drugs. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 45: 91–108PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference de Jonge MJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of encapsulated oral 9-aminocamptothecin in plasma and saliva. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 65: 491–9PubMedCrossRef de Jonge MJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of encapsulated oral 9-aminocamptothecin in plasma and saliva. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 65: 491–9PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Ellerhorst JA, Bedikian AY, Smith TM, et al. Phase II trial of 9-nitrocamptothecin (RFS 2000) for patients with metastatic cutaneous or uveal melanoma. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13: 169–72PubMedCrossRef Ellerhorst JA, Bedikian AY, Smith TM, et al. Phase II trial of 9-nitrocamptothecin (RFS 2000) for patients with metastatic cutaneous or uveal melanoma. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13: 169–72PubMedCrossRef
90.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Rizzo J, Ochoa L, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pegylated camptothecin as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 148–57PubMedCrossRef Rowinsky EK, Rizzo J, Ochoa L, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pegylated camptothecin as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 148–57PubMedCrossRef
91.
go back to reference Saetern AM, Brandl M, Bakkelund WH, et al. Cytotoxic effect of different camptothecin formulations on human colon carcinoma in vitro. Anticancer Drugs 2004; 15: 899–906PubMedCrossRef Saetern AM, Brandl M, Bakkelund WH, et al. Cytotoxic effect of different camptothecin formulations on human colon carcinoma in vitro. Anticancer Drugs 2004; 15: 899–906PubMedCrossRef
92.
go back to reference Henwood JM, Brogden RN. Etoposide: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs 1990; 39: 438–90PubMedCrossRef Henwood JM, Brogden RN. Etoposide: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs 1990; 39: 438–90PubMedCrossRef
93.
go back to reference Hande KR. Etoposide: four decades of development of a topoisomerase II inhibitor. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1514–21PubMedCrossRef Hande KR. Etoposide: four decades of development of a topoisomerase II inhibitor. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1514–21PubMedCrossRef
94.
go back to reference Hande KR. Topoisomerase II inhibitors. In: Giaccone G, Schilsky RL, Sondel P, editors. Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003: 103–25CrossRef Hande KR. Topoisomerase II inhibitors. In: Giaccone G, Schilsky RL, Sondel P, editors. Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003: 103–25CrossRef
95.
go back to reference Lipp H-P. Prevention and management of anticancer drug toxicity: the significance of clinical pharmacokinetics [thesis]. Jena: University of Jena, 1995 Lipp H-P. Prevention and management of anticancer drug toxicity: the significance of clinical pharmacokinetics [thesis]. Jena: University of Jena, 1995
96.
go back to reference Hussain M, Vaishampayan U, Heilbrun LK, et al. A phase II study of rebeccamycin analog (NSC-655649) in metastatic renal cell cancer. Invest New Drugs 2003; 21: 465–71PubMedCrossRef Hussain M, Vaishampayan U, Heilbrun LK, et al. A phase II study of rebeccamycin analog (NSC-655649) in metastatic renal cell cancer. Invest New Drugs 2003; 21: 465–71PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Fortune JM, Osheroff N. Topoisomerase II as a target for anticancer drugs: when enzymes stop being nice. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 2000; 64: 221–53PubMedCrossRef Fortune JM, Osheroff N. Topoisomerase II as a target for anticancer drugs: when enzymes stop being nice. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 2000; 64: 221–53PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Clark PI, Slevin ML. The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide. Clin Pharmacokinet 1987; 12: 223–52PubMedCrossRef Clark PI, Slevin ML. The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide. Clin Pharmacokinet 1987; 12: 223–52PubMedCrossRef
99.
go back to reference Long BH. Mechanisms of action of teniposide (VM-26) and comparison with etoposide (VP-16). Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 3–19PubMed Long BH. Mechanisms of action of teniposide (VM-26) and comparison with etoposide (VP-16). Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 3–19PubMed
100.
