Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 8/2004

01-07-2004 | Leading Article

CIOMS and ICH Initiatives in Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management

Overview and Implications

Authors: Dr Panos Tsintis, Edith La Mache

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 8/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

In this article we review the current initiatives by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) on pharmacovigilance planning that are due for general release during 2004. These initiatives could form the basis for applying concepts of risk management to medicines throughout their life cycle, from preclinical and clinical development to marketed use.
The CIOMS VI Working Group (with 28 senior scientists worldwide from drug regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies) is currently developing scientific guidance that relates to clinical trials for medicines during development. It recommends a developmental pharmacovigilance concept — a ‘living’ concept that would start early in drug development supporting the science and ethics of research leading up to licensing (marketing authorisation) and continuing to post-authorisation (postmarketing) pharmacovigilance.
This approach is seen as complementary to current ICH initiatives called ‘Pharmacovigilance Planning’. ICH will introduce two concepts in pharmacovigilance management of medicinal products: the ‘Pharmacovigilance Specification’ and the ‘Pharmacovigilance Plan’. The ‘Pharmacovigilance Specification’ will summarise important knowns and unknowns about the medicine. It will include safety risks identified at the licensing stage, potential risks and any key missing information. These elements will be essential to the formulation of pharmacovigilance plans.
Dialogue and common understanding between regulators and the pharmaceutical industry will be a key factor for developing pharmacovigilance plans during the life cycle of medicines. Appropriate interaction with health professionals and patients should also be planned for the future as regulatory systems become more transparent.
Where no significant issues are apparent at the licensing (marketing authorisation) stage, routine pharmacovigilance practices will be followed during the marketing phase. Where issues do exist or the data are limited, further study, including epidemiological approaches can be planned. All types of medicines (new drugs, biological agents, orphan drugs) may be involved in these concepts, as would major extensions to existing medicines.
Currently ongoing CIOMS and ICH initiatives are in line with emerging risk-management strategies in the US, the European Union and Japan aimed at early and proactive pharmacovigilance.
Footnotes
1
ICH topic E2E is currently in development at Step 2 of the ICH process.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burley DM. The rise and fall of thalidomide. Pharm Med 1988; 3: 231–7 Burley DM. The rise and fall of thalidomide. Pharm Med 1988; 3: 231–7
2.
go back to reference Fung M, Thornton A, Mybeck K, et al. Evaluation of the characteristics of safety withdrawal of prescription drugs from worldwide pharmaceutical markets: 1960 to 1999, Drug Inf J 2001; 35: 293–317CrossRef Fung M, Thornton A, Mybeck K, et al. Evaluation of the characteristics of safety withdrawal of prescription drugs from worldwide pharmaceutical markets: 1960 to 1999, Drug Inf J 2001; 35: 293–317CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Friedman MA, Woodcock J, Lumpkin MM, et al. The safety of newly approved medicines. do recent market removals mean there is a problem? JAMA 1999; 281: 1728–34PubMedCrossRef Friedman MA, Woodcock J, Lumpkin MM, et al. The safety of newly approved medicines. do recent market removals mean there is a problem? JAMA 1999; 281: 1728–34PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalised patients. JAMA 1998; 279: 1200–5PubMedCrossRef Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalised patients. JAMA 1998; 279: 1200–5PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Waller PC, Coulson RA, Wood SM. Regulatory Pharmacovigilance in the United Kingdom; Current Principles and Practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1996; 5: 363–75PubMedCrossRef Waller PC, Coulson RA, Wood SM. Regulatory Pharmacovigilance in the United Kingdom; Current Principles and Practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1996; 5: 363–75PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference The importance of pharmacovigilance. World Health Organisation, 2002 The importance of pharmacovigilance. World Health Organisation, 2002
7.
