Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 4/2003

01-04-2003 | Current Opinion

Consumer Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting

A New Step in Pharmacovigilance?

Authors: Dr Kees van Grootheest, Linda de Graaf, Lolkje T.W. de Jong-van den Berg

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 4/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

The direct reporting of adverse drug reactions by patients is becoming an increasingly important topic for discussion in the world of pharmacovigilance. At this time, few countries accept consumer reports.
We present an overview of experiences with consumer reporting in various countries of the world. The potential contribution of patient reports of adverse drug reactions is discussed, both in terms of their qualitative and quantitative contribution. The crucial question is one of whether patient reports will increase the number and quality of the reports submitted and/or lead to a more timely detection of signals of possible adverse reactions, thus contributing to an enhancement of the existing methods of drug safety monitoring. To date, the data available are insufficient to establish such added value.
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB). Declaration on therapeutic advance in the use of medicines. ISDB, Paris 2001 International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB). Declaration on therapeutic advance in the use of medicines. ISDB, Paris 2001
2.
go back to reference van den Bemt PMLA, Egberts ACG, Lendering AW, et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparison of doctors, nurses and patients as sources of reports. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 55: 155–8PubMedCrossRef van den Bemt PMLA, Egberts ACG, Lendering AW, et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparison of doctors, nurses and patients as sources of reports. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 55: 155–8PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jarernsiripornkul N, Krska J, Capps PAG, et al. Patient reporting of potential adverse drug reactions: a methodological study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 53: 318–25PubMedCrossRef Jarernsiripornkul N, Krska J, Capps PAG, et al. Patient reporting of potential adverse drug reactions: a methodological study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 53: 318–25PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mitchell AS, Henry DA, Sanson-Fischer R, et al. Patients as a direct source of information on adverse drug reactions. BMJ 1988; 297: 891–3PubMedCrossRef Mitchell AS, Henry DA, Sanson-Fischer R, et al. Patients as a direct source of information on adverse drug reactions. BMJ 1988; 297: 891–3PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Solovitch BL, Fisher S, Bryand SG, et al. How well can patients discriminate drug-related side effects from extraneous new symptoms? Psychopharmacol Bull 1987; 23: 189–92 Solovitch BL, Fisher S, Bryand SG, et al. How well can patients discriminate drug-related side effects from extraneous new symptoms? Psychopharmacol Bull 1987; 23: 189–92
6.
go back to reference Egberts ACG, Smulders M, de Koning GHP, et al. Can adverse drug reactions be detected earlier? A comparison of reports by patients and professionals. BMJ 1996; 313: 530–1PubMedCrossRef Egberts ACG, Smulders M, de Koning GHP, et al. Can adverse drug reactions be detected earlier? A comparison of reports by patients and professionals. BMJ 1996; 313: 530–1PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Egberts ACG, Koning FHP de, Meyboom RHB, et al. ADR-related questions received by a telephone medicine information service and ADRs received by a spontaneous ADR reporting system: a comparison regarding patients and drug. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1997; 6: 269–76PubMedCrossRef Egberts ACG, Koning FHP de, Meyboom RHB, et al. ADR-related questions received by a telephone medicine information service and ADRs received by a spontaneous ADR reporting system: a comparison regarding patients and drug. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1997; 6: 269–76PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dukes MNG, Aronsons JK, editors. Meyler’s side effects of drugs. 14th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001 Dukes MNG, Aronsons JK, editors. Meyler’s side effects of drugs. 14th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001
11.
go back to reference van Grootheest AC, van Puijenbroek EP, Jong-van den Berg LTW. Contribution of pharmacists to the reporting of adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11: 205–10PubMedCrossRef van Grootheest AC, van Puijenbroek EP, Jong-van den Berg LTW. Contribution of pharmacists to the reporting of adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11: 205–10PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Roughead L. Consumer reporting of adverse drug events: a discussion paper for the consumer reporting of adverse drug events working party of the Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council. Paper Kilen Conference; Sigtuna, 2000 Roughead L. Consumer reporting of adverse drug events: a discussion paper for the consumer reporting of adverse drug events working party of the Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council. Paper Kilen Conference; Sigtuna, 2000
15.
go back to reference Wouterse JJ. Patiëntenervaringen, een bron van informatie rijker Wetenschapswinkel Geneesmiddelen, Faculteit Farmacie, Universiteit Utrecht. 1998 Mei Wouterse JJ. Patiëntenervaringen, een bron van informatie rijker Wetenschapswinkel Geneesmiddelen, Faculteit Farmacie, Universiteit Utrecht. 1998 Mei
16.
go back to reference UK call for patient ADR reporting. Script 2001; 2634: 4 UK call for patient ADR reporting. Script 2001; 2634: 4
18.
go back to reference Sukker E, UK patients to report ADRs [comment]. Script 2002; 2784: 5 Sukker E, UK patients to report ADRs [comment]. Script 2002; 2784: 5
19.
go back to reference Morel P, Vandel B. Adverse drug reaction monitoring and the Internet: evaluation of the use of the Internet by French Pharmacovigilance Centres and a non-exhaustive survey of websites of interest for collecting information about adverse drug reactions. Thérapie 1999; 54: 525–32PubMed Morel P, Vandel B. Adverse drug reaction monitoring and the Internet: evaluation of the use of the Internet by French Pharmacovigilance Centres and a non-exhaustive survey of websites of interest for collecting information about adverse drug reactions. Thérapie 1999; 54: 525–32PubMed
20.
go back to reference Rijcken CAW, Dekens-Konter JAM, Knegtering H, et al. Reporting sexual function disorders caused by antipsychotic drugs: is there a role for the pharmacy? Pharm World Sci 2001; 23: 169–72PubMedCrossRef Rijcken CAW, Dekens-Konter JAM, Knegtering H, et al. Reporting sexual function disorders caused by antipsychotic drugs: is there a role for the pharmacy? Pharm World Sci 2001; 23: 169–72PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Edwards IR. Spontaneous reporting: of what? Clinical concerns about drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 138–41PubMedCrossRef Edwards IR. Spontaneous reporting: of what? Clinical concerns about drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 138–41PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eland IA, Belton KJ, van Grootheest AC, et al. Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 623–7PubMedCrossRef Eland IA, Belton KJ, van Grootheest AC, et al. Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 623–7PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Watson R. Consumer groups fight plans for ‘direct to patient’ drug advertisements. BMJ 2001; 323: 889CrossRef Watson R. Consumer groups fight plans for ‘direct to patient’ drug advertisements. BMJ 2001; 323: 889CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Drazen JM. The consumer and the learned intermediary in health care. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 523–3PubMedCrossRef Drazen JM. The consumer and the learned intermediary in health care. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 523–3PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fleuranceau-Morel P. How do pharmaceutical companies handle consumer adverse drug reactions reports? An overview based on a survey of French drug safety managers and officers. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11: 37–44PubMedCrossRef Fleuranceau-Morel P. How do pharmaceutical companies handle consumer adverse drug reactions reports? An overview based on a survey of French drug safety managers and officers. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11: 37–44PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Consumer Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting
A New Step in Pharmacovigilance?
Authors
Dr Kees van Grootheest
Linda de Graaf
Lolkje T.W. de Jong-van den Berg
Publication date
01-04-2003
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 4/2003
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200326040-00001

Other articles of this Issue 4/2003

Drug Safety 4/2003 Go to the issue