go back to reference Budman DR, Igwemezie LN, Kaul S, et al. Phase I evaluation of a water-soluble etoposide prodrug, etoposide phosphate, given as a 5-minute infusion on days 1, 3, and 5 in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1902–9PubMed Budman DR, Igwemezie LN, Kaul S, et al. Phase I evaluation of a water-soluble etoposide prodrug, etoposide phosphate, given as a 5-minute infusion on days 1, 3, and 5 in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1902–9PubMed
101.
go back to reference Reif S, Kingreen D, Kloft C, et al. Bioequivalence investigation of high-dose etoposide and etoposide phosphate in lymphoma patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001; 48: 134–40PubMedCrossRef Reif S, Kingreen D, Kloft C, et al. Bioequivalence investigation of high-dose etoposide and etoposide phosphate in lymphoma patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001; 48: 134–40PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Schacter LP, Igwemezie LN, Seyedsadr M, et al. Clinical and pharmacokinetic overview of parenteral etoposide phosphate. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994; 34Suppl.: S58–63PubMedCrossRef Schacter LP, Igwemezie LN, Seyedsadr M, et al. Clinical and pharmacokinetic overview of parenteral etoposide phosphate. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994; 34Suppl.: S58–63PubMedCrossRef
103.
go back to reference Kaul S, Igwemezie LN, Stewart DJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of etoposide following intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate and etoposide in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2835–41PubMed Kaul S, Igwemezie LN, Stewart DJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of etoposide following intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate and etoposide in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2835–41PubMed
104.
go back to reference Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, et al. The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1986; 16: 178–81PubMedCrossRef Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, et al. The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1986; 16: 178–81PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference Hande KR, Krozely MG, Greco FA, et al. Bioavailability of low-dose oral etoposide. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 374–7PubMed Hande KR, Krozely MG, Greco FA, et al. Bioavailability of low-dose oral etoposide. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 374–7PubMed
106.
go back to reference Aita P, Robieux I, Sorio R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999; 43: 287–94PubMedCrossRef Aita P, Robieux I, Sorio R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999; 43: 287–94PubMedCrossRef
107.
go back to reference Millward MJ, Newell DR, Yuen K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 37: 161–7PubMedCrossRef Millward MJ, Newell DR, Yuen K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 37: 161–7PubMedCrossRef
108.
go back to reference Chabot GG, Armand JP, Terret C, et al. Etoposide bioavailability after oral administration of the prodrug etoposide phosphate in cancer patients during a phase I study. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2020–30PubMed Chabot GG, Armand JP, Terret C, et al. Etoposide bioavailability after oral administration of the prodrug etoposide phosphate in cancer patients during a phase I study. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2020–30PubMed
109.
go back to reference De Jong RS, Slijfer EAM, Uges DRA, et al. Conversion of the prodrug etoposide phosphate to etoposide in gastric juice and bile. Br J Cancer 1997; 76: 1480–3PubMedCrossRef De Jong RS, Slijfer EAM, Uges DRA, et al. Conversion of the prodrug etoposide phosphate to etoposide in gastric juice and bile. Br J Cancer 1997; 76: 1480–3PubMedCrossRef
110.
go back to reference Edick MJ, Gajjar A, Mahmoud HH, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide in children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1340–6PubMedCrossRef Edick MJ, Gajjar A, Mahmoud HH, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide in children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1340–6PubMedCrossRef
111.
go back to reference Toffoli G, Corona G, Basso B, et al. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43: 441–66PubMedCrossRef Toffoli G, Corona G, Basso B, et al. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43: 441–66PubMedCrossRef
112.
go back to reference Joel SP, Shah R, Slevin ML. Etoposide dosage and pharmacodynamics. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994; 34Suppl.: S69–75PubMedCrossRef Joel SP, Shah R, Slevin ML. Etoposide dosage and pharmacodynamics. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994; 34Suppl.: S69–75PubMedCrossRef
113.