go back to reference Waller PC, Evans JW. A model for the future conduct of pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2003; 12: 17–29PubMedCrossRef Waller PC, Evans JW. A model for the future conduct of pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2003; 12: 17–29PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Establishing a European risk-management strategy [online]. Available from URL: http://www.heads.medagencies.org/heads/docs/summary.pdf [Accessed 2004 Apr 30] Establishing a European risk-management strategy [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​heads.​medagencies.​org/​heads/​docs/​summary.​pdf [Accessed 2004 Apr 30]
9.
go back to reference Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/riskManageI.htm http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/2004d-0188-gdl1001.doc [Accessed 2004 May 6] Available from URL: http://​www.​fda.​gov/​cder/​meeting/​riskManageI.​htm http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/2004d-0188-gdl1001.doc [Accessed 2004 May 6]
10.
go back to reference Available from URL: http://www.cioms.ch/frame_current_programme.htm [Accessed 2004 Apr 30] Available from URL: http://​www.​cioms.​ch/​frame_​current_​programme.​htm [Accessed 2004 Apr 30]
11.
go back to reference International Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: final report of CIOMS Working Group. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1990 International Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: final report of CIOMS Working Group. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1990
12.
go back to reference International Reporting of Periodic Drug-Safety Update Summaries: final report of CIOMS Working Group II. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1992 International Reporting of Periodic Drug-Safety Update Summaries: final report of CIOMS Working Group II. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1992
13.
go back to reference Guidelines for preparing core clinical-safety information on drugs. 2nd ed. Including new proposals for investigator’s brochures. Report of CIOMS Working Group III. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1999 Guidelines for preparing core clinical-safety information on drugs. 2nd ed. Including new proposals for investigator’s brochures. Report of CIOMS Working Group III. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1999
14.
go back to reference Benefit-risk balance for marketed drugs: evaluating safety signals. Report of CIOMS Working Group IV. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1998 Benefit-risk balance for marketed drugs: evaluating safety signals. Report of CIOMS Working Group IV. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1998
15.
go back to reference Current challenges in pharmacovigilance: pragmatic approaches report of CIOMS Working Group V. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 2001 Current challenges in pharmacovigilance: pragmatic approaches report of CIOMS Working Group V. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 2001
16.
go back to reference Available from URL: http://www.meddramsso.com [Accessed 2004 Apr 30] Available from URL: http://​www.​meddramsso.​com [Accessed 2004 Apr 30]
17.
go back to reference Access via Guidelines E [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ich.org/UrlGrpServer.jser@_TEMPLATE=245 [Accessed 2004 Apr 30] Access via Guidelines E [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​ich.​org/​UrlGrpServer.​jser@_TEMPLATE=245 [Accessed 2004 Apr 30]
18.
go back to reference Available from URL: http://eudraVigilance.emea.eu.int [Accessed 2004 Apr 30] Available from URL: http://​eudraVigilance.​emea.​eu.​int [Accessed 2004 Apr 30]
19.
go back to reference Smalley W, Shatin D, Wysowski DK, et al. Contraindicated use of cisapride. Impact of Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Action. JAMA 2000 Dec; 284(23): 3036–9PubMedCrossRef Smalley W, Shatin D, Wysowski DK, et al. Contraindicated use of cisapride. Impact of Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Action. JAMA 2000 Dec; 284(23): 3036–9PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Graham DJ, Drinkard CR, Shatin D, et al. Liver enzyme monitoring in patients treated with Troglitazone. JAMA 2001 Aug; 286(7): 831–3PubMedCrossRef Graham DJ, Drinkard CR, Shatin D, et al. Liver enzyme monitoring in patients treated with Troglitazone. JAMA 2001 Aug; 286(7): 831–3PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CIOMS and ICH Initiatives in Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management
Overview and Implications
Authors
Dr Panos Tsintis
Edith La Mache
Publication date
01-07-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 8/2004
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200427080-00004

Other articles of this Issue 8/2004

Drug Safety 8/2004 Go to the issue

Leading Article

Using MedDRA

Leading Article

Risk Management

Leading Article

Clinical Pharmacology