114.
go back to reference Liu B, Earl HM, Poole CJ, et al. Etoposide protein binding in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 36: 506–12PubMedCrossRef Liu B, Earl HM, Poole CJ, et al. Etoposide protein binding in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 36: 506–12PubMedCrossRef
115.
go back to reference Nguyen L, Chatelut E, Chevreau C, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 41: 125–32PubMedCrossRef Nguyen L, Chatelut E, Chevreau C, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 41: 125–32PubMedCrossRef
116.
go back to reference D’Incalci M, Rossi C, Zucchetti M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in patients with abnormal renal and hepatic function. Cancer Res 1986; 46: 2566–71PubMed D’Incalci M, Rossi C, Zucchetti M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in patients with abnormal renal and hepatic function. Cancer Res 1986; 46: 2566–71PubMed
117.
go back to reference Stewart CF, Arbuck SG, Fleming RA, et al. Changes in the clearance of total and unbound etoposide in patients with liver dysfunction. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 1874–9PubMed Stewart CF, Arbuck SG, Fleming RA, et al. Changes in the clearance of total and unbound etoposide in patients with liver dysfunction. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 1874–9PubMed
118.
go back to reference Schwinghammer TL, Fleming RA, Rosenfeld CS, et al. Disposition of total and unbound etoposide following high-dose therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1993; 32: 273–8PubMedCrossRef Schwinghammer TL, Fleming RA, Rosenfeld CS, et al. Disposition of total and unbound etoposide following high-dose therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1993; 32: 273–8PubMedCrossRef
119.
go back to reference Mross K, Bewermeier P, Kruger W, et al. Pharmacokinetics of undiluted or diluted high-dose etoposide with or without busulfan administered to patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1468–74PubMed Mross K, Bewermeier P, Kruger W, et al. Pharmacokinetics of undiluted or diluted high-dose etoposide with or without busulfan administered to patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1468–74PubMed
120.
go back to reference Kreis W, Budman DR, Vinciguerra V, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of high-dose etoposide phosphate after a 2-hour infusion in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996; 38: 378–84PubMedCrossRef Kreis W, Budman DR, Vinciguerra V, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of high-dose etoposide phosphate after a 2-hour infusion in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996; 38: 378–84PubMedCrossRef
121.
go back to reference Zhuo X, Zheng N, Felix CA, et al. Kinetics and regulation of cytochrome P450-mediated etoposide metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32: 993–1000PubMed Zhuo X, Zheng N, Felix CA, et al. Kinetics and regulation of cytochrome P450-mediated etoposide metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32: 993–1000PubMed
122.
go back to reference Relling MV, Nemec J, Schuetz EG, et al. O-demethylation of epipodophyllotoxins is catalyzed by human cytochrome P450 3A4. Mol Pharmacol 1994; 45: 352–8PubMed Relling MV, Nemec J, Schuetz EG, et al. O-demethylation of epipodophyllotoxins is catalyzed by human cytochrome P450 3A4. Mol Pharmacol 1994; 45: 352–8PubMed
123.
go back to reference Hainsworth JD, Greco FA. Etoposide: twenty years later. Ann Oncol 1995; 6: 325–41PubMed Hainsworth JD, Greco FA. Etoposide: twenty years later. Ann Oncol 1995; 6: 325–41PubMed
124.
go back to reference Hande KR, Wolff SN, Greco FA, et al. Etoposide kinetics in patients with obstructive jaundice. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 1101–7PubMed Hande KR, Wolff SN, Greco FA, et al. Etoposide kinetics in patients with obstructive jaundice. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 1101–7PubMed
125.
go back to reference Holthuis JJ, Van de Vyver FL, van Oort WJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of increasing dosages of etoposide in a chronic hemodialysis patient. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 1279–82PubMed Holthuis JJ, Van de Vyver FL, van Oort WJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of increasing dosages of etoposide in a chronic hemodialysis patient. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 1279–82PubMed
126.
go back to reference Kiya K, Uozumi T, Ogasawara H, et al. Penetration of etoposide into human malignant brain tumors after intravenous and oral administration. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 29: 339–42PubMedCrossRef Kiya K, Uozumi T, Ogasawara H, et al. Penetration of etoposide into human malignant brain tumors after intravenous and oral administration. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 29: 339–42PubMedCrossRef
127.
go back to reference van der GA, Sonneveld P, Mans DR, et al. Intrathecal administration of etoposide in the treatment of malignant meningitis: feasibility and pharmacokinetic data. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 29: 335–7CrossRef van der GA, Sonneveld P, Mans DR, et al. Intrathecal administration of etoposide in the treatment of malignant meningitis: feasibility and pharmacokinetic data. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 29: 335–7CrossRef
128.
go back to reference Hande K, Messenger M, Wagner J, et al. Inter- and intrapatient variability in etoposide kinetics with oral and intravenous drug administration. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 2742–7PubMed Hande K, Messenger M, Wagner J, et al. Inter- and intrapatient variability in etoposide kinetics with oral and intravenous drug administration. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 2742–7PubMed
129.
go back to reference Minami H, Ratain MJ, Ando Y, et al. Pharmacodynamic modeling of prolonged administration of etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996; 39: 61–6PubMedCrossRef Minami H, Ratain MJ, Ando Y, et al. Pharmacodynamic modeling of prolonged administration of etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996; 39: 61–6PubMedCrossRef
130.
go back to reference Brooks DJ, Srinivas NR, Alberts DS, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of etoposide phosphate. Anticancer Drugs 1995; 6: 637–44PubMedCrossRef Brooks DJ, Srinivas NR, Alberts DS, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of etoposide phosphate. Anticancer Drugs 1995; 6: 637–44PubMedCrossRef
131.
go back to reference Issell BF. The podophyllotoxin derivatives VP16-213 and VM26. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1982; 7(2-3): 73–80PubMed Issell BF. The podophyllotoxin derivatives VP16-213 and VM26. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1982; 7(2-3): 73–80PubMed
132.
go back to reference Weiss RB. Hypersensitivity reactions. Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 458–77PubMed Weiss RB. Hypersensitivity reactions. Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 458–77PubMed
133.
go back to reference Alley E, Green R, Schuchter L. Cutaneous toxicities of cancer therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2002; 14: 212–6PubMedCrossRef Alley E, Green R, Schuchter L. Cutaneous toxicities of cancer therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2002; 14: 212–6PubMedCrossRef
134.
go back to reference Hudson MM, Weinstein HJ, Donaldson SS, et al. Acute hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide in a VEPA regimen for Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1080–4PubMed Hudson MM, Weinstein HJ, Donaldson SS, et al. Acute hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide in a VEPA regimen for Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1080–4PubMed
135.
go back to reference Ogle KM, Kennedy BJ. Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol 1988; 11: 663–5PubMedCrossRef Ogle KM, Kennedy BJ. Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol 1988; 11: 663–5PubMedCrossRef
136.
go back to reference Jameson CH, Solanki DL. Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with etoposide therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 1983; 67: 1050–1PubMed Jameson CH, Solanki DL. Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with etoposide therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 1983; 67: 1050–1PubMed
137.
go back to reference Hoetelmans RM, Schornagel JH, Bokkel Huinink WW, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30: 367–71PubMed Hoetelmans RM, Schornagel JH, Bokkel Huinink WW, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30: 367–71PubMed
138.
go back to reference Nolte H, Carstensen H, Hertz H. VM-26 (teniposide)-induced hypersensitivity and degranulation of basophils in children. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1988; 10: 308–12PubMedCrossRef Nolte H, Carstensen H, Hertz H. VM-26 (teniposide)-induced hypersensitivity and degranulation of basophils in children. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1988; 10: 308–12PubMedCrossRef
139.
go back to reference Siderov J, Prasad P, De Boer R, et al. Safe administration of etoposide phosphate after hypersensitivity reaction to intravenous etoposide. Br J Cancer 2002; 86: 12–3PubMedCrossRef Siderov J, Prasad P, De Boer R, et al. Safe administration of etoposide phosphate after hypersensitivity reaction to intravenous etoposide. Br J Cancer 2002; 86: 12–3PubMedCrossRef
140.
go back to reference Bernstein BJ, Troner MB. Successful rechallenge with etoposide phosphate after an acute hypersensitivity reaction to etoposide. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19: 989–91PubMedCrossRef Bernstein BJ, Troner MB. Successful rechallenge with etoposide phosphate after an acute hypersensitivity reaction to etoposide. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19: 989–91PubMedCrossRef
141.
go back to reference Cersosimo RJ, Calarese P, Karp DD. Acute hypotensive reaction to etoposide with successful rechallenge: case report and review of the literature. DICP 1989; 23: 876–7PubMed Cersosimo RJ, Calarese P, Karp DD. Acute hypotensive reaction to etoposide with successful rechallenge: case report and review of the literature. DICP 1989; 23: 876–7PubMed
142.
go back to reference Wilson DB, Beck TM, Gundlach CA. Paclitaxel formulation as a cause of ethanol intoxication. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31: 873–5PubMed Wilson DB, Beck TM, Gundlach CA. Paclitaxel formulation as a cause of ethanol intoxication. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31: 873–5PubMed
143.
go back to reference Imrie KR, Couture F, Turner CC, et al. Peripheral neuropathy following high-dose etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 13: 77–9PubMed Imrie KR, Couture F, Turner CC, et al. Peripheral neuropathy following high-dose etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 13: 77–9PubMed
144.
go back to reference McLeod HL, Baker DK, Pui CH, et al. Somnolence, hypotension, and metabolic acidosis following high-dose teniposide treatment in children with leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1991; 29: 150–4PubMedCrossRef McLeod HL, Baker DK, Pui CH, et al. Somnolence, hypotension, and metabolic acidosis following high-dose teniposide treatment in children with leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1991; 29: 150–4PubMedCrossRef
145.
go back to reference Nakanomyo H, Hiraoka M, Shiraya M. Mutagenicity tests of etoposide and teniposide [in Japanese]. J Toxicol Sci 1986; 11Suppl. 1: 301–10PubMedCrossRef Nakanomyo H, Hiraoka M, Shiraya M. Mutagenicity tests of etoposide and teniposide [in Japanese]. J Toxicol Sci 1986; 11Suppl. 1: 301–10PubMedCrossRef
146.
go back to reference Anderson RD, Berger NA. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of topoisomerase-interactive agents. Mutat Res 1994; 309: 109–42PubMedCrossRef Anderson RD, Berger NA. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of topoisomerase-interactive agents. Mutat Res 1994; 309: 109–42PubMedCrossRef
147.
go back to reference Kollmannsberger C, Beyer J, Droz JP, et al. Secondary leukemia following high cumulative doses of etoposide in patients treated for advanced germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3386–91PubMed Kollmannsberger C, Beyer J, Droz JP, et al. Secondary leukemia following high cumulative doses of etoposide in patients treated for advanced germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3386–91PubMed
148.
go back to reference Duffner PK, Krischer JP, Horowitz ME, et al. Second malignancies in young children with primary brain tumors following treatment with prolonged postoperative chemotherapy and delayed irradiation: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Ann Neurol 1998; 44: 313–6PubMedCrossRef Duffner PK, Krischer JP, Horowitz ME, et al. Second malignancies in young children with primary brain tumors following treatment with prolonged postoperative chemotherapy and delayed irradiation: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Ann Neurol 1998; 44: 313–6PubMedCrossRef
149.
go back to reference Horibe K, Matsushita T, Numata S, et al. Acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17) abnormality after chemotherapy containing etoposide for Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Cancer 1993; 72: 3723–6PubMedCrossRef Horibe K, Matsushita T, Numata S, et al. Acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17) abnormality after chemotherapy containing etoposide for Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Cancer 1993; 72: 3723–6PubMedCrossRef
150.
go back to reference Relling MV, Yanishevski Y, Nemec J, et al. Etoposide and antimetabolite pharmacology in patients who develop secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 1998; 12: 346–52PubMedCrossRef Relling MV, Yanishevski Y, Nemec J, et al. Etoposide and antimetabolite pharmacology in patients who develop secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 1998; 12: 346–52PubMedCrossRef
151.
go back to reference Zulian GB, Selby P, Milan S, et al. High dose melphalan, BCNU and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation for Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 631–5PubMedCrossRef Zulian GB, Selby P, Milan S, et al. High dose melphalan, BCNU and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation for Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 631–5PubMedCrossRef
152.
go back to reference Stine KC, Saylors RL, Sawyer JR, et al. Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia following safe exposure to etoposide. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1583–6PubMed Stine KC, Saylors RL, Sawyer JR, et al. Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia following safe exposure to etoposide. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1583–6PubMed
153.
go back to reference Houck W, Einhorn LH. Secondary leukemias in germ cell tumor patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant utilizing high dose etoposide [abstract 1566]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 390CrossRef Houck W, Einhorn LH. Secondary leukemias in germ cell tumor patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant utilizing high dose etoposide [abstract 1566]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 390CrossRef
154.
go back to reference Ratain MJ, Kaminer LS, Bitran JD, et al. Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia following etoposide and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Blood 1987; 70: 1412–7PubMed Ratain MJ, Kaminer LS, Bitran JD, et al. Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia following etoposide and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Blood 1987; 70: 1412–7PubMed
155.
go back to reference Pui CH, Relling MV. Topoisomerase II inhibitor-related acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2000; 109: 13–23PubMedCrossRef Pui CH, Relling MV. Topoisomerase II inhibitor-related acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2000; 109: 13–23PubMedCrossRef
156.
go back to reference Pui CH, Ribeiro RC, Hancock ML, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in children treated with epipodophyllotoxins for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1682–7PubMedCrossRef Pui CH, Ribeiro RC, Hancock ML, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in children treated with epipodophyllotoxins for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1682–7PubMedCrossRef
157.
go back to reference Mistry AR, Felix CA, Whitmarsh RJ, et al. DNA topoisomerase II in therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1529–38PubMedCrossRef Mistry AR, Felix CA, Whitmarsh RJ, et al. DNA topoisomerase II in therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1529–38PubMedCrossRef
158.
go back to reference Le Deley MC, Leblanc T, Shamsaldin A, et al. Risk of secondary leukemia after a solid tumor in childhood according to the dose of epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines: a case-control study by the Societe Francaise d’Oncologie Pediatrique. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1074–81PubMedCrossRef Le Deley MC, Leblanc T, Shamsaldin A, et al. Risk of secondary leukemia after a solid tumor in childhood according to the dose of epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines: a case-control study by the Societe Francaise d’Oncologie Pediatrique. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1074–81PubMedCrossRef
159.
go back to reference Sandler ES, Friedman DJ, Mustafa MM, et al. Treatment of children with epipodophyllotoxin-induced secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 1997; 79: 1049–54PubMedCrossRef Sandler ES, Friedman DJ, Mustafa MM, et al. Treatment of children with epipodophyllotoxin-induced secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 1997; 79: 1049–54PubMedCrossRef
160.
go back to reference Rodman JH, Abromowitch M, Sinkule JA, et al. Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 1007–14PubMed Rodman JH, Abromowitch M, Sinkule JA, et al. Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 1007–14PubMed
161.
go back to reference Lum BL, Kaubisch S, Yahanda AM, et al. Alteration of etoposide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics by cyclosporine in a phase I trial to modulate multidrug resistance. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1635–42PubMed Lum BL, Kaubisch S, Yahanda AM, et al. Alteration of etoposide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics by cyclosporine in a phase I trial to modulate multidrug resistance. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1635–42PubMed
162.
go back to reference Baker DK, Relling MV, Pui CH, et al. Increased teniposide clearance with concomitant anticonvulsant therapy. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 311–5PubMed Baker DK, Relling MV, Pui CH, et al. Increased teniposide clearance with concomitant anticonvulsant therapy. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 311–5PubMed
163.
go back to reference Splinter TA, Holthuis JJ, Kok TC, et al. Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral teniposide. Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 28–34PubMed Splinter TA, Holthuis JJ, Kok TC, et al. Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral teniposide. Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 28–34PubMed
164.
go back to reference Bork E, Hansen M, Dombernowsky P, et al. Teniposide (VM-26), an overlooked highly active agent in small-cell lung cancer: results of a phase II trial in untreated patients. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 524–7PubMed Bork E, Hansen M, Dombernowsky P, et al. Teniposide (VM-26), an overlooked highly active agent in small-cell lung cancer: results of a phase II trial in untreated patients. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 524–7PubMed
165.
go back to reference Whitacre CM, Zborowska E, Gordon NH, et al. Topotecan increases topoisomerase IIalpha levels and sensitivity to treatment with etoposide in schedule-dependent process. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 1425–8PubMed Whitacre CM, Zborowska E, Gordon NH, et al. Topotecan increases topoisomerase IIalpha levels and sensitivity to treatment with etoposide in schedule-dependent process. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 1425–8PubMed
166.
go back to reference Bonner JA, Kozelsky TF. The significance of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996; 39: 109–12PubMedCrossRef Bonner JA, Kozelsky TF. The significance of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996; 39: 109–12PubMedCrossRef
167.
go back to reference Dowlati A, Levitan N, Gordon NH, et al. Phase II and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial of sequential topoisomerase I and II inhibition with topotecan and etoposide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001; 47: 141–8PubMedCrossRef Dowlati A, Levitan N, Gordon NH, et al. Phase II and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial of sequential topoisomerase I and II inhibition with topotecan and etoposide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001; 47: 141–8PubMedCrossRef
168.
go back to reference Hammond LA, Eckardt JR, Ganapathi R, et al. A phase I and translational study of sequential administration of the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors topotecan and etoposide. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4: 1459–67PubMed Hammond LA, Eckardt JR, Ganapathi R, et al. A phase I and translational study of sequential administration of the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors topotecan and etoposide. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4: 1459–67PubMed
169.
go back to reference van Gijn R, Bokkel Huinink WW, Rodenhuis S, et al. Topoisomerase I/II inhibitor intoplicine administered as a 24h infusion: phase I and pharmacologic study. Anticancer Drugs 1999; 10: 17–23PubMedCrossRef van Gijn R, Bokkel Huinink WW, Rodenhuis S, et al. Topoisomerase I/II inhibitor intoplicine administered as a 24h infusion: phase I and pharmacologic study. Anticancer Drugs 1999; 10: 17–23PubMedCrossRef
170.
go back to reference Etievant C, Kruczynski A, Barret JM, et al. F 11782, a dual inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II with an original mechanism of action in vitro, and markedly superior in vivo antitumour activity, relative to three other dual topoisomerase inhibitors, intoplicin, aclarubicin and TAS-103. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2000; 46: 101–13PubMedCrossRef Etievant C, Kruczynski A, Barret JM, et al. F 11782, a dual inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II with an original mechanism of action in vitro, and markedly superior in vivo antitumour activity, relative to three other dual topoisomerase inhibitors, intoplicin, aclarubicin and TAS-103. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2000; 46: 101–13PubMedCrossRef
171.
go back to reference Caponigro F, Dittrich C, Sorensen JB, et al. Phase II study of XR 5000, an inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II, in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 70–4PubMedCrossRef Caponigro F, Dittrich C, Sorensen JB, et al. Phase II study of XR 5000, an inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II, in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 70–4PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Camptothecin and Podophyllotoxin Derivatives
Inhibitors of Topoisomerase I and II — Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity Profile
Authors
Dr Jörg T Hartmann
Hans-Peter Lipp
Publication date
01-03-2006
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200629030-00005

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Drug Safety 3/2006 Go to the